Jack Smith could face indictment

[bripat9643]

Yeah I got it. Why are we using metaphors? How about a direct and specific discussion about reality. Y’all hid me behind these metaphors and evasive claims. Run when it comes to specifics. It’s extremely weak

How stupid are you?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

How stupid are you?

He can't even wrap his feeble intellect around "A jury could indict a ham sandwich".

He's literally been pondering it for multiple pages of this thread.

Debating a kindergartener would be eminently more intimidating, if not as amusing.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The man that sat on OJ's team and is a Fox News shill? Sorry, Al lost his credibility a long time ago.
Oh yeah..and Trump isn't gonna win.

/——-/ Your smear of Alan Dershowitz is laughable. Other than name calling you got nothing.

Alan Dershowitz - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Independent thinker]

LOL ^^^: List Jack Smith and the other 99 who were corrupt, or STFU!

I don't have the time to list a hundred people but it involves the Russian Collusion hoax, dems refusing to certify the 2016 election, all of the democrats who claimed the 2016 election was not legitimate, all of those in the Jan 6th investigation, and all of the other investigations and abuses of power to indict.

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

 

[Hum Dinger]

Those of us who paid attention in Physics (and many of us who didn't), are well aware that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The Democrats, in their desperate fury to throw the kitchen sink at Trump, are not only putting him in the driver's seat for 2024; they are putting themselves in serious legal jeopardy.

Alan Dershowitz: Jack Smith could face indictment if Trump wins case * WorldNetDaily * by Around the Web

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Special Counsel Jack Smith could himself be indicted if the indictment of former President Donald Trump is thrown out.

www.wnd.com

The possibility of this is very real.

Trump will never win his trial in DC.

But he will definitely appeal it - and the case is almost just as flimsy as the rest. He will win on appeal.

Potentially right around the time he moves back into the White House.

What a confluence of striking events that is.

How sweet it's going to be next year, when the idiot Leftists crowing on this board about what seems to be an imminent victory - self-immolate into the perpetual abyss of total loss.

Unless Smith or the judge screw up royally, the case will not be appealed.

"must be a legal basis for the appeal an alleged material error in the trial not just the fact that the losing party didn t like the verdict."

But it's a free country...keep dreamin'!

 

[Billiejeens]

Attorney General Merrick Garland claims Smith has been conducting a fair and impartial investigation, his connection to protecting former IRS official Lois Lerner paints a different picture.

Smith worked with Lerner to target conservative tea party groups back in 2010. In fact, then Attorney General Eric Holder was asked to make Smith available for testimony in front of the House Oversight Committee about his role in weaponizing the powerful agency. After the scandal broke, Lerner eventually retired in disgrace (with a nice bonus from taxpayers and without consequences).

 

[Winston]

He didn't negotiate Biden's failure to take any action when the Afghans failed to comply with the terms, dumbass.

From the article,

The agreement contained no enforcement mechanisms and included no penalties on the Taliban for failing to comply with its terms.

And who do you think you are fooling. If Biden would have backed out of the agreement and kept the forces in Afghanistan you would be bitching about forever wars and such. Seems to be Biden, and more importantly, the American military, made the best of a bad situation.

 

[Billiejeens]

We've been waiting for you to jail him for 7 fucking years.

How you have the temerity to say any of this shit utterly escapes me.

Just no self awareness, like at all.

Tell ya what: If we come back in another 7 years - halfway through DeSantis' term, and Trump's still not in jail - will you finally shut the fuck up?

Nope.

August 2030: CNN is reporting that former President Trump has been indicted for using the wrong fork to eat his salad at the dinner where he accepted his Nobel Peace Prize for Middle East accomplishments...

You: "HE GOIN' DOWN"!!!!!

temerity


holy fuck dude. are you sure that you used to be a Democrat?

 

[Billiejeens]

Unless Smith or the judge screw up royally, the case will not be appealed.

"must be a legal basis for the appeal an alleged material error in the trial not just the fact that the losing party didn t like the verdict."

But it's a free country...keep dreamin'!

If the Judge doesn't grant a change of venue, that will be a sure appeal.

 

[Hum Dinger]

If the Judge doesn't grant a change of venue, that will be a sure appeal.

No valid reason to grant a change of venue.

The crime happened in DC and that's where the trial must happen.

To bad you're not getting the jury of 12 MAGGOTS that you want...Loser!

 

[Billiejeens]

No valid reason to grant a change of venue.

The crime happened in DC and that's where the trial must happen.

To bad you're not getting the jury of 12 MAGGOTS that you want...Loser!

Clearly you don't know what a change of venue motion is.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

No valid reason to grant a change of venue.

The crime happened in DC and that's where the trial must happen.

To bad you're not getting the jury of 12 MAGGOTS that you want...Loser!

Yeah, who are we gonna believe - you or Alan Dershowitz?

Oh, and BTW:

'The View' Co-Host Asks CNN Legal Analyst If Trump Will Go to Jail, Gets Crushing Answer

And yet another Leftist fantasy comes crashing down to Earth... With CNN legal analyst Elie Honig in the audience, co-host Joy Behar posed the question on everyone’s mind: “Can I just ask Elie if he thinks Trump will go to jail?” Honig did not give Behar the answer she wanted. “No. Sorry...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[bripat9643]

From the article,

The agreement contained no enforcement mechanisms and included no penalties on the Taliban for failing to comply with its terms.

And who do you think you are fooling. If Biden would have backed out of the agreement and kept the forces in Afghanistan you would be bitching about forever wars and such. Seems to be Biden, and more importantly, the American military, made the best of a bad situation.

So your argument is that we would have criticized Biden anyway? Does that logic ever work in court?

 

[Hum Dinger]

Clearly you don't know what a change of venue motion is.

There has to be a valid reason for a change in venue.

 

[bripat9643]

There has to be a valid reason for a change in venue.

95% Democrat in DC is as valid a reason as any, chump

 

[RhodyPatriot]

95% Democrat in DC is as valid a reason as any, chump

He doesn't need a change in venue.

There will be an appeal, even if it has to go all the way to the Supremes.

It'll fail like everything else has.

I mean, if you were a gambler and HAD to bet, who would you place your chips on given the Dems horrible track record vis a vis Trump?

If one is being intellectually honest, the question answers itself.

 

[Hum Dinger]

95% Democrat in DC is as valid a reason as any, chump

Nope. Saying that he can't get a fair trial in DC based on politics is an indictment of the very people who decide whether to change venues.

Expecting them to agree to move the venue to a place that's overwhelmingly Pro-Trump by saying that DC is anti-Trump is idiotic.

Just what I'd expect from you!

 

[bripat9643]

Nope. Saying that he can't get a fair trial in DC based on politics is an indictment of the very people who decide whether to change venues.

True enough. So?

Expecting them to agree to move the venue to a place that's overwhelmingly Pro-Trump by saying that DC is anti-Trump is idiotic.

Who said they need to move to a place that's overwhelmingly pro-Trump?

Just what I'd expect from you!

 

[excalibur]

The evidence against Trump is solid.
Read the indictments if you don't believe me.

LOL It reads like a white paper from the DNC.