Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong.Nazism was fascist. It was pro union, but only the right unions. IT was after all the National Socialist German Workers' Party.Nazism was a bit of both, it isn't 'liberal' or 'conservative'.Did you get your brownshirt cleaned and your jackboots polished, shitting bull?
You have a Kristalnacht to attend!
It was the Nazis who brought on the refusal of serving Jews by 'Aryan' businesses.
No one is talking about refusing to serve gays a sit-down or take-out meal. We're talking about not forcing a religious business owner to host or attend a gay ceremony. There is a huge difference.
And given the many parallels between Nazi ideology and liberalism, I would be careful about making Nazi comparisons. The Nazis were much closer to liberalism than they were to conservatism.
If you call it 'socialist' then you have to realize that Nazism was anti-union and endorsed state driven economics with corporate-state monopolies.
If you call it 'liberal' socially, then you would have to ignore the heavy censorship of art and culture, and the Nazi regime's imprisonment of all open communists, social Democrats, and democratic socialists.
To call it 'conservative' would be silly too, as Nazism was opposed to most Keynesian and Free Market ideas, as well as any kind of economic or religious freedom.
IOW, it was perfectly in step with Progressivism, which indeed admired it and vice versa.
The Nazis banned unions.
That's why more and more states are passing Religious Rights Restoration acts?It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
That's why more and more states are passing Religious Rights Restoration acts?It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
You're a bumbler. Not even mildly persuasive.
It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
Sounds like an opinion as there is no "wrong side of history". This is very much a fight for civil rights....from our perspective as well.
It's good for them to stand up for their beliefs. You can attach any nasty name you want to. That shows more about you than them. They never said they hated gays, or blacks for whatever reason you decided to throw that in there, you did. Any gay person and their friends are more than welcome to come purchase pizza's, cakes, get pictures taken etc. These people based on their own religious beliefs simply want to draw the line at being forced to participate in a wedding for them. And the law should protect them from having to do so without the threat of being sued and all the other bull that comes from these gay activists. Just like they can refuse to participate in a KKK wedding, a devil worship wedding or any other type of activity that invades religious traditions and practices. Gays are basically making fun of religion when they hold these ceremonies. It's their way of saying fuck you I'm going to slime your traditions and practices and be a total fucking prick in the process by forcing you to participate as well in our debauchery. It's time to take a stand and draw the line at how far these cretins are going to be allowed to go.Good for them.
Which part is good for them?
The free advertising?
The admitted bigotry? Even though they mean well.
Hey, If a "secret" gay couple comes in, passes themselves off as straight, does big, good business with the pizza man and then the couple shows the owners they did business with gays. And the earth still turned. Do they still get to heaven, They were tricked? (I don't think people who judge other people by being racist and bigoted get too close to heaven anyway) but I bet you do.
How about a gay black couple. Does the owner of the business get in trouble for refusing the black part but not the homosexual part? Or is it an either/or situation?
No wonder Pence wants clarification.
It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
Sounds like an opinion as there is no "wrong side of history". This is very much a fight for civil rights....from our perspective as well.
Religious extremists are fighting a losing battle - therefore, putting them on the wrong side of history. Was the Confederacy not on the wrong side of history?
Sounds like you are saying that gay Christians are not real Christians. Somehow you and your brand of Christians were given the authority from Christ to determine who worshipped him and how they worshipped him. Can you provide a link showing how and when that happened?It's good for them to stand up for their beliefs. You can attach any nasty name you want to. That shows more about you than them. They never said they hated gays, or blacks for whatever reason you decided to throw that in there, you did. Any gay person and their friends are more than welcome to come purchase pizza's, cakes, get pictures taken etc. These people based on their own religious beliefs simply want to draw the line at being forced to participate in a wedding for them. And the law should protect them from having to do so without the threat of being sued and all the other bull that comes from these gay activists. Just like they can refuse to participate in a KKK wedding, a devil worship wedding or any other type of activity that invades religious traditions and practices. Gays are basically making fun of religion when they hold these ceremonies. It's their way of saying fuck you I'm going to slime your traditions and practices and be a total fucking prick in the process by forcing you to participate as well in our debauchery. It's time to take a stand and draw the line at how far these cretins are going to be allowed to go.Good for them.
Which part is good for them?
The free advertising?
The admitted bigotry? Even though they mean well.
Hey, If a "secret" gay couple comes in, passes themselves off as straight, does big, good business with the pizza man and then the couple shows the owners they did business with gays. And the earth still turned. Do they still get to heaven, They were tricked? (I don't think people who judge other people by being racist and bigoted get too close to heaven anyway) but I bet you do.
How about a gay black couple. Does the owner of the business get in trouble for refusing the black part but not the homosexual part? Or is it an either/or situation?
No wonder Pence wants clarification.
OK so you admit your point about being on the wrong side of history is incorrect. Wonderful.That's why more and more states are passing Religious Rights Restoration acts?It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
You're a bumbler. Not even mildly persuasive.
Actually, CNN was talking about that a few minutes ago - regarding states passing religious extremist laws. All GOP presidential candidates will be asked these questions during debates. It should be fun to watch...
