Israel MUST stop recieving all USA funds

[watchingfromafar]

You might try reading the entire Book from the 1st verse to the last and see what an asshole you are.

I did sweep pee, now it is your turn, if, and only if, you can read.
-

 

[Indeependent]

You might try reading the entire Book from the 1st verse to the last and see what an asshole you are.

I did sweep pee, now it is your turn, if, and only if, you can read.
-

You didn't as you always posts verses from all over the place.
You are psychotic.

 

[Indeependent]

You might try reading the entire Book from the 1st verse to the last and see what an asshole you are.

I did sweep pee, now it is your turn, if, and only if, you can read.
-

Here, retard...how Ezekiel ends.
You're too psychotic to feel stupid.

Ezekiel 48 / Hebrew - English Bible / Mechon-Mamre

 

[watchingfromafar]

You didn't as you always posts verses from all over the place.
You are psychotic.

I admit my efforts to convince the Israelis to change their ways is all over the place and frankly I am no longer going to try and enlighten them, hoping they will change their ways. They will not because murder in a primary gene that they only carry. This cannot be corrected; they were born with it.

They are like a hive of ants in you back yard. Try as you may to keep them out of your house is futile.

There is only one cure that does the trick—

-

 

[Indeependent]

You didn't as you always posts verses from all over the place.
You are psychotic.

I admit my efforts to convince the Israelis to change their ways is all over the place and frankly I am no longer going to try and enlighten them, hoping they will change their ways. They will not because murder in a primary gene that they only carry. This cannot be corrected; they were born with it.

They are like a hive of ants in you back yard. Try as you may to keep them out of your house is futile.

There is only one cure that does the trick—
View attachment 494715

-

You’re psychotic.

 

[watchingfromafar]

Here, retard...how Ezekiel ends.

read, sweet pee, the end.
Ezekiel
Chapter 21
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,

2 Son of man, set thy face toward Jerusalem, and drop thy word toward the holy places, and prophesy against the land of Israel,

3 And say to the land of Israel, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I am against thee, and will draw forth my sword out of his sheath, and will cut off from thee the righteous and the wicked.

22 At his right hand was the divination for Jerusalem, to appoint captains, to open the mouth in the slaughter, to lift up the voice with shouting, to appoint battering rams against the gates, to cast a mount, and to build a fort.

23 And it shall be unto them as a false divination in their sight, to them that have sworn oaths: but he will call to remembrance the iniquity, that they may be taken.

24 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Because ye have made your iniquity to be remembered, in that your transgressions are discovered, so that in all your doings your sins do appear; because, I say, that ye are come to remembrance, ye shall be taken with the hand.

25 And thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come, when iniquity shall have an end,

27 I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him.

28 And thou, son of man, prophesy and say, Thus saith the Lord GOD concerning the Ammonites, and concerning their reproach; even say thou, The sword, the sword is drawn: for the slaughter it is furbished, to consume because of the glittering:

29 Whiles they see vanity unto thee, whiles they divine a lie unto thee, to bring thee upon the necks of them that are slain, of the wicked, whose day is come, when their iniquity shall have an end.

30 Shall I cause it to return into his sheath? I will judge thee in the place where thou wast created, in the land of thy nativity. (Created in 1947 and there they be judged!!!)

31 And I will pour out mine indignation upon thee, I will blow against thee in the fire of my wrath, and deliver thee into the hand of brutish men, and skilful to destroy.
Below is the END
32 Thou shalt be for fuel to the fire; thy blood shall be in the midst of the land; thou shalt be no more remembered: for I the LORD have spoken it.

-

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Israel MUST stop receiving all USA funding
SUBTOPIC: Reasonable Man Concept
⁜→ watchingfromafar, et al,

BLUF: “Nothing can justify terrorism — ever,” (Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon)

RoccoR, based on “your objective view” were the above murders justified--?

