Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But there are those of us looking at the whole picture. From declining ice mass on Greenland and Antarctica, alpine glaciers receding worldwide, ocean pH, warming atmosphere, warming oceans, going from 280 ppm CO2 to 400+ ppm CO2, about 750 ppb to over 1800 ppb CH4. From Tyndall's early experiments, to Arrhenius's estimation of the effects of a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere. If you have a minor in Physics, then you have to know what those are.Well, thank you for correcting me. There are not wrong or right scientists just like there is not good or bad science. That's something many too often forget. I still think, MaryL, that the whole picture should be looked at on the scientific end. I simply was persuaded to look at it more closely by things that didn't seem right, and my own science led me to see it differently. I got somewhere like a 34/36 on the ACT in science. I have a Master's in Math and a Minor in Physics.
[/URL]How are you on smog and plastic in the oceans?Well I think the consensus global warming science is wrong now. Hopefully I can hang with the other side.
I am convinced that they do not treat people seriously enough who try to go against the consensus. It is like string theory - non-observable, non-repeatable, non-falsifiable, non-testable. They were saying it (AGW) since the '50s, when we really didn't have any evidence, perhaps to ease people's minds about nukes. There are definite financial incentives, such as vaccines and abortion services.
The charts that I relied on from the M.I.T. class were not conclusive enough to show a steady prediction.
Top Scientist Resigns Admitting Global Warming Is A Big Scam
I am not trying to tell anyone who to vote for but just taking a stand on this one issue.
OK. When Dr. Lewis can provide us with a scientific explanation of what we are seeing right now on this planet, I will listen to the old fart. Until then, he is just another over the hill fool denying the science.
On the contrary, for the last 6000 years, until the advent of the Industrial Age, the climate was slowly cooling.The climate has been getting warmer, it does that on its own. Been doing it for eons. Relax and throw some more charcoal on the grill.
Climate myths: It’s been far warmer in the past, what’s the big deal?
e·on
ˈēən,ˈēˌän/
noun
Well now, silly ignorant ass, you lose even more on that. For most of past eons, the world has been warmer, with a few glacial periods thrown in.
- an indefinite and very long period of time, often a period exaggerated for humorous or rhetorical effect.
"he reached the crag eons before I arrived"
- ASTRONOMYGEOLOGY
a unit of time equal to a billion years.- GEOLOGY
a major division of geological time, subdivided into eras.
"the Precambrian eon"
"I've changed sides"
That there are those who perceive ‘sides’ is the problem.
On a scientific issue, and that is what global warming is, there are no sides. Just what the evidence and observations indicate. That the 'Conservatives' have made it a matter of sides is an indication that they are not interested in the science, just the politics of it."I've changed sides"
That there are those who perceive ‘sides’ is the problem.
Why are facts summed up into a conspiracy? Ice sheets are melting, its getting warmer and drier and the weather is totally freakinkin out. Facts are facts. We aren't seeing Elvis holding hands with the Loc ness monster.
Well, thank you for correcting me. There are not wrong or right scientists just like there is not good or bad science. That's something many too often forget. I still think, MaryL, that the whole picture should be looked at on the scientific end. I simply was persuaded to look at it more closely by things that didn't seem right, and my own science led me to see it differently. I got somewhere like a 34/36 on the ACT in science. I have a Master's in Math and a Minor in Physics.
Funny, We've been asking you to produce said evidence and you cant seem to find it... And then you post up political crap...On a scientific issue, and that is what global warming is, there are no sides. Just what the evidence and observations indicate. That the 'Conservatives' have made it a matter of sides is an indication that they are not interested in the science, just the politics of it."I've changed sides"
That there are those who perceive ‘sides’ is the problem.
