You gave your opinion. Your opinion is only seconded by your fellow right-wingers.
If your opinion accurately describes the situation, why have you not backed it up by posting articles from the world press in which they discuss the president "submitting" to the Saudi king and the resulting negative impact on the U.S.'s position in the world?
I tried to help you out. I Googled "Obama submits to Saudi king."
Sorry. Only a bunch of forums there.
I did see that y'all missed one:
Frank Gaffney the director of the conservative think tank the Center for Security Policy was on MSNBCs Hardball today where he accused President Barack Obama of speaking in code, and telling the Middle East that America will submit to them. Gaffney says using the word respect is code in the Muslim word for submission.
I don't care how many people share my opinion or your opinion, but rather about the facts surrounding the incident. Majority opinion does not change the facts.
I gave you specific examples in context of the situation to describe why it was submission and not respect.
Now you tell me, are all the G20 leaders except Obama disrespectful and arrogant because they did not bow to King Abdullah?
Why did King Abdullah not bow back?
Why did Obama not bow to Queen Elizabeth II?
If it is a gesture of common respect, then Obama must bow to the Queen and the Saudi King along with every other G20 leader.
Likewise, Abdullah should have returned the bow in respect, otherwise Obama is submitting to him.
The CNN reporter attached no importance to it. As he admitted, he asked only because people are talking about it.
Now, what "people" have been talking about it?! U.S. right-wing crackpots and people talking about right-wing crackpots talking about it.
...LOTHIAN: When the President met with King Abdullah, there was something that took place which I believe the White House explained was just the president being taller than the king. We took a look at the video, and it does appear that the president actually bowed to King Abdullah. Did he bow or didn't he?
GIBBS: No, I think he bent over with both, to shake -- with both hands to shake his hand, so I don't--
LOTHIAN: -- one hand --
GIBBS: Well I... [laughter]
LOTHIAN: Did he bow or didn't he?
GIBBS: No. But I think this meeting was like a week ago, right?
LOTHIAN: That's right but this is something a lot of people are talking about today.
GIBBS: I can only imagine it is of great cause and concern for many people struggling with the economy....
But the reporter himself said it appeared to be a bow.
He is acknowledging the truth of the outrage.
Furthermore, he pressed Gibbs and forced a lie out of him.
If it was not important why bother asking about it?
Read the transcript for yourself instead of taking the Huffington Post's word for it.