Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report, as it was his job to determine if there was a crime committed, he says there were no crimes found, therefore there are no basis for an indictment either.
By LAW Mueller was supposed to provide either a Prosecution charge or a Declination charge for the final report to AG. He posted NONE, thus the case is closed.
Your link is stupid because the word MAY have obstructed was never shown to have been carried out and yesterday Mueller answered the question if he was obstructed during the investigation, he says NO. From VOX,
"Mueller made this assertion in response to questioning from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. Collins, in a series of rapid-fire questions, asked the special counsel whether
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report,
Stop right there.
Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.
You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.
Here from Merriam-Webster:
Exonerate
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.
You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.
Stop right there.
Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.
You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.
Here from Merriam-Webster:
Exonerate
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.
You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.
Except that isn't what Mueller said when he corrected his earlier testimony. In fact, he said the opposite of what you claim:
“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump
Even more importantly, "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."LOL. You must ignore Mueller's correction of his testimony just hours later:
“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump
He's simply reiterating that they would not reach a determination of criminality. By testifying that but for the OLC guidelines, "they would have brought charges", would be making a determination of criminality.
Not making a determination does not mean there is no evidence or that there was no criminality but that they will not make a determination either way.
Mueller said this at the beginning of his report, in his opening statements and numerous times yesterday.
You should understand this by now. Pay attention.
Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?
Now watch this mentally ill boy evade with another vague deflection, ignoring the reality that Robert Mueller III NEVER posted any crime charges at all.
WTF....seriously.
You just responded to "they wouldn't make a determination either way" with....
"Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?"
That is just dumb, dude. He didn't
Mueller stated in the beginning of his report that they would not be making that determination, dope.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Then you admit he NEVER posted any charge of a CRIME anywhere in the 448 page report. Since he was tasked to find one from day one and report it to the AG of any. Since his FINAL report has ZERO charges of any crime at all in it, there is nothing left to run on.
Thank you.
OMG.....I've never said Mueller charged trump with a crime, dope
Stop right there.
Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.
You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.
Here from Merriam-Webster:
Exonerate
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.
You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.
Except that isn't what Mueller said when he corrected his earlier testimony. In fact, he said the opposite of what you claim:
“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump
yes, I do remember her denying and then admitting she reported to the Crown Prosecutor of Russia, who btw, was the person noted in the Don Jr emails, that had the dirt on Hillary to give junior for the Russian Govt's support for Trump's run for president.FYI-she was here as the lawyer for some Russian Corporation being tried for money laundering or fraud.... the Southern District might have been the prosecutors that charged the Russian firm if memory serves....Veselnitskaya didn't have what she promised. The questions that should be asked are how did she get into the country for that meeting?
When Don jr got the email for the Russian meeting set up with Veselnitskaya from his promoter friend, junior tried to move up the meeting earlier, and that promoter guy (can't remember his name) answered back to him via this email chain, that she could not meet earlier, she had to be in a Court hearing for her clients....
Veselnitskaya has given conflicting statements however. At one time she said she had no direct connection with the Russian government and at another time said she was an informant for the Russian government. The most curious thing is that she met with Glenn Simpson, co founder of Fusion GPS at that court hearing just before her meeting with Don Jr. et al, and then again just after that meeting. That happened in June 2016, the same month that Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele to dig up dirt on Trump. Fusion GPS is the firm Hillary and the DNC hired to get dirt on Trump. (That Mueller said he didn't know what Fusion GPS is really REALLY puts his and his team's credibility into question.)
Russian Lawyer Admits to Being 'Informant,' Met with Fusion GPS Co-Founder Before, After Trump Jr.
