ISIS calls for attack on First Baptist of Dallas

[Divine Wind]

Baptists might shoot them in the parking lot and be done with it.

Agreed. Islamic terrorists are much more likely to attack a anti-gun state to avoid a violent confrontation which would see them shot down in the street like happened in Garland, TX.

ISIS claims responsibility for Garland, Texas, shooting - CNN.com
ISIS has claimed responsibility for the attack outside a Prophet Mohammed cartoon contest in Texas -- and warned of more attacks to come.

In a broadcast on its official radio channel Tuesday, the group said two Al Khilafa soldiers opened fire outside the event in Garland, a Dallas suburb. Al Khilafa is how ISIS refers to its soldiers.
CNN cannot confirm the claim, and ISIS offered no evidence the gunmen were affiliated with the terror organization.
The gunmen, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, wounded a security guard before police shot and killed them.

 

[EverCurious]

Go get em boys! You Texan's cover the South, Alaska has the north, we'll clean dem sum bitches out if they wanna play with the big dogs.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Go get em boys! You Texan's cover the South, Alaska has the north, we'll clean dem sum bitches out if they wanna play with the big dogs.

Bring it dune coons!!!
We love a good shooting down here in Texas!!

 

[EverCurious]

I hear you don't even need a scope for that game. Just remember, if you can't eat it you gotta give it back to nature to continue the cycle, so give em to the coyotes - I hear they'll eat any kind of shit. heh

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

View attachment 109035

ISIS Calls for Attack on First Baptist of Dallas


Guess we will have to wait and see if they are all talk or not, or possibly a false flag propaganda in hopes that some nut job will actually do it.

Wouldn't be smart. Those super big Baptists churches in Texas have police directing traffic and providing security.

And now that they've been warned, they'll all be carrying.

 

[Divine Wind]

Go get em boys! You Texan's cover the South, Alaska has the north, we'll clean dem sum bitches out if they wanna play with the big dogs.

FWIW, as the laws of Texas below note, if a person is legal to possess a firearm, they can carry it concealed in their car without any special requirements. In Texas, it's possible for every car or truck on the road to have a Texan with a handgun or rifle ready to defend themselves and others against Islamic terrorists or other assholes seeking to harm innocent people.

In short, all Islamic terrorists and ISIS supporters are welcome to come to Texas.
We'll greet you with "open arms".

Texas Gun Law
In Texas, it is generally illegal to carry a handgun outside of a person’s own premises. However, a person may carry, either open or concealed, in a non-threatening or alarming manner, a shotgun or rifle. However even with a handgun, in Texas, there are several places where a person may possess a handgun legally without the benefit of a Texas Concealed Handgun License (CHL). These places include:

• A person’s residence or other real property under their control.
• A person’s private motor vehicle or watercraft if the handgun is concealed, and the person is legal to possess a firearm, is not a member of a street gang, and is not engaged in the commission of a crime greater than a Class C misdemeanor traffic or boating violation.
• A person engaged in lawful fishing, hunting, or other sporting activity on the immediate premises where the activity is conducted, or is en route between the premises and the persons’ residence or motor vehicle, if the firearm is a type commonly used in the activity.
• While storing a loaded firearm, it must be in a place which cannot be accessed by a child under the age of 17, or secured with a trigger lock if there is reason to know that a child under 17 may gain access to the firearm.

 

[Divine Wind]

Any Texans wondering about what "concealed" means, please ask or PM me.

 

[HenryBHough]

Those church people (jackasses though the particular lot might be) have far more to fear from The Democrat Party than from ISIS.

 

[Divine Wind]

Although my preferred rifle for both self-defense and hog hunting is an AK-47, one of mine is pictured below, for carrying in my truck as a precaution against ISIS assholes, I'm thinking of carrying my Hi-Point .45 carbine. The reasons include cost (including incentive for an asshole to steal), likelihood of use, effectiveness and firepower.

Rather than carry it on my gun rack, simply sliding it behind the seat solves several problems. In Texas, it's only handguns which must remain concealed without a special permit. A .45 carbine with 3 10-round magazines (each loaded with 5 rounds) and a box of .45s should be sufficient insurance against an ISIS attack without too much investment.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

I hear you don't even need a scope for that game. Just remember, if you can't eat it you gotta give it back to nature to continue the cycle, so give em to the coyotes - I hear they'll eat any kind of shit. heh

Worms and buzzards gotta eat.