(COMMENT)

Every act or event you listed happened more than a half-century ago, when acts of terrorism in Civil Wars and World Wars alike were viewed differently... Whether you talk about the Office of Strategic Services (American OSS), the Special Operations Executive (British SOE), The Maquis (French Resistance), or the Soviet Partisans, (etc, etc, etc) the entire world saw a legitimate need for such activities. Fast-Forward a couple of decades → with the creation of the United Nations and the new formation of the International Community, the world began to mature politically, socio-economically, and in (warfare being the direct evidence of failed diplomacy). And a new need arose, with the added dimension of immorality, in the form of Fourth Generation Warfare (4GW)/Asymmetric Armed Insurgencies → an ancient political tool that had been evolving for more than 3000 years. Most policymakers battling various forms 4GW/Asymmetric confrontations, still today, think of it as (in Winston Churchill's words) “civilization” versus “barbarism.” After the defeat of General Gordon, towards the end of the 19th Century at Khartoum, the coalition of British and Egyptian Forces broken the Islamic State in Sudan (10,000 Enemy KIA & 13,000 Enemy WIA) at Omdurman (one day before dusk). This was of the last major battles in which an Irregular Force of Insurgents stood toe-to-toe with a heavily armed formation of regular military. Today, it is almost unheard of. When in 1935, the hero to the Palestinians (and for which their most popular rocket is named) Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, after a run of several very successful attacks against Jewish Civilians and British Railway Lines, and killing of a Colonial Police Constable, al-Qassam was said to have told his men to fight until the last (which he did). Although the story is undoubtedly embellished, the death of al-Qassam rallied many to the various Islamic Terrorist band of the time. The most notorious of those being the Palestinian Black Hand.

What makes most the Arab Palestinian Armed Resistance/Islamic Resistance different from the aforementioned European Organization is that in Europe, during WWII, the Allied movements, in general, were fighting to recover sovereign territory that the individual European Nations lost to enemy forces. In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the Israelis had not taken any territory that was sovereign to the Arab Palestinians. In 1948, the Israelis only assume sovereignty over the associated UN Trustee Territory. The conflict was between Israel and the aggressor Arab League Coalition. The ensuing Armistice Arrangements between Israel and the four principle Arab League nations that "occupied" the remainder of the Trustee Territory; which included the Gaza Strip, Jerusalem, and the West Bank.

The Arab Palestinian terrorist attack of today, are NOT trying to recover sovereign territory they militarily lost in the defense of their nation. The Israelis have never engaged a Palestinian Army, Civil Defense Force or national security services. In fact, there was no Arab Palestinian Government anywhere to be found when the Jordanians cut all ties with territory west of the Jordan River, leaving it in the hands of the Israelis.

Today, the Arab Palestinian Terrorist attacks, trigger responses from Israel. There are no Israeli Forces inside the Gaza Strip, and have not been since 2005.

Every nation has a responsibility to protect its citizens and sovereign territory to the extent possible. So I will ask again, which one of the Permanent Members to the Security Council would not respond to a barrage of 4000 rockets?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Israel MUST stop receiving all USA funding
SUBTOPIC: Reasonable Man Concept
⁜→ watchingfromafar, et al,

BLUF: “Nothing can justify terrorism — ever,” (Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon)

RoccoR, based on “your objective view” were the above murders justified--?

(COMMENT)

Every act or event you listed happened more than a half-century ago, when acts of terrorism in Civil Wars and World Wars alike were viewed differently... Whether you talk about the Office of Strategic Services (American OSS), the Special Operations Executive (British SOE), The Maquis (French Resistance), or the Soviet Partisans, (etc, etc, etc) the entire world saw a legitimate need for such activities. Fast-Forward a couple of decades → with the creation of the United Nations and the new formation of the International Community, the world began to mature politically, socio-economically, and in (warfare being the direct evidence of failed diplomacy). And a new need arose, with the added dimension of immorality, in the form of Fourth Generation Warfare (4GW)/Asymmetric Armed Insurgencies → an ancient political tool that had been evolving for more than 3000 years. Most policymakers battling various forms 4GW/Asymmetric confrontations, still today, think of it as (in Winston Churchill's words) “civilization” versus “barbarism.” After the defeat of General Gordon, towards the end of the 19th Century at Khartoum, the coalition of British and Egyptian Forces broken the Islamic State in Sudan (10,000 Enemy KIA & 13,000 Enemy WIA) at Omdurman (one day before dusk). This was of the last major battles in which an Irregular Force of Insurgents stood toe-to-toe with a heavily armed formation of regular military. Today, it is almost unheard of. When in 1935, the hero to the Palestinians (and for which their most popular rocket is named) Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, after a run of several very successful attacks against Jewish Civilians and British Railway Lines, and killing of a Colonial Police Constable, al-Qassam was said to have told his men to fight until the last (which he did). Although the story is undoubtedly embellished, the death of al-Qassam rallied many to the various Islamic Terrorist band of the time. The most notorious of those being the Palestinian Black Hand.