I would absolutely have the Hysterical House Dems pursue impeachment but President Trump would have been within his authority to have Mueller replaced and doing so would not have stopped, slowed, or impeded the witch-hunt.Ok, let's put this to a test. It came out yesterday that trump tried to end Mueller's investigation but failed because no one would do it for him and he couldn't do it himself. It also came out yesterday that just attempting to impede an investigation, even if not successful, is still obstruction of justice.Likewise, trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any supporters.Obama has the fortune of being sandwiched by 2 of the worst presidents in history.Like how 'history' has judged BONOBO? HAAA HAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
BONOBO's 'legacy' would fit in a woman's shoe box.
BONOBO's 'library' is going to be in a portable behind some post office in the middle of nowhere.
Bush Jr who took us into an illegitimate war based on lies and used our tax $$$ to bail out rich CEO's and wall street. Folks who are now richer than even and getting richer by the moment. Wonder when they'll 'need' another bailout?
And Trump, who can barely read and has no idea how government functions, even after 2 1/2 years.
Obama will be remembered as brilliant, lmao!
There is nothing to say to you never-Trumpers. Trump could cure cancer and you would likely be pissed due to population growth, further contributing to your global warming theory. The real proof is in the pudding, which can't be denied by sane people.
Obama was a foreign policy moron. History has already shown this.
For some yes, but for me, if he had colluded with Russia, I would be the first one to say he should be impeached. The diffference is that by all reasonable accounts, he was shown to be innnocent but the never-Trumpers can't stop. Their hate for Trump, the man, blinds rational thought.
So given those two components, why are you not calling for for trump's impeachment.
Even more importantly, "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."He's simply reiterating that they would not reach a determination of criminality. By testifying that but for the OLC guidelines, "they would have brought charges", would be making a determination of criminality.
Not making a determination does not mean there is no evidence or that there was no criminality but that they will not make a determination either way.
Mueller said this at the beginning of his report, in his opening statements and numerous times yesterday.
You should understand this by now. Pay attention.
Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?
Now watch this mentally ill boy evade with another vague deflection, ignoring the reality that Robert Mueller III NEVER posted any crime charges at all.
WTF....seriously.
You just responded to "they wouldn't make a determination either way" with....
"Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?"
That is just dumb, dude. He didn't
Mueller stated in the beginning of his report that they would not be making that determination, dope.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Then you admit he NEVER posted any charge of a CRIME anywhere in the 448 page report. Since he was tasked to find one from day one and report it to the AG of any. Since his FINAL report has ZERO charges of any crime at all in it, there is nothing left to run on.
Thank you.
OMG.....I've never said Mueller charged trump with a crime, dope
We do not prosecute nor should congress persecute anyone that a 2 yr, $35 million SC witch hunt finds to have not committed a crime - even the POTUS - no matter how much you hate him.
Case closed.
Stop right there.
Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.
You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.
Here from Merriam-Webster:
Exonerate
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.
You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.
The Muel Team's mission was to uncover criminality but: "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."
We do not prosecute nor should congress persecute anyone that a 2 yr, $35 million SC witch hunt finds to have not committed a crime - even the POTUS - no matter how much you hate him.
Case closed.
LOL. Yanno, I think you actually believe that silliness.No. I'm making you dopes look like idiots.Give it up pal. Now you're making yourself look like a fucking idiot...
It says may. Doesn’t say is. Two different situations and the may is not he did! So he didn’tI asked you when, I replied to your post. you implied he came to your position. so I'm asking you, when did he obstruct? cause had he, then it would have been charged because that was the point of the investigation in case you didn't know.At the time the above poster suggested, dope. You know....the post you responded to but didn't read.When?Innocent people don't sit quietly while corrupt people try to hang them, Jackass.
So you're admitting Trump obstructed then?
WOW.... the level of willful ignorance is astounding.
You've responded to posts with the link to obsruction, dope. Here you are now asking for it.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller
The OLC rules at the DOJ don't allow for a sitting president to be charged.
