Issue 1 in Ohio

[Dadoalex]

The fact that you believe it's "anti-women" is less surprising, but equally troubling.

The intent is to prevent women from making their own choices.
That is anti-women.

 

[Dadoalex]

Again, the majority has to vote on it, so no it does not.

The majority has to bote on issue 1.
If it passes then a super majority is required to pass an initiative AND getting the initiative on the ballot will be nearly impossible.
Anti-democratic
Anti-woman.

 

[Dadoalex]

Wrong on all counts.

Your understanding of "democratic" is non-existent.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

They are in favor of it up to around the end of the first trimester, after that support drops quickly.

Most people are OK with bans after 8-16 weeks, so be careful going to the people with this.

Then that's up to the people, which is how it should be.
However, the conservative hair on fire about late term abortions...doesn't exist...unless the mother is going to die

 

[Votto]

Then that's up to the people, which is how it should be.
However, the conservative hair on fire about late term abortions...doesn't exist...unless the mother is going to die

Then why no age limits in the amendment?

All the Left does is lie 24/7.

People are sick of ya in case you had not noticed.

 

[BluesLegend]

A majority of Americans are in favor of abortion rights.

Proof of your claim?

 

[Votto]

Proof of your claim?

I've provided articles showing that the majority of Americans approve of some abortion rights

However, the majority of Americans also approve of restricting abortion rights as well.

That is what the Left WILL NOT TELL YOU!

And when the amendment is being sold to voters, something they will not talk about.

 

[hadit]

The intent is to prevent women from making their own choices.
That is anti-women.

The intent is to protect innocent human life. That's pro-woman and pro-man.

 

[Aldo Raine]

That is a lie. Why don't you try telling the truth. Prop 1 is the latest assault on democracy by Republicans. It would raise the threshold for passing a constitutional amendment from a simple majority to 60% which makes no sense. The people of Ohio are not being fooled and will vote this down by a sizeable majority.

I hope that's the case but the MAGAGATARDS In this state are so used to voting against their own best interests then bragging about doing it. It is funny and sad at the same time!

 

[Dadoalex]

The intent is to protect innocent human life. That's pro-woman and pro-man.

The intent is to deprive women of the absolute right to make their own decisions about their bodies.
You know, like you guys demanded about not getting vaxxed.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The intent is to deprive women of the absolute right to make their own decisions about their bodies.

The the proposed OH abortion amendment deprives women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.
Roe v Wade deprives women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.
All 50 states have laws that deprive women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.

 

[Dadoalex]

The the proposed OH abortion amendment deprives women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.
Roe v Wade deprives women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.
All 50 states have laws that deprive women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.

And?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

So you're saying that overturning ROE has led the GOP to become anti-democracy?
Actually, you're wrong.
The GOP has been anti democracy for more than 2 decades.

For me this is not about abortion. The GOP will pay the price for that in 24 as they paid in 22.
It is about supporting the democratic processes which the GOP has both abandoned and scourged for decades.

Isn’t it more about child murder? You can vote for whatever you want and that’s democracy. When you vote for the legalization of child murder maybe that is a reflection on you.

You are hoping for and promoting the murder of a child. As your political stance. The death of children is more beneficial to you than them living. That is a crazy stance to take.

In the next post I’m sure you will demand more welfare “for the children”. Do you mean the ones that escaped your killing?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The the proposed OH abortion amendment deprives women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.
Roe v Wade deprives women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.
All 50 states have laws that deprive women of the absolute right to make their own decisions their bodies.

Which one of those laws deprive the child of his or her bodies? Oh right, all of them.

 

[Billiejeens]

They are in favor of it up to around the end of the first trimester, after that support drops quickly.

Most people are OK with bans after 8-16 weeks, so be careful going to the people with this.

Safe, rare and legal
That was the winning hand.