What makes most the Arab Palestinian Armed Resistance/Islamic Resistance different from the aforementioned European Organization is that in Europe, during WWII, the Allied movements, in general, were fighting to recover sovereign territory that the individual European Nations lost to enemy forces. In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the Israelis had not taken any territory that was sovereign to the Arab Palestinians. In 1948, the Israelis only assume sovereignty over the associated UN Trustee Territory. The conflict was between Israel and the aggressor Arab League Coalition. The ensuing Armistice Arrangements between Israel and the four principle Arab League nations that "occupied" the remainder of the Trustee Territory; which included the Gaza Strip, Jerusalem, and the West Bank.

The Arab Palestinian terrorist attack of today, are NOT trying to recover sovereign territory they militarily lost in the defense of their nation. The Israelis have never engaged a Palestinian Army, Civil Defense Force or national security services. In fact, there was no Arab Palestinian Government anywhere to be found when the Jordanians cut all ties with territory west of the Jordan River, leaving it in the hands of the Israelis.

Today, the Arab Palestinian Terrorist attacks, trigger responses from Israel. There are no Israeli Forces inside the Gaza Strip, and have not been since 2005.

Every nation has a responsibility to protect its citizens and sovereign territory to the extent possible. So I will ask again, which one of the Permanent Members to the Security Council would not respond to a barrage of 4000 rockets?

Most Respectfully,
R

So, when did the Palestinians get the right to sovereignty that the UN says they have?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Israel MUST stop receiving all USA funding
SUBTOPIC: Territorial Sovereignty Concept
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: All people everywhere have the "Right to Sovereignty." You just don't understand what that means.

So, when did the Palestinians get the right to sovereignty that the UN says they have?

(COMMENT)

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

I have the Right to a Million Dollars. But no one is going to give me a Million Dollars based solely on my right to have it.

Sovereignty in its internal aspects is concerned with the identity of the bearer of supreme authority within a State.
SOURCE: Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law • Copyright ˝ 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016

To my knowledge, that would only be Area "A" and the Gaza Strip.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

 

[Hollie]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

If it is “inadmissible” to acquire territory through the threat or use of force, we can agree the Hamas Charter is “inadmissible”. Or, do you make an exception for Islamic terrorists?

 

[P F Tinmore]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

If it is “inadmissible” to acquire territory through the threat or use of force, we can agree the Hamas Charter is “inadmissible”. Or, do you make an exception for Islamic terrorists?

Hamas only operates inside its own borders.

 

[Hollie]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

If it is “inadmissible” to acquire territory through the threat or use of force, we can agree the Hamas Charter is “inadmissible”. Or, do you make an exception for Islamic terrorists?

Hamas only operates inside its own borders.

Except when they infiltrate Israeli borders.

What borders do the Hamas terrorists maintain?

 

[P F Tinmore]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

If it is “inadmissible” to acquire territory through the threat or use of force, we can agree the Hamas Charter is “inadmissible”. Or, do you make an exception for Islamic terrorists?

Hamas only operates inside its own borders.

Except when they infiltrate Israeli borders.

What borders do the Hamas terrorists maintain?

The ones they work within.

 

[Hollie]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

If it is “inadmissible” to acquire territory through the threat or use of force, we can agree the Hamas Charter is “inadmissible”. Or, do you make an exception for Islamic terrorists?

