It's Mueller Time!

[Frannie]

An investigation into a bogus charge is illegal

What was bogus about the investigation in to the Russians interfering?

The premise Trump had anything to do with it.

121 verified contacts between the Trump Campaign and the very Russians interfering in our election, where as no other presidential candidate, has had any contacts with any Russians trying to help them, during their presidential runs.

It was unAmerican to do such, so OF COURSE the Trump campaign came under suspicion of being a witting or unwitting asset, of the Russians.

Yesssssss……..he should have been more careful like Hillary was. She went thru a law firm to hire a company to hire an unregistered foreign agent to talk to Russian officials to obtain dirt on Trump. I mean, there is a protocol to be followed when hiding that you are seeking Russian interference and Hillary followed it. Trump could have avoided all of this investigation if he had just imitated Hillary's actions, correct? I'm curious as to why her actions are ignored while Trumps aren't when they both went to the Russians for assistance in their campaigns???

kwc, she hired the DNC's law firm, of whom they had employed as their law firm for nearly a decade.

ALL of the rest of your post is crazy ass conspiracy, right wing bunk... seriously!

Were the Russians in your conspiracy the same ones who tried to get Trump elected?

Were the Russians trying to get her elected?

What part of GPS hiring an investigator for his client to do opposition research on Candidate Trump, who had expertise in Russian affairs...the country that all financials of Trump lead to, is illegal?

How in the world does that make Steele an agent of a foreign power where he would need to register?

YOU are way way smarter than all that nonsensical, not thought out with any kind of logic involved, garbage, imo.

Triggered

So are they impeaching trump now?

Yawn

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I feel no weight at all. I'm simply pointing to and laughing at you dopes as I always have.

Rich pickins in this one.

Rich Pickins?

Wasn't he in that movie Dr. Strange Glove?

LOL...

I've got you dancing like a fool.

You are the fool who is being ridiculed for the whole board to see.

You lied about all of this for three years.

America sees it.

There will be a huge price for your corrupt cheating, lying party to pay in 2020.

You're not ridiculing. You're dancing around like a clown. If you had any acumen at all, you would challenge me. Since you don't you dance. You dance because I'm under your skin. I'm under your skin because I'm nailing you dopes and there's nothing else you can do.

let me ask you a quick question, do you think mueller wrote his report? let's see what you actually know after yesterday.

My opinion is irrelevant to the discussion. He had an entire staff. I'm sure he had editorial authority. Why do you imagine that to be important in any way?

 

[jc456]

But, even if he did, the obstructive act is not enough. They have to prove it was done with corrupt intent...

Derp.... Subjects of an investigation don't obstruct that investigation with the intent of aiding the investigators, dope.

Innocent people don't sit quietly while corrupt people try to hang them, Jackass.

So you're admitting Trump obstructed then?

When?

At the time the above poster suggested, dope. You know....the post you responded to but didn't read.

I asked you when, I replied to your post. you implied he came to your position. so I'm asking you, when did he obstruct? cause had he, then it would have been charged because that was the point of the investigation in case you didn't know.

 

[jc456]

You're such a dumbass. From Mueller:

“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

Yes, because they were never going to make such a determination.

Mueller just verified what we've been saying all along.
Your narrative that Mueller concluded that there was no crime was debunked, dope.

WRONG. In the US you are innocent until proven guilty. Period. End of Story. Mueller did not have enough evidence to prove guilt. None on Conspiracy and iffy at best on obstruction as there was not an underlying crime and the President was visibly frustrated. Your blue tint is amusing to me. That hearing hurt the Democrats visibly. I am an Independent and I was embarrased for them. Similarly I was embarrassed for the GOP after the Starr investigation.

You are a stupid person. That is a fact. And the fact that your vote counts as much as mine is frightening.

WRONG. In the US you are innocent until proven guilty. Period. End of Story. Mueller did not have enough evidence to prove guilt.

Not facts in evidence.

You know, you can lead a horse....well, you get the idea.

Listen carefully.

in america you need evidence to indict. so, not sure your point?

Uff....
Half the fucking Mueller report is evidence, dope.

of what?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

LOL...

You didn't "think" at all, dope.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller

No, mr. fakey mcfakerson, it is you who can't think. Whenever that "MAY" shows up in a legal report, it means it didn't happen. Because if it had happened, there wouldn't be a "MAY" in front of it. The dems rely on stupid people, like you, to carry their water, but intelligent people know that putting that qualifier in renders all the rest moot.

But we understand the consequences of perjury, and so do the assholes who wrote that ridiculous report.