 

[g5000]

Yes on Issue 1

The mission of Ohio Right to Life is to promote and defend the right to life of all innocent human beings, from the time of fertilization until natural death.

www.ohiolife.org

Since Roe vs Wade has been overturned, the Left has begun an all-out assault to recodify abortion back into the law of states that opted out, like Ohio. In Ohio, they are now trying to add abortion to the state Constitution via a direct vote to circumvent lawmakers who restrict abortion. Voting no on issue one would allow a simple majority to add abortion to the Ohio Constitution. But as we all know, the Left will not be honest about advertising it, since they own the media. They will sell it as a return to Roe vs. Wade, but that would be a lie. The proposed amendment would do much more than that as I will explain later. However, voting yes would require more than just a simple majority to change the Constitution.

The Amendment has already been written and will not only allow abortion on demand, but it does away with the Roe vs Wade mandate that abortions not occur on viable infants. That means abortions up to the partial birth abortion. Anything goes now.

But it does not end there. It would also allow children to have abortions without their parents' consent.

But it doesn't even end there. It would also allow children to begin to transition into another sex without their parents' notification or approval.

Imagine your child making the most difficult decisions of their lives that will alter their lives forever, without they help of their parents.

Parental rights would become nonexistent with the proposed Constitutional amendment, but again, it is not being advertised this way.

In fact, why even have parents since the state can only be trusted with the welfare of children and not the parents? After all, we see what a swell job the state does with children in foster care.

No, parents need to be targeted because they cannot be trusted. America really is that bad, all of them.

Isn't that right democrats?

Voting is on August 8th.

Everything you claim about the abortion amendment is wrong. You should have read it before swallowing a load of horseshit about it.

https://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/getattachment/cf27c10f-b153-4731-ae9e-e3555a326ed9/The-Right-to-Reproductive-Freedom-with-Protections-for-Health-and-Safety.aspx

It has NOTHING to do with gender transition surgeries or underaged children getting such surgeries.

And it does ban abortions after fetal viability, with exceptions for the health of the mother.

 

[Dadoalex]

Isn’t it more about child murder? ...

No it's not, although I'm sure your church, the same church that covers for pedophiles, has told you otherwise.

Has it occurred to you your Church's efforts may be self serving? Consider...
The church's primary source of worshipers is the poor.
It is the poor who are most likely to need the church's services.
The poor provide most of the victims for the church's pedophiles.
The wealthy can go anywhere anytime for an abortion
The poor cannot
By shutting down abortion the church ensures more births among the poor
and thereby
An ongoing supply of young children for the church's pedophiles.

The question is do you support the church's actions in ensuring an ongoing supply of young children for their pedophiles?


So how about we cut out the hyperbole and discuss the actual topic.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

No it's not, although I'm sure your church, the same church that covers for pedophiles, has told you otherwise.

Has it occurred to you your Church's efforts may be self serving? Consider...
The church's primary source of worshipers is the poor.
It is the poor who are most likely to need the church's services.
The poor provide most of the victims for the church's pedophiles.
The wealthy can go anywhere anytime for an abortion
The poor cannot
By shutting down abortion the church ensures more births among the poor
and thereby
An ongoing supply of young children for the church's pedophiles.

The question is do you support the church's actions in ensuring an ongoing supply of young children for their pedophiles?


So how about we cut out the hyperbole and discuss the actual topic.

Really? So children who are murdered are a good thing since they will never be part of a church. Or poor. Or anything else bad that may happen.

You’re the fucking hero in this story of murder. A Nobel knight who by killing the child has saved them from any possibility of having a difficult existence. You have saved these poor children. You must be like…God. So benevolent saving these children through killing them. Really what choice did you have? They are decidedly better off dead by your Nobel hand than living a life you wouldn’t approve of, attending church and shit like that.

I often wonder if it’s so good for these kids to die why haven’t you committed suicide yet? Surely you deserve the same salvation you want for others.

 

[martybegan]

Your understanding of "democratic" is non-existent.

And your use of the word is grade school level understanding.

 

[martybegan]

Then that's up to the people, which is how it should be.
However, the conservative hair on fire about late term abortions...doesn't exist...unless the mother is going to die

Then why do blue state laws allow abortion up to the second of birth with just a doctor saying the woman's health MIGHT be impacted?