IT’S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Allred's Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED

Why would someone put a date and location in a year book?

To help remember when and where it was written.

So the women who supposedy worked in the restaurant didn't know how to spell the name?
Who said the person who wrote that, worked there?
Who wrote it, if not the owner of the year book?
LOL

Why are you asking me? How the fuck would I know?

That's the problem, isn't it? Anyone but Moore or the owner writing it doesn't make any sense, does it? However, it also doesn't make sense for them to have written it.
 
If Moore had any honor, he would drop out for the sake of the party and the Republicans in Congress who are forced to speak on this subject.

What would you know about honor?
This is about Moore, remember?
Starskey changed the subject to honor.

Yes, regarding Moore, dope.

That's what brought your understanding of the concept of honor into question.

I explained my meaning in my post, dope.
Try commenting on that rather than attacking me.

Is it honorable that Moore, by staying in the race, is forcing congressional Republicans to put themselves in a bind by having to comment on this repeatedly?
 
That she’s a lovely girl? That’s creepy?

Within the context of her allegations? Absolutely.

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?
I never said that to one I didn’t know. I certainly wouldn’t say I love them. That’s fucking creepy for a 30 year old to say that to a 15 year old that’s not a family member or at least the daughter of a close family friend.
He just said "love," which many people do.
 
Creepy predators are creeeeepy... and so are their political agendas!

keep making make excuses for the inexcusable. it's the GOP way! :eusa_clap:

If Republicans let this clown slide ..

And THIS one:

The judicial nominee who’s never tried a case is also married to a Trump administration lawyer

They will be the final death blows to the "Party of Lincoln".

A former prosecutor who worked alongside Moore in the early 1980s told CNN it was known at the time that Moore dated high school girls.

“It was common knowledge that Roy dated high school girls, everyone we knew thought it was weird,” former deputy district attorney Teresa Jones told CNN in comments aired Saturday. “We wondered why someone his age would hang out at high school football games and the mall … but you really wouldn’t say anything to someone like that.”

Sources tell me Moore was actually banned from the Gadsden Mall and the YMCA for his inappropriate behavior of soliciting sex from young girls. If Moore keeps lying, that story will soon come out in a big way too.​

Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows, but Jesus. Not this.
 
That she’s a lovely girl? That’s creepy?

Within the context of her allegations? Absolutely.

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful? If so, then you are a creep?
And put her hand on a dick? Grabbed her neck and forced her face to the crotch?

You are completely immoral and without honor and manhood.

Then why the deflection. The question was, and still is:

Have you ever called an underage female Lovely and/or beautiful?

And leave my manhood out of this, to you a real man is one that wants to have sex with other men.

so there's that.
 
That she’s a lovely girl? That’s creepy?

Within the context of her allegations? Absolutely.

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?

Not as a thirty plus year old man while planning on molesting her, dope.

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.
 
There will be no coming back from this. The defense of a child molester is fatal for all who engage in it.

Alledged.

There were those that said that anyone who defended those involved in the McMartin preschool molestation case were themselves molestors. It ended up the people saying the charges were BS were correct.

More recently those defending the Duke lacrosse players accused of gang rape were called women haters. Those defending the players again were right.

Alleged or confirmed, it looks bad either way. Not to mention that it's a huge gamble to back Moore when the outcome is unknown.
More details are coming out from some very credible people.

That's the motivation isn't it? The gamble?

Does not matter what the truth is to you or the progs, just need to make it a HUGE GAMBLE.

Proves you don't give a crap about this country.

Progs?
How is this on Progs?

The entire Republican leadership is calling for him to step down.


You are sorely mistaken if you think that the Establishment GOP is not a faction of Big Government Progressivism. They're just the Big Government Lite version.

Regardless, it's still his party.
 
Within the context of her allegations? Absolutely.

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful? If so, then you are a creep?
And put her hand on a dick? Grabbed her neck and forced her face to the crotch?

You are completely immoral and without honor and manhood.

Then why the deflection. The question was, and still is:

Have you ever called an underage female Lovely and/or beautiful?

And leave my manhood out of this, to you a real man is one that wants to have sex with other men.

so there's that.
People like you who do not recognize a compliment or positive critique from sexual lust are dangers in our society
 
Alledged.

There were those that said that anyone who defended those involved in the McMartin preschool molestation case were themselves molestors. It ended up the people saying the charges were BS were correct.

More recently those defending the Duke lacrosse players accused of gang rape were called women haters. Those defending the players again were right.