But there are those of us looking at the whole picture. From declining ice mass on Greenland and Antarctica, alpine glaciers receding worldwide, ocean pH, warming atmosphere, warming oceans, going from 280 ppm CO2 to 400+ ppm CO2, about 750 ppb to over 1800 ppb CH4. From Tyndall's early experiments, to Arrhenius's estimation of the effects of a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere. If you have a minor in Physics, then you have to know what those are.Well, thank you for correcting me. There are not wrong or right scientists just like there is not good or bad science. That's something many too often forget. I still think, MaryL, that the whole picture should be looked at on the scientific end. I simply was persuaded to look at it more closely by things that didn't seem right, and my own science led me to see it differently. I got somewhere like a 34/36 on the ACT in science. I have a Master's in Math and a Minor in Physics.
How are you on smog and plastic in the oceans?Well I think the consensus global warming science is wrong now. Hopefully I can hang with the other side.
I am convinced that they do not treat people seriously enough who try to go against the consensus. It is like string theory - non-observable, non-repeatable, non-falsifiable, non-testable. They were saying it (AGW) since the '50s, when we really didn't have any evidence, perhaps to ease people's minds about nukes. There are definite financial incentives, such as vaccines and abortion services.
The charts that I relied on from the M.I.T. class were not conclusive enough to show a steady prediction.
Top Scientist Resigns Admitting Global Warming Is A Big Scam
I am not trying to tell anyone who to vote for but just taking a stand on this one issue.
Well I think the consensus global warming science is wrong now. Hopefully I can hang with the other side.
I am convinced that they do not treat people seriously enough who try to go against the consensus. It is like string theory - non-observable, non-repeatable, non-falsifiable, non-testable. They were saying it (AGW) since the '50s, when we really didn't have any evidence, perhaps to ease people's minds about nukes. There are definite financial incentives, such as vaccines and abortion services.
The charts that I relied on from the M.I.T. class were not conclusive enough to show a steady prediction.
Top Scientist Resigns Admitting Global Warming Is A Big Scam
I am not trying to tell anyone who to vote for but just taking a stand on this one issue.
Well I think the consensus global warming science is wrong now. Hopefully I can hang with the other side.
I am convinced that they do not treat people seriously enough who try to go against the consensus. It is like string theory - non-observable, non-repeatable, non-falsifiable, non-testable. They were saying it (AGW) since the '50s, when we really didn't have any evidence, perhaps to ease people's minds about nukes. There are definite financial incentives, such as vaccines and abortion services.
The charts that I relied on from the M.I.T. class were not conclusive enough to show a steady prediction.
Top Scientist Resigns Admitting Global Warming Is A Big Scam
I am not trying to tell anyone who to vote for but just taking a stand on this one issue.
String Theory can never be tested and made up by mad scientists probably under the influence of alcohol and other mind altering drugs. There are different string theories and even the mad scientists can't decide how many dimensions there are. Global warming is testable and proved to be happening.
All it takes is an intelligent mind imagining. An unintelligent imaginer would only be able to fatom one universe made by a creator. But what is beyond our universe and what created God?Well I think the consensus global warming science is wrong now. Hopefully I can hang with the other side.
I am convinced that they do not treat people seriously enough who try to go against the consensus. It is like string theory - non-observable, non-repeatable, non-falsifiable, non-testable. They were saying it (AGW) since the '50s, when we really didn't have any evidence, perhaps to ease people's minds about nukes. There are definite financial incentives, such as vaccines and abortion services.
The charts that I relied on from the M.I.T. class were not conclusive enough to show a steady prediction.
Top Scientist Resigns Admitting Global Warming Is A Big Scam
I am not trying to tell anyone who to vote for but just taking a stand on this one issue.
String Theory can never be tested and made up by mad scientists probably under the influence of alcohol and other mind altering drugs. There are different string theories and even the mad scientists can't decide how many dimensions there are. Global warming is testable and proved to be happening.
what are you seeing? shit dude, SSDD has been asking for observed data. Why haven't you posted any since you're now making this statement?OK. When Dr. Lewis can provide us with a scientific explanation of what we are seeing right now on this planet, I will listen to the old fart. Until then, he is just another over the hill fool denying the science.