Clearly you're too stupid to understand.

No. "May" means exactly what it says, dope.
It may have happened but there is no conclusion or confirmation that it did.

Geez, that's called "Not Guilty" in a Court of Law.

Thanks for playing Putin's Lil Buttplug.

Loser

There was no court of law, dope.

what was it then?

WTF?

An investigatiin.

 

[jc456]

Rich Pickins?

Wasn't he in that movie Dr. Strange Glove?

LOL...

I've got you dancing like a fool.

You are the fool who is being ridiculed for the whole board to see.

You lied about all of this for three years.

America sees it.

There will be a huge price for your corrupt cheating, lying party to pay in 2020.

You're not ridiculing. You're dancing around like a clown. If you had any acumen at all, you would challenge me. Since you don't you dance. You dance because I'm under your skin. I'm under your skin because I'm nailing you dopes and there's nothing else you can do.

let me ask you a quick question, do you think mueller wrote his report? let's see what you actually know after yesterday.

My opinion is irrelevant to the discussion. He had an entire staff. I'm sure he had editorial authority. Why do you imagine that to be important in any way?

you're exactly right, your opinion is irrelevant. and the fact it is titled the Mueller Report would mean he provided the report, which after yesterday it's clear he didn't.

 

[dannyboys]

LOL. You must ignore Mueller's correction of his testimony just hours later:

“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump

He's simply reiterating that they would not reach a determination of criminality. By testifying that but for the OLC guidelines, "they would have brought charges", would be making a determination of criminality.

Not making a determination does not mean there is no evidence or that there was no criminality but that they will not make a determination either way.

Mueller said this at the beginning of his report, in his opening statements and numerous times yesterday.

You should understand this by now. Pay attention.

Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?

Now watch this mentally ill boy evade with another vague deflection, ignoring the reality that Robert Mueller III NEVER posted any crime charges at all.

WTF....seriously.

You just responded to "they wouldn't make a determination either way" with....

"Where did your fan boy Mueller state that a crime was committed in the Mueller report?"

That is just dumb, dude. He didn't

Mueller stated in the beginning of his report that they would not be making that determination, dope.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Then you admit he NEVER posted any charge of a CRIME anywhere in the 448 page report. Since he was tasked to find one from day one and report it to the AG of any. Since his FINAL report has ZERO charges of any crime at all in it, there is nothing left to run on.

Thank you.

OMG.....I've never said Mueller charged trump with a crime, dope

As soon as anyone charges Trump with any crime by all means let us know. In the meantime be careful. You could get carpal tunnel.

 

[jc456]

No, mr. fakey mcfakerson, it is you who can't think. Whenever that "MAY" shows up in a legal report, it means it didn't happen. Because if it had happened, there wouldn't be a "MAY" in front of it. The dems rely on stupid people, like you, to carry their water, but intelligent people know that putting that qualifier in renders all the rest moot.

But we understand the consequences of perjury, and so do the assholes who wrote that ridiculous report.

Clearly you're too stupid to understand.

No. "May" means exactly what it says, dope.
It may have happened but there is no conclusion or confirmation that it did.

Geez, that's called "Not Guilty" in a Court of Law.

Thanks for playing Putin's Lil Buttplug.

Loser

There was no court of law, dope.

what was it then?

WTF?

An investigatiin.

under oath correct?

BTW, do you know the reason mueller wouldn't answer was not to perjure himself because he didn't know the answers.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

LOL...

You didn't "think" at all, dope.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller

And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report, as it was his job to determine if there was a crime committed, he says there were no crimes found, therefore there are no basis for an indictment either.

By LAW Mueller was supposed to provide either a Prosecution charge or a Declination charge for the final report to AG. He posted NONE, thus the case is closed.

Your link is stupid because the word MAY have obstructed was never shown to have been carried out and yesterday Mueller answered the question if he was obstructed during the investigation, he says NO. From VOX,

"Mueller made this assertion in response to questioning from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. Collins, in a series of rapid-fire questions, asked the special counsel whether

“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded. "

And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report,

Stop right there.

Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.

Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.

You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.

By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:

“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded. "

You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!

Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.

it wasn't his job to exonerate him. he didn't indict him, nor did he find any evidence. that's called exonerated by every aspect of our rule of law. I don't need mueller's consent to that, nor was it his job!

And the fact it was in the report makes the entire investigation a political attack at a presidential election. the true interference was the DNC and FBI.

I said nothing of exoneration, dope.

 

[dannyboys]

Rich Pickins?

Wasn't he in that movie Dr. Strange Glove?

LOL...

