It's Over

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.

If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.

The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.

So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?

 

[9thIDdoc]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

But in the meantime, T**** can continue to twist arms in the Republican party like the thug he is, and Trumpism will continue unabated. That is not an acceptable outcome to me.

Someone cares?

 

[BS Filter]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Do you support

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment

President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.

Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?

He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.

Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were

It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.

 

[BS Filter]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.

If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.

The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.

So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?

They were arrested for breaking the law. They were damaging property. Now she's the Vice President.

 

[Faun]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Idiot or liar? It cited months of indoctrination of his base. It wasn't speech from just one day. But there was speech on that one day which contributed to the insurrection...

On January 6, 2021, pursuant to the 12th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Vice President of the United States, the House of Representatives, and the Senate met at the United States Capitol for a Joint Session of Congress to count the votes of the Electoral College. In the months preceding the Joint Session, President Trump repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials. Shortly before the Joint Session commenced, President Trump, addressed a crowd at the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. There, he reiterated false claims that "we won this election, and we won it by a landslide." He also willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged — and foreseeably resulted in — lawless action at the Capitol, such as: "if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore." Thus incited by President Trump, members of the crowd he had addressed, in an attempt to, among other objectives, interfere with the Joint Session's solemn constitutional duty to certify the results of the 2020 Presidential election, unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice President, and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive and seditious acts.​

​

President Trump's conduct on January 6, 2021, followed his prior efforts to subvert and obstruct the certification of the results of the 2020 Presidential election. Those prior efforts included a phone call on January 2, 2021, during which President Trump urged the secretary of state of Georgia, Brad Raffensperger, to "find" enough votes to overturn the Georgia Presidential election results and threatened Secretary Raffensperger if he failed to do so.​

Wow, that's a great pack of lies. No one killed a law enforcement officer. Also the only one who died as a result of violence is the unarmed woman shot by the capitol police.

.

It's not yet known if the cop sustained injuries from the insurrection and whether or not he died from those injuries. The autopsy report has not been released to the public. While they are reporting it's not true he was struck with a fire extinguisher, the case is still being investigated as a homicide and they do have some suspects. I've read they're also looking into whether or not he was sprayed with bear spray and if that played a role in his death.

 

[Faun]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Do you support

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment

President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.

Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?

He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.

Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were

It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.

How would a peaceful protest stop the steal?

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Do you support

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment

President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.

Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?

He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.

Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were

It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.

I know what it’s called but that’s not what happened. And how exactly does peaceful protest stop the steal? Please explain how doing that gets it done

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Well child wait till the defense trots out videos of commiecrats using the exact same language Trump used in the Jan 6th speech. Many while US cities were burning. Oh then you have kneepads harriss raising money to get rioters, looters and child molesters out on bail, so they could return to do more damage. Like I said you commies hands aren't clean.

.

If commiecrats said anything to inspire an insurrection on our capital then those responsible should be held to account.

The Vice President bailed out criminals during riots that destroyed the businesses of citizens.

So what’s your point? Did she get a mob to go into jail and bust these people out by force or did she use the legal system?

They were arrested for breaking the law. They were damaging property. Now she's the Vice President.

Yeah, and... what’s your point?

 

[Papageorgio]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

So Senators want to be re-elected? Shocking! If they don’t vote the way their constituents want them to vote they will be voted out? So these Senators are doing what they were elected to by their constituents want, in what you call a purely political process?

This is why debt will continue to grow because politicians want to get re-elected instead of doing the right thing and cut spending. That seems perfectly fine to you but in this case you want the Senate to do the right thing and in other areas you don’t want them to?

 

[Papageorgio]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Do you support

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment

President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.

Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?

He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.

Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were

It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.

How would a peaceful protest stop the steal?

The same way this summers riots were to cure racism?

 

[Faun]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

Do you support

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Yes it’s political theater showing an unhindered leader lying to the public and rallying his supporters to overthrow our government so he can stay in power. That’s Tyranny dude. He’s lucky to get off with only an impeachment

President Trump never said a word about overturning the government. You're brainwashed.