Hamas only operates inside its own borders.

Except when they infiltrate Israeli borders.

What borders do the Hamas terrorists maintain?

The ones they work within.

The ones that don’t exist.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In order to exercise sovereignty, you first have to have something (territory in this case) to be sovereign over. No one anywhere has to give up territorial control based solely on the claim: Right to Sovereignty.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

You keep confusing military control/occupation with sovereignty.

It is inadmissible to acquire territory through the threat or use of force.

If it is “inadmissible” to acquire territory through the threat or use of force, we can agree the Hamas Charter is “inadmissible”. Or, do you make an exception for Islamic terrorists?

Hamas only operates inside its own borders.

Except when they infiltrate Israeli borders.

What borders do the Hamas terrorists maintain?

The ones they work within.

The ones that don’t exist.

The Palestinians don't exist either so it is a good match.

 

[watchingfromafar]

“Nothing can justify terrorism — ever,” (Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon)

RoccoR says--Every act or event you listed happened more than a half-century ago, when acts of terrorism in Civil Wars and World Wars alike were viewed differently...

WRONG, every Zionists terrorist act below occurred after 2000AD.

These are the Palestinian children killed by Israel in 2016 | The ...
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/.../these-are-palestinian-children-killed-israel-2016
Jan 27, 2017 - Thirty-five Palestinian children were killed by Israeli soldiers
Invisible killings: Israel's daily toll of Palestinian children | The ...
https://electronicintifada.net/content/invisible-killings-israels-daily-toll...children/4263
Israel 'killed 25 Palestinian children' in three months | News | Al Jazeera
www.aljazeera.com/.../israel-killed-25-palestinian-children-months-16051414083314...
May 14, 2016 - Twenty-five Palestinian children were killed in the last three months of 2015
One Palestinian child killed every 3 days by Israel for 13 years ...
One Palestinian child killed every 3 days by Israel for 13 years: statistics...
“The International Day for the Protection of Children is on June 1,” said a spokesman, “but Palestinian children are still subject to attacks by the Israelis and ...
Report: Israel killed 3,000 Palestinian children since 2000 – Middle ...
Report: Israel killed 3,000 Palestinian children since 2000...

Jun 1, 2017 - Israel has killed more than 3,000 children since 28 September 2000 when the Second Intifada began until the end of April 2017, a new report ...
Children in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict - Wikipedia
Children in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict - Wikipedia

IDF troops shot and killed an 8-year-old Palestinian girl who was on her way to school in a Gaza Strip refugee camp
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/494672.html
Photos of a 12 year old palestinian boy being shot by Israeli soldiers and the ambulance driver who tried to save him also being shot and killed.
palestine-net.com
Three-year-old Rawan Abu Zeid, who took bullets in the neck and dead while buying candy with her friends.
5 June 2004
The New Yorker’s Israel: Where Objectivity Fails
Bullets fired from the tank flew through the classroom window, hitting Mahmoud Hamad in the neck and Hisham al Habil in the head. The boys had not even been sitting by the windows but in the middle of the room.
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/index.html
An eight-year-old Palestinian girl shot dead by Israeli troops in the central Gaza Strip was killed while showing off her new school uniform to friends
Category: | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site

RoccoR says-- the Israelis had not taken any territory that was sovereign to the Arab Palestinians. In 1948, the Israelis only assume sovereignty over the associated UN Trustee Territory.

WRONG, the term “settlements” means areas outside the true borders of a country. In this case it is LAND THEFT!!!!

As of 30 January 2020, there are about 130 government-approved settlements, and 100 unofficial ones, which are home to around 400,000 Israelis in the West Bank, with an additional 200,000 Israelis residing in 12 neighborhoods in East Jerusalem.
Israeli settlement - Wikipedia

Israel has pressed forward on plans for more than 3,000 West Bank settlement homes, making 2020 one of the most prolific years for illegal settlement building, according to a watchdog group.
Part of a building boom that has gained steam during the presidency of United States President Donald Trump, a staunch ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Israel’s settlement approvals hit record high: Watchdog | Occupied East Jerusalem News | Al Jazeera

RoccoR says-- The conflict was between Israel and the aggressor Arab League Coalition. The ensuing Armistice Arrangements between Israel and the four principle Arab League nations that "occupied" the remainder of the Trustee Territory; which included the Gaza Strip, Jerusalem, and the West Bank.

