IT’S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Allred's Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED

[Pop23]

So the women who supposedy worked in the restaurant didn't know how to spell the name?

Who said the person who wrote that, worked there?

Who wrote it, if not the owner of the year book?

LOL

Why are you asking me? How the fuck would I know?

That's the problem, isn't it? Anyone but Moore or the owner writing it doesn't make any sense, does it? However, it also doesn't make sense for them to have written it.

LOL

You’re grasping at straws. The salient part of that book is the creepy message preceding that.

No, the creepy part is that someone would write that book as one that is non-fiction when in actuality it may be complete fiction.

 

[Pop23]

Did I read where Moore insisted he got permission from Moms to molest, um, date daughters?

I doubt you actually can read. Books on tape perhaps?

You so silly. How long have you been such a fool?

Writing "you so silly", just proved my point.

 

[boedicca]

That's the motivation isn't it? The gamble?

Does not matter what the truth is to you or the progs, just need to make it a HUGE GAMBLE.

Proves you don't give a crap about this country.

Progs?
How is this on Progs?

The entire Republican leadership is calling for him to step down.

You are sorely mistaken if you think that the Establishment GOP is not a faction of Big Government Progressivism. They're just the Big Government Lite version.

Regardless, it's still his party.

Oh yeah. Just like the Dems were Bernie's party....oh wait.

LOL

They weren't his party at all. Sanders is an Independant and a self described democratic socialist, dope.

Oh, silly wabbit. That is just a big fake sham. If Bernie isn't a closet Dem, then how on earth was he able to run in the Dem primary against hiLIARy?

 

[Pop23]

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?

Not as a thirty plus year old man while planning on molesting her, dope.

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.

Yet, that was not the question. If the allegations are proven wrong, then calling a young women lovely or beautiful is not, in and of itself creepy.

You want to reverse engineer this whole thing, that is not only retarded, but creepy.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This is about Moore, remember?

Starskey changed the subject to honor.

Yes, regarding Moore, dope.

That's what brought your understanding of the concept of honor into question.

I explained my meaning in my post, dope.
Try commenting on that rather than attacking me.

Is it honorable that Moore, by staying in the race, is forcing congressional Republicans to put themselves in a bind by having to comment on this repeatedly?

He's not the one who's forcing it, dumbass.

He is you obtuse fool. As long as he stays in, this doesn't go away. If he wins, the Senate will have to dump him to save their own asses. That is months more of this. They certainly don't want this going into the midterms.

 

[DrLove]

Then why the deflection. The question was, and still is:

Have you ever called an underage female Lovely and/or beautiful?

And leave my manhood out of this, to you a real man is one that wants to have sex with other men.

so there's that.

One thing to admire the beauty of a 14, 15 or 16 year old ...

Entirely another thing to diddle or attempt to rape one in a dark parking lot behind a dumpster.

If you don't get that - seek help immediately

 

[ClosedCaption]

Case closed. Allred and this attention seeker should be sued into oblivion.


The comments are great!
IT'S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser's Yearbook Was FORGED

Case closed again? I thought this was over because the mom didnt remember which room the phone was in LOL. Its really over now I bet

 

[Camp]

Did I read where Moore insisted he got permission from Moms to molest, um, date daughters?

I doubt you actually can read. Books on tape perhaps?

You so silly. How long have you been such a fool?

Writing "you so silly", just proved my point.

Your point being that a person posting on a message board where reading and writing is required does not know how to read?
You so silly.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Progs?
How is this on Progs?

The entire Republican leadership is calling for him to step down.

You are sorely mistaken if you think that the Establishment GOP is not a faction of Big Government Progressivism. They're just the Big Government Lite version.

Regardless, it's still his party.

Oh yeah. Just like the Dems were Bernie's party....oh wait.

LOL

They weren't his party at all. Sanders is an Independant and a self described democratic socialist, dope.

Oh, silly wabbit. That is just a big fake sham. If Bernie isn't a closet Dem, then how on earth was he able to run in the Dem primary against hiLIARy?

You don't know? It must suck to not understand the world around you.
When you figure that out, you'll be the better for it.

Why Bernie Sanders had to run as a Democrat

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?

Not as a thirty plus year old man while planning on molesting her, dope.

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.

Yet, that was not the question. If the allegations are proven wrong, then calling a young women lovely or beautiful is not, in and of itself creepy.

You want to reverse engineer this whole thing, that is not only retarded, but creepy.

I've explained it at least twice, dope.
It is you who is "reverse engineering" this by changing the context.

You all are exceptionally troll-y on this subject and in general lately. The pressure is mounting.

 

[bripat9643]

Then why the deflection. The question was, and still is:

Have you ever called an underage female Lovely and/or beautiful?

And leave my manhood out of this, to you a real man is one that wants to have sex with other men.

so there's that.

One thing to admire the beauty of a 14, 15 or 16 year old ...

Entirely another thing to diddle or attempt to rape one in a dark parking lot behind a dumpster.

