It is confirmed.........Trump is a retard

NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Are NATO nations violating a rule?
No. The 2 percent standard is just a guideline, not a legally binding requirement. In 2006, even as the United States was increasing military spending because of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, European allies were shrinking their military spending. NATO defense ministers that year adopted a guideline suggesting that each spend the equivalent of 2 percent of its annual economic output on its military — but it was a target, not a rule, and not endorsed by heads of state.

Only in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and intervened militarily in eastern Ukraine, did NATO leaders meeting in Wales agree to the 2 percent standard, and even then they urged members to “move toward” that goal by 2024, still seven years away.

Gary J. Schmitt, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Mr. Trump was putting it in layman’s terms and “doesn’t care whether it’s technically accurate.”

But Mr. Schmitt identified two problems: “One, because it’s not technically correct, it is too easily dismissed by the very folks he wants to put pressure on. Two, and more important, it tends to bury the point that we’re invested in European security for our own strategic reasons.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-spending.html
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.
 
The rest of the world looks at Trump as a child like leader with a tendency towards temper tantrums. The best tactic is to treat him like the Saudis......give him a medal and tell him how great he is
In other words...you are openly admitting that the rest of the world agrees the best course of action is to cater to President Trump. Which means that once again, the U.S. will get everything it wants. Talk about Making America Great Again! You continue to make the best case as to why we are blessed to have Donald Trump as President of the United States.
Doesn't seem that way based on last week. Europe made it clear they are not taking his shit

Who wins in a confused NATO alliance?
U.S.? Europe?

No....Putin wins when NATO is in disarray
Just like he planned
/---- how will Eurotrash FORCE the US to pay their share of NATO?
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Are NATO nations violating a rule?
No. The 2 percent standard is just a guideline, not a legally binding requirement. In 2006, even as the United States was increasing military spending because of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, European allies were shrinking their military spending. NATO defense ministers that year adopted a guideline suggesting that each spend the equivalent of 2 percent of its annual economic output on its military — but it was a target, not a rule, and not endorsed by heads of state.

Only in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and intervened militarily in eastern Ukraine, did NATO leaders meeting in Wales agree to the 2 percent standard, and even then they urged members to “move toward” that goal by 2024, still seven years away.

Gary J. Schmitt, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Mr. Trump was putting it in layman’s terms and “doesn’t care whether it’s technically accurate.”

But Mr. Schmitt identified two problems: “One, because it’s not technically correct, it is too easily dismissed by the very folks he wants to put pressure on. Two, and more important, it tends to bury the point that we’re invested in European security for our own strategic reasons.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-spending.html



A signed treaty or a mutually agreed up on guideline, the fact remains that THEY agreed that 2% was a reasonable MINIMUM for them to spend so that they could shoulder a PORTION of the burden of the defense of their people.


THey have failed to do that. Despite the fact that their people, their nations are vastly closer to any potential enemies.

And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsible behavior.


They are comfortable attacking and defaming the very people that have accepted the responsibility and burden of ensuring THEIR safety and prosperity.


As I said,


THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.
 
The rest of the world looks at Trump as a child like leader with a tendency towards temper tantrums. The best tactic is to treat him like the Saudis......give him a medal and tell him how great he is
In other words...you are openly admitting that the rest of the world agrees the best course of action is to cater to President Trump. Which means that once again, the U.S. will get everything it wants. Talk about Making America Great Again! You continue to make the best case as to why we are blessed to have Donald Trump as President of the United States.
Doesn't seem that way based on last week. Europe made it clear they are not taking his shit

Who wins in a confused NATO alliance?
U.S.? Europe?

No....Putin wins when NATO is in disarray
Just like he planned
/---- how will Eurotrash FORCE the US to pay their share of NATO?

By holding their own lives as hostage, and depending on our being adults to drive us to care for their helpless selves.
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Are NATO nations violating a rule?
No. The 2 percent standard is just a guideline, not a legally binding requirement. In 2006, even as the United States was increasing military spending because of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, European allies were shrinking their military spending. NATO defense ministers that year adopted a guideline suggesting that each spend the equivalent of 2 percent of its annual economic output on its military — but it was a target, not a rule, and not endorsed by heads of state.

Only in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and intervened militarily in eastern Ukraine, did NATO leaders meeting in Wales agree to the 2 percent standard, and even then they urged members to “move toward” that goal by 2024, still seven years away.

Gary J. Schmitt, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Mr. Trump was putting it in layman’s terms and “doesn’t care whether it’s technically accurate.”

But Mr. Schmitt identified two problems: “One, because it’s not technically correct, it is too easily dismissed by the very folks he wants to put pressure on. Two, and more important, it tends to bury the point that we’re invested in European security for our own strategic reasons.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-spending.html



A signed treaty or a mutually agreed up on guideline, the fact remains that THEY agreed that 2% was a reasonable MINIMUM for them to spend so that they could shoulder a PORTION of the burden of the defense of their people.


