Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's up to the Republicans when they start the investigationShe has already said she will turn it over to Senate investigators
When, after the election?
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
His name was on the motion to dismiss, dumbass. Apparently you believe no one has ever been divorced.
It's up to the Republicans when they start the investigationShe has already said she will turn it over to Senate investigators
When, after the election?
Congress can't investigate him until he's elected, dumbass. Why don't you just admit she is never going to turn over the yearbook? That's more evidence that this whole thing is just one big smear job.
It's up to the Republicans when they start the investigationShe has already said she will turn it over to Senate investigators
When, after the election?
Congress can't investigate him until he's elected, dumbass. Why don't you just admit she is never going to turn over the yearbook? That's more evidence that this whole thing is just one big smear job.
Of course she will
She promised
Just as soon as the IRS has completed their audit
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
There are hundreds of official court documents with Moore's signature on them you IDIOT!!!!!!!Let's be honest hereWell....if you put it that wayAnd you know that's really his signature? To the best of my knowledge, it's not been verified, and probably won't be until it loses its value.
How do we know that Roy Moore is really Roy Moore and not some imposter?
You never know for sure
A signature can be verified, if those in possession are willing to put it to the test.
How do we know that is the REAL Roy Moore?
Whoever this guy is, does anyone believe someone can be that clueless?
The real Roy Moore must be locked away somewhere
I will not believe it until I see his fingerprints
A signature can be verified, if the person in possession wants to put it to the test.
And if the person whose signature it allegedly is is willing to submit items with his own signature. I'll let you in on a little secret: Roy Moore is full of shit and will never ever do this.
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
The worst part about the Dirty Democratic Party's smear campaigns is that the Press helps them.
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
Wow, another stupid YouTube video full of lies. First off, Moore did not preside over her divorce, all he did was dismiss the petition for divorce, more than a year later a different judge presided over her divorce, a divorce that she herself asked for. I will take it as a win that all you have is YouTube videos, desperate much?
The worst part about the Dirty Democratic Party's smear campaigns is that the Press helps them.
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
Wow, another stupid YouTube video full of lies. First off, Moore did not preside over her divorce, all he did was dismiss the petition for divorce, more than a year later a different judge presided over her divorce, a divorce that she herself asked for. I will take it as a win that all you have is YouTube videos, desperate much?
REVENGE? ROY MOORE RULED AGAINST 1999 DIVORCE HEARING OF ACCUSER BEVERLY YOUNG NELSON
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
Wow, another stupid YouTube video full of lies. First off, Moore did not preside over her divorce, all he did was dismiss the petition for divorce, more than a year later a different judge presided over her divorce, a divorce that she herself asked for. I will take it as a win that all you have is YouTube videos, desperate much?
REVENGE? ROY MOORE RULED AGAINST 1999 DIVORCE HEARING OF ACCUSER BEVERLY YOUNG NELSON
Desperate much? First a video of a Moore's lawyer lying through his teeth. As a lawyer he knows very well that just because a judge was assigned does not mean the person in question ever had contact with said judge. I never once met the judge that signed my divorce papers.
Then you put up this lying POS article from 70news (what the hell ever that is) that is totally full of crap. Moore did not rule against her, the petition for divorce was dismissed because Nelson and her then husband asked for it to be as they were trying to work things out.
This is getting more pathetic with each post from you.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
Wow, another stupid YouTube video full of lies. First off, Moore did not preside over her divorce, all he did was dismiss the petition for divorce, more than a year later a different judge presided over her divorce, a divorce that she herself asked for. I will take it as a win that all you have is YouTube videos, desperate much?
REVENGE? ROY MOORE RULED AGAINST 1999 DIVORCE HEARING OF ACCUSER BEVERLY YOUNG NELSON
Desperate much? First a video of a Moore's lawyer lying through his teeth. As a lawyer he knows very well that just because a judge was assigned does not mean the person in question ever had contact with said judge. I never once met the judge that signed my divorce papers.
Then you put up this lying POS article from 70news (what the hell ever that is) that is totally full of crap. Moore did not rule against her, the petition for divorce was dismissed because Nelson and her then husband asked for it to be as they were trying to work things out.
This is getting more pathetic with each post from you.