I've got you dancing like a fool.

You are the fool who is being ridiculed for the whole board to see.

You lied about all of this for three years.

America sees it.

There will be a huge price for your corrupt cheating, lying party to pay in 2020.

You're not ridiculing. You're dancing around like a clown. If you had any acumen at all, you would challenge me. Since you don't you dance. You dance because I'm under your skin. I'm under your skin because I'm nailing you dopes and there's nothing else you can do.

let me ask you a quick question, do you think mueller wrote his report? let's see what you actually know after yesterday.

My opinion is irrelevant to the discussion. He had an entire staff. I'm sure he had editorial authority. Why do you imagine that to be important in any way?

Yes your opinion is irrelevant.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Derp....
Subjects of an investigation don't obstruct that investigation with the intent of aiding the investigators, dope.

Hate less and think more, and you will look stupid less often.

1. The Executive is always ultimately in charge of every Executive Branch investigation. Period. Mueller didn't magically move to a 4th branch of government or become King when his Witchhunt began.

2. Since Trump was completely innocent of the baseless charge of colluding with Russia, Justice demanded he be found so.

3. Mueller admitted that Trump never, ever, ever interfered with his Witchhunt.

4. The Witchhunt found nothing on Trump. Zero. NADDA. Zilch..

LOL...

You didn't "think" at all, dope.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller

All that means what?

That you're dumb ?

That Mueller documented evidence of 10 different acts of obstruction?

Take your pick.

what did he obstruct? Mueller were you allowed to complete your mission--yes, did anyone interfere--no, did anyone ask you to stop the investigation-no. So what exactly is the obstruction you think he found trump guilty of? cause he didn't. so you should relisten to his testimony cause you missed it. check out the statement ahead of the afternoon intelligence testimony

what did he obstruct?

Well, you could read the link.

 

[Faun]

History will have a lot to say about Trump. History will judge, as it always does.

The difference is now we have the internet where everyone's side is publicly stated. Forever. You won't be able to go back and hide it. History will not be kind to the Trumpers.

Like how 'history' has judged BONOBO? HAAA HAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
BONOBO's 'legacy' would fit in a woman's shoe box.
BONOBO's 'library' is going to be in a portable behind some post office in the middle of nowhere.

Obama has the fortune of being sandwiched by 2 of the worst presidents in history.

Bush Jr who took us into an illegitimate war based on lies and used our tax $$$ to bail out rich CEO's and wall street. Folks who are now richer than even and getting richer by the moment. Wonder when they'll 'need' another bailout?

And Trump, who can barely read and has no idea how government functions, even after 2 1/2 years.

Obama will be remembered as brilliant, lmao!

There is nothing to say to you never-Trumpers. Trump could cure cancer and you would likely be pissed due to population growth, further contributing to your global warming theory. The real proof is in the pudding, which can't be denied by sane people.

Obama was a foreign policy moron. History has already shown this.

Likewise, trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any supporters.

For some yes, but for me, if he had colluded with Russia, I would be the first one to say he should be impeached. The diffference is that by all reasonable accounts, he was shown to be innnocent but the never-Trumpers can't stop. Their hate for Trump, the man, blinds rational thought.

Ok, let's put this to a test. It came out yesterday that trump tried to end Mueller's investigation but failed because no one would do it for him and he couldn't do it himself. It also came out yesterday that just attempting to impede an investigation, even if not successful, is still obstruction of justice.

So given those two components, why are you not calling for for trump's impeachment.

 

[Foxfyre]

And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report, as it was his job to determine if there was a crime committed, he says there were no crimes found, therefore there are no basis for an indictment either.

By LAW Mueller was supposed to provide either a Prosecution charge or a Declination charge for the final report to AG. He posted NONE, thus the case is closed.

Your link is stupid because the word MAY have obstructed was never shown to have been carried out and yesterday Mueller answered the question if he was obstructed during the investigation, he says NO. From VOX,

"Mueller made this assertion in response to questioning from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. Collins, in a series of rapid-fire questions, asked the special counsel whether

“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded. "

And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report,

Stop right there.

Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.

Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.

You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.

By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:

“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded. "

You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!

Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.

You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.

You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.

You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.

Here from Merriam-Webster:

Exonerate

1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame

Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.

You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!

You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.

Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.

Mueller's job was to find any evidence that President Trump and/or anyone in his campaign committed a crime re Russian meddling in the election and/or anything else that turned up in the investigation. Whether or not he could have indicted a sitting President there was NOTHING preventing him for giving the evidence for a crime that the President and/or his campaign committed.

