It's Over

[hunarcy]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

This Impeachment has little hope of getting Republicans to condemn Trump.

What it does is makes a case for History to condemn Trumps actions and inaction related to the attack. Republicans have a chance to refute what was presented today. If they are as ineffective as they were yesterday, History will also condemn those Republicans who failed to hold Trump accountable.

Specifically, Cruz, McConnell, Graham and others who supported the lies that led to the attacks

History will condemn the Democrats for making impeachment a political exercise instead of the deterrence to misbehavior it was intended to be by the Founders.

After today’s case, that is hardly likely

Republicans have no response to today’s charges. Don’t see any out of you either

Nothing to respond to...other than exercising his right to free speech, Trump didn't do anything wrong.

 

[Crepitus]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Never expected cowardly republicans to convict. Excusing his treasonous behavior makes them guilty if it as well.

But It was over before it started, a forgone conclusion.

 

[Concerned American]

Those without honor and dignity have zero problems with letting off a known traitor.

How childish. You people are flat wrong and dishonest in your pursuit, and you know it. The game will not turn for you despite your best efforts.

As I said earlier, it's as if Democrats are begging to be hated.

I've heard them and I wish to accommodate them.

 

[Lastamender]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

 

[Lastamender]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Never expected cowardly republicans to convict. Excusing his treasonous behavior makes them guilty if it as well.

But It was over before it started, a forgone conclusion.

I guess that makes you guilty of fraud and treason.

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

 

[BS Filter]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

This Impeachment has little hope of getting Republicans to condemn Trump.

What it does is makes a case for History to condemn Trumps actions and inaction related to the attack. Republicans have a chance to refute what was presented today. If they are as ineffective as they were yesterday, History will also condemn those Republicans who failed to hold Trump accountable.

Specifically, Cruz, McConnell, Graham and others who supported the lies that led to the attacks

History will condemn the Democrats for making impeachment a political exercise instead of the deterrence to misbehavior it was intended to be by the Founders.

After today’s case, that is hardly likely

Republicans have no response to today’s charges. Don’t see any out of you either

There is no case. President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful. Case closed.

 

[OKTexas]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

This Impeachment has little hope of getting Republicans to condemn Trump.

What it does is makes a case for History to condemn Trumps actions and inaction related to the attack. Republicans have a chance to refute what was presented today. If they are as ineffective as they were yesterday, History will also condemn those Republicans who failed to hold Trump accountable.

Specifically, Cruz, McConnell, Graham and others who supported the lies that led to the attacks

You just broke every irony meter on the planet. Hypocrisy, thy name is commiecrat.

.

 

[OKTexas]

This impeachment trial is and always will be remembered as a politically driven joke I don't believe I am going out a limb in the slightest when I say every member of the Senate Democrat and Republican knew how they were going to vote before the impeachment was ever sent to the Senate. When you have that all that is going is people playing politics which is what we are seeing.

Can you defend Trumps actions and inactions that were presented today?
Can you defend what Trump did to his Vice President?

Can you defend the DC mayor refusing to accept 10,000 national guard prior to Jan 6.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

So if someones Moral compass is different than yours they should be outcast and vilified!!! A very strange way of seeking equity, equality and Unity. So the path to Unity is exclusion and cancellation even drone strikes you folks are moon bats crazed follow your leader the pie eyed piper!!

No the path to unity according to the commies is, FORCED CONFORMATY TO THEIR IDEOLOGY, just like all the commie regimes that have ever existed.

.

 

[Faun]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Right, Republicans want to hide behind their false claim the Constitution doesn't allow this trial. What a pity Republicans have no balls.

 

[Faun]

T**** is clearly guilty. The Republican senators are looking pretty ugly right now.

Please list the legal points establishing his guilt.

No sloppy grouping of incongruent elements please, like the impeachment managers are employing. Clarity is king.

If not for Trump, there would not have been a seditious attack on our government.

 

[OKTexas]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

.

 

[Faun]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

This Impeachment has little hope of getting Republicans to condemn Trump.

What it does is makes a case for History to condemn Trumps actions and inaction related to the attack. Republicans have a chance to refute what was presented today. If they are as ineffective as they were yesterday, History will also condemn those Republicans who failed to hold Trump accountable.

Specifically, Cruz, McConnell, Graham and others who supported the lies that led to the attacks

History will condemn the Democrats for making impeachment a political exercise instead of the deterrence to misbehavior it was intended to be by the Founders.

After today’s case, that is hardly likely

Republicans have no response to today’s charges. Don’t see any out of you either

Nothing to respond to...other than exercising his right to free speech, Trump didn't do anything wrong.

He didn't? How about where he tried to get the VP to send electors back to their respective states so they could re-vote. Only the ones he lost, of course. That was an unconstitutional request. That was not wrong?

