Jack Smith's cases in jeopardy because he was NOT legally appointed. (Poll)

[kyzr]

Judge Cannon is no hack judge like Engeron or Merchan. The democrat's "Lawfare" just hit the wall.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/politics/cannon-trump-special-counsel-hearing/index.html

Judge Aileen Cannon rips up court schedule in Mar-a-Lago case in ways that benefit Trump​

Cannon is planning on holding a sprawling hearing on Trump’s request to declare Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel invalid, signaling she could be more willing than any other trial judge to veto the special prosecutor’s authority.
The planned hearing also adds a new, unusual twist in the federal criminal case against the former president: Cannon on Tuesday said that a variety of political partisans and constitutional scholars not otherwise involved with the case can join in the oral arguments later this month.
It’s an extraordinary elevation of arguments in a criminal case – filed a year ago this week – that likely won’t see trial until next year, if at all.

Two former Republican-appointed US attorneys general, Edwin Meese and Michael Mukasey, are part of the groups of so-called “friends of the court” that side with Trump and whom Cannon will hear from. The three groups will be allowed to argue, in addition to Justice Department and defendants’ lawyers, for 30 minutes each, according to the court record.
Meese and Mukasey have special insight to share with the judge, they say, given their former roles leading the Justice Department.

The hearing is scheduled for June 21st. I have no clue how it will shake out, but here's hoping that Lawfare loses bigly.


JUST IN: FANI WILLIS' CASE AGAINST TRUMP HALTED BY GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS.
SO NO MORE TRIALS BEFORE NOVEMBER

 

[Votto]

Judge Cannon is no hack judge like Engeron or Merchan. The democrat's "Lawfare" just hit the wall.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/politics/cannon-trump-special-counsel-hearing/index.html

Judge Aileen Cannon rips up court schedule in Mar-a-Lago case in ways that benefit Trump​

Cannon is planning on holding a sprawling hearing on Trump’s request to declare Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel invalid, signaling she could be more willing than any other trial judge to veto the special prosecutor’s authority.
The planned hearing also adds a new, unusual twist in the federal criminal case against the former president: Cannon on Tuesday said that a variety of political partisans and constitutional scholars not otherwise involved with the case can join in the oral arguments later this month.
It’s an extraordinary elevation of arguments in a criminal case – filed a year ago this week – that likely won’t see trial until next year, if at all.

Two former Republican-appointed US attorneys general, Edwin Meese and Michael Mukasey, are part of the groups of so-called “friends of the court” that side with Trump and whom Cannon will hear from. The three groups will be allowed to argue, in addition to Justice Department and defendants’ lawyers, for 30 minutes each, according to the court record.
Meese and Mukasey have special insight to share with the judge, they say, given their former roles leading the Justice Department.

The hearing is scheduled for June 21st. I have no clue how it will shake out, but here's hoping that Lawfare loses bigly.


JUST IN: FANI WILLIS' CASE AGAINST TRUMP HALTED BY GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS.
SO NO MORE TRIALS BEFORE NOVEMBER

The DNC got their conviction, the facts don't matter.

They will run with the propaganda now, which is all they wanted.

Then they will just blame some Putin conspiracy for questioning the verdict.

 

[Skylar]

Judge Cannon is no hack judge like Engeron or Merchan. The democrat's "Lawfare" just hit the wall.

Judge Cannon, the judge that in violation of the separation of powers took a case that wasn't hers, tried to tell the DOJ how they could investigate their own case and was thrown off the case by a 3 panel 11th circuit court in 2022?

In an absolute evisceration of judge Cannon, the 11th circuit overturned her 'radical reordering of caselaw', and an attempt to 'write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant."

They vacated EVERY order that Cannon made on Trump's case, from her attempt to assert equitable jurisdiction over a case that wasn't hers to the appointment of special master, to her flagrant violation of 50 years of legal precedent in the Richey test, finding that her application of exceptions for Trump defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies “to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank." And that her orders violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.

This is the woman that ISN'T a hack?

 

[excalibur]

Judge Cannon, the judge that in violation of the separation of powers took a case that wasn't hers, tried to tell the DOJ how they could investigate their own case and was thrown off the case by a 3 panel 11th circuit court in 2022?

