🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Issues that conservatives suddenly don't care about ..

now that Trump is elected , cons have quickly forgotten issues that really bothered them under Obama.

Debt/deficit : 20 trillion!! Bah, who cares . Let's build giant walls and double the military. Costs be damn !

Prez security budget: Obama couldn't go to dinner without a story of how it cost taxpayers trillions . Now trump will be commuting from DC to manhattan on a daily basis . That's cool!

States rights : sanctuary city? You
Must bow to the Feds directives , at your own cost!

What else ? I had more but forgot .
maybe if the presidents dinner didnt have to be in Martha's Vinyard, take a week, two presidential planes 500 men on security detail and golf course fee's, he wouldnt have heard so much grief about the expense of that dinner.

Obama took the same vacation every year to the vineyard . Security had it down pat. He stayed in country side , and its a island wh few options to get in and out . It's the perfect spot for security. And it's like an hour flight from DC on marine one .

Trump is going to hang out in the middle of the busiest most congested places in the country !
do you have a link to Trumps travel plans?
Im sure you do, as a liberal you certainly would not be caught dead making things up.

Yeah . His wife n kid are staying in NYC . So he'll be commuting .

Remember, it was you righties who made a big deal over Obamas travel . You reap what you sow .

What's with you people anyway? He didn't commute anywhere just yet. He's not even officially elected or sworn in yet.

Nobody knows what Trump or his family are really going to do. I'm sure living in the White House was discussed with the family before he decided to run.
 
now that Trump is elected , cons have quickly forgotten issues that really bothered them under Obama.

Debt/deficit : 20 trillion!! Bah, who cares . Let's build giant walls and double the military. Costs be damn !

Prez security budget: Obama couldn't go to dinner without a story of how it cost taxpayers trillions . Now trump will be commuting from DC to manhattan on a daily basis . That's cool!

States rights : sanctuary city? You
Must bow to the Feds directives , at your own cost!

What else ? I had more but forgot .
maybe if the presidents dinner didnt have to be in Martha's Vinyard, take a week, two presidential planes 500 men on security detail and golf course fee's, he wouldnt have heard so much grief about the expense of that dinner.

Obama took the same vacation every year to the vineyard . Security had it down pat. He stayed in country side , and its a island wh few options to get in and out . It's the perfect spot for security. And it's like an hour flight from DC on marine one .

Trump is going to hang out in the middle of the busiest most congested places in the country !
do you have a link to Trumps travel plans?
Im sure you do, as a liberal you certainly would not be caught dead making things up.

Yeah . His wife n kid are staying in NYC . So he'll be commuting .

Remember, it was you righties who made a big deal over Obamas travel . You reap what you sow .
you know what would be really cool, if liberals were to reap what they sow.
The problem is that the saying actually has to do with the rewards you will receive from putting forth effort, I cant see liberals putting forth effort as long as they can reap what other sow.
 
Teachers, policemen, firemen, public works employees, construction jobs, the entire defense industry both public and private

All jobs created by the government
The purpose of government has expanded to the point that it has become overly burdensome to the public good. You say you work in the government and you should know how it is slow and inefficient. You also should know that in every office or shop there are people who don't pull their own weight. Because they've created permanent positions, the lazy and worthless can come in every day and do absolutely nothing and not get fired because of it.

We're talking strictly Public Works here.

Policemen, teachers, and firefighters are a different issue. They aren't federal employees. I've never been one of these, so I can't speak to that issue and all you're trying to do is deflect from what we have been talking about.

Government employees are government employees regardless of what level they work at. Still jobs created by government
Government fills the roles that people can't. People can't build roads, so government collects money to build them collectively. Same with education, police, fire. The people can't build a military...we need the government to do that
Still trying to deflect.
The feds have nothing to do with local government jobs.
The primary responsibility of the federal government is to provide national defense and security. State and local government is responsible for infrastructure...or did you forget that. Nope, you're just trying to move the goalposts to justify your false positions.


You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':

" provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"
If your interpretation was what they meant then the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.

What interpretation? I simply quoted the Constitution.
 
Just wait until the spending cuts are announced, and you'll be screaming chicken little....

What spending cuts? Trump don't need no stinking spending cuts. He's going to bring in jobs, jobs, jobs. Everyone will be happy and wealthy and working and America will be great again.
 
now that Trump is elected , cons have quickly forgotten issues that really bothered them under Obama.

Debt/deficit : 20 trillion!! Bah, who cares . Let's build giant walls and double the military. Costs be damn !

Prez security budget: Obama couldn't go to dinner without a story of how it cost taxpayers trillions . Now trump will be commuting from DC to manhattan on a daily basis . That's cool!