I would absolutely have the Hysterical House Dems pursue impeachment but President Trump would have been within his authority to have Mueller replaced and doing so would not have stopped, slowed, or impeded the witch-hunt.Ok, let's put this to a test. It came out yesterday that trump tried to end Mueller's investigation but failed because no one would do it for him and he couldn't do it himself. It also came out yesterday that just attempting to impede an investigation, even if not successful, is still obstruction of justice.Likewise, trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any supporters.Obama has the fortune of being sandwiched by 2 of the worst presidents in history.
Bush Jr who took us into an illegitimate war based on lies and used our tax $$$ to bail out rich CEO's and wall street. Folks who are now richer than even and getting richer by the moment. Wonder when they'll 'need' another bailout?
And Trump, who can barely read and has no idea how government functions, even after 2 1/2 years.
Obama will be remembered as brilliant, lmao!
There is nothing to say to you never-Trumpers. Trump could cure cancer and you would likely be pissed due to population growth, further contributing to your global warming theory. The real proof is in the pudding, which can't be denied by sane people.
Obama was a foreign policy moron. History has already shown this.
For some yes, but for me, if he had colluded with Russia, I would be the first one to say he should be impeached. The diffference is that by all reasonable accounts, he was shown to be innnocent but the never-Trumpers can't stop. Their hate for Trump, the man, blinds rational thought.
So given those two components, why are you not calling for for trump's impeachment.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.
You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.
Here from Merriam-Webster:
Exonerate
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.
You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.
Except that isn't what Mueller said when he corrected his earlier testimony. In fact, he said the opposite of what you claim:
“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump
I addressed that in an earlier post in a response to YOU, dope. Try reading the thread.
And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report, as it was his job to determine if there was a crime committed, he says there were no crimes found, therefore there are no basis for an indictment either.
By LAW Mueller was supposed to provide either a Prosecution charge or a Declination charge for the final report to AG. He posted NONE, thus the case is closed.
Your link is stupid because the word MAY have obstructed was never shown to have been carried out and yesterday Mueller answered the question if he was obstructed during the investigation, he says NO. From VOX,
"Mueller made this assertion in response to questioning from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. Collins, in a series of rapid-fire questions, asked the special counsel whether
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report,
Stop right there.
Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
it wasn't his job to exonerate him. he didn't indict him, nor did he find any evidence. that's called exonerated by every aspect of our rule of law. I don't need mueller's consent to that, nor was it his job!
And the fact it was in the report makes the entire investigation a political attack at a presidential election. the true interference was the DNC and FBI.
I said nothing of exoneration, dope.
It says may. Doesn’t say is. Two different situations and the may is not he did! So he didn’tI asked you when, I replied to your post. you implied he came to your position. so I'm asking you, when did he obstruct? cause had he, then it would have been charged because that was the point of the investigation in case you didn't know.At the time the above poster suggested, dope. You know....the post you responded to but didn't read.When?So you're admitting Trump obstructed then?
WOW.... the level of willful ignorance is astounding.
You've responded to posts with the link to obsruction, dope. Here you are now asking for it.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller
The OLC rules at the DOJ don't allow for a sitting president to be charged.
So he wouldn’t have committed obstruction had he fired him because another would have been brought in! Thanks, see te May isn’t a possibility by your own admittanceI would absolutely have the Hysterical House Dems pursue impeachment but President Trump would have been within his authority to have Mueller replaced and doing so would not have stopped, slowed, or impeded the witch-hunt.Ok, let's put this to a test. It came out yesterday that trump tried to end Mueller's investigation but failed because no one would do it for him and he couldn't do it himself. It also came out yesterday that just attempting to impede an investigation, even if not successful, is still obstruction of justice.Likewise, trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any supporters.There is nothing to say to you never-Trumpers. Trump could cure cancer and you would likely be pissed due to population growth, further contributing to your global warming theory. The real proof is in the pudding, which can't be denied by sane people.
Obama was a foreign policy moron. History has already shown this.