 

[EverCurious]

Go get em boys! You Texan's cover the South, Alaska has the north, we'll clean dem sum bitches out if they wanna play with the big dogs.

FWIW, as the laws of Texas below note, if a person is legal to possess a firearm, they can carry it concealed in their car without any special requirements. In Texas, it's possible for every car or truck on the road to have a Texan with a handgun or rifle ready to defend themselves and others against Islamic terrorists or other assholes seeking to harm innocent people.

In short, all Islamic terrorists and ISIS supporters are welcome to come to Texas.
We'll greet you with "open arms".

Texas Gun Law
In Texas, it is generally illegal to carry a handgun outside of a person’s own premises. However, a person may carry, either open or concealed, in a non-threatening or alarming manner, a shotgun or rifle. However even with a handgun, in Texas, there are several places where a person may possess a handgun legally without the benefit of a Texas Concealed Handgun License (CHL). These places include:

• A person’s residence or other real property under their control.
• A person’s private motor vehicle or watercraft if the handgun is concealed, and the person is legal to possess a firearm, is not a member of a street gang, and is not engaged in the commission of a crime greater than a Class C misdemeanor traffic or boating violation.
• A person engaged in lawful fishing, hunting, or other sporting activity on the immediate premises where the activity is conducted, or is en route between the premises and the persons’ residence or motor vehicle, if the firearm is a type commonly used in the activity.
• While storing a loaded firearm, it must be in a place which cannot be accessed by a child under the age of 17, or secured with a trigger lock if there is reason to know that a child under 17 may gain access to the firearm.

Pfft look at you with your freedom lite. Lemme show you how it's done in the Arctic:

The U.S. state of Alaska has very permissive gun laws, and very few regulations regarding the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition compared to those in most of the contiguous United States. Alaska was the first state to adopt carry laws modeled after those of Vermont, where no license is required to carry a handgun either openly or concealed. However, permits are still issued to residents, allowing reciprocity with other states[1] and exemption from the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act.[2] The legal stipulation that gun permits are issued but not required is referred to by gun rights advocates as an "Alaska carry," as opposed to a "Vermont carry" (or "Constitutional carry"), where gun licenses are neither issued nor required. Some city ordinances do not permit concealed carry without a license, but these have been invalidated by the recent[when?] state preemption statute.

As of 2013, Alaska passed HB69, which made it unlawful for any state assets to go toward the enforcement of federal gun laws, an act of de facto nullification. State laws still apply.

State Permit to Purchase? No
Firearm registration? No
Assault weapon law? No
Owner license required? No
Carry permits issued? No [Long guns: Yes AS 18.65.700 through 18.65.778 May carry concealed without permit, though permits can be issued for those who wish to have them.]
Open Carry? Yes [May carry openly without permit/license.]
State Preemption of local restrictions? Yes [AS 29.35.145 Municipalities may enact and enforce local regulations only if they are identical to, and provide the same penalty as, State law.]
NFA weapons restricted? No
Shall Certify? Yes [AS 18.65.810 Shall certify within 30 days.]
Peaceable Journey laws? No [Federal rules observed.]
Background checks required for private sales? No

AS 11.61.220 - Off limits locations

1. A public or private school for grades K-12, including the school grounds, parking lot or on a bus while used for a school sponsored activities, unless the person carrying the firearm has the permission of the chief administrative officer of the school or the school district.
Note: a person 21 years of age or older who is not a student may possess an unloaded firearm in the trunk of a motor vehicle or encased in a closed container of a motor vehicle.

2. Any place where intoxicating liquor is sold for consumption on the premises except a restaurant where the person carrying the firearm did not consume intoxicating liquor.

3. Any licensed child care facility if the facility is other than a private residence.

4. Within a courtroom or office of the Alaska Court System, or within a courthouse that is occupied only by the Alaska Court System and other Justice-related agencies.

5. Within a domestic violence or sexual assault shelter that receives funding from the state.

6. Within another person's residence, unless the person carrying the firearm has first obtained the express permission of an adult residing there to bring the firearm into the residence.