Those Armistice arrangements included fishing rights for the Palestinians that the Israelis broke. Israel mandated that the Palestinians could not fish within 15 nautical miles from shore. This prohibited most Palestinian fisherman from fishing at all due to the fuel costs to cover that distance. (The Zionists believe if you cannot feed yourselves you will die)

Every nation has a responsibility to protect its citizens and sovereign territory to the extent possible. So I will ask again, which one of the Permanent Members to the Security Council would not respond to a barrage of 4000 rockets?

The rocket attacks are nothing more than self-defense. The Zionists:---

[1] murder Palestinian children.
[2] Bulldoze Palestinian villages.
[3] Cut off fishing rights.
[4] Cut off water rights.
[5] Assassinates Palestinian children
[6] Steal land
[7] Lie, then Lie some more.

The Zionists are mimicking the “Gestapo”
a secret-police organization employing underhanded and terrorist methods against persons suspected of disloyalty

Only in this case they are not a secret.

-

 

[TDontTouchMyCigars]

Just like they bought Jerusalem from the Jebusites.

And of course, since they had no gold or silver they used the Shekel as currency for the purchase.

1 Israeli New Shekel equals
0.31 United States Dollar

View attachment 494608
You can not even buy a cup of coffee with an Israeli dollar.
-

You do know ancient Shekel means a weight measure. Dont you?

 

[TDontTouchMyCigars]

RE: Israel MUST stop receiving all USA funding
SUBTOPIC: Refugees 'vs' Descendants of Refugees
⁜→ et al,

IF there are still such a thing as "Palestinian Refugees" THEN they must be older than I am.

The Palestinian Right of Return (RoR) is generally based on:

◈ Paragraph 11 • General Assembly Resolution A/RES/194 (III) 11 December 1948, which: "Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date."​

​

◈ Paragraph 2 • General Assembly Resolution A/RES/3236 (XXIX) 22 November 1974, which: Reaffirms also the inalienable right of the Palestinians to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted, and calls for their return."​

​

◈ Article 12(4) • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 16 December 1966, which states: "No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country."​

Now none of these is really an International Order or International Law. But even if they were, there are two basic problems which present themselves.

◈ (NON-RETROACTIVITY RATIONE PERSONAE) Article 24 • Rome Statures • International Criminal Court:​

​

✧ You cannot charge and prosecute any event for a violation of law if the law did not exist at the time of the event.​

✧ You cannot charge and prosecute any event that happened outside the jurisdiction of the court.​

​

◈ (Return to their Homes and Property from which they have been Displaced and Uprooted 'vs' Return to their Homes and Live at Peace)​

​

✧ Descendants which never had an established residence or home at the time of the event cannot claim a home or property which they never had.​

✧ Ambiguous Meaning:​

○ One Resolution stipulates homes and property from which they were "displaced and uprooted."​

○ One Resolution stipulates merely to Return to their "Homes and Live at Peace."​

In an official communique (6 February 1948) to the UN Secretary-General by Mr. Isa Nakhleh, Representative of the Arab Higher Committee formally stated that "the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom." Additionally it was made very clear that the Arab Palestinians intended to "drenching the soil of our beloved country with the last drop of our blood in the lawful defense of all and every inch of it.” And the Arab Palestinians reaffirmed this position several times since then in various from by station Jihad is the only solution and armed struggle is the correct means to force their demands to be accepted. (Palestine from the River to the Sea.) The Arabs of Palestine consider the "creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.“

WHAT does this mean? (RHETORICAL) It means that The Arabs of Palestine have NO intention of living in peace.

