Jack Smith could face indictment

[Rye Catcher]

Those of us who paid attention in Physics (and many of us who didn't), are well aware that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The Democrats, in their desperate fury to throw the kitchen sink at Trump, are not only putting him in the driver's seat for 2024; they are putting themselves in serious legal jeopardy.

Alan Dershowitz: Jack Smith could face indictment if Trump wins case * WorldNetDaily * by Around the Web

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Special Counsel Jack Smith could himself be indicted if the indictment of former President Donald Trump is thrown out.

www.wnd.com

The possibility of this is very real.

Trump will never win his trial in DC.

But he will definitely appeal it - and the case is almost just as flimsy as the rest. He will win on appeal.

Potentially right around the time he moves back into the White House.

What a confluence of striking events that is.

How sweet it's going to be next year, when the idiot Leftists crowing on this board about what seems to be an imminent victory - self-immolate into the perpetual abyss of total loss.

LOL: Another Internet tabloid. Read the BS here:

Home

www.wnd.com

 

[toobfreak]

Sorry, Al lost his credibility a long time ago.

TRANSLATION: Poor Leftist Jack has to tune out the views of anyone, even an expert, who doesn't tell him what he wants to hear!

 

[Rye Catcher]

There are a whole lotta people who need to be indicted for abuse of power for political purposes, going all the way back to 2016 before Trump even took office. Jack Smith is but one of over a hundred.

LOL ^^^: List Jack Smith and the other 99 who were corrupt, or STFU!

 

[RhodyPatriot]

LOL: Another Internet tabloid. Read the BS here:

Home

www.wnd.com

You people are such braindead zombies.

Forget the fact that World Net Daily has more integrity in a single sentence than the NY Times on its best day.

And never mind that the original source is Daily Caller.

Your claim doesn't even make sense.

Are you saying Dershowitz DIDN'T say it?

It's a fucking video from FOX News with Alan Dershowitz live on the air.

You retards just reflexively see something you don't like, call it Fake News, and move on.

Why do you even bother?

All it shows is you're not even capable of engaging in the rhetorical jousting necessary to traverse a political message board.

 

[toobfreak]

Trump is a menace to this country.

 

[Faun]

Those of us who paid attention in Physics (and many of us who didn't), are well aware that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The Democrats, in their desperate fury to throw the kitchen sink at Trump, are not only putting him in the driver's seat for 2024; they are putting themselves in serious legal jeopardy.

Alan Dershowitz: Jack Smith could face indictment if Trump wins case * WorldNetDaily * by Around the Web

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Special Counsel Jack Smith could himself be indicted if the indictment of former President Donald Trump is thrown out.

www.wnd.com

The possibility of this is very real.

Trump will never win his trial in DC.

But he will definitely appeal it - and the case is almost just as flimsy as the rest. He will win on appeal.

Potentially right around the time he moves back into the White House.

What a confluence of striking events that is.

How sweet it's going to be next year, when the idiot Leftists crowing on this board about what seems to be an imminent victory - self-immolate into the perpetual abyss of total loss.

Oh? Got any examples of any prosecutors indicted for losing their case...?

 

[toobfreak]

I know more about the Constitution than he does.

JACK THE CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR!

 

[Slade3200]

What's that, boy? You need a good physic? All plugged up again with leftist bullshit?

Once again, the best laid plans to get Trump are fizzling out!

Uhh he is being arrested again today. That’s not a fizzle. You are detached from reality

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Oh? Got any examples of any prosecutors indicted for losing their case...?

Another reading comprehension casualty.

 

[Faun]

Another reading comprehension casualty.

Concession accepted.

 

[toobfreak]

Uhh he is being arrested again today.

Again? Idiot, Trump has NEVER been arrested. You must have diarrhea of the brain.

That’s not a fizzle. You are detached from reality

Your brain must be detached from its spinal cord.

 

[Winston]

There are no such sources, moron.

Seriously, how damn flippin hard is it to read the last indictment? How damn hard is it to look into the testimony before the January 6 committee? "There are no such sources, moron"--How the fawk can you make such a stupid statement? There are several, they are now part of the public record, and anyone that doesn't have their head shoved up their ass, would know that.

Trump told his top military advisor 'we're going to give that to the next guy,' apparently conceding Biden's win days before January 6

According to special counsel Jack Smith's indictment, Trump had been informed that Inauguration Day was just 17 days away.

news.yahoo.com

That came out yesterday but just add it to a long list. You are a waste of air.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Concession accepted.