If you don't get that - seek help immediately

We don't assume he's guilty like you do, asshole.

 

[jc456]

Alabama Perv is done. The molester or young girls will fail to be a Senator. Republican Senate doesn't want him and America doesn't want him.
Alabama seems to be a shameless place.

And they get the vote! Not you. So accept your loss!

 

[jc456]

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?

Not as a thirty plus year old man while planning on molesting her, dope.

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.

Yet, that was not the question. If the allegations are proven wrong, then calling a young women lovely or beautiful is not, in and of itself creepy.

You want to reverse engineer this whole thing, that is not only retarded, but creepy.

I've explained it at least twice, dope.
It is you who is "reverse engineering" this by changing the context.

You all are exceptionally troll-y on this subject and in general lately. The pressure is mounting.

Not at all! And only in your dreams!

 

[Pop23]

Then why the deflection. The question was, and still is:

Have you ever called an underage female Lovely and/or beautiful?

And leave my manhood out of this, to you a real man is one that wants to have sex with other men.

so there's that.

One thing to admire the beauty of a 14, 15 or 16 year old ...

Entirely another thing to diddle or attempt to rape one in a dark parking lot behind a dumpster.

If you don't get that - seek help immediately

The only established fact is that there is no established facts, simply allegations.

A poster earlier said that the creepy part of the year book was him calling her beautiful or lovely.

Unless you reverse engineer this, the question becomes, what is creepy about calling a young girl lovely or beautiful?

If help is required, I suggest some mirror time for you might be appropriate.

 

[Pop23]

Not as a thirty plus year old man while planning on molesting her, dope.

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.

Yet, that was not the question. If the allegations are proven wrong, then calling a young women lovely or beautiful is not, in and of itself creepy.

You want to reverse engineer this whole thing, that is not only retarded, but creepy.

I've explained it at least twice, dope.
It is you who is "reverse engineering" this by changing the context.

You all are exceptionally troll-y on this subject and in general lately. The pressure is mounting.

Not at all! And only in your dreams!

He obviously is a political dupe or doesn’t understand reverse engineering.

 

[Pop23]

Did I read where Moore insisted he got permission from Moms to molest, um, date daughters?

I doubt you actually can read. Books on tape perhaps?

You so silly. How long have you been such a fool?

Writing "you so silly", just proved my point.

Your point being that a person posting on a message board where reading and writing is required does not know how to read?
You so silly.

There are many apps that will read for you as well as type what you speak.

If I were you I’d get a better one.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.

Yet, that was not the question. If the allegations are proven wrong, then calling a young women lovely or beautiful is not, in and of itself creepy.

You want to reverse engineer this whole thing, that is not only retarded, but creepy.

I've explained it at least twice, dope.
It is you who is "reverse engineering" this by changing the context.

You all are exceptionally troll-y on this subject and in general lately. The pressure is mounting.

Not at all! And only in your dreams!

He obviously is a political dupe or doesn’t understand reverse engineering.

The only established fact is that there is no established facts, simply allegations.

Yes there are indeed allegations.

Unless you reverse engineer this, the question becomes, what is creepy about calling a young girl lovely or beautiful?

No, taken at face value and within the context of the allegations, it is creepy AF.

He obviously is a political dupe or doesn’t understand reverse engineering.

How ironic.

 

[Camp]

Alabama Perv is done. The molester or young girls will fail to be a Senator. Republican Senate doesn't want him and America doesn't want him.
Alabama seems to be a shameless place.

And they get the vote! Not you. So accept your loss!

US Senate is suggesting the Alabama vote will not be accepted. If they vote shamelessly to install Moore the Senate will reject the shameless vote.

 

[jc456]

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.

Yet, that was not the question. If the allegations are proven wrong, then calling a young women lovely or beautiful is not, in and of itself creepy.

You want to reverse engineer this whole thing, that is not only retarded, but creepy.

I've explained it at least twice, dope.
It is you who is "reverse engineering" this by changing the context.

You all are exceptionally troll-y on this subject and in general lately. The pressure is mounting.

Not at all! And only in your dreams!

He obviously is a political dupe or doesn’t understand reverse engineering.

The only established fact is that there is no established facts, simply allegations.

Yes there are indeed allegations.

Unless you reverse engineer this, the question becomes, what is creepy about calling a young girl lovely or beautiful?

No, taken at face value and within the context of the allegations, it is creepy AF.

He obviously is a political dupe or doesn’t understand reverse engineering.

How ironic.

And fake allegations at that! ROY isn’t going anywhere without valid evidence. If he steps down it would only give credence to a fake story. He ain’t that stupid like you!

 

[jc456]

Alabama Perv is done. The molester or young girls will fail to be a Senator. Republican Senate doesn't want him and America doesn't want him.
Alabama seems to be a shameless place.

And they get the vote! Not you. So accept your loss!

US Senate is suggesting the Alabama vote will not be accepted. If they vote shamelessly to install Moore the Senate will reject the shameless vote.

Yeah we’ll see eh! The GOP doesn’t have the support to do that!