THey have failed to do that. Despite the fact that their people, their nations are vastly closer to any potential enemies.

And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsible behavior.


They are comfortable attacking and defaming the very people that have accepted the responsibility and burden of ensuring THEIR safety and prosperity.


As I said,


THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Only in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and intervened militarily in eastern Ukraine, did NATO leaders meeting in Wales agree to the 2 percent standard, and even then they urged members to “move toward” that goal by 2024, still seven years away.
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.

The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need dumbed down presentations. The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need "lots of pictures" in a daily briefing. Trump is the epitome of dumb.
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.

The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need dumbed down presentations. The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need "lots of pictures" in a daily briefing. Trump is the epitome of dumb.
/--- And yet Hildabeast couldn't beat someone as dumb as Trump. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
bored.jpg
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Are NATO nations violating a rule?
No. The 2 percent standard is just a guideline, not a legally binding requirement. In 2006, even as the United States was increasing military spending because of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, European allies were shrinking their military spending. NATO defense ministers that year adopted a guideline suggesting that each spend the equivalent of 2 percent of its annual economic output on its military — but it was a target, not a rule, and not endorsed by heads of state.

Only in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and intervened militarily in eastern Ukraine, did NATO leaders meeting in Wales agree to the 2 percent standard, and even then they urged members to “move toward” that goal by 2024, still seven years away.

Gary J. Schmitt, a scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Mr. Trump was putting it in layman’s terms and “doesn’t care whether it’s technically accurate.”

But Mr. Schmitt identified two problems: “One, because it’s not technically correct, it is too easily dismissed by the very folks he wants to put pressure on. Two, and more important, it tends to bury the point that we’re invested in European security for our own strategic reasons.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-spending.html



A signed treaty or a mutually agreed up on guideline, the fact remains that THEY agreed that 2% was a reasonable MINIMUM for them to spend so that they could shoulder a PORTION of the burden of the defense of their people.


THey have failed to do that. Despite the fact that their people, their nations are vastly closer to any potential enemies.

And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsible behavior.


They are comfortable attacking and defaming the very people that have accepted the responsibility and burden of ensuring THEIR safety and prosperity.


As I said,


THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Only in 2014, after Russia annexed Crimea and intervened militarily in eastern Ukraine, did NATO leaders meeting in Wales agree to the 2 percent standard, and even then they urged members to “move toward” that goal by 2024, still seven years away.


Here you are making excuses for the people that don't want to pay for their own defense, and like to ridicule the people that have taken responsibility for protecting their lives and fortunes.


They are the children here.
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.

The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need dumbed down presentations. The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need "lots of pictures" in a daily briefing. Trump is the epitome of dumb.


Shorter is not "dumber".

Nor is an ability to drone on an sign of intelligence.

As is demonstrated on this site, every single day.

Trump is obviously brilliant
 
NATO Frantically Tries to Trump-Proof President’s First Visit

A ‘freaked-out’ NATO braces for Donald Trump’s first meeting of the transatlantic alliance.
<excerpts>
NATO is scrambling to tailor its upcoming meeting to avoid taxing President Donald Trump’s notoriously short attention span. The alliance is telling heads of state to limit talks to two to four minutes at a time during the discussion, several sources inside NATO and former senior U.S. officials tell Foreign Policy. And the alliance scrapped plans to publish the traditional full post-meeting statement meant to crystallize NATO’s latest strategic stance.

“It’s kind of ridiculous how they are preparing to deal with Trump,” said one source briefed extensively on the meeting’s preparations. “It’s like they’re preparing to deal with a child — someone with a short attention span and mood who has no knowledge of NATO, no interest in in-depth policy issues, nothing,” said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They’re freaking out.”

They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.

The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need dumbed down presentations. The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need "lots of pictures" in a daily briefing. Trump is the epitome of dumb.
/---- Here's a picture for you.
mexican-word-of-the-day-nacho-still-nacho-president-fwd-20014914.png
 
They had to child proof NATO for Trump. No, not embarrassing at all...


Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.

The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need dumbed down presentations. The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need "lots of pictures" in a daily briefing. Trump is the epitome of dumb.


Shorter is not "dumber".

Nor is an ability to drone on an sign of intelligence.

As is demonstrated on this site, every single day.

Trump is obviously brilliant

In Trump's case all evidence points to dumb.
 
For one thing, it's clear that Trump is not a devotee of reading, whether it's newspapers, books or memos. Instead, he is most moved by what he sees and hears in a most fundamental sense. When Trump began receiving intelligence briefings in January, his aides asked the briefers to reduce the number of words in their daily briefing book and instead use more pictures and other graphics. Trump, the aides explained, is a "visual and auditory learner," according to the Washington Post. After Trump took office in January, his staff assessed President Barack Obama's contingency plans for Syria and trimmed them into small pieces, illustrated by photos, the Post said, so Trump could get a better grasp on what was going on in his own way and so he could best improve the situation.

