It's Over

[EvilCat Breath]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.

If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.

The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.

Impeach kamala

Huckabee floats impeaching Kamala Harris for supporting bailing protesters and rioters out of jail this summer - Washington Examiner

Mike Huckabee said that Vice President-elect Kamala Harris should face impeachment over her comments on the riots that rocked the country this summer in light of President Trump’s impeachment. “If we’re going to impeach Donald Trump for what he said, then we’d better impeach Kamala Harris for...

www.google.com

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.

If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.

OH, so it only counts if it's the capitol? What happened at the capitol pales to the 2 billion in damages and 30 dead across the nation. There were coordinated groups, some going from city to city to incite violence. All the while the commiecrats were egging them on. Kneepads harriss said herself that it wouldn't stop before the election and wouldn't stop after, and it shouldn't. Well guess what, it let up some but it still hasn't stopped. What should be done with her?

.

Tyranny and insurrection absolutely applies to any forceful effort to overthrow our government which would occur at a public office or event and against elected officials performing our countries business. Get a dictionary man. These are basic definitions

So the folks that occupied the WI legislature for 2 days were insurrectionist? Come on man, be consistent.

Can you send a link to the situation you’re talking about? Did they use force? If so, then yes, that’s exactly what they are

Protestors Take State Capital in Wisconsin

Protestors camp out overnight at the statehouse in Madison, Wis. The combined shortfalls of other states is $125 billion for the fiscal year of 2012.

abcnews.go.com

.

Thanks for the link, I just read it. Don’t see any force or violence. Seems like it is a protest. Are you saying that what happened at the capital is on par with what happened in Wisconsin?

Yeah, they occupied the WI state house for two days, vs 4 hours in DC. They threatened WI lawmakers as well. But that's different, RIGHT???

yes!!!! Are you blind?! It’s totally different.

I didn’t see any reference to threats in your article. If anybody said anything more than rhetoric then they should be punished.

Damn child, I'm not going to all your work for you. I gave you one MSM source, do you really expect the whole truth from the state run media?

.

You didn’t give a source for the thing you claimed. That’s on you. I read the link you posted. Looked like a regular protest. Nothing about threats force or destruction. Nothing like what happened at the capital.

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.

If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.

The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.

Impeach kamala

Huckabee floats impeaching Kamala Harris for supporting bailing protesters and rioters out of jail this summer - Washington Examiner

Mike Huckabee said that Vice President-elect Kamala Harris should face impeachment over her comments on the riots that rocked the country this summer in light of President Trump’s impeachment. “If we’re going to impeach Donald Trump for what he said, then we’d better impeach Kamala Harris for...

www.google.com

Lame whataboutism. Y’all are sooo damn weak

 

[OKTexas]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.

If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand

If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.

I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin

Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?

Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion

Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.

Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?

It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.

it’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.

Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.

.

I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weak

Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.

.

 

[Rambunctious]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.

If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand

If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.

I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin

Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?

Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion

Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.

Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?

It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.

it’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.

Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.

.

I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weak

Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.

.

Broken record... I’ve addressed this.

 

[Slade3200]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

What kind of nutty shit are they tossing out?

 

[OKTexas]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.

If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand

If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.

I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin

Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?

Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion

Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.

Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?

It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.

it’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.

Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.

.

I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weak

Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.

.

Broken record... I’ve addressed this.

Not really, you still keep claiming this shit show is on the up and up, it's not.

.

 

[Rambunctious]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

What kind of nutty shit are they tossing out?

That everyone on Trump's side is guilty....for everything...and they all must be punished....

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

Seems everyone is covering it except for Fox, Newsmax and OAN

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

What kind of nutty shit are they tossing out?

That everyone on Trump's side is guilty....for everything...and they all must be punished....

Not everyone, but those who supported his lies and spread misinformation should be held accountable

 

[Rambunctious]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

Seems everyone is covering it except for Fox, Newsmax and OAN

No one watches the liberal hacks....that's the point.....so the dems are mad because FOX won't do wall to wall...lmao

 

[postman]

You didn’t give a source for the thing you claimed. That’s on you. I read the link you posted. Looked like a regular protest. Nothing about threats force or destruction. Nothing like what happened at the capital.

Wikipedia explains how they peacefully occupied the PUBLIC areas of the capitol. That was the one, where the democratic senators fled out of state, so they couldn't hold a vote.

And unlike the DC insurrection, the WI police joined the sit-in / occupation.

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.

If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand

If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.

I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin

Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?

Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion

Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.

Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?

It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.

it’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.

Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.

.

I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weak

Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.

.

Clubs, Bear gas and pipe bombs.

They were also adept at beating people with the American Flag

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

Seems everyone is covering it except for Fox, Newsmax and OAN

No one watches the liberal hacks....that's the point.....so the dems are mad because FOX won't do wall to wall...lmao

EVERY Network and significant global coverage

 

[Rambunctious]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

What kind of nutty shit are they tossing out?

That everyone on Trump's side is guilty....for everything...and they all must be punished....

Not everyone, but those who supported his lies and spread misinformation should be held accountable

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

 

[postman]

Clubs, Bear gas and pipe bombs.

They were also adept at beating people with the American Flag

They also had tazers and a battering ram.

 

[postman]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.

If the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understand

If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?

.

I didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thin

Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?

Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussion

Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.

Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?

It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.

it’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.

Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.

.

I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weak

Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.

.

Broken record... I’ve addressed this.

Not really, you still keep claiming this shit show is on the up and up, it's not.

.

Up and up?? When did I say that?! You are trying to pounce on little cherry picked partisan jabs or hyperbolic claims. Thats fine. If they called flagpoles, spears, and claimed the protesters were armed and you thing that's BS then ok. But its not hard to see through that shit and understand what actually happened. You are going to get dizzy trying to spin everything into a Dems bad/Trump good case. You just can't do it here. Something really wrong happened here and it happened because Trump lied, rallied, provoked, invited, and encourage his supporters to Stop the Steal. Its as simple as that. You can't spin it.

 

[rightwinger]

Democrats are beside themselves that no one is watching their little sham of a hearing...so now they are tossing out all kinds of nutty shit.....

What kind of nutty shit are they tossing out?

That everyone on Trump's side is guilty....for everything...and they all must be punished....

Not everyone, but those who supported his lies and spread misinformation should be held accountable

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

The truth about the election was arbited by the states, the courts and the Congress.