Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shaking Hands with Saddam HusseinWhy did Bush and everyone else think Saddam had WMDs to begin with.
For one thing, he used WMDs against the Kurds and Iranians. For another, British Intelligence told them Saddam had WMDs.
Reagan gave Saddam weapons to fight the Russians? Srange. I didn't know Russia had invaded Iraq as well as Afghanistan.
Link?
At the time of the visit , Iraq had already been removed from the State Department's list of terrorist countries in 1982; and in the previous month, November, President Reagan had approved National Security Decision Directive 114, on expansion of U.S.-Iraq relations generally. But it was Donald Rumsfeld's trip to Baghdad which opened of the floodgates during 1985-90 for lucrative U.S. weapons exports--some $1.5 billion worth-- including chemical/biological and nuclear weapons equipment and technology, along with critical components for missile delivery systems for all of the above. According to a 1994 GAO Letter Report (GAO/NSIAD-94-98) some 771 weapons export licenses for Iraq were approved during this six year period....not by our European allies, but by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Oh heaven's everyone and their mother should know that Reagan armed Iraq. My link request was for you to prove that Reagan gave the weapons to Iraq to fight the Russians.
You just got the wrong war. No big smurf.
It was to fight the Iranians. And btw as much as I loved RR and understood the actions of GH, Clinton, GW I sure as well wished in 20/20 hindsight that they had stayed out of ME affairs.
I wish to hell that the bloody League of Nations hadn't formed Iraq willy nilly.
My "I wish to hell" list just keeps growing and growing with each passing day.
![]()
Just to be clear.....we are NOW fighting in Iraq those we ARMED in Syria.....
Just to be clear.....we are NOW fighting in Iraq those we ARMED in Syria.....
Most Americans don't realize that. We've been funding & arming these very questionable groups in Syria for a long time. And all because Obama and his cronies became hell-bent on killing Assad. It's just like Bush being so obsessed with getting Hussein. They're actually calling these groups the 'Good Guys' in Syria, but the 'Bad Guys' in Iraq. It's such a miserable failed Foreign Policy. When will we ever learn?
World manipulation has never been an exact science based upon human behavior...Never has been, never will be...but at least we DO know EVIL is still around. THAT much is certain.Just to be clear.....we are NOW fighting in Iraq those we ARMED in Syria.....
Most Americans don't realize that. We've been funding & arming these very questionable groups in Syria for a long time. And all because Obama and his cronies became hell-bent on killing Assad. It's just like Bush being so obsessed with getting Hussein. They're actually calling these groups the 'Good Guys' in Syria, but the 'Bad Guys' in Iraq. It's such a miserable failed Foreign Policy. When will we ever learn?
Hell at east it took 20 years for us to end up fighting those that Reagan armed.
What about Republicans' "red line" bullshit argument? Even if Obama did something right for a change, you people would still cry foul.
Just how many countries total do you Republicans think that the US should invade and occupy indefinitely? How many permanent military bases do we have to set up around the world before we can win the unwinnable war of terror?
They really played to the weak minded.Of course by the same token, a hand grenade is not a WMD until you put it on an airplane and pull the pin. Nobody believes that this is what GWB and company meant however when they had Dr. Rice talk about mushroom clouds...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxhIkzTg14M
The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly Saddam... - Condoleezza Rice at BrainyQuote
The weak minded you say. Okey dokey.
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Democrat Quotes on WMD
snopes.com: Weapons of Mass Destruction Quotes
what % of the population support the gays you twerp.
The MENTALLY DERANGED, the same scum that gave us the Manchurian muslim!![]()
Yup, the paranoid schizophrenics like Vigilante call deranged those who understand .
Normal defense reaction by idiots in the foolish far right.
Those Dems are winning senate seats because of certain GOP candidates' stupidity about marriage equality and hatred for women.
The Senate should have been Red in 2010, but, no, we nominate the biggest assholes we can find to throw the elections to the Dems.
what % of the population support the gays you twerp.
The MENTALLY DERANGED, the same scum that gave us the Manchurian muslim!![]()
So you hate gays, Muslims, Manchurians, the mentally ill, whites and blacks. Tell us, who DON'T you hate?
What ISIS found was a chemical weapons FACILITY that was BOMBED in the EARLY 90s. Sorry, but the WMDs Bush said existed still aren't there.
Sorry.![]()
Just to be clear.....we are NOW fighting in Iraq those we ARMED in Syria.....
Most Americans don't realize that. We've been funding & arming these very questionable groups in Syria for a long time. And all because Obama and his cronies became hell-bent on killing Assad. It's just like Bush being so obsessed with getting Hussein. They're actually calling these groups the 'Good Guys' in Syria, but the 'Bad Guys' in Iraq. It's such a miserable failed Foreign Policy. When will we ever learn?
Hell at east it took 20 years for us to end up fighting those that Reagan armed.
Like the last time we had to go over this. Chemical weapons have a shelf life. Saddam's chemicals have expired awhile ago..
Also your title is a lie.
You would think if we thought the weapons where dangerous we would have removed them when we were there.
But then you would need a brain to think of this logically and the op doesn't have this
Most Americans don't realize that. We've been funding & arming these very questionable groups in Syria for a long time. And all because Obama and his cronies became hell-bent on killing Assad. It's just like Bush being so obsessed with getting Hussein. They're actually calling these groups the 'Good Guys' in Syria, but the 'Bad Guys' in Iraq. It's such a miserable failed Foreign Policy. When will we ever learn?
Hell at east it took 20 years for us to end up fighting those that Reagan armed.
Exactly. And it took years of moving jobs to China and deregulation to bring down the economy. It took years for Republicans to create the massive deficit. Republicans are working on voter suppression now to affect elections years into the future. It took years for more than 40,000 Americans to be killed and maimed in Iraq.
Republicans light a fire and by the time they give it to Obama, it's a forest fire. Then they cut the water lines and complain Obama hasn't done anything to stop the fire.
Most Americans don't realize that. We've been funding & arming these very questionable groups in Syria for a long time. And all because Obama and his cronies became hell-bent on killing Assad. It's just like Bush being so obsessed with getting Hussein. They're actually calling these groups the 'Good Guys' in Syria, but the 'Bad Guys' in Iraq. It's such a miserable failed Foreign Policy. When will we ever learn?
Hell at east it took 20 years for us to end up fighting those that Reagan armed.
Exactly. And it took years of moving jobs to China and deregulation to bring down the economy. It took years for Republicans to create the massive deficit. Republicans are working on voter suppression now to affect elections years into the future. It took years for more than 40,000 Americans to be killed and maimed in Iraq.
Republicans light a fire and by the time they give it to Obama, it's a forest fire. Then they cut the water lines and complain Obama hasn't done anything to stop the fire.
What about Republicans' "red line" bullshit argument? Even if Obama did something right for a change, you people would still cry foul.
Just how many countries total do you Republicans think that the US should invade and occupy indefinitely? How many permanent military bases do we have to set up around the world before we can win the unwinnable war of terror?
Obama's big blunder was funding & arming these terror-linked groups in Syria. We should have stayed out of it. We're suffering the Blow Back on that now.
And the 'War on Terror' isn't supposed to be winnable. It's supposed to go on forever. That's the point. How else can you get a Patriot Act, NDAA, and massive NSA domestic spying? You have to have a Boogeyman that will never go away. And that's the 'War on Terror.'