For some yes, but for me, if he had colluded with Russia, I would be the first one to say he should be impeached. The diffference is that by all reasonable accounts, he was shown to be innnocent but the never-Trumpers can't stop. Their hate for Trump, the man, blinds rational thought.
So given those two components, why are you not calling for for trump's impeachment.
Good thing Trump didn't replace Mueller. The next guy may have been more like Starr and recommended multiple charges.
we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.
You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.
Here from Merriam-Webster:
Exonerate
1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.
You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!
You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.
Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.
Except that isn't what Mueller said when he corrected his earlier testimony. In fact, he said the opposite of what you claim:
“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”
Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump
Get an adult in your life to explain what "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..." means, Jackass.Even more importantly, "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?
Now watch this mentally ill boy evade with another vague deflection, ignoring the reality that Robert Mueller III NEVER posted any crime charges at all.
WTF....seriously.
You just responded to "they wouldn't make a determination either way" with....
"Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?"
That is just dumb, dude. He didn't
Mueller stated in the beginning of his report that they would not be making that determination, dope.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Then you admit he NEVER posted any charge of a CRIME anywhere in the 448 page report. Since he was tasked to find one from day one and report it to the AG of any. Since his FINAL report has ZERO charges of any crime at all in it, there is nothing left to run on.
Thank you.
OMG.....I've never said Mueller charged trump with a crime, dope
We do not prosecute nor should congress persecute anyone that a 2 yr, $35 million SC witch hunt finds to have not committed a crime - even the POTUS - no matter how much you hate him.
Case closed.
It also does not conclude that he did not commit a crime, dope...
Stop right there.
Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.
Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.
You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.
By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:
“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”
“No,” Mueller responded. "
You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!
Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.
it wasn't his job to exonerate him. he didn't indict him, nor did he find any evidence. that's called exonerated by every aspect of our rule of law. I don't need mueller's consent to that, nor was it his job!
And the fact it was in the report makes the entire investigation a political attack at a presidential election. the true interference was the DNC and FBI.
I said nothing of exoneration, dope.
Wasn’t his job
Get an adult in your life to explain what "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..." means, Jackass.Even more importantly, "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."WTF....seriously.
You just responded to "they wouldn't make a determination either way" with....
"Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?"
That is just dumb, dude. He didn't
Mueller stated in the beginning of his report that they would not be making that determination, dope.
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Then you admit he NEVER posted any charge of a CRIME anywhere in the 448 page report. Since he was tasked to find one from day one and report it to the AG of any. Since his FINAL report has ZERO charges of any crime at all in it, there is nothing left to run on.
Thank you.
OMG.....I've never said Mueller charged trump with a crime, dope
We do not prosecute nor should congress persecute anyone that a 2 yr, $35 million SC witch hunt finds to have not committed a crime - even the POTUS - no matter how much you hate him.
Case closed.
It also does not conclude that he did not commit a crime, dope...
Sheesh. TDS destroy brain cells ... BIGLY.
nope, you're wrong as usual, he can say he obstructed and not charge him. you're just too stupid or to partisan to understand the law. Cause in our country, one is innocent until proven with evidence. May is not evidence. it is a speculation and needs more understanding. It wasn't his job to provide a volume 2 anyway? If you actually listened yesterday.It says may. Doesn’t say is. Two different situations and the may is not he did! So he didn’tI asked you when, I replied to your post. you implied he came to your position. so I'm asking you, when did he obstruct? cause had he, then it would have been charged because that was the point of the investigation in case you didn't know.At the time the above poster suggested, dope. You know....the post you responded to but didn't read.When?
WOW.... the level of willful ignorance is astounding.
You've responded to posts with the link to obsruction, dope. Here you are now asking for it.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller
The OLC rules at the DOJ don't allow for a sitting president to be charged.
OMG it says may because there was no charges. It's just how that link presented it. There's 100 more that don't say that. The report doesnt say "may" at all.
You would know that if you bothered to be at least minimally competent with this information.
