Issue 1 in Ohio

I know what I was thinking of, the Born Alive Abortion Survivor bill. That one the democrats went nuts screeching about.

Democrats Cite Infants’ Well-Being in Arguing against ‘Born-Alive’ Abortion-Survivor Bill

Obviously, they do NOT believe that being born makes a baby a person.

Already covered in the 2002 bill. No need to reinvent the wheel.

"As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion."
 
if the baby is born alive due to a botched abortion. In that case, they insist the baby is not a human being and should legally be left to die or callously killed.
Completely contrary to known reality, but typical of the New-GOP belief in Faux not News and their insidious propaganda.

As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion.


 
...

A fertilized acorn is an oak tree by species, fertilized chicken egg contains a chicken, and caterpillar and butterfly are just growth phases of the same species.
Speaking of spewing opinions absent of facts

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Why don't you go sit under an acorn moron.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Speaking of spewing opinions absent of facts

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Why don't you go sit under an acorn moron.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
That's biology you're arguing against. An acorn develops into an oak tree, not a pecan tree. A developing chicken develops into a chicken, not a frog. A caterpillar develops into a butterfly, not a zebra, and so on. In the same way, an unborn human develops into an adult human, not a yeti. It's biology.
 
Already covered in the 2002 bill. No need to reinvent the wheel.

"As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced
abortion."
That wasn't their core objection. The bottom line is, once an unborn child is targeted for death, the democrats are determined that child must die, even AFTER said child is born and is a full person, according to the same people wanting him/her to die.
 
Well most of the acorns\nuts become food. A few grow into trees. Many fertilized eggs do not attach to mom's womb......
Irrelevant as to identity. You can extract the DNA from an acorn and identify it as oak. Likewise with a fertilized human egg.

If you want to talk about things that stop a new being from developing into an adult being, don't forget to include the abortionists' knife and acid.
 
Speaking of spewing opinions absent of facts

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Why don't you go sit under an acorn moron.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Does a fertilized chicken egg contain a chicken?

Yes. It doesn't contain a duck.
 
That wasn't their core objection.
Yeah it was. The case that brought it to the national forefront was a nurse who busted the hospital she worked for, for putting the babies who survived abortion or were born with fatal anomalies, into a closet and just let them die alone. Why does the anti-choice crowd ignore history?
once an unborn child is targeted for death, the democrats are determined that child must die

An absurdity contrary to all semblance of reality.
 
Irrelevant as to identity. You can extract the DNA from an acorn and identify it as oak. Likewise with a fertilized human egg.
So what? It is stipulated and beyond question that the fertilized human egg is human. My position is that zygotes are not sacred to everyone.
If you want to talk about things that stop a new being from developing
Just stating facts about conception and why it is a secular event and not sacred imo.
 
At birth, major changes take place. The umbilical cord is clamped and the baby no longer receives oxygen and nutrients from the mother. With the first breaths of air, the lungs start to expand and the ductus arteriosus and the foramen ovale both close. The baby's circulation and blood flow through the heart now function like an adult's.
I'd like to see your source on that because I remember watching my son's delivery. He was breathing, screaming and peeing well before the cord was cut.
See above and select to see the full message and link.

If you want to see all my posts on the realities about the biological miracle that occurs at birth when it goes well, please take a moment to search this message board on my screen name for the word “shunt” .

If you were Jewish seeing your child’s arrival you would have witnessed at your son’s first breath, the miracle of God breathing life into a new human being giving him a soul.

When you watched you son’s birth was there a County Sheriff or anyone wearing a law officer’s badge just to make sure nobody committed a crime before baby fetus took that first breath?

nf.23.08.11 #10,013
hvdvt.23.08.11 #660
nf.23.08.11 #671
 
Last edited:
That's biology you're arguing against. An acorn develops into an oak tree, not a pecan tree. A developing chicken develops into a chicken, not a frog. A caterpillar develops into a butterfly, not a zebra, and so on. In the same way, an unborn human develops into an adult human, not a yeti. It's biology.
If an acorn is an oak tree
Go sit under it with some eggs and have a chicken sandwich while you contemplate this...

YOU LOST, AGAIN.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
So what? It is stipulated and beyond question that the fertilized human egg is human. My position is that zygotes are not sacred to everyone.

Just stating facts about conception and why it is a secular event and not sacred imo.
Zygote is a term used to dehumanize that very human. Which is why it's easy for your liberal friends to traffic, and sexually abuse children, they see them as less than human!
 
Does a fertilized chicken egg contain a chicken?

Yes. It doesn't contain a duck.
No, fool. It contains an egg. Yellow and white.
For egg salad.

Try making your egg salad with a chicken or your chicken dinner with an egg.

Better yet, try making a cake with a chicken.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
No, fool. It contains an egg. Yellow and white.
For egg salad.

Try making your egg salad with a chicken or your chicken dinner with an egg.

Better yet, try making a cake with a chicken.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

fertilized egg. not the eggs we eat.
 
Zygote is a term used to dehumanize that very human.
One lesson you should be takaway from Ohio 1 results is that the propagandistic political shaming of alleged sinful behavior by so many who stand up for reproductive freedom, is too stupid to even think about for more than a few seconds. Let alone make it part of your arguments.

frnknstn.23.08.11
nf.23.08.11 #678
 
Last edited:
fertilized egg. not the eggs we eat.
Eggs we eat.
Never been on a farm eh?

Now go watch that catepillar flap it's wings while you bake a cake with your secret chicken recipe and admire the shade from your acorn.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
Eggs we eat.
Never been on a farm eh?

Now go watch that catepillar flap it's wings while you bake a cake with your secret chicken recipe and admire the shade from your acorn.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You are saying the eggs we get from the supermarket are fertilized?

It will eventually flap it's wings.

By your logic pre-pubescent girls aren't human beings because they aren't menstruating yet.

You are confusing developmental stages with species identification, because you simply can't admit abortion kills a human being.
 

Forum List

Back
Top