Sounds like you are saying that gay Christians are not real Christians. Somehow you and your brand of Christians were given the authority from Christ to determine who worshipped him and how they worshipped him. Can you provide a link showing how and when that happened?It's good for them to stand up for their beliefs. You can attach any nasty name you want to. That shows more about you than them. They never said they hated gays, or blacks for whatever reason you decided to throw that in there, you did. Any gay person and their friends are more than welcome to come purchase pizza's, cakes, get pictures taken etc. These people based on their own religious beliefs simply want to draw the line at being forced to participate in a wedding for them. And the law should protect them from having to do so without the threat of being sued and all the other bull that comes from these gay activists. Just like they can refuse to participate in a KKK wedding, a devil worship wedding or any other type of activity that invades religious traditions and practices. Gays are basically making fun of religion when they hold these ceremonies. It's their way of saying fuck you I'm going to slime your traditions and practices and be a total fucking prick in the process by forcing you to participate as well in our debauchery. It's time to take a stand and draw the line at how far these cretins are going to be allowed to go.Good for them.
Which part is good for them?
The free advertising?
The admitted bigotry? Even though they mean well.
Hey, If a "secret" gay couple comes in, passes themselves off as straight, does big, good business with the pizza man and then the couple shows the owners they did business with gays. And the earth still turned. Do they still get to heaven, They were tricked? (I don't think people who judge other people by being racist and bigoted get too close to heaven anyway) but I bet you do.
How about a gay black couple. Does the owner of the business get in trouble for refusing the black part but not the homosexual part? Or is it an either/or situation?
No wonder Pence wants clarification.
Sounds to me like you read something way fucking different than what I wrote. No Christian is without sin, not a single one. However that doesn't mean all Christians must partake in others sins.Sounds like you are saying that gay Christians are not real Christians. Somehow you and your brand of Christians were given the authority from Christ to determine who worshipped him and how they worshipped him. Can you provide a link showing how and when that happened?It's good for them to stand up for their beliefs. You can attach any nasty name you want to. That shows more about you than them. They never said they hated gays, or blacks for whatever reason you decided to throw that in there, you did. Any gay person and their friends are more than welcome to come purchase pizza's, cakes, get pictures taken etc. These people based on their own religious beliefs simply want to draw the line at being forced to participate in a wedding for them. And the law should protect them from having to do so without the threat of being sued and all the other bull that comes from these gay activists. Just like they can refuse to participate in a KKK wedding, a devil worship wedding or any other type of activity that invades religious traditions and practices. Gays are basically making fun of religion when they hold these ceremonies. It's their way of saying fuck you I'm going to slime your traditions and practices and be a total fucking prick in the process by forcing you to participate as well in our debauchery. It's time to take a stand and draw the line at how far these cretins are going to be allowed to go.Good for them.
Which part is good for them?
The free advertising?
The admitted bigotry? Even though they mean well.
Hey, If a "secret" gay couple comes in, passes themselves off as straight, does big, good business with the pizza man and then the couple shows the owners they did business with gays. And the earth still turned. Do they still get to heaven, They were tricked? (I don't think people who judge other people by being racist and bigoted get too close to heaven anyway) but I bet you do.
How about a gay black couple. Does the owner of the business get in trouble for refusing the black part but not the homosexual part? Or is it an either/or situation?
No wonder Pence wants clarification.
Being on the wrong side of right side of history just means future generations look at people in the past as smart a righteous people who made wise decisions that improved the lives of future generations and those who stunted progress do to their stubbornness, foolishness and lack of foresight and wisdom.It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
Sounds like an opinion as there is no "wrong side of history". This is very much a fight for civil rights....from our perspective as well.
Religious extremists are fighting a losing battle - therefore, putting them on the wrong side of history. Was the Confederacy not on the wrong side of history?
Yes, repeat yourself. Because if you say "wrong side of history" enough times, it might start to exist.
Being on the wrong side of right side of history just means future generations look at people in the past as smart a righteous people who made wise decisions that improved the lives of future generations and those who stunted progress do to their stubbornness, foolishness and lack of foresight and wisdom.It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
Sounds like an opinion as there is no "wrong side of history". This is very much a fight for civil rights....from our perspective as well.
Religious extremists are fighting a losing battle - therefore, putting them on the wrong side of history. Was the Confederacy not on the wrong side of history?
Yes, repeat yourself. Because if you say "wrong side of history" enough times, it might start to exist.
The "wrong side of history" argument is for the simpletons and brain dead. A lot of shit has happened in history with a lot of the people behind it and cheering that sure as hell didn't end up being on the "right side of history".Being on the wrong side of right side of history just means future generations look at people in the past as smart a righteous people who made wise decisions that improved the lives of future generations and those who stunted progress do to their stubbornness, foolishness and lack of foresight and wisdom.It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
Sounds like an opinion as there is no "wrong side of history". This is very much a fight for civil rights....from our perspective as well.
Religious extremists are fighting a losing battle - therefore, putting them on the wrong side of history. Was the Confederacy not on the wrong side of history?
Yes, repeat yourself. Because if you say "wrong side of history" enough times, it might start to exist.
The "wrong side of history" argument is for the simpletons and brain dead. A lot of shit has happened in history with a lot of the people behind it and cheering that sure as hell didn't end up being on the "right side of history".Being on the wrong side of right side of history just means future generations look at people in the past as smart a righteous people who made wise decisions that improved the lives of future generations and those who stunted progress do to their stubbornness, foolishness and lack of foresight and wisdom.It makes me so happy to see lefties fighting fire with fire and challenging religious extremism. The future does not look bright for religious zealots. They are on the wrong side of history.
Sounds like an opinion as there is no "wrong side of history". This is very much a fight for civil rights....from our perspective as well.
Religious extremists are fighting a losing battle - therefore, putting them on the wrong side of history. Was the Confederacy not on the wrong side of history?
Yes, repeat yourself. Because if you say "wrong side of history" enough times, it might start to exist.
