Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,773
- 55,409
- 3,600
They also say geotracking is as precise as an ankle bracelet.The Supreme Court says they do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They also say geotracking is as precise as an ankle bracelet.The Supreme Court says they do.
Because the Committee paid him to say it.LOL
Poor, deranged FruitLoops.
How would Baranyi know police warned the mob to 'get back' unless he heard it himself?
They also say geotracking is as precise as an ankle bracelet.
Because the Committee paid him to say it.
You've got several different recordings of the incident...all with excellent video and audio. What makes you think that something wasn't "captured"? Because it totally blows your narrative out of the water?Audio doesn't capture everything. That's obvious listening to the various videos from that area where somethings heard on one video are not heard on another.
Regardless, Baranyi said he heard police warn the crowd to 'get back.' The exact same warning police said they issued.
What he or she is not doing at the same locations time and again? We know what they were doing. A child would know.What they don't say is that geotracking shows what a person is doing. For that, video evidence is needed.
LOL...so you CLAIM, Faun! Would you care to point out WHERE they said that?The Supreme Court says they do.
How many times do Police say get back and no one is shot?You've got several different recordings of the incident...all with excellent video and audio. What makes you think that something wasn't "captured"? Because it totally blows your narrative out of the water?
You've got several different recordings of the incident...all with excellent video and audio. What makes you think that something wasn't "captured"? Because it totally blows your narrative out of the water?
Can you imagine the OUTRAGE from the left if video surfaced showing a Police Officer at one of the numerous riots by the left coming out of hiding and without saying a word...shooting an unarmed female protester at point blank range? There would be HOWLS of indignation! There would be violent protests in the street! Cities would burn. People would die!That is because it would not match their fairytale about what happened. The truth is their enemy.
What he or she is not doing at the same locations time and again? We know what they were doing. A child would know.
LOL...so you CLAIM, Faun! Would you care to point out WHERE they said that?
Pray tell? What have you heard on one video that you don't on others?Again, things heard on one video are not heard on others.
And again, how do you explain how Baranyi says he heard police warn the mob to 'get back' before police said they warned the mob to 'get back?'
How many times do Police say get back and no one is shot?
That's a ruling on people's right to protest on public sidewalks. Show me the ruling where the Supreme Court ruled it was people's right to intimidate judges?Sure, go back to my post where I linked their ruling on that case. I quoted the ruling in my post.
No you have the mind of a child, and not a very smart one either. The election was stolen. Period.At least you admit you have the mind of a child. Everyone here already knew that. Regardless, there are reasons other than dropping off ballots for being in the vicinity of a drop box. Besides, True the Vote claims they have the video to prove it -- yet they never showed even one.
Oh no, not againToday's hearing was a total and thorough take down of the biggest liar to ever try and steal an election. Attorney General Barr and many others threw daggers into Trump's claims of a "stolen election." Despite the best efforts of his Cult members, his efforts to steal the win from President Biden failed miserably, in the courts and the court of public opinion.
It's now up to Attorney General Garland to deal with Trump via an aggressive prosecution of his sedition efforts! Locking him up lets him off easy! Bigly!!!
Pray tell? What have you heard on one video that you don't on others?
As for what Baranyi remembered? It's obvious that his recollection was faulty. The audio makes that abundantly clear.
That's a ruling on people's right to protest on public sidewalks. Show me the ruling where the Supreme Court ruled it was people's right to intimidate judges?
No you have the mind of a child, and not a very smart one either. The election was stolen. Period.
And again, what are you going to do when the videos emerge?