Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That means competition is not dependent on it. [ it=free trade]
Why do you insist with this false premise. We have always had trade with the world and therefore competition. Competition is not dependent on free trade. Did you not prove that with your auto industry example? Can you summon the courage to admit it and move this discussion along?dear, if we have no trade outside our USA borders there is still competition within our borders. But, if we have free trade within our borders and also with the entire world then there is much much more competition and so the quality of goods and services ( and our standard of living) rises much faster.
Do you understand now or does your liberal IQ prevent it??
[. Competition is not dependent on free trade.
Why do you insist with this false premise. We have always had trade with the world and therefore competition. Competition is not dependent on free trade. Did you not prove that with your auto industry example? Can you summon the courage to admit it and move this discussion along?dear, if we have no trade outside our USA borders there is still competition within our borders. But, if we have free trade within our borders and also with the entire world then there is much much more competition and so the quality of goods and services ( and our standard of living) rises much faster.
Do you understand now or does your liberal IQ prevent it??
Free trade isn't about competition. It is about undermining the sovereignty of nations. Congress was given the authority to regulate commerce. Free trade agreements wrest that authority from the people's representatives and gives it to the corporations.
GOP leaders want to fuck people over for money more desperately than they want to screw the President. Simple math.
Well to be fair, a trade policy which contains tariffs is not consistent with free trade principles. Our founding fathers were absolutely correct in using protectionist measures though and in doing so they had this country's best interests at heart as you have rightly pointed out.The truth of the matter is, our founders were advocates of free trade, but they also took into consideration an America First trade policy to encourage a strong and vibrant domestic manufacturing base. For example, let review part of our founder's first revenue raising act.
JWK
“He has erected a multitude of new offices , and sent hither swarms of officers, to harass our people, and eat out their substance” ___Declaration of Independence
The truth of the matter is, our founders were advocates of free trade,
The truth of the matter is, our founders were advocates of free trade,
Why always be stupid and liberal?? the more companies competing to make cars, for example, the better the cars will be and the faster our standard of living will rise.
Notice I have a way of explaining things so even a liberal can understand them??
The more countries competing to cure cancer the sooner we will have a cure, and the sooner we won't have to die slow and very painful deaths from it.
See why we have to be 100% positive that the liberal is stupid?
[. Competition is not dependent on free trade.
dear, you lack the IQ to follow along. Most economists support free trade because the more of it we have the more competition there is to produce the best goods and services in the world and thus the faster our standard of living rises.
I'll bet your Mom can explain it to you? Let us know.
[. Competition is not dependent on free trade.
dear, you lack the IQ to follow along. Most economists support free trade because the more of it we have the more competition there is to produce the best goods and services in the world and thus the faster our standard of living rises.
I'll bet your Mom can explain it to you? Let us know.
Since Clinton and his free trade sell out has the standard of living increased or decreased for those who worked in manufacturing?
I suppose having our enemies producing our weapons of defense will insure our national security.
[. Competition is not dependent on free trade.
dear, you lack the IQ to follow along. Most economists support free trade because the more of it we have the more competition there is to produce the best goods and services in the world and thus the faster our standard of living rises.
I'll bet your Mom can explain it to you? Let us know.
Since Clinton and his free trade sell out has the standard of living increased or decreased for those who worked in manufacturing?
dear, free trade is for all the people in America, not just for those who work in manufacturing. Do you have a better question?
OK, since Clinton's "free" trade agreement is the middle class better off or not. We know the rich are, but how about the rest of us?
OK, since Clinton's "free" trade agreement is the middle class better off or not. We know the rich are, but how about the rest of us?
dear, correlation is not causality?? Do you understand? Without trade you starve to death making everything yourself. Middle class suffers today not because of trade but because of other liberal liberal policies that drove 40 million jobs to China.
Do you understand?
OK, since Clinton's "free" trade agreement is the middle class better off or not. We know the rich are, but how about the rest of us?
dear, correlation is not causality?? Do you understand? Without trade you starve to death making everything yourself. Middle class suffers today not because of trade but because of other liberal liberal policies that drove 40 million jobs to China.
Do you understand?
You do understand that people need to make X amount of money to live a decent life. Which is more expensive in the US then most third world countries. So yeah people want paid what they need to live and everyone wants to live a good life.
But, when Clinton was selling out the Unions with his free trade agreements exactly what was predicted has come to be fact.
http://spiritofcontradiction.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ManufacturingEmployment-1-1-1.jpg
I am all for FAIR trade verse the BS of FREE trade.
OK, since Clinton's "free" trade agreement is the middle class better off or not. We know the rich are, but how about the rest of us?
dear, correlation is not causality?? Do you understand? Without trade you starve to death making everything yourself. Middle class suffers today not because of trade but because of other liberal liberal policies that drove 40 million jobs to China.
Do you understand?
You do understand that people need to make X amount of money to live a decent life. Which is more expensive in the US then most third world countries. So yeah people want paid what they need to live and everyone wants to live a good life.
But, when Clinton was selling out the Unions with his free trade agreements exactly what was predicted has come to be fact.
http://spiritofcontradiction.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ManufacturingEmployment-1-1-1.jpg
I am all for FAIR trade verse the BS of FREE trade.
dear, as a liberal you lack the IQ to understand free trade. Do you want fair trade between all the states cities and counties of the USA??
Send all our jobs overseas is that what you really want? Your really want free over fair? Carnegie and Frick would be proud of you.
OK, since Clinton's "free" trade agreement is the middle class better off or not. We know the rich are, but how about the rest of us?
dear, correlation is not causality?? Do you understand? Without trade you starve to death making everything yourself. Middle class suffers today not because of trade but because of other liberal liberal policies that drove 40 million jobs to China.
Do you understand?
Of course we understand what the NAFTA has done. It benefits international corporations who have no allegiance to America or any nation.
JWK