Alleged or confirmed, it looks bad either way. Not to mention that it's a huge gamble to back Moore when the outcome is unknown.
More details are coming out from some very credible people.

That's the motivation isn't it? The gamble?

Does not matter what the truth is to you or the progs, just need to make it a HUGE GAMBLE.

Proves you don't give a crap about this country.

Progs?
How is this on Progs?

The entire Republican leadership is calling for him to step down.


You are sorely mistaken if you think that the Establishment GOP is not a faction of Big Government Progressivism. They're just the Big Government Lite version.

Regardless, it's still his party.


Oh yeah. Just like the Dems were Bernie's party....oh wait.

LOL
 
To help remember when and where it was written.

So the women who supposedy worked in the restaurant didn't know how to spell the name?
Who said the person who wrote that, worked there?
Who wrote it, if not the owner of the year book?
LOL

Why are you asking me? How the fuck would I know?

That's the problem, isn't it? Anyone but Moore or the owner writing it doesn't make any sense, does it? However, it also doesn't make sense for them to have written it.
LOL

You’re grasping at straws. The salient part of that book is the creepy message preceding that.
 
What would you know about honor?
This is about Moore, remember?
Starskey changed the subject to honor.

Yes, regarding Moore, dope.

That's what brought your understanding of the concept of honor into question.

I explained my meaning in my post, dope.
Try commenting on that rather than attacking me.

Is it honorable that Moore, by staying in the race, is forcing congressional Republicans to put themselves in a bind by having to comment on this repeatedly?
He's not the one who's forcing it, dumbass.
 
Within the context of her allegations? Absolutely.

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?
I never said that to one I didn’t know. I certainly wouldn’t say I love them. That’s fucking creepy for a 30 year old to say that to a 15 year old that’s not a family member or at least the daughter of a close family friend.
He just said "love," which many people do.
Not 30 year old men to 15 year old girls they claim to not know.
 
So the women who supposedy worked in the restaurant didn't know how to spell the name?
Who said the person who wrote that, worked there?
Who wrote it, if not the owner of the year book?
LOL

Why are you asking me? How the fuck would I know?

That's the problem, isn't it? Anyone but Moore or the owner writing it doesn't make any sense, does it? However, it also doesn't make sense for them to have written it.
LOL

You’re grasping at straws. The salient part of that book is the creepy message preceding that.

The part that follows draws the author of the messasge into question.
 
Who said the person who wrote that, worked there?
Who wrote it, if not the owner of the year book?
LOL

Why are you asking me? How the fuck would I know?

That's the problem, isn't it? Anyone but Moore or the owner writing it doesn't make any sense, does it? However, it also doesn't make sense for them to have written it.
LOL

You’re grasping at straws. The salient part of that book is the creepy message preceding that.

The part that follows draws the author of the messasge into question.
Only to you sycophants who are desperately searching for something to cling to.
 
Within the context of her allegations? Absolutely.

So you already convicted. In context it is only creepy when proven guilty.

I doubt you would ever be considered for a judicial appointment and likely not allowed in the Jury box.

So there's that.

I've convicted no one, dope. I'm only commenting on the evidence and your attempts to discredit it.

So you've never called an underage female lovely or beautiful?

If so, then you are a creep?

Not as a thirty plus year old man while planning on molesting her, dope.

The molestation is unproven. So, all we have at this point is that he called a young women lovely and beautiful. Have you not done the same?

Is that too tough a question. If so, then just keep up the deflections.

The molestation allegations is the context in which this discussion is taking place. We would not be discussing a yearbook note without the allegations.

As I have never conducted myself in that way, I can say I have never referred a teenaged girl in that way in such a context.

Your question is retarded.
 
Alleged or confirmed, it looks bad either way. Not to mention that it's a huge gamble to back Moore when the outcome is unknown.
More details are coming out from some very credible people.

That's the motivation isn't it? The gamble?

Does not matter what the truth is to you or the progs, just need to make it a HUGE GAMBLE.

Proves you don't give a crap about this country.

Progs?
How is this on Progs?

The entire Republican leadership is calling for him to step down.


You are sorely mistaken if you think that the Establishment GOP is not a faction of Big Government Progressivism. They're just the Big Government Lite version.

Regardless, it's still his party.


Oh yeah. Just like the Dems were Bernie's party....oh wait.

LOL

They weren't his party at all. Sanders is an Independant and a self described democratic socialist, dope.
 

Forum List

Back
Top