Mueller and his team were the most viciously pro-Clinton, anti-Trump group he could have possibly assembled if that had been his intent. Maybe it was his intent, but more likely it was Weissmann but in all likelihood we'll never know about that. But if that group after examining 1.4 documents, issuing 500+ subpoenas, taking more than 2 years and spending somewhere between $25 and $50 million dollars couldn't find a crime that President Trump committed, it is pretty safe to say President Trump didn't commit one.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What you're engaging in is speculation. Dopey speculation in an attempt to create a new narrative no doubt.

You are a complete leftist hack, so filter everything through the eyes of a complete leftist hack.

Those of us who are more impartial and intelligent realize that his refusal to answer much less dismiss those questions pertaining to Democrats indicate they most likely WEREN'T as you say "dopey conspiracies". Otherwise, he would have simply denied them.

He did deny them. By not answering them.

Give it up pal. Now you're making yourself look like a fucking idiot.
How are you making out selling off all those 'Hands Up Don't Shoot" hoodies?

No. I'm making you dopes look like idiots.
The fact that you don't get that is hilarious and why I continue. Mueller destroyed your narrative and you dopes are throwing straight up nonsense out there now.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

What you're engaging in is speculation. Dopey speculation in an attempt to create a new narrative no doubt.

You are a complete leftist hack, so filter everything through the eyes of a complete leftist hack.

Those of us who are more impartial and intelligent realize that his refusal to answer much less dismiss those questions pertaining to Democrats indicate they most likely WEREN'T as you say "dopey conspiracies". Otherwise, he would have simply denied them.

He did deny them. By not answering them.

Are you really THAT stupid, child?

 

[jc456]

Hate less and think more, and you will look stupid less often.

1. The Executive is always ultimately in charge of every Executive Branch investigation. Period. Mueller didn't magically move to a 4th branch of government or become King when his Witchhunt began.

2. Since Trump was completely innocent of the baseless charge of colluding with Russia, Justice demanded he be found so.

3. Mueller admitted that Trump never, ever, ever interfered with his Witchhunt.

4. The Witchhunt found nothing on Trump. Zero. NADDA. Zilch..

LOL...

You didn't "think" at all, dope.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller

All that means what?

That you're dumb ?

That Mueller documented evidence of 10 different acts of obstruction?

Take your pick.

what did he obstruct? Mueller were you allowed to complete your mission--yes, did anyone interfere--no, did anyone ask you to stop the investigation-no. So what exactly is the obstruction you think he found trump guilty of? cause he didn't. so you should relisten to his testimony cause you missed it. check out the statement ahead of the afternoon intelligence testimony

what did he obstruct?

Well, you could read the link.

I did, and I want to know which one is actual obstruction. if he had obstructed, the terminology would have been here are the 10 obstruction charges. so, clarity is definitely not your thing.

 

[Faun]

2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won

You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.

Too late.
They've become rhetorical kamikazes. They've passed the the failsafe point and no longer have enough fuel to get back.

That comment did not make any sense. Mueller himself didn’t even read the report.

Of course that is just another of your dopey narratives. Mueller destroyed your talking points. You are reduced to attacking his performance and elemants of dopey conspiracies that don't exist outside of the fox news sphere rather than the substance.

I don't really blame you hapless dopes though. That would be like taunting a handicapped reporter. Just something I would never do. You were lulled into that little corner with no room to maneuver by the soothing balm of persistent propaganda from Trump and fox with little defense from your Dunning Kruger addled wits.
One day, maybe soon, you'll have a moment of clarity. At which time you will realize that Trump has played you. Bigly.

2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won

You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.

Too late.
They've become rhetorical kamikazes. They've passed the the failsafe point and no longer have enough fuel to get back.

That comment did not make any sense. Mueller himself didn’t even read the report.

Of course that is just another of your dopey narratives. Mueller destroyed your talking points. You are reduced to attacking his performance and elemants of dopey conspiracies that don't exist outside of the fox news sphere rather than the substance.

I don't really blame you hapless dopes though. That would be like taunting a handicapped reporter. Just something I would never do. You were lulled into that little corner with no room to maneuver by the soothing balm of persistent propaganda from Trump and fox with little defense from your Dunning Kruger addled wits.
One day, maybe soon, you'll have a moment of clarity. At which time you will realize that Trump has played you. Bigly.

You're such a dumbass. From Mueller:

“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

So? He also said he didn't reach such a determination because of the OLC opinion, not because the evidence exonerated trump's culpability.

 

[jc456]

What you're engaging in is speculation. Dopey speculation in an attempt to create a new narrative no doubt.