States rights : sanctuary city? You
Must bow to the Feds directives , at your own cost!

What else ? I had more but forgot .
:)
 
Last edited:
Just wait until the spending cuts are announced, and you'll be screaming chicken little....

What spending cuts? Trump don't need no stinking spending cuts. He's going to bring in jobs, jobs, jobs. Everyone will be happy and wealthy and working and America will be great again.
And he is going to build a wall.....a big beautiful wall
Believe me
 
now that Trump is elected , cons have quickly forgotten issues that really bothered them under Obama.

Debt/deficit : 20 trillion!! Bah, who cares . Let's build giant walls and double the military. Costs be damn !

Prez security budget: Obama couldn't go to dinner without a story of how it cost taxpayers trillions . Now trump will be commuting from DC to manhattan on a daily basis . That's cool!

States rights : sanctuary city? You
Must bow to the Feds directives , at your own cost!

What else ? I had more but forgot .
maybe if the presidents dinner didnt have to be in Martha's Vinyard, take a week, two presidential planes 500 men on security detail and golf course fee's, he wouldnt have heard so much grief about the expense of that dinner.

Obama took the same vacation every year to the vineyard . Security had it down pat. He stayed in country side , and its a island wh few options to get in and out . It's the perfect spot for security. And it's like an hour flight from DC on marine one .

Trump is going to hang out in the middle of the busiest most congested places in the country !
do you have a link to Trumps travel plans?
Im sure you do, as a liberal you certainly would not be caught dead making things up.

Yeah . His wife n kid are staying in NYC . So he'll be commuting .

Remember, it was you righties who made a big deal over Obamas travel . You reap what you sow .
here is the difference that you will end up seeing should you be correct.
It will be a very short time of him doing that before the right starts to give him crap about wasting money. Although I doubt he is going to waste 4 hours a day commuting, lets just say for a moment he does, The right will step in and give him logical options. Move the family to DC and act like every other president in the history of this country, Interact with the family through skype or the governments secure alternative, or divorce the wife, disown the kids and continue on as a single man with no distractions, however the millions per week for commuting is not going to be a valid option.
You are assuming that Trump really cares about any separation. This will not be the first time a first lady walked away from the White House. Bess Truman hated Washington and hated being First Lady even more. She spent most of her time back in Independence Mo. while Harry was in White House alone. She would travel back and forth at Harry's insistence. H. W. Bush's wife shared Bess's feeling about the White House but she toughed it out and spend most of her time there. I think Melanie is uncomfortable with the whole mess. She married Trump for a life leisure and wealth, not living in a 3 ring circus, hounded by the media. The wives of most presidents after spending years in the political spotlight, were well prepared for Washington and the White House. Melanie was not.
 
The purpose of government has expanded to the point that it has become overly burdensome to the public good. You say you work in the government and you should know how it is slow and inefficient. You also should know that in every office or shop there are people who don't pull their own weight. Because they've created permanent positions, the lazy and worthless can come in every day and do absolutely nothing and not get fired because of it.

We're talking strictly Public Works here.

Policemen, teachers, and firefighters are a different issue. They aren't federal employees. I've never been one of these, so I can't speak to that issue and all you're trying to do is deflect from what we have been talking about.

Government employees are government employees regardless of what level they work at. Still jobs created by government
Government fills the roles that people can't. People can't build roads, so government collects money to build them collectively. Same with education, police, fire. The people can't build a military...we need the government to do that
Still trying to deflect.
The feds have nothing to do with local government jobs.
The primary responsibility of the federal government is to provide national defense and security. State and local government is responsible for infrastructure...or did you forget that. Nope, you're just trying to move the goalposts to justify your false positions.


You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':

" provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"
If your interpretation was what they meant then the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.

What interpretation? I simply quoted the Constitution.
You forgot what you said, read your own posts instead of looking like a moron.

"You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':"

You were arguing against the purpose of the federal government to provide primary functions, national security, borders, etc. We do that with a strong military, immigration laws, police, emergency services, etc. It does not mean food stamps and disability checks for being too fat and lazy to work.
 
its not our fault if you cant understand how building the wall and getting rid of the democrats illegal pets will save billions every year.
Education is free for the first 12 years, don't blame others because you failed to make the most of it.

Show us the math on how the Great Wall pays for itself.

You're the one who doesn't understand immigration.

Why do we have to repeatedly explain this to you Timmy?
I mean Holy Shit, this'll be like the hundredth time!!!
Until what you say is correct.
 