 

[Lastamender]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

You mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?

The way to fight back is in court. Not tyranny

He tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.

 

[dudmuck]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

“Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.”

History is often written by bad people. Opposition to the Democratic Party and their cohorts needs to increase exponentially to prevent that.

Opposition with no moral compass is the definition of Trumplicans and their cohorts.

Very true....no moral compass whatsoever.

Impeachment is a purely political process, but it is very apparent that many of today's Republicans are more concerned about their re-election chances than their conscience. Nothing is beyond the pale. No one expects conviction, but at least all of this is part of the record, and everyone could see very very clearly what happened. There is no question Trump planned and incited his "brown shirt" mob to over turn the election. It might be the consequences of this will be felt further on in time, and of course NewYork and Georgia are investigating him.

The scary thing is...if nothing is beyond the pale, what happens when a more competent kleptocrat with a resounding populist message comes into power? Who knows, it could be a leftist next time. Hell...they'll crap their pants

This Impeachment has little hope of getting Republicans to condemn Trump.

What it does is makes a case for History to condemn Trumps actions and inaction related to the attack. Republicans have a chance to refute what was presented today. If they are as ineffective as they were yesterday, History will also condemn those Republicans who failed to hold Trump accountable.

Specifically, Cruz, McConnell, Graham and others who supported the lies that led to the attacks

History will condemn the Democrats for making impeachment a political exercise instead of the deterrence to misbehavior it was intended to be by the Founders.

After today’s case, that is hardly likely

Republicans have no response to today’s charges. Don’t see any out of you either

Nothing to respond to...other than exercising his right to free speech, Trump didn't do anything wrong.

1st amendment doesnt apply to inciting imminent lawless action

Imminent lawless action - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Crepitus]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Never expected cowardly republicans to convict. Excusing his treasonous behavior makes them guilty if it as well.

But It was over before it started, a forgone conclusion.

I guess that makes you guilty of fraud and treason.

You guess wrong.

Unsurprisingly.

 

[OKTexas]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

Of course it wouldn't have happened if you commies and the state run media hadn't been denigrating Trump supporters for the last 4+ years either. Don't pretend your hands are clean.

You mean us Nazi commie socialists?! Haha. Denigration between the political loudmouth idiots is one thing. Tyranny is another. You can’t do your whataboutisms with this one.

 

[Faun]

Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest

I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.

“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?

Hell no this wouldn’t have occurred. The anger of the mob was built on lies told by Trump and a willingness to fight for him after he asked over and over for them to fight for him. Not fight through the power of their voices or the power of their vote but fight through the power of force to “stop the steal”. Trump called them to come to Washington and to go to the capital and to stop the steal at the same time the votes were being certified. This shit doesn’t get any more obvious and in your face. How do these assholes here deny Trumps culpability with a straight face?

President Trump told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. Fact.

That he did. So what?

So we know President Trump never told anyone to storm the Capitol and we know he told the crowd to be peaceful and patriotic. You agree. Therefore, you agree that President Trump is innocent of insurrection.

No I don’t agree. If your mind is so simple that those are the only elements that you cam see and hear then I don’t think I can help you. The series of events are so crystal clear it’s embarrassing if people like you still don’t get it.

The one article of impeachment didn't list a series of events, it claimed one event was the cause. The commies are trying to push irrelevant crap that would never be allowed in a court of law. This shit show is nothing but political theater and you commies deserve to lose.

.

Idiot or liar? It cited months of indoctrination of his base. It wasn't speech from just one day. But there was speech on that one day which contributed to the insurrection...

On January 6, 2021, pursuant to the 12th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, the Vice President of the United States, the House of Representatives, and the Senate met at the United States Capitol for a Joint Session of Congress to count the votes of the Electoral College. In the months preceding the Joint Session, President Trump repeatedly issued false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials. Shortly before the Joint Session commenced, President Trump, addressed a crowd at the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. There, he reiterated false claims that "we won this election, and we won it by a landslide." He also willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged — and foreseeably resulted in — lawless action at the Capitol, such as: "if you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore." Thus incited by President Trump, members of the crowd he had addressed, in an attempt to, among other objectives, interfere with the Joint Session's solemn constitutional duty to certify the results of the 2020 Presidential election, unlawfully breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice President, and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other violent, deadly, destructive and seditious acts.

President Trump's conduct on January 6, 2021, followed his prior efforts to subvert and obstruct the certification of the results of the 2020 Presidential election. Those prior efforts included a phone call on January 2, 2021, during which President Trump urged the secretary of state of Georgia, Brad Raffensperger, to "find" enough votes to overturn the Georgia Presidential election results and threatened Secretary Raffensperger if he failed to do so.​