Cougarbear
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2022
- 9,423
- 4,217
- 208
The fact is, El refers to the almighty God. But, as scholars will tell you if you would study others besides your pathetic false prophet scholars, El also refers to Jehovah as well. As it should. Father and Son are both our almighty Gods. Your issue is you get caught up in semantics and force things to fit into your narrative. So, let me help here.EL is always a short version of Elohim. You best tell Jesus-John 20:17
First in that scripture, what is being pointed out is that Jesus is not trying to take the place of Elohim, the Father of all spirits and mankind. Again, Jesus is the Son of God making him a God. This actually fits the LDS doctrine of the trinity and not the mainstream Christian doctrine that there is but one God manifested into 3 personages. Instead, this scripture proves the LDS doctrine that there are 3 separate personages of a Godhead, two of them Father and Son God. And, that Jesus does not attempt to usurp Father God in Heaven's position as the Most High God, Elohim. "God" is a title, not a name. Once you understand that, you can move on from your narrative and understand doctrine better.