You are a complete leftist hack, so filter everything through the eyes of a complete leftist hack.

Those of us who are more impartial and intelligent realize that his refusal to answer much less dismiss those questions pertaining to Democrats indicate they most likely WEREN'T as you say "dopey conspiracies". Otherwise, he would have simply denied them.

He did deny them. By not answering them.

Give it up pal. Now you're making yourself look like a fucking idiot.
How are you making out selling off all those 'Hands Up Don't Shoot" hoodies?

No. I'm making you dopes look like idiots.
The fact that you don't get that is hilarious and why I continue. Mueller destroyed your narrative and you dopes are throwing straight up nonsense out there now.

or not. and I mean or not!! you've lost every post so far. keep trying, your fail is our gain.

 

[SAYIT]

And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report, as it was his job to determine if there was a crime committed, he says there were no crimes found, therefore there are no basis for an indictment either.

By LAW Mueller was supposed to provide either a Prosecution charge or a Declination charge for the final report to AG. He posted NONE, thus the case is closed.

Your link is stupid because the word MAY have obstructed was never shown to have been carried out and yesterday Mueller answered the question if he was obstructed during the investigation, he says NO. From VOX,

"Mueller made this assertion in response to questioning from Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA), the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee. Collins, in a series of rapid-fire questions, asked the special counsel whether

“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded. "

And yet he never charged him with a crime anywhere in the report,

Stop right there.

Mueller has explained why 100 times. If you can't understand why, that's on you. This was covered probably 20 times yesterday.

Ha ha ha, then YOU can't point out where he said there was crime committed anywhere in the Mueller report. The investigation where he was supposed to find crimes, yet couldn't find any to write up for the Mueller report.

You are stupid as hell for failing to notice THAT particular reality.

By the way you IGNORED this from Mueller's own mouth to the important question:

“your investigation [was] curtailed or stopped or hindered?”

“No,” Mueller responded. "

You ignore openly stated evidence completely because you are a stupid partisan jackass!

Seriously, dope. Watch this as many times as it takes for you to get it. Let Mueller clarify for you from his own mouth.

You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.

You have NOTHING to show for your bullcrap, and you do this video thing from a man who stated over and over that his testimony is BASED on his 448 page report. The Exoneration statement is bogus crap for a reason that amazingly eludes a lot of Dumbocrats. It made you go sniffing for a lot of crap piles left by partisan hacks,, while ignoring that there was NEVER crime discovered and posted anywhere in the 448 page report.

You are one stupid little boy who can't understand that being exonerated means you have to be accused/Indicted/charged with something legally binding first. Mueller was charged to FIND any conspiracy crimes against Trump, and report it to the AG, but he NEVER posted a single charge in his 448 page report. YOU never showed where in the 448 page report of a charge, which means you have NOTHING to maintain your mentally ill beliefs that Trump is guilty of a conspiracy.

Here from Merriam-Webster:

Exonerate

1 : to relieve of a responsibility, obligation, or hardship
2 : to clear from accusation or blame

Since he was NEVER charged with anything by Mueller in his 448 page report, there is nothing to exonerate, since Trump was never charged with anything beyond partisan hate claims.

You have NOTHING real to run on stupid little boy!

You can't answer the SIMPLE question then, which means you KNOW that Mueller NEVER stated a single charge of a crime in the 448 page report. You continue your torrential flow of bullshit because you are a partisan jackass.

Of course I know that Mueller didn't bring charges, dope. Everyone knows that. The entire world knows that.
Why? How?
Because Mueller told us he couldn't bring charges, dope.

Except that isn't what Mueller said when he corrected his earlier testimony. In fact, he said the opposite of what you claim:

“I want to add one correction to my testimony this morning," Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

Mueller issues clarification, takes back bombshell statement about indicting Trump

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Derp.... Subjects of an investigation don't obstruct that investigation with the intent of aiding the investigators, dope.

Innocent people don't sit quietly while corrupt people try to hang them, Jackass.

So you're admitting Trump obstructed then?

When?

At the time the above poster suggested, dope. You know....the post you responded to but didn't read.

I asked you when, I replied to your post. you implied he came to your position. so I'm asking you, when did he obstruct? cause had he, then it would have been charged because that was the point of the investigation in case you didn't know.

WOW.... the level of willful ignorance is astounding.

You've responded to posts with the link to obsruction, dope. Here you are now asking for it.
10 times Trump may have obstructed justice, according to Mueller

The OLC rules at the DOJ don't allow for a sitting president to be charged.