AS 11.81.320. Justification: Necessity.

(a) Conduct which would otherwise be an offense is justified by reason of necessity to the extent permitted by common law when

(1) neither this title nor any other statute defining the offense provides exemptions or defenses dealing with the justification of necessity in the specific situation involved; and

(2) a legislative intent to exclude the justification of necessity does not otherwise plainly appear.

(b) The justification specified in (a) of this section is an affirmative defense.


AS 11.81.340. Justification: Use of Force in Defense of a Third Person.

A person is justified in using force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to defend a third person when, under the circumstances as the person claiming defense of another reasonably believes them to be, the third person would be justified under AS 11.81.330 or 11.81.335 in using that degree of force for self-defense.


AS 11.81.335. Justification: Use of Deadly Force in Defense of Self.

(a) Except as provided in (b) of this section, a person who is justified in using nondeadly force in self-defense under AS 11.81.330 may use deadly force in self-defense upon another person when and to the extent the person reasonably believes the use of deadly force is necessary for self-defense against

(1) death;

(2) serious physical injury;

(3) kidnapping, except for what is described as custodial interference in the first degree in AS 11.41.320;

(4) sexual assault in the first degree;

(5) sexual assault in the second degree;

(6) sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree; or

(6) robbery in any degree.

(b) A person may not use deadly force under this section if the person knows that, with complete personal safety and with complete safety as to others being defended, the person can avoid the necessity of using deadly force by leaving the area of the encounter, except there is no duty to leave the area if the person is

(1) on premises

(A) that the person owns or leases;

(B) where the person resides, temporarily or permanently; or

(C) as a guest or express or implied agent of the owner, lessor, or resident;

(2) a peace officer acting within the scope and authority of the officer's employment or a person assisting a peace officer under AS 11.81.380;

(3) in a building where the person works in the ordinary course of the person's employment; or

(4) protecting a child or a member of the person's household.


AS 11.81.340. Justification: Use of Force in Defense of a Third Person.

A person is justified in using force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to defend a third person when, under the circumstances as the person claiming defense of another reasonably believes them to be, the third person would be justified under AS 11.81.330 or 11.81.335 in using that degree of force for self-defense.


AS 11.81.350. Justification: Use of Force in Defense of Property and Premises.

(a) A person may use nondeadly force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to terminate what the person reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission by the other of an unlawful taking or damaging of property or services.

(b) A person may use deadly force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it necessary to terminate what the person reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission of arson upon a dwelling or occupied building.

(c) A person in possession or control of any premises, or an express or implied agent of that person, may use

(1) nondeadly force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to terminate what the person reasonably believes to be the commission or attempted commission by the other of criminal trespass in any degree upon the premises;

(2) deadly force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to terminate what the person reasonably believes to be a burglary in any degree occurring in an occupied dwelling or building.

(d) [Repealed, Sec. 7 Ch 68 SLA 2006.]

(e) A person

(1) in a vehicle, or forcibly removed from a vehicle, may use deadly force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to terminate what the person reasonably believes to be a carjacking of that vehicle at or about the time the vehicle is carjacked;

(2) outside of a vehicle may use deadly force upon another when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it is necessary to terminate what the person reasonably believes to be the theft of that vehicle when another person, other than the perceived offender, is inside of the vehicle; this paragraph does not apply to a person outside of a vehicle who is involved in a dispute with a person inside of the vehicle who is a household member of that person; in this paragraph, "household member" has the meaning given in AS 18.66.990 .

(f) A person justified in using force under this section does not have a duty to leave or attempt to leave the area of the encounter before using force.

(g) In (e) of this section,

(1) "carjacking" means a robbery involving the taking or attempted taking of a vehicle from a person in possession of the vehicle;

(2) "vehicle" means a "motor vehicle" as defined in AS 28.40.100 , an aircraft, or a watercraft.


AS 11.81.370. Justification: Use of Force By a Peace Officer in Making An Arrest or Terminating An Escape.