In an absolute evisceration of judge Cannon, the 11th circuit overturned her 'radical reordering of caselaw', and an attempt to 'write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant."

They vacated EVERY order that Cannon made on Trump's case, from her attempt to assert equitable jurisdiction over a case that wasn't hers to the appointment of special master, to her flagrant violation of 50 years of legal precedent in the Richey test, finding that her application of exceptions for Trump defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies “to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank." And that her orders violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.

This is the woman that ISN'T a hack?

​

 

[kyzr]

Judge Cannon, the judge that in violation of the separation of powers took a case that wasn't hers, tried to tell the DOJ how they could investigate their own case and was thrown off the case by a 3 panel 11th circuit court in 2022?

In an absolute evisceration of judge Cannon, the 11th circuit overturned her 'radical reordering of caselaw', and an attempt to 'write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant."

They vacated EVERY order that Cannon made on Trump's case, from her attempt to assert equitable jurisdiction over a case that wasn't hers to the appointment of special master, to her flagrant violation of 50 years of legal precedent in the Richey test, finding that her application of exceptions for Trump defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies “to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank." And that her orders violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations. This is the woman that ISN'T a hack?

She didn't rule like Engeron or Merchan in obvious violation of law to convict a political opponent in a show trial.
She wants to be sure that the defendant has all of his Constitutional protections so the result is not overturned.

Engeron and Merchan will probably have their "convictions" overturned, proving that they are political hacks.

 

[Skylar]

​

Or I've just read the 11th Circuit's ruling, when they tossed Cannon out on her ass.

 

[Skylar]

She didn't rule like Engeron or Merchan in obvious violation of law to convict a political opponent in a show trial.
She wants to be sure that the defendant has all of his Constitutional protections so the result is not overturned.

Engeron and Merchan will probably have their "convictions" overturned, proving that they are political hacks.

She ruled in a manner so eggregious, carving out special exemptions for Trump in violations of 50 years of precedent, so contrary to basic principles of separation-of-powers that the 11th Circuit threw her the hell off the case.

 

[excalibur]

Or I've just read the 11th Circuit's ruling, when they tossed Cannon out on her ass.

View attachment 958073

You:
​

 

[kyzr]

She ruled in a manner so egregious, carving out special exemptions for Trump in violations of 50 years of precedent, so contrary to basic principles of separation-of-powers that the 11th Circuit threw her the hell off the case.

But its okay for the DOJ to let Hunter's "egregious" tax crimes expire?
Two IRS agent whistleblowers can't understand why.
Two-tier justice system.

If they threw her off the case, why is she still on it?
You're posting about Jack Smith's classified documents case right?

 

[Skylar]

But its okay for the DOJ to let Hunter's "egregious" tax crimes expire?
Two IRS agent whistleblowers can't understand why.
Two-tier justice system.

If they threw her off the case, why is she still on it?
You're posting about Jack Smith's classified documents case right?

Laughing....so you're going to ignore the entire premise of the thread and claims about Judge Cannon not being a hack....and flee to whataboutry with Hunter Biden?

I accept your capitulation about Judge Cannon with all the grace and patience it deserves.

 

[Nostra]

Judge Cannon, the judge that in violation of the separation of powers took a case that wasn't hers, tried to tell the DOJ how they could investigate their own case and was thrown off the case by a 3 panel 11th circuit court in 2022?

In an absolute evisceration of judge Cannon, the 11th circuit overturned her 'radical reordering of caselaw', and an attempt to 'write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant."

They vacated EVERY order that Cannon made on Trump's case, from her attempt to assert equitable jurisdiction over a case that wasn't hers to the appointment of special master, to her flagrant violation of 50 years of legal precedent in the Richey test, finding that her application of exceptions for Trump defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies “to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank." And that her orders violate bedrock separation-of-powers limitations.

This is the woman that ISN'T a hack?

Provide your evidence, Troll.

 

[Skylar]

Provide your evidence, Troll.

