candycorn
Diamond Member
You can't govern if you don't win. Win first; ask questions later. Trump is the lead horse in the pack so the money is being placed on him.
I still wonder why you think this bench is so deep. Romney had better credentials.
I think your political bias is clouding your judgement. They have a lot of successful young men of national prominence, either as governors or senators. They look much better than the Democrats.
The Democrats are putting forward a woman who is in her late 60s and is retread of the 90s (albeit I think she will be President). Look at who is challenging her. A septuagenarian socialist who isn't even a Democrat. And now that she's falling in the polls, who is being mooted as possible replacements? Guys in the 60s. Where are all the young Democrats? Where are the governors and senators? Gore, Kerry and Biden? Seriously? Can't find anyone not on Social Security? It's pretty sad.
This isn't anything new. I saw James Carville say the same thing a few years ago. I see many more potential Presidents on the Republican side than I do on the Democrats.
But the Republicans are intent on snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It's amazing how clueless these people are.
Really?You can't govern if you don't win. Win first; ask questions later. Trump is the lead horse in the pack so the money is being placed on him.
I still wonder why you think this bench is so deep. Romney had better credentials.
I think your political bias is clouding your judgement. They have a lot of successful young men of national prominence, either as governors or senators. They look much better than the Democrats.
I'll give you Rubio who has "national prominence". He did the rebuttal to Obama's SOTU a few years back (the infamous drink heard around the world). Outside of that, he has done very little to improve his standing--in fact has done quite a bit to hurt his standing. During Cruz's filibuster, he was quoting rap stars.
Marco Rubio Filibusters With Jay-Z, Wiz Khalifa Quotes | Rolling Stone
Say what you want about the politics of it. Does that scream "Elder Statesman" to you? As for success, being elected Senator is an accomplishment. Has he set the world on fire as such? Hardly. And his one big accomplishment--the Immigration plan--is pretty much garbage as far as the GOP is concerned.
But Paul, Cruz, and Graham? There is little hope of any of them becoming President.
The Governors are a better lot. Pataki, Kasich, Walker, Bush and Christie. Some decent candidates. But I'll stand by what I said, Romney with the mixture of public/private sector experience was a better candidate than them. Maybe Bush is better.
That you think she will be President indicates that you don't take Sanders insurgency seriously....or the GOP field for that matter. When you have someone with her resume, I don't think you worry too much about the rest of the field this go-round.The Democrats are putting forward a woman who is in her late 60s and is retread of the 90s (albeit I think she will be President). Look at who is challenging her. A septuagenarian socialist who isn't even a Democrat. And now that she's falling in the polls, who is being mooted as possible replacements? Guys in the 60s.
Corey Booker (46) isn't on Social Security.Where are all the young Democrats? Where are the governors and senators? Gore, Kerry and Biden? Seriously? Can't find anyone not on Social Security? It's pretty sad.
Julian Castro (40) isn't on Social Security.
Maria Cantwell (56) isn't on Social Security.
Steve Bullock (Gov. of MT) (51) isn't on Social Security and a rising star.
Jim Webb
Governor O'Malley
Susan Rice
There are plenty more who will be coming of age about the time Hillary is finishing her 2nd term. LOL. <--wishful thinking
Well, if you use the word "potential", Jim Webb is a potential President I suppose. So is Lyndon LaRouche. You honestly look at Ted Cruz and see a President? At Rand Paul? At Marco Rubio? Really?This isn't anything new. I saw James Carville say the same thing a few years ago. I see many more potential Presidents on the Republican side than I do on the Democrats.
You'll see a lot more GOP contenders for the throne as we move forward. Two reasons. The GOP is dominating the State Houses. Inside of 20 years, the electoral map will be nothing like it is today. Second reason is that the GOP can't decide what it means to be a republican.
Most of us measure victory by getting to 270 EVs. Some in the GOP have a different measurement. Unfortunately, that is a segment that seems to be growingBut the Republicans are intent on snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. It's amazing how clueless these people are.