(a) In addition to using force justified under other sections of this chapter, a peace officer may use nondeadly force and may threaten to use deadly force when and to the extent the officer reasonably believes it necessary to make an arrest, to terminate an escape or attempted escape from custody, or to make a lawful stop. The officer may use deadly force only when and to the extent the officer reasonably believes the use of deadly force is necessary to make the arrest or terminate the escape or attempted escape from custody of a person the officer reasonably believes

(1) has committed or attempted to commit a felony which involved the use of force against a person;

(2) has escaped or is attempting to escape from custody while in possession of a firearm on or about the person; or

(3) may otherwise endanger life or inflict serious physical injury unless arrested without delay.

(b) The use of force in making an arrest or stop is not justified under this section unless the peace officer reasonably believes the arrest or stop is lawful.

(c) Nothing in this section prohibits or restricts a peace officer in preparing to use or threatening to use a dangerous instrument.


AS 11.81.380. Justification: Use of Force By Private Person Assisting An Arrest or Terminating An Escape.

(a) Except as provided in (b) of this section, a person who has been directed by another who that person reasonably believes to be a peace officer to assist in making an arrest or terminating or preventing an escape may use nondeadly force when and to the extent the person reasonably believes it necessary to carry out the peace officer's direction. A person may use deadly force under this section only when the person reasonably believes it necessary to carry out the peace officer's direction to use deadly force.

(b) The use of force under (a) of this section is not justified if the person believes that the peace officer is not justified in using that degree of force under the circumstances.


AS 11.81.390. Use of Force By a Private Person in Making Arrest or Terminating An Escape.

In addition to using force justified under other sections of this chapter, a person, acting as a private person, may use nondeadly force to make the arrest or terminate the escape or attempted escape from custody of a person who the private person reasonably believes has committed a misdemeanor in the private person's presence or a felony when and to the extent the private person reasonably believes it necessary to make that arrest or terminate that escape or attempted escape from custody. A private person may use deadly force under this section only when and to the extent the private person reasonably believes the use of deadly force is necessary to make the arrest or terminate the escape or attempted escape from custody of another who the private person reasonably believes

(1) has committed or attempted to commit a felony which involved the use of force against a person; or

(2) has escaped or is attempting to escape from custody while in possession of a firearm on or about the person.


AS 11.81.400. Justification: Use of Force in Resisting or Interfering With Arrest.

(a) A person may not use force to resist personal arrest or interfere with the arrest of another by a peace officer who is known by the person, or reasonably appears, to be a peace officer, whether the arrest is lawful or unlawful, unless

(1) the force used by the peace officer exceeds that allowed under AS 11.81.370;

(2) [Repealed, Sec. 1 ch 63 SLA 1982].

(b) The use of force justified under this section in resisting arrest or interfering with the arrest of another may not exceed the use of force justified under AS 11.81.330 or 11.81.335.

(c) [Repealed, Sec. 1 ch 63 SLA 1982].

(d) [Repealed, Sec. 1 ch 63 SLA 1982].


AS 11.81.410. Justification: Use of Force By Guards.

(a) In addition to using force justified under other sections of this chapter, a guard or peace officer employed in a correctional facility may, if authorized by regulations adopted by the Department of Corrections, use nondeadly force upon another person when and to the extent reasonably necessary and appropriate to maintain order.

(b) Except as provided in (c) of this section, a guard or peace officer employed in a correctional facility or a peace officer in the immediate vicinity of a correctional facility at the time of an escape from the facility may use deadly force when and to the extent the guard or peace officer reasonably believes it necessary to terminate the escape or attempted escape of a prisoner from the correctional facility.

(c) The use of deadly force under (b) of this section is not justified if the guard or peace officer knows that the prisoner was under official detention in the correctional facility on a charge of a misdemeanor and does not believe that the prisoner is armed with a firearm, in which event only nondeadly force may be used.

AS 11.81.420. Justification: Performance of Public Duty.

(a) Unless inconsistent with AS 11.81.320 - 11.81.410, conduct which would otherwise constitute an offense is justified when it is required or authorized by law or by a judicial decree, judgment, or order.

(b) The justification afforded by this section also applies when

(1) the person reasonably believes the conduct to be required or authorized by a decree, judgment, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction or in the lawful execution of legal process, notwithstanding lack of jurisdiction of the court or defect in the legal process; or

(2) the person reasonably believes the conduct to be required or authorized to assist a peace officer in the performance of the officer's duties, notwithstanding that the officer exceeded the officer's authority.


