It's Over

Those without honor and dignity have zero problems with letting off a known traitor.

How childish. You people are flat wrong and dishonest in your pursuit, and you know it. The game will not turn for you despite your best efforts.

As I said earlier, it's as if Democrats are begging to be hated.

Don’t you find it a little ironic that you’re calling people childish and saying that they’re playing a game when in fact it is the future of the nation that hangs in the balance.

It was in fact Trump and the Republican party that was playing a game and continues to play games. Lying about the results of the election, whipping the mob into a frenzy over an election was not stolen.

Throughout the four years of Trump’s administration, Republicans of played a game of stick it to the liberals. That seems to be the only goal in life is to oppose Democrats. They’re supposed to be running the country. They’re supposed to be improving things for working people. They’re supposed to be dealing with the pandemic. Instead of doing any of those things they’ve been sticking it to the Democrats.

This is why Trump lost the election. This is why Republicans have lost the house. This is why Republicans have lost the Senate. It is time for Republicans to get some ideas, some plans, a platform that doesn’t include racism and white supremacy, and then ask the voters to render a decision on the issues.

Republicans were elected to help the American people, not to stick it to the Democrats. Since Republicans refuse to do anything for the American people, the American people are going to refuse to vote for them. Just like last election.
 
While citizens were assaulted, their businesses looted and burned, Nazi Pelosi encouraged more and never said a word about the violence.

So what you’re saying is that Nancy Pelosi did not incite violence. Too bad Trump didn’t do the same.

Also there was nothing Nancy could have done. Donald Trump had the power to call out the National Guard. He refused. His staffers begged him to call out the National Guard. To send assistance to the beleaguered Capitol. Trump did nothing. He waited for the murder of Pence, and the members of the House and Senate.
 
Those without honor and dignity have zero problems with letting off a known traitor.

How childish. You people are flat wrong and dishonest in your pursuit, and you know it. The game will not turn for you despite your best efforts.

As I said earlier, it's as if Democrats are begging to be hated.

Don’t you find it a little ironic that you’re calling people childish and saying that they’re playing a game when in fact it is the future of the nation that hangs in the balance.

What I find ironic is you believing you have any credibility among the Americans.

Actually, I'm not too concerned with the future of the nation. Americans are historically slow to anger as one, but their patience is not unlimited.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.
Do you support
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?
President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.
That he did. So what?
So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.
No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.


The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.
Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment
President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.
Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?
He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.
Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were
It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.
I know what it’s called but that’s not what happened. And how exactly does peaceful protest stop the steal? Please explain how doing that gets it done
It doesn't. Please explain how assaulting citizens, looting and burning down their businesses stop a cop from killing a black man.
None of those violent actions stops cops from killing black men. I do t make excuses for any violence or destruction. I don’t see what this has to do with tyranny. I know you are desperate for a whataboutism but you are not comparing like items.

you just said that peaceful protest does not stop the steal... so what the fuck do you think Trump thought was going to happen when that mob hit the capital?! If he didn’t know that shit was going to go down then he is a complete dumbass. He pushed the lie, feed his base, set the target, then unleashed them in an attempt to overthrow the government. It’s plain as day
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.
The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.
So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?
They were arrested for breaking the law. They were damaging property. Now she's the Vice President.
Yeah, and... what’s your point?
This is the part where you play dumb, huh.
If not understanding how your dumb point relates to this situation then yes... that’s what I’m doing
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?
The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny
He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.
If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand


If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.
I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin


Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?
Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.


OH, so it only counts if it's the capitol? What happened at the capitol pales to the 2 billion in damages and 30 dead across the nation. There were coordinated groups, some going from city to city to incite violence. All the while the commiecrats were egging them on. Kneepads harriss said herself that it wouldn't stop before the election and wouldn't stop after, and it shouldn't. Well guess what, it let up some but it still hasn't stopped. What should be done with her?

.
Tyranny and insurrection absolutely applies to any forceful effort to overthrow our government which would occur at a public office or event and against elected officials performing our countries business. Get a dictionary man. These are basic definitions


So the folks that occupied the WI legislature for 2 days were insurrectionist? Come on man, be consistent.
Can you send a link to the situation you’re talking about? Did they use force? If so, then yes, that’s exactly what they are
 
While citizens were assaulted, their businesses looted and burned, Nazi Pelosi encouraged more and never said a word about the violence.

So what you’re saying is that Nancy Pelosi did not incite violence. Too bad Trump didn’t do the same.