If she was requesting for a divorce and if it was denied what she has requested for. He ruled against her. Which means that there was not enough grounds for a divorce. And so if she still wanted to pursued the divorce, that she will not be getting anything from her spouse, but the spouse will be getting all of their asset that they has acquired over the years. But if both of them wanted the divorce, because of Irreconcilable Differences, then it can be granted. But the judge will decide on who can get what. But marriage is treated as a contract. But whomever walks away from that contract, can be sued by the other party. She probably was asking for more than what she'll be granted. Every states has their own rules. Like in Oklahoma. They doesn't grant anyone alimony, unless children were involved. And so, any of you that wants to get married. Get married in Oklahoma. But stay away from New York. Because after twenty years of paying alimony, that the receiving spouse can refile for another ten or twenty more years for hardship. That is why Robin Givens married Mike Tyson in the state of New York.
Divorce: Grounds For Divorce You Can Or Should Use
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
His name was on the motion to dismiss, dumbass. Apparently you believe no one has ever been divorced.
But you just said they were on her divorce papers. Those of us that have been divorced know those two things are not the same. It is very likely she never saw the signed motion to dismiss.
It's up to the Republicans when they start the investigationShe has already said she will turn it over to Senate investigators
When, after the election?
Congress can't investigate him until he's elected, dumbass. Why don't you just admit she is never going to turn over the yearbook? That's more evidence that this whole thing is just one big smear job.
Of course she will
She promised
Just as soon as the IRS has completed their audit
I believe that he can write. You guys act as if the only thing he ever written was in that yearbook. Remember, he has handled her divorce case years later, and which his assistant had stamped his signature on her divorce papers, and the assistance had put her initials DA after his stamped signature. And the stamper did not fully printed the entirety of his signature. So when she photo copied his stamped signature, that she had practiced tracing over it until she was able to duplicate it on her own. But ask any artist, that it is hard to make an exact copy. Because everyone perceives things differently. Whomever made the forgery, in there mind, that it looks like an exact duplicate at the time, until someone has pointed out the flaws. But they had examined recent signatures of his, to compared them with the forgery.
He did not handle her divorce case, all he did was dismiss the divorce action. His name was not on her divorce papers. This is just a lie that the folks at Gateway Pundit and Breitbart are spreading because they know folks like you will not look into it
His name was on the motion to dismiss, dumbass. Apparently you believe no one has ever been divorced.
But you just said they were on her divorce papers. Those of us that have been divorced know those two things are not the same. It is very likely she never saw the signed motion to dismiss.
You're splitting hairs because you don't have an argument.
Wow, another stupid YouTube video full of lies. First off, Moore did not preside over her divorce, all he did was dismiss the petition for divorce, more than a year later a different judge presided over her divorce, a divorce that she herself asked for. I will take it as a win that all you have is YouTube videos, desperate much?
REVENGE? ROY MOORE RULED AGAINST 1999 DIVORCE HEARING OF ACCUSER BEVERLY YOUNG NELSON
Desperate much? First a video of a Moore's lawyer lying through his teeth. As a lawyer he knows very well that just because a judge was assigned does not mean the person in question ever had contact with said judge. I never once met the judge that signed my divorce papers.
Then you put up this lying POS article from 70news (what the hell ever that is) that is totally full of crap. Moore did not rule against her, the petition for divorce was dismissed because Nelson and her then husband asked for it to be as they were trying to work things out.
This is getting more pathetic with each post from you.
If she was requesting for a divorce and if it was denied what she has requested for. He ruled against her. Which means that there was not enough grounds for a divorce. And so if she still wanted to pursued the divorce, that she will not be getting anything from her spouse, but the spouse will be getting all of their asset that they has acquired over the years. But if both of them wanted the divorce, because of Irreconcilable Differences, then it can be granted. But the judge will decide on who can get what. But marriage is treated as a contract. But whomever walks away from that contract, can be sued by the other party. She probably was asking for more than what she'll be granted. Every states has their own rules. Like in Oklahoma. They doesn't grant anyone alimony, unless children were involved. And so, any of you that wants to get married. Get married in Oklahoma. But stay away from New York. Because after twenty years of paying alimony, that the receiving spouse can refile for another ten or twenty more years for hardship. That is why Robin Givens married Mike Tyson in the state of New York.
Divorce: Grounds For Divorce You Can Or Should Use
It was not denied, it was withdrawn by her, so he actually ruled for her. It was withdrawn because her and her husband at the time decided to try and work things out. WHNT News 19 reviewed the documents and confirmed there was no hearing, just the judge signing something because it was his turn to do so.
In fact, the initial petition for divorce was assigned to and signed by Judge W. D. Russell, not Moore. All Moore did was sign the paperwork dismissing the petition, at the request of the petitioner.