Government employees are government employees regardless of what level they work at. Still jobs created by government
Government fills the roles that people can't. People can't build roads, so government collects money to build them collectively. Same with education, police, fire. The people can't build a military...we need the government to do that
Still trying to deflect.
The feds have nothing to do with local government jobs.
The primary responsibility of the federal government is to provide national defense and security. State and local government is responsible for infrastructure...or did you forget that. Nope, you're just trying to move the goalposts to justify your false positions.


You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':

" provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"
If your interpretation was what they meant then the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.

What interpretation? I simply quoted the Constitution.
You forgot what you said, read your own posts instead of looking like a moron.

"You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':"

You were arguing against the purpose of the federal government to provide primary functions, national security, borders, etc. We do that with a strong military, immigration laws, police, emergency services, etc. It does not mean food stamps and disability checks for being too fat and lazy to work.
Yes, it does include taking care of those who need help. It is all part of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
Governments job is to pool the resources of the people and do what is in the best interests of We the People
 
its not our fault if you cant understand how building the wall and getting rid of the democrats illegal pets will save billions every year.
Education is free for the first 12 years, don't blame others because you failed to make the most of it.

Show us the math on how the Great Wall pays for itself.

You're the one who doesn't understand immigration.

Why do we have to repeatedly explain this to you Timmy?
I mean Holy Shit, this'll be like the hundredth time!!!
Until what you say is correct.

Same bullshit liberal tactic.
Repeatedly post the same stupid shit.
 
its not our fault if you cant understand how building the wall and getting rid of the democrats illegal pets will save billions every year.
Education is free for the first 12 years, don't blame others because you failed to make the most of it.

Show us the math on how the Great Wall pays for itself.

You're the one who doesn't understand immigration.

Why do we have to repeatedly explain this to you Timmy?
I mean Holy Shit, this'll be like the hundredth time!!!
Until what you say is correct.

Same bullshit liberal tactic.
Repeatedly post the same stupid shit.
Repeat the truth, although it seldom does any good.
 
Government employees are government employees regardless of what level they work at. Still jobs created by government
Government fills the roles that people can't. People can't build roads, so government collects money to build them collectively. Same with education, police, fire. The people can't build a military...we need the government to do that
Still trying to deflect.
The feds have nothing to do with local government jobs.
The primary responsibility of the federal government is to provide national defense and security. State and local government is responsible for infrastructure...or did you forget that. Nope, you're just trying to move the goalposts to justify your false positions.


You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':

" provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"
If your interpretation was what they meant then the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.

What interpretation? I simply quoted the Constitution.
You forgot what you said, read your own posts instead of looking like a moron.

"You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':"

You were arguing against the purpose of the federal government to provide primary functions, national security, borders, etc. We do that with a strong military, immigration laws, police, emergency services, etc. It does not mean food stamps and disability checks for being too fat and lazy to work.


Absolutely nothing I have said has been against the government providing for the common defense. You seem to read a lot more into what I've said then is actually there.

But, as I posted an except from the preamble to the constitution, it was you, not I, that interpreted 'promoting the general welfare' to mean 'the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.' Your words, not mine.

So far I've said nothing that was any sort of interpretation. I only quoted the constitution. You seem to be going off the deep end - making all sorts of assumptions - and putting your foot in mouth with each one.
 
They still care about those things. But they had to support the alternative to the Clinton Crime Family. They didn't have much of a choice. I've already warned my Republican friends that Trump is not a staunch Conservative or Constitutionalist. I've warned em, they shouldn't expect him to be. If they do, they'll be bitterly disappointed. Trump was simply the only choice we had.

For me personally, i'll be satisfied if he just gets aggressive on border security and attempts to rebuild Hussein's dismantled Immigration System. And he appoints Supreme Court Justices who aren't Anti-American Globalists. That's all i really need from Trump. I've given up hope on things like balancing the budget, reducing the devastating Debt, stopping the rapid expansion of the Police State, ending endless war, and so on. I realize that stuff is gonna go on and on regardless of which Party controls the White House. I'll just take what i can get at this point.
 
They still care about those things. But they had to support the alternative to the Clinton Crime Family. They didn't have much of a choice. I've already warned my Republican friends that Trump is not a staunch Conservative or Constitutionalist. I've warned em, they shouldn't expect him to be. If they do, they'll be bitterly disappointed. Trump was simply the only choice we had.

For me personally, i'll be satisfied if he just gets aggressive on border security and attempts to rebuild Hussein's dismantled Immigration System. And he appoints Supreme Court Justices who aren't Anti-American Globalists. That's all i really need from Trump. I've given up hope on things like balancing the budget, reducing the devastating Debt, stopping the rapid expansion of the Police State, ending endless war, and so on. I realize that stuff is gonna go on and on regardless of which Party controls the White House. I'll just take what i can get at this point.