Also there was nothing Nancy could have done. Donald Trump had the power to call out the National Guard. He refused. His staffers begged him to call out the National Guard. To send assistance to the beleaguered Capitol. Trump did nothing. He waited for the murder of Pence, and the members of the House and Senate.
The democrat governors and Mayors of Minneapolis, Seattle and Portland sat on their hands while their citizens were attacked and their businesses destroyed. Go sell your propaganda to some naive college kids.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.
The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.
So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?
They were arrested for breaking the law. They were damaging property. Now she's the Vice President.
Yeah, and... what’s your point?
This is the part where you play dumb, huh.
If not understanding how your dumb point relates to this situation then yes... that’s what I’m doing
So you really are dumb. Tell me, when you sit on the toilet do you look into the bowl when you get up to find out what just happened?
 
Last edited:
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.
Do you support
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?
President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.
That he did. So what?
So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.
No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.


The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.
Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment
President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.
Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?
He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.
Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were
It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.
I know what it’s called but that’s not what happened. And how exactly does peaceful protest stop the steal? Please explain how doing that gets it done
It doesn't. Please explain how assaulting citizens, looting and burning down their businesses stop a cop from killing a black man.

It doesn't. Has anyone claimed it does? Has anyone supported the rioters? Most have condemned it - it takes away from the message of the actual protestors.


I think you need to go back and review what palousey, kneepads harriss and others said over the summer.

.
 
While citizens were assaulted, their businesses looted and burned, Nazi Pelosi encouraged more and never said a word about the violence.


While cities were burning during the DNC convention, there were no words of condemnation.

.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.
The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.
So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?
They were arrested for breaking the law. They were damaging property. Now she's the Vice President.
Yeah, and... what’s your point?
This is the part where you play dumb, huh.
If not understanding how your dumb point relates to this situation then yes... that’s what I’m doing
So you really are dumb. Tell me, when you sit on the toilet do you look into the bowl when you get up to find out what just happened?
Ditching the debate I see... nice, you were getting schooled, I don’t blame you.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?
The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny
He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.
If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand


If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.
I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin


Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?
Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion


Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.

.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.
The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.
So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?
They were arrested for breaking the law. They were damaging property. Now she's the Vice President.
Yeah, and... what’s your point?
This is the part where you play dumb, huh.
If not understanding how your dumb point relates to this situation then yes... that’s what I’m doing
So you really are dumb. Tell me, when you sit on the toilet do you look into the bowl when you get up to find out what just happened?
Ditching the debate I see... nice, you were getting schooled, I don’t blame you.
Whatever. Idiot.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.


OH, so it only counts if it's the capitol? What happened at the capitol pales to the 2 billion in damages and 30 dead across the nation. There were coordinated groups, some going from city to city to incite violence. All the while the commiecrats were egging them on. Kneepads harriss said herself that it wouldn't stop before the election and wouldn't stop after, and it shouldn't. Well guess what, it let up some but it still hasn't stopped. What should be done with her?

.
Tyranny and insurrection absolutely applies to any forceful effort to overthrow our government which would occur at a public office or event and against elected officials performing our countries business. Get a dictionary man. These are basic definitions


So the folks that occupied the WI legislature for 2 days were insurrectionist? Come on man, be consistent.
Can you send a link to the situation you’re talking about? Did they use force? If so, then yes, that’s exactly what they are



.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?
The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny
He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.
If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand


If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.
I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin


Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?
Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion


Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.
Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?
 
While citizens were assaulted, their businesses looted and burned, Nazi Pelosi encouraged more and never said a word about the violence.

So what you’re saying is that Nancy Pelosi did not incite violence. Too bad Trump didn’t do the same.

Also there was nothing Nancy could have done. Donald Trump had the power to call out the National Guard. He refused. His staffers begged him to call out the National Guard. To send assistance to the beleaguered Capitol. Trump did nothing. He waited for the murder of Pence, and the members of the House and Senate.

So now that I’ve dismantled your weak, bullshit argument, you’re moving the goalposts.

Your user name says it all. You filter out all of the facts, common sense, sanity and reason, and give us the pure bullshit.
 
Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?


Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.
You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.


Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.
If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.


OH, so it only counts if it's the capitol? What happened at the capitol pales to the 2 billion in damages and 30 dead across the nation. There were coordinated groups, some going from city to city to incite violence. All the while the commiecrats were egging them on. Kneepads harriss said herself that it wouldn't stop before the election and wouldn't stop after, and it shouldn't. Well guess what, it let up some but it still hasn't stopped. What should be done with her?

.
Tyranny and insurrection absolutely applies to any forceful effort to overthrow our government which would occur at a public office or event and against elected officials performing our countries business. Get a dictionary man. These are basic definitions


So the folks that occupied the WI legislature for 2 days were insurrectionist? Come on man, be consistent.
Can you send a link to the situation you’re talking about? Did they use force? If so, then yes, that’s exactly what they are



.
Thanks for the link, I just read it. Don’t see any force or violence. Seems like it is a protest. Are you saying that what happened at the capital is on par with what happened in Wisconsin?
 

Forum List

Back
Top