Its very telling- liberals and blacks vs muslim terrorists

ninja007

Gold Member
Aug 4, 2014
9,812
3,042
Libs always excuse both black thug behavior and muslim terrorist behavior. But libs always blame cons for both issues while ignoring the real issues in both populations. Muslims turning into terrorists isn't America's fault. Black criminals are not the result of Conservative policies or values; just the opposite. In BOTH cases lib policy and beliefs influence the muslim terrorists and black criminals. Liberals always try to find reasons to excuse the behavior of both by blaming it on Conservatives.
 
Liberals always excuse murderers, thugs, and criminals. Anything that undermines or seeks to damage this country, they support. ALWAYS, and the more power they gain in Washington, the more blatant they are about it. Just look at our so-called president, that says it all.
 
The day libbie wibbies can name a black city/town that is not under the control of Democrats is the day I'll even begin to consider their arguments blaming conservatives for the savagery and barbarousness of black towns/cities.

"But but...most blacks are peaceful and law abiding!"

Yes, that may be true, but it's not the percentage of peaceful/law abiding people that matter, since even in the most savage societies the majority of people obey the ruler. What matters is the percentage of savages/outlaws, just like it only requires 3% of the population to win a revolution. The amount of black thugs/outlaws in any black town/city vastly exceeds the maximum threshold for a non-savage/non-barbarian black society to exist.

ninja007 I edited this post since you thanked it. If you don't agree with it anymore I've alerted you so you can remove your thanks/agreement with it.
 
Last edited:
Libs(1) always (2) excuse both black thug behavior (3) and muslim terrorist behavior (4). But libs always blame cons (5) for both issues while ignoring the real issues in both populations.

I love your threads. They're made out of such lightweight paper, they collapse at the slightest puff of air.

There's five fallacies in the first two sentences alone.
 
The day libbie wibbies can name a black city/town that is not under the control of Democrats is the day I'll even begin to consider their arguments blaming conservatives for the savagery and barbarousness of black towns/cities.

That doesn't even make any kind of coherent sense.
 
Libs always excuse both black thug behavior and muslim terrorist behavior. But libs always blame cons for both issues while ignoring the real issues in both populations. Muslims turning into terrorists isn't America's fault. Black criminals are not the result of Conservative policies or values; just the opposite. In BOTH cases lib policy and beliefs influence the muslim terrorists and black criminals. Liberals always try to find reasons to excuse the behavior of both by blaming it on Conservatives.
DumbAss-138223086893_xlarge.jpeg
 
Libs always excuse both black thug behavior and muslim terrorist behavior. But libs always blame cons for both issues while ignoring the real issues in both populations. Muslims turning into terrorists isn't America's fault. Black criminals are not the result of Conservative policies or values; just the opposite. In BOTH cases lib policy and beliefs influence the muslim terrorists and black criminals. Liberals always try to find reasons to excuse the behavior of both by blaming it on Conservatives.
And why is that whenever someone looks at a problem, figures out the components, and identifies areas of improvement some idiot conservative is willing to dismiss the idea because Benghazi it's a liberal "excuse"? Muslims did indeed turn into terrorists because of the US, and the US did indeed train those terrorists because Benghazi of the USSRs involvement in trying to politically take over oil fields.

And here's a Libertarian view for you. The US should never have declared a war on drugs, we should have opted for treatment instead of incarceration. Therefore, when Nixon - a conservative - decided to imprison people for smoking a little weed, his policies, and the policies every president following in his footsteps who respected or feared the conservative crime-centric crazies have created criminals. Conservative policies have driven most industry from inner cities and stranded the least mobile - who happen to be mostly black - and created a free-market in controlled substances as the only viable industry available (which is, itself, a conservative value).

And now we have an issue with a very stubborn and proud people - Muslims. The only policy that appeases conservatives seems to be all out war and their ultimate extermination. Expulsion from this country at the very least. Because Benghazi this is a Christian country and we don't allow that shit here.

It's not an excuse, it's an explanation. Whether you happen to agree with it or not, I think it's how a reasonable person with reasonable intelligence would see things.
 
Libs always excuse both black thug behavior and muslim terrorist behavior. But libs always blame cons for both issues while ignoring the real issues in both populations. Muslims turning into terrorists isn't America's fault. Black criminals are not the result of Conservative policies or values; just the opposite. In BOTH cases lib policy and beliefs influence the muslim terrorists and black criminals. Liberals always try to find reasons to excuse the behavior of both by blaming it on Conservatives.
DumbAss-138223086893_xlarge.jpeg
Stop posting the dashboard gauges from your car. God damn it, we've been over this already
 
Libs always excuse both black thug behavior and muslim terrorist behavior. But libs always blame cons for both issues while ignoring the real issues in both populations. Muslims turning into terrorists isn't America's fault. Black criminals are not the result of Conservative policies or values; just the opposite. In BOTH cases lib policy and beliefs influence the muslim terrorists and black criminals. Liberals always try to find reasons to excuse the behavior of both by blaming it on Conservatives.
DumbAss-138223086893_xlarge.jpeg
You've posted the gauges from your own dashboard twice? What the hell bro
 
The day libbie wibbies can name a black city/town that is not under the control of Democrats is the day I'll even begin to consider their arguments blaming conservatives for the savagery and barbarousness of black towns/cities.

Ferguson.
 
You're right, they wanna create "better world" for minorities and they're trying to give 'em more rights, but in fact, their "deeds" brings more harm than good to all our country... Why they can't understand such simplest things?
 
The day libbie wibbies can name a black city/town that is not under the control of Democrats is the day I'll even begin to consider their arguments blaming conservatives for the savagery and barbarousness of black towns/cities.

Ferguson.

So, your claim is that the political offices of Ferguson were dominated by conservatives?

You asked for a city not run by Democrats. Ferguson, you may have heard of it, is not run by Democrats.

So now stick to your end of the bargain.
 
The day libbie wibbies can name a black city/town that is not under the control of Democrats is the day I'll even begin to consider their arguments blaming conservatives for the savagery and barbarousness of black towns/cities.

Ferguson.

So, your claim is that the political offices of Ferguson were dominated by conservatives?

You asked for a city not run by Democrats. Ferguson, you may have heard of it, is not run by Democrats.

So now stick to your end of the bargain.

The Washington Times seems to think otherwise (and everyone else too).

Black voters rejecting Democratic Party in Ferguson It s time to send a message - Washington Times

Now stick to your end of the bargain.
 

Forum List

Back
Top