The Israeli position may be interpreted (by a layman like myself) as implying the Arab Palestinians have NO right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of the Jewish National, The State of Israel, or the rights, safety, and freedoms recognized by Israeli Citizens. Based on the past history of criminal and terrorist behaviors there is no reason to assume that the Arab Palestinians will accept a form of peace that does not include the dismantlement of the State of Israel and any aspect of a Jewish National Home.

Most Respectfully,
R

They lived in peace for 2500 years.

Samartians that were put here by Sargon 2 in a colonialist action? Yes.

Until the Arabs came in 637 - slayed 99.998% of them.

The Arabs have no history here - and they should go.


The Samartians have converted in the biblical times. And I assure you, as an Israeli who have friendship connection with the actuall Samartians - they are not the "palestinians".
They kept their converted Jewish-like cult - which made them be persecuted badly EVER SINCE the ARABS invaded and colonized Judeah and the Levant in about 636AD

Once upon a time - The land of Israel was full of the Samartian converted to Judaism - the Samartians. They were over a 1.2 million people in Judeah of the 4th century AD.

Since the 7th century - their number shrank year by year. in 636 victory of the muslims in the Yarmuk battle - thousands of Samartians fled all over the country from fear of the Arabic invaders. In the 9th century - Arabic Muslim invaders have destroyed, burnt and looted hundreds of Jewish and Samartians synaguages.

in the 14th century - the Muslims have turned dozens of Samartian synaguages into mosques - violently

At 1500 AD - Out of 1.2million Samartians [400ad ] remained only 500 PEOPLE.

In 1625 the Samartians in Schem have called to all Samartian communties in the region that have not yet been murdered - to come to thier settlement. [ The Arab invaders all over the Levant have been murdering the Samartians all along the years of Arab colonization of the levant ]

in 1837AD - only 200 samartians have survived the persecution.

In 1841AD rulled over Israel Ibrahim pacha who wished to kill all the Samartians - for being not Jews, not christians and not muslims. They were only saved due to the fact that the Grand Rabbi Rabbi Chaim Abraham gagin sent them a certification that they are part of the Jewish people [ to save them ]
( In 17th century- most of the Samartians in Syria were murdered )

In 1901 - only 151 Samartians survived.


There you go - 1300 years of Arabic Muslim invasion and colonization.

1,200,000 Samartians - to 151. Decrease of 99.998%

[ I don't have to say even, that in 70 years of Jewish the number of Samartians rised to over 800. which means - about 530% increase. ]

 

[TDontTouchMyCigars]

Hebron was a Jewish site of prayer since the first temple. We talk about 1000BC.

the above is bull-shit!!​

The Israeli–Palestinian conflict in Hebron refers to an ongoing conflict between Palestinians and Jewish settlers in the West Bank city of Hebron in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Hebron has a Palestinian majority, consisting of an estimated 208,750 citizens and a small Jewish minority, variously numbered between 500 and 800. The H1 sector of Hebron, home to around 170,000 Palestinians, is governed by the Palestinian Authority. H2, which was inhabited by around 30,000 Palestinians is under Israeli military control with an entire brigade in place to protect some 800 Jewish residents living in the old Jewish quarter. As of 2015, Israel has declared that a number of special areas of Old City of Hebron constitute a closed military zone. Palestinians shops have been forced to close; despite protests Palestinian women are reportedly frisked by men, and residents, who are subjected every day to repeated body searches, must register to obtain special permits to navigate through the 18 military checkpoints Israel has set up in the city center.
Israeli–Palestinian conflict in Hebron - Wikipedia

Israel is set to approve construction of settler homes in a flashpoint area of the West Bank city of Hebron for the first time since 2002, the anti-occupation group Peace Now said Tuesday.

Hebron is considered a West Bank powder-keg where around 800 Jewish settlers live under hefty Israeli army security, surrounded by around 200,000 Palestinians.

Israel to okay permits for 31 settler homes in Hebron -- watchdog | The Times of Israel

800 Jewish settlers mean they are not from Hebron but invaders using the Zionist military to force their occupation.
-

I don't see context or answered or even argument here