Ignoring the rest of your post, it seems idiotic that you would use the phrase 'The Clinton Crime Family' while supporting Donald Trump.

You do know that Donald Trump's father made his fortune in real estate and construction in the New York area during the 1960s - 1980s, right? You do know that the New York area was rife with organized crime during that period, right? I doubt that there's a chance in hell Donald Trumps father could have been successful in that area and at that time without having some connection to organized crime.

Maybe you should think of him more as 'The Don...ald'.
 
Still trying to deflect.
The feds have nothing to do with local government jobs.
The primary responsibility of the federal government is to provide national defense and security. State and local government is responsible for infrastructure...or did you forget that. Nope, you're just trying to move the goalposts to justify your false positions.


You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':

" provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"
If your interpretation was what they meant then the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.

What interpretation? I simply quoted the Constitution.
You forgot what you said, read your own posts instead of looking like a moron.

"You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':"

You were arguing against the purpose of the federal government to provide primary functions, national security, borders, etc. We do that with a strong military, immigration laws, police, emergency services, etc. It does not mean food stamps and disability checks for being too fat and lazy to work.


Absolutely nothing I have said has been against the government providing for the common defense. You seem to read a lot more into what I've said then is actually there.

But, as I posted an except from the preamble to the constitution, it was you, not I, that interpreted 'promoting the general welfare' to mean 'the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.' Your words, not mine.

So far I've said nothing that was any sort of interpretation. I only quoted the constitution. You seem to be going off the deep end - making all sorts of assumptions - and putting your foot in mouth with each one.
I didn't say you said government shouldn't provide for the common defense. Jesus, you can't read period! Your comment was in response to smaller government so you don't even have a deep end.
 
They still care about those things. But they had to support the alternative to the Clinton Crime Family. They didn't have much of a choice. I've already warned my Republican friends that Trump is not a staunch Conservative or Constitutionalist. I've warned em, they shouldn't expect him to be. If they do, they'll be bitterly disappointed. Trump was simply the only choice we had.

For me personally, i'll be satisfied if he just gets aggressive on border security and attempts to rebuild Hussein's dismantled Immigration System. And he appoints Supreme Court Justices who aren't Anti-American Globalists. That's all i really need from Trump. I've given up hope on things like balancing the budget, reducing the devastating Debt, stopping the rapid expansion of the Police State, ending endless war, and so on. I realize that stuff is gonna go on and on regardless of which Party controls the White House. I'll just take what i can get at this point.

Ignoring the rest of your post, it seems idiotic that you would use the phrase 'The Clinton Crime Family' while supporting Donald Trump.

You do know that Donald Trump's father made his fortune in real estate and construction in the New York area during the 1960s - 1980s, right? You do know that the New York area was rife with organized crime during that period, right? I doubt that there's a chance in hell Donald Trumps father could have been successful in that area and at that time without having some connection to organized crime.

Maybe you should think of him more as 'The Don...ald'.
If he had to do business with the unions he definitely was dealing with organized crime.
 
You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':

" provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity"
If your interpretation was what they meant then the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.

What interpretation? I simply quoted the Constitution.
You forgot what you said, read your own posts instead of looking like a moron.

"You seem to have forgotten the part about 'promoting the general welfare' and 'securing the blessings of liberty':"

You were arguing against the purpose of the federal government to provide primary functions, national security, borders, etc. We do that with a strong military, immigration laws, police, emergency services, etc. It does not mean food stamps and disability checks for being too fat and lazy to work.


Absolutely nothing I have said has been against the government providing for the common defense. You seem to read a lot more into what I've said then is actually there.

But, as I posted an except from the preamble to the constitution, it was you, not I, that interpreted 'promoting the general welfare' to mean 'the government has the authority to do whatever it wants. They can take 100% of your earnings and make you stand in their bread lines for rations.' Your words, not mine.

So far I've said nothing that was any sort of interpretation. I only quoted the constitution. You seem to be going off the deep end - making all sorts of assumptions - and putting your foot in mouth with each one.
I didn't say you said government shouldn't provide for the common defense. Jesus, you can't read period! Your comment was in response to smaller government so you don't even have a deep end.


Are you confusing me with another poster?

You said to me 'You were arguing against the purpose of the federal government to provide primary functions, national security, borders, etc.'

No I wasn't. They would be covered under the 'common defense' clause. I only quoted the Constitution to show that government had an equal responsibility to 'Promote the General Welfare'.

Either you've mixed me up with another poster or you have a severe problem with reading comprehension.
 

Forum List

Back
Top