I've already offered screenshots of the very 11th Circuit ruling I'm referring to. In post 7, and post 6.

With the entire ruling available here.

Remember, Nostra......just because you do no original research doesn't mean I'm similarly crippled.

 

[Nostra]

I've already offered screenshots of the very 11th Circuit ruling I'm referring to. In post 7, and post 6.

With the entire ruling available here.

Remember, Nostra......just because you do no original research doesn't mean I'm similarly crippled.

Nah,, that didn't back up you lies, Troll.

 

[Skylar]

Nah,, that didn't back up you lies, Troll.

Ah, good ol' Argument from Ignorance. Where you refuse to look at the ruling. And then insist any citation is fake because you won't look at it.

And yet closing your eyes and pretending doesn't make this passage of the 11th circuit ruilng disappear:

Laughing....what a hack Cannon is.

With the entire ruling available here. Good luck with the desperate, willful ignorance!

 

[kyzr]

Laughing....so you're going to ignore the entire premise of the thread and claims about Judge Cannon not being a hack....and flee to whataboutry with Hunter Biden? I accept your capitulation about Judge Cannon with all the grace and patience it deserves.

Don't dodge your claim that she was "thrown off the case".
She is still on the case.
If she's still on the case, you're lying about her.

My point is that Cannon protects the rights of the accused, Engeron and Merchan use the courts as political hacks.
Thanks for playing.

 

[Crepitus]

Judge Cannon is no hack judge like Engeron or Merchan. The democrat's "Lawfare" just hit the wall.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/04/politics/cannon-trump-special-counsel-hearing/index.html

Judge Aileen Cannon rips up court schedule in Mar-a-Lago case in ways that benefit Trump​

Cannon is planning on holding a sprawling hearing on Trump’s request to declare Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel invalid, signaling she could be more willing than any other trial judge to veto the special prosecutor’s authority.
The planned hearing also adds a new, unusual twist in the federal criminal case against the former president: Cannon on Tuesday said that a variety of political partisans and constitutional scholars not otherwise involved with the case can join in the oral arguments later this month.
It’s an extraordinary elevation of arguments in a criminal case – filed a year ago this week – that likely won’t see trial until next year, if at all.

Two former Republican-appointed US attorneys general, Edwin Meese and Michael Mukasey, are part of the groups of so-called “friends of the court” that side with Trump and whom Cannon will hear from. The three groups will be allowed to argue, in addition to Justice Department and defendants’ lawyers, for 30 minutes each, according to the court record.
Meese and Mukasey have special insight to share with the judge, they say, given their former roles leading the Justice Department.

The hearing is scheduled for June 21st. I have no clue how it will shake out, but here's hoping that Lawfare loses bigly.


JUST IN: FANI WILLIS' CASE AGAINST TRUMP HALTED BY GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS.
SO NO MORE TRIALS BEFORE NOVEMBER

This won't happen.

 

[Crepitus]

But its okay for the DOJ to let Hunter's "egregious" tax crimes expire?
Two IRS agent whistleblowers can't understand why.
Two-tier justice system.

If they threw her off the case, why is she still on it?
You're posting about Jack Smith's classified documents case right?

You know that if it happens it mean hunter Biden is free to go as well, right?

 

[Skylar]

Don't dodge your claim that she was "thrown off the case".

You're confused. Not the 2022 case, which is what I'm clearly referring to. And cited. And linked to.

You obviously didn't read the 11th Circuit Court case I cited, did you?

Unless you want to tell me how I could be referring to the current case when I'm citing a 2022 ruling......and Trump wasn't even indicted until March of 2023, you'll have to concede the point.

Or get that Delorian up to 88 mph.

And she was absolutely thrown off the 2022 case. And I quote: "Accordingly, we agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction, and that dismissal of the entire proceeding is required.

Remember, K....I know more than you.

 

[Marener]

She didn't rule like Engeron or Merchan in obvious violation of law to convict a political opponent in a show trial.

She made an obviously wrong ruling with the special master that was thoroughly trashed by the appellate court.

 

[Marener]

I love how Trump’s defenders don’t really say he’s innocent. They just are looking for technicalities to evade culpability.