Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Bezos wants a public vote so they can see who to fire when the move is defeated.If you believe the GOP, Bezos got it half right.
.
Bezos is in deep sh!t if the vote to unionize is strongly in favor. Unlike the RWNJs, Bezos must realize, he can't run the business alone.Bezos wants a public vote so they can see who to fire when the move is defeated.If you believe the GOP, Bezos got it half right.
.
You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Bezos knows how mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud. He doesn't want fraudulent ballots in his unionization vote but doesn't care if there are fraudulent ballots in the presidential election.Bezos wants a public vote so they can see who to fire when the move is defeated.If you believe the GOP, Bezos got it half right.
.
Why would they use mail in voting when it is not needed?Bezos knows how mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud. He doesn't want fraudulent ballots in his unionization vote but doesn't care if there are fraudulent ballots in the presidential election.Bezos wants a public vote so they can see who to fire when the move is defeated.If you believe the GOP, Bezos got it half right.
.
No one is getting elected at Amazon it is an election to unionize.You really have to love that one of the stated reasons for their opposition is election security. Maybe they think it's easier to, well you know, CHEAT if you vote by mail.
I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Like most hungry for $$$$$ & fame folks one can safely bet the farm that ole JB is loaded with narcissism which leads to the classic "after me you're first" Power & Control(PC) demi god wannabee complex.He called for mail-in in the presidential election, but opposes them in Amazon's unionizing vote!
Hypocritical Jeff Bezos Demands Amazon’s Unionizing Vote Be In-Person NOT Via Mail - The Lid (lidblog.com)
Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
Yet, there is a very small number of voters at Amazon compared to the US and Amazon is a private corporation that doesn't want everyone in the US voting on their issues.Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
I don't think the numbers matter with respect to the goal. The goal is effectively a standard. When one deviates from the standard they should expect predictable surprises.Yet, there is a very small number of voters at Amazon compared to the US and Amazon is a private corporation that doesn't want everyone in the US voting on their issues.Right. That's the point of the thread. It's kind of hard to argue against the goal of encouraging more voter participation.Except that the state legislatures allowed people to do mail in voting, Bezos has not.I don't see a major difference between the two. There is an issue or a candidate and a vote. The issue or the candidate that gets the most votes win. That's the purpose.and yet the purpose is not the same.You mean besides the one who gets the most votes wins?What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
What does a union vote at a private corporation have in common with a presidential election, not a damn thing.