Interesting. How exactly did he want his crew to “Stop the steal”?

He said to let your voices be heard. Be peaceful and patriotic. Democrats never showed that in the trial, did they.

Why would they? They are presenting the evidence against him. You’d make a really shitty lawyer.

Let me ask. How do peaceful voices stop the steal? Paint the picture for how that works and what the desired actions and results were

It's called peaceful protest. Ever hear of it? It's in the Constitution.

How would a peaceful protest stop the steal?

The same way this summers riots were to cure racism?

Racism is not curable and those riots were never intended to end racism.

Try harder.

 

[Slade3200]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

So Senators want to be re-elected? Shocking! If they don’t vote the way their constituents want them to vote they will be voted out? So these Senators are doing what they were elected to by their constituents want, in what you call a purely political process?

This is why debt will continue to grow because politicians want to get re-elected instead of doing the right thing and cut spending. That seems perfectly fine to you but in this case you want the Senate to do the right thing and in other areas you don’t want them to?

Since I know you care very much about what I think... I think the senate should ALWAYS do the right thing. The right thing in this case is to hold Trump accountable for abusing the power of his office

 

[Turtlesoup]

Those without honor and dignity have zero problems with letting off a known traitor.

Could not agree more hence why the dems are ignoring JOe and son taking bribes from the chinese and his sons video of raping little girls and molesting Joes own granddaughter.

 

[Claudette]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

Let history judge Dems for their vote.

 

[rightwinger]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

So Senators want to be re-elected? Shocking! If they don’t vote the way their constituents want them to vote they will be voted out? So these Senators are doing what they were elected to by their constituents want, in what you call a purely political process?

This is why debt will continue to grow because politicians want to get re-elected instead of doing the right thing and cut spending. That seems perfectly fine to you but in this case you want the Senate to do the right thing and in other areas you don’t want them to?

What is shocking is .....

That Senators would emerge from the safety of their bunker and then vote to support the same lies that enraged the crowd.

That Senators would ignore a President who sent a crowd to attack his own Vice President (from their party) and sent a tweet attacking his patriotism while that VP was being evacuated

That Senators would ignore the actions of a President who praised the attackers and called them Patriots. The same patriots that we’re calling for their heads.

That Senators would refuse to protect those police who risked their lives to protect them.

That they refuse to acknowledge it was a TRUMP Mob. Formed by Trump, called to DC by Trump, fed lies by Trump, and loyal only to Trump (not Republicans)

That the President they are protecting refused to do anything to protect them while their lives were being threatened.

 

[Slade3200]

Those without honor and dignity have zero problems with letting off a known traitor.

Could not agree more hence why the dems are ignoring JOe and son taking bribes from the chinese and his sons video of raping little girls and molesting Joes own granddaughter.

Just go away man. Nobody believes your toxic garbage. You are a disturbed person. Seek help

 

[rightwinger]

Why are Republicans rallying to defend Trump when Trump made no attempt to defend them and their families while they were under attack?

 

[Coyote]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

So Senators want to be re-elected? Shocking! If they don’t vote the way their constituents want them to vote they will be voted out? So these Senators are doing what they were elected to by their constituents want, in what you call a purely political process?

This is why debt will continue to grow because politicians want to get re-elected instead of doing the right thing and cut spending. That seems perfectly fine to you but in this case you want the Senate to do the right thing and in other areas you don’t want them to?

Since I know you care very much about what I think... I think the senate should ALWAYS do the right thing. The right thing in this case is to hold Trump accountable for abusing the power of his office

They were willing to do so, finally, for Nixon, who's conduct outraged the American public, and yet was LESS than what we see from Trump. It goes to show how much our country has changed.

 

[DukeU]

Not one shred of evidence.

 

[Coyote]

Rightists: But Trump called for them to march peacefully!

...Trump used the word "peacefully" one time in his speech to his supporters the morning of Jan. 6 — a point his defense team used to argue he was not inciting violence. But Dean said the managers analyzed the same speech, and he used the words "fight" or "fighting" 20 times.


What do you think was the take away by his mob?