AS 11.81.430. Justification: Use of Force, Special Relationships.

(a) The use of force upon another person that would otherwise constitute an offense is justified under any of the following circumstances:

(1) When and to the extent reasonably necessary and appropriate to promote the welfare of the child or incompetent person, a parent, guardian, or other person entrusted with the care and supervision of a child under 18 years of age or an incompetent person may use reasonable and appropriate nondeadly force upon that child or incompetent person.

(2) When and to the extent reasonably necessary and appropriate to maintain order and when the use of force is consistent with the welfare of the students, a teacher may, if authorized by school regulations and the principal of the school, use reasonable and appropriate nondeadly force upon a student. If authorized by school regulations and the principal of the school, a teacher may use nondeadly force under this paragraph in any situation in which the teacher is responsible for the supervision of students. A teacher employed by a school board, including a regional educational attendance area school board, may use nondeadly force under this paragraph only if the school regulations authorizing the use of force have been adopted by the school board.

(3) When and to the extent reasonably necessary and appropriate to maintain order, a person responsible for the maintenance of order in a common carrier of passengers, or a person acting under that person's direction, may use reasonable and appropriate nondeadly force.

(4) When and to the extent reasonably necessary to prevent a suicide, a person who reasonably believes that another is imminently about to commit suicide may use reasonable and appropriate nondeadly force upon that person.

(5) A licensed physician, licensed mobile intensive care paramedic, or registered nurse; or a person acting under the direction of a licensed physician, licensed mobile intensive care paramedic, or registered nurse; or any person who renders emergency care at the scene of an emergency, may use reasonable and appropriate nondeadly force for the purpose of administering a recognized and lawful form of treatment that is reasonably adapted to promoting the physical or mental health of the patient if

(A) the treatment is administered with the consent of the patient or, if the patient is a child under 18 years of age or an incompetent person, with the consent of the parent, guardian, or other person entrusted with care and supervision of the child or incompetent person; or

(B) the treatment is administered in an emergency if the person administering the treatment reasonably believes that no one competent to consent can be consulted under the circumstances and that a reasonable person, wishing to safeguard the welfare of the patient, would consent.

(b) A person who raises a defense under (a)(1) of this section and claims that the person upon whom force was used was an incompetent person has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that, at the time force was used, the person upon whom the force was used was an incompetent person.

 

[Nia88]

People here always talk about their hate for fake news but always post links to websites that are masters of fake news. Hypocrites.

 

[EverCurious]

In all fake news can be found a kernel of truth. I read everything from prophecy to CNN, then sort out reality between the shit piles.

I like to see them on forums personally, even if the story is fake it is a good conversation/debate starter.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

CNN is fake news?

 

[EverCurious]

Do you think clean freak Trump likes golden showers? Come on now... Yeah, CNN is full of shit.

 

[Divine Wind]

Do you think clean freak Trump likes golden showers? Come on now... Yeah, CNN is full of shit.

No and disagreed. Having two call girls pee on the bed slept upon by Barack and Michelle is not a "golden shower" fetish anymore than walking my dog on the grave of an enemy is a scatological fetish.

 

[EverCurious]

Sooo... what you're saying is you still believe this bullshit story?

BUHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Divine Wind]

People here always talk about their hate for fake news but always post links to websites that are masters of fake news. Hypocrites.

Sooo... what you're saying is you still believe this bullshit story?

BUHAHAHAHAHA

1) CNN isn't a fake news site.

2) Do you doubt ISIS is calling for attacks on America?

3) Even though they are, I strongly doubt the outcome in a "red state" like Texas will be as beneficial to ISIS fans as an attack on a "blue state"/blue city like California or NYC due to Second Amendment rules.

 

[aris2chat]

View attachment 109035

ISIS Calls for Attack on First Baptist of Dallas


Guess we will have to wait and see if they are all talk or not, or possibly a false flag propaganda in hopes that some nut job will actually do it.

end times headlines?

stay away from conspiracy sites. seriously. you sound nuts

Dallas news reported, so did christian news sites

 

[jknowgood]

Baptists might shoot them in the parking lot and be done with it.

Shooting them in the head is fatal, though.

Don't forget to wrap the bullet in bacon.