Critics are hardly reassured by these tendencies, which strike them as puerile and superficial. But this visual focus should not be surprising given that Trump achieved fame as the host of a reality-television show where appearances and impressions were everything




No wonder he constantly changes his mind....he has the attention span of a goldfish

Donald Trump's Governing Styles Has Critics Up in Arms



.
/---- And here I thought Liberals wanted everyone to pay their FAIR SHARE.
 
Our nato allies refuse to pay even the bare minimum share of their own defense.


And they are angry that Trump called them on their irresponsibility.


While still expecting US to protect them.

THAT is the act of a child.


An ungrateful, spoiled, stupid child.

Also, total non sequitur. Did you read the linked article? Because the U.S. president has less the attention span of a retarded goldfish, they have to dumb down NATO. They practically had to give him a pop up book.


Trump is obviously the opposite of dumb. If he wants information summarized, that is his way of doing things and there is nothing wrong with that.


You are reaching for excused to keep believing what you want to believe.

The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need dumbed down presentations. The "opposite of dumb" wouldn't need "lots of pictures" in a daily briefing. Trump is the epitome of dumb.


Shorter is not "dumber".

Nor is an ability to drone on an sign of intelligence.

As is demonstrated on this site, every single day.

Trump is obviously brilliant

In Trump's case all evidence points to dumb.


He's has succeeded in THREE highly competitive fields.

All evidence points to brilliance.
 
For one thing, it's clear that Trump is not a devotee of reading, whether it's newspapers, books or memos. Instead, he is most moved by what he sees and hears in a most fundamental sense. When Trump began receiving intelligence briefings in January, his aides asked the briefers to reduce the number of words in their daily briefing book and instead use more pictures and other graphics. Trump, the aides explained, is a "visual and auditory learner," according to the Washington Post. After Trump took office in January, his staff assessed President Barack Obama's contingency plans for Syria and trimmed them into small pieces, illustrated by photos, the Post said, so Trump could get a better grasp on what was going on in his own way and so he could best improve the situation.

Critics are hardly reassured by these tendencies, which strike them as puerile and superficial. But this visual focus should not be surprising given that Trump achieved fame as the host of a reality-television show where appearances and impressions were everything




No wonder he constantly changes his mind....he has the attention span of a goldfish

Donald Trump's Governing Styles Has Critics Up in Arms



.
/---- And here I thought Liberals wanted everyone to pay their FAIR SHARE.

That can't be accomplished without publicly embarrassing our strategic partners and diminishing the standing of NATO?
 
For one thing, it's clear that Trump is not a devotee of reading, whether it's newspapers, books or memos. Instead, he is most moved by what he sees and hears in a most fundamental sense. When Trump began receiving intelligence briefings in January, his aides asked the briefers to reduce the number of words in their daily briefing book and instead use more pictures and other graphics. Trump, the aides explained, is a "visual and auditory learner," according to the Washington Post. After Trump took office in January, his staff assessed President Barack Obama's contingency plans for Syria and trimmed them into small pieces, illustrated by photos, the Post said, so Trump could get a better grasp on what was going on in his own way and so he could best improve the situation.

Critics are hardly reassured by these tendencies, which strike them as puerile and superficial. But this visual focus should not be surprising given that Trump achieved fame as the host of a reality-television show where appearances and impressions were everything




No wonder he constantly changes his mind....he has the attention span of a goldfish

Donald Trump's Governing Styles Has Critics Up in Arms



.
/---- And here I thought Liberals wanted everyone to pay their FAIR SHARE.

That can't be accomplished without publicly embarrassing our strategic partners and diminishing the standing of NATO?



The fact that our allies are DETERMINED to not pay for their own defense is what has diminished NATO.
 
For one thing, it's clear that Trump is not a devotee of reading, whether it's newspapers, books or memos. Instead, he is most moved by what he sees and hears in a most fundamental sense. When Trump began receiving intelligence briefings in January, his aides asked the briefers to reduce the number of words in their daily briefing book and instead use more pictures and other graphics. Trump, the aides explained, is a "visual and auditory learner," according to the Washington Post. After Trump took office in January, his staff assessed President Barack Obama's contingency plans for Syria and trimmed them into small pieces, illustrated by photos, the Post said, so Trump could get a better grasp on what was going on in his own way and so he could best improve the situation.

Critics are hardly reassured by these tendencies, which strike them as puerile and superficial. But this visual focus should not be surprising given that Trump achieved fame as the host of a reality-television show where appearances and impressions were everything




No wonder he constantly changes his mind....he has the attention span of a goldfish

Donald Trump's Governing Styles Has Critics Up in Arms



.
/---- And here I thought Liberals wanted everyone to pay their FAIR SHARE.

That can't be accomplished without publicly embarrassing our strategic partners and diminishing the standing of NATO?



The fact that our allies are DETERMINED to not pay for their own defense is what has diminished NATO.

Not really what I was looking for.
Answer my question.
 

Forum List

Back
Top