January 6th rioter, who blamed Trump for his actions, found guilty

The context was "or you won't have a country any more"

So Trump was telling his supporters to fight like hell, just like President Zelensky is telling his people to fight like hell against the invading Russians.
1650053032870.jpeg
 
Show me just where in that speech Trump said he would personally lead them to storm the capitol. Your media really has you brain washed. Maybe, just maybe there's a chance you can be deprogrammed.
Don't be a stooge, it's in every transcript.
“We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women,” Trump told his supporters shortly before the Capitol assault. “We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”
 
Don't be a stooge, it's in every transcript.
“We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women,” Trump told his supporters shortly before the Capitol assault. “We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”
He was talking about how some of those Senators were weak politically. Once again out of context. Your TDS is obvious. Maybe you should go lay down for awhile.
 
Put demand in one hand and shit in the other and see which one fills up faster. You repeat and perpetuate lies like the traitor you are. That is on you, you POS.
Lackeyamender, you seem very upset that we identified you as the ultimate Trump lackey.
But once a lackey always a lackey.
 
Zelensky supports the NWO and Nazis. He is your buddy.
It is bad enough you are a lackey for Trump but to be a lackey for Putin is as low as you go. There is no doubt you would be a lackey for Hitler if you lived in his time.
You are a horrible human being.
 
He was talking about how some of those Senators were weak politically. Once again out of context. Your TDS is obvious. Maybe you should go lay down for awhile.
It would take the dumbest among us, and stash is one, to not see Trump's actions supported the attempted interference with our government.
Many of the rioters have said they were carrying out Trump's instructions.
Trump had 4 hours, after the riot began, to make a statement that the rioters misunderstood what he was saying. He could have asked them to stop rioting. Many in his inner circle asked him to do so.
He chose not to ask the rioters to go home for 4 hours. Criminal.
Trump's actions before, during and after the riot show he was all for the riot.
 
It would take the dumbest among us, and stash is one, to not see Trump's actions supported the attempted interference with our government.
Many of the rioters have said they were carrying out Trump's instructions.
Trump had 4 hours, after the riot began, to make a statement that the rioters misunderstood what he was saying. He could have asked them to stop rioting. Many in his inner circle asked him to do so.
He chose not to ask the rioters to go home for 4 hours. Criminal.
Trump's actions before, during and after the riot show he was all for the riot.
I thought you were laying down.
 
He was talking about how some of those Senators were weak politically. Once again out of context. Your TDS is obvious. Maybe you should go lay down for awhile.
Trumps definition of a weak senator, or weak vice president, is one who wouldn't overturn an election when there was no proven fraud to support that action.
 
You have to serve 8 years, moron, not just run for election twice.
Read the constitution, it says that a person can only be elected twice. There is no requirement of service. Such as Nixon served a 4 year term, than less than 2 years of a second term. He was ineligible to be elected to a third term, even though he served less than 8 years.
 
You have to serve 8 years, moron, not just run for election twice.
The 22nd clearly states someone can only be "elected" to the presidency "twice".
If Trump was elected in 2016 and 2020, he would be ineligible to run in 2024.
Although technically there is no bar on Trump running for a 3rd term, he could not be elected no matter how many votes he received.
 
22nd Amendment

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
 
22nd Amendment

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
Your mom really needs to remove all sharp objects from your house. You might put an eye out.
 
Lackeyamender, you seem very upset that we identified you as the ultimate Trump lackey.
But once a lackey always a lackey.
You propaganda spreading moron I am going to tell you again whatever you say means 0. Are we done now, or are you stupid enough to keep posting?
 
Your mom really needs to remove all sharp objects from your house. You might put an eye out.
All I did was quote the 22nd amendment, because so many republicans don't have a clue what the clear text of the amendment says.

There is a prohibition on the number of times someone can be elected, not the number or length of terms they can serve. Such as someone who was already elected president twice, could be elected vice president, or speaker of the house, and upon the death, resignation or disability of the president, (and vice president) assume the office of president for a third term.
 

Forum List

Back
Top