HenryBHough
Diamond Member
Only 15?
These younger troops just don't have the edge their forebears had......
These younger troops just don't have the edge their forebears had......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? Sacrifice--the shedding of innocent blood as a means of atonement--plays no role in the development of Judaism?Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
Your understanding of Judaism is faulty. G-d requires no such appeasement. But check Christianity for that.
Go away, little boy.So? Satan believes in God too. And from your posts, looks like you agree with him a lot.I believe in God. I just don't believe in magic books.Obviously a poser troll.We could start with the appalling story of Abraham willing to sacrifice his son to please "god".Which innocent?I would be happy to engage you in debate over whether the sacrifice of an innocent played a role in the development of Judaic law, but you are not an honest debater. You don't have the strength of character to grant a debate opponent a point earned, as I've learned.
I have no clue as to who you are referring.
You atheist freak haters are hilarious.
View attachment 185943
Really? Sacrifice--the shedding of innocent blood as a means of atonement--plays no role in the development of Judaism?Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
Your understanding of Judaism is faulty. G-d requires no such appeasement. But check Christianity for that.
Really? Sacrifice--the shedding of innocent blood as a means of atonement--plays no role in the development of Judaism?Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
Your understanding of Judaism is faulty. G-d requires no such appeasement. But check Christianity for that.
The shedding of blood is not the means of atonement (and certainly not the ONLY means of atonement). Nor is it required to achieve atonement. (And you don't even understand what atonement means). Those are all Christian thoughts. Not Jewish ones.
Thanks for admitting you know nothing.You mean God, the creator and sustainer of existence, asking a 100+ year old Avraham to offer his healthy 37 year old son as a sacrifice and his 37 year old son, who believes in God and is a prophet, goes along with God’s request?We could start with the appalling story of Abraham willing to sacrifice his son to please "god".Which innocent?I would be happy to engage you in debate over whether the sacrifice of an innocent played a role in the development of Judaic law, but you are not an honest debater. You don't have the strength of character to grant a debate opponent a point earned, as I've learned.Please explain the barbarism of Judaism.
It is virtually impossible in Jewish law to find someone guilty of a capital crime.
I understand you do not know the complexities of Jewish law and arriving at a guilty verdict.
In the meantime, the RCC was using the Roman Empire to murder at will.
So much for Catholicism being the religion of love.
I have no clue as to who you are referring.
Yeah, we can discuss that.
Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
I have a better idea...start from Genesis 1:1.Really? Sacrifice--the shedding of innocent blood as a means of atonement--plays no role in the development of Judaism?Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
Your understanding of Judaism is faulty. G-d requires no such appeasement. But check Christianity for that.
The shedding of blood is not the means of atonement (and certainly not the ONLY means of atonement). Nor is it required to achieve atonement. (And you don't even understand what atonement means). Those are all Christian thoughts. Not Jewish ones.
Then why don't you explain it to me. Start with Leviticus 17
For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
There is no sacrifice for a trespass committed intentionally.Really? Sacrifice--the shedding of innocent blood as a means of atonement--plays no role in the development of Judaism?Alright, you worship a God one of whose attributes is a demand to be appeased by the shedding of innocent blood. Appalling, primitive, and indefensible. Your turn.
Your understanding of Judaism is faulty. G-d requires no such appeasement. But check Christianity for that.
The shedding of blood is not the means of atonement (and certainly not the ONLY means of atonement). Nor is it required to achieve atonement. (And you don't even understand what atonement means). Those are all Christian thoughts. Not Jewish ones.
Then why don't you explain it to me. Start with Leviticus 17
For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
Then why don't you explain it to me. Start with Leviticus 17
For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
Yeah, poor farmer was simply digging under a fence to get to the property next door. The nation of Israel.It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
No, the IDF did not like the way he was digging with his accomplice UNDER the fence.
Tell me, why would a farmer be digging UNDER a fence?
You have evidence of this?
The army said that the “two suspects approached the perimeter fence… and engaged in suspicious behavior on the ground alongside it. In response, an IDF unit fired at them with a tank.” Source
Now. Where is your condemnation of the acts of violence committed by Gaza?
It is Arabs-Moslems who are instigating hostilities.
And the Palestinian who was shot BEFORE the march whilst working on his land?
Ah, the IDF didn't like the way he was digging I guess!
No, the IDF did not like the way he was digging with his accomplice UNDER the fence.
Tell me, why would a farmer be digging UNDER a fence?
You have evidence of this?
The army said that the “two suspects approached the perimeter fence… and engaged in suspicious behavior on the ground alongside it. In response, an IDF unit fired at them with a tank.” Source
Now. Where is your condemnation of the acts of violence committed by Gaza?
"Witnesses said he was working his land near the border when the shells hit."
The army said that the “two suspects approached the perimeter fence… and engaged in suspicious behavior on the ground alongside it. In response, an IDF unit fired at them with a tank.”
Just two segments from your link...
Is shelling "suspects" with tanks normal behavior for a civilized nation?
Haha, I accept your surrender.This thread, however, is about the current events in Gaza and this will be my last response on the topic of blood and atonement.
What are you. 12? That's ok. Go back to worshiping your bloodthirsty vengeance-freak. I long ago learned few Jews have the strength of character to concede a point, let alone admit blame.Haha, I accept your surrender.This thread, however, is about the current events in Gaza and this will be my last response on the topic of blood and atonement.
Lol. Too View attachment 186105 to start a thread on the proper board, huh?
The fact that the Arabs are multiplying like rabbits is proof enough.What are you. 12? That's ok. Go back to worshiping your bloodthirsty vengeance-freak. I long ago learned few Jews have the strength of character to concede a point, let alone admit blame.Haha, I accept your surrender.This thread, however, is about the current events in Gaza and this will be my last response on the topic of blood and atonement.
Lol. Too View attachment 186105 to start a thread on the proper board, huh?
... I long ago learned few Jews have the strength of character to concede a point ....
Still no actual argument, I see. Why not show some integrity? Just say, Yes, I was wrong. Blood sacrifice is an element of Judaism.... I long ago learned few Jews have the strength of character to concede a point ....
Yeah, and I know too many Christians who drop a cherry-picked verse, declare victory and vanish.
(OUTSIDE OBSERVATION)Still no actual argument, I see. Why not show some integrity? Just say, Yes, I was wrong. Blood sacrifice is an element of Judaism.... I long ago learned few Jews have the strength of character to concede a point ....
Yeah, and I know too many Christians who drop a cherry-picked verse, declare victory and vanish.
And to really impress me, you can add, "Yes, you are right. Indeependent is a sniveling little rat-animal."
You are correct...Still no actual argument, I see. Why not show some integrity? Just say, Yes, I was wrong. Blood sacrifice is an element of Judaism.... I long ago learned few Jews have the strength of character to concede a point ....
Yeah, and I know too many Christians who drop a cherry-picked verse, declare victory and vanish.
And to really impress me, you can add, "Yes, you are right. Indeependent is a sniveling little rat-animal."