Here ya go, but it has a lot of words and such - so you may just peter out.

“The statute says the following, two or more persons conspire to injure and deny somebody the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured him by the constitution. What if a court ultimately rules that Donald Trump had a right under the First Amendment to make his Jan. 6 speech and to do what he did? Then Jack Smith will have conspired to deny him of that right. That’s how serious this is.”

I await your informed, nuanced analysis.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

JACK THE CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR!

Y-A-W-N. Back to having nothing.

 

[Winston]

I count years of trying to bring Trump down and failing every time. So now the DOJ is attacking, and violating EVERY Americans rights in the process.

You are so fucking stupid that you think the DOJ is going to win. They aren't. All they are doing is ensuring a real civil war in the very near future.

The half of Americans who voted for Trump have figured out that they are next if Trump goes down.

You think 80 million armed people are going to let themselves be marched off to the "reeducation" camps?

You're insane.

LMAO, you guys won't do jackshit, just a bunch of dumbasses with big mouths. The January 6 insurrection a case in point, rioters more worried about taking selfies and posting on social media than anything. The reality is all of you are too stupid to mount any kind of resistance. You continue to prove that each and every day.

 

[toobfreak]

Y-A-W-N. Back to having nothing.

Jackoff, you were BORN with nothing.

Nothing in the head OR pants.

 

[Winston]

Let's just say that script is gonna get flipped.

The Left are existentially dreading a second Trump term because they know he will demolish the Deep State and ensure no latent vestiges survive.

And if Jack Off going to jail is part and parcel of the MAGA process, so be it.

Why the hell didn't Trump "demolish the Deep State" in his first term?

 

[bripat9643]

Seriously, how damn flippin hard is it to read the last indictment? How damn hard is it to look into the testimony before the January 6 committee? "There are no such sources, moron"--How the fawk can you make such a stupid statement? There are several, they are now part of the public record, and anyone that doesn't have their head shoved up their ass, would know that.

It's hardly stupid. Your theory that Jack Smith can be trusted to give an honest presentation of the facts doesn't pass the laugh test. There are no sources that support Smith's indictments. They're there only to fool gullible morons like you.

The Jan 6 committee is a kangaroo court. It has nothing to do with the facts or the truth.

Trump told his top military advisor 'we're going to give that to the next guy,' apparently conceding Biden's win days before January 6

According to special counsel Jack Smith's indictment, Trump had been informed that Inauguration Day was just 17 days away.

news.yahoo.com

That came out yesterday but just add it to a long list. You are a waste of air.

It doesn't prove what you think it proves. "The next guy" could be four years from 2020.

Bottom line: you're a dumbass

 

[RhodyPatriot]

LMAO, you guys won't do jackshit, just a bunch of dumbasses with big mouths.

We've been waiting for you to jail him for 7 fucking years.

How you have the temerity to say any of this shit utterly escapes me.

Just no self awareness, like at all.

Tell ya what: If we come back in another 7 years - halfway through DeSantis' term, and Trump's still not in jail - will you finally shut the fuck up?

Nope.

August 2030: CNN is reporting that former President Trump has been indicted for using the wrong fork to eat his salad at the dinner where he accepted his Nobel Peace Prize for Middle East accomplishments...

You: "HE GOIN' DOWN"!!!!!

 

[struth]

Those of us who paid attention in Physics (and many of us who didn't), are well aware that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.

The Democrats, in their desperate fury to throw the kitchen sink at Trump, are not only putting him in the driver's seat for 2024; they are putting themselves in serious legal jeopardy.

Alan Dershowitz: Jack Smith could face indictment if Trump wins case * WorldNetDaily * by Around the Web

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said that Special Counsel Jack Smith could himself be indicted if the indictment of former President Donald Trump is thrown out.

www.wnd.com

The possibility of this is very real.

Trump will never win his trial in DC.

But he will definitely appeal it - and the case is almost just as flimsy as the rest. He will win on appeal.

Potentially right around the time he moves back into the White House.

What a confluence of striking events that is.

How sweet it's going to be next year, when the idiot Leftists crowing on this board about what seems to be an imminent victory - self-immolate into the perpetual abyss of total loss.

I doubt he'll ultimately be indicted for it