Jesus was a Jew. Why do some Christians and Muslims hate Jews?

[RWS]

Bc a good "God" would never allow that. But religions follow human laws.

People that have faith should not follow those laws, and do what their ideal should do. And that's faith. And it requires dropping the human rulers and their religion.

You don’t have perfect knowledge. So you can’t see how things are connected.

seems like you are proposing anarchy. I suggest you read Locke.

I don't see how that's anarchy to drop religions and live on faith. I do agree it's impossible on a small scale, bc greedy humans know how to take advantage of others, and a society based on faith is ultimately doomed to attackers from other religions, and have to create leadership, which then leads to another religion. I would need the world devoid of religion, so attacks stop.

Tell me a little about Locke, and why you think it would help me.

 

[RWS]

That's faith.

Faith is having complete trust in something or someone. You only have faith in yourself and that is misguided. You aren’t perfect. God is.

I don't have faith in myself to a point of perfection. I'm far from that. I do have faith in knowing what is good and what is not. I know my mistakes but I would never hurt anyone, based on religion..

 

[RWS]

And that's why I can't understand why people follow religions that established themselves by genocide.

 

[RWS]

It's like Nazis that had to follow their ruler, because they would be ostracized and condemned, if they didn't follow orders. Nazism is a religion btw. The trilogy religions follow the same rules.

But somehow we're ok with that?

 

[RWS]

It makes no sense to me. They're all evil constructs to fool people to donate and die/kill and convert others, and make the people in power richer and more powerful.

 

[ding]

Bc a good "God" would never allow that. But religions follow human laws.

People that have faith should not follow those laws, and do what their ideal should do. And that's faith. And it requires dropping the human rulers and their religion.

You don’t have perfect knowledge. So you can’t see how things are connected.

seems like you are proposing anarchy. I suggest you read Locke.

I don't see how that's anarchy to drop religions and live on faith. I do agree it's impossible on a small scale, bc greedy humans know how to take advantage of others, and a society based on faith is ultimately doomed to attackers from other religions, and have to create leadership, which then leads to another religion. I would need the world devoid of religion, so attacks stop.

Tell me a little about Locke, and why you think it would help me.

You said drop human rulers and their religion. That’s anarchy. Unless you want to adopt atheistic rulers and that’s been done before. That was worse than anarchy.

The only thing that will help you is experiencing your predictable surprises.

 

[ding]

And that's why I can't understand why people follow religions that established themselves by genocide.

Yet again I will say, you have an unbalanced view of history and religion.

 

[ding]

Tell me a little about Locke,

No. Figure it out for yourself.

but I will tell you about Yuri Bezmenov. But I think you already know what he has to say.

 

[ding]

That's faith.

Faith is having complete trust in something or someone. You only have faith in yourself and that is misguided. You aren’t perfect. God is.

I don't have faith in myself to a point of perfection. I'm far from that. I do have faith in knowing what is good and what is not. I know my mistakes but I would never hurt anyone, based on religion..

You worship yourself.

don’t kid yourself, you are a religious fanatic. I don’t for a second believe you wouldn’t hurt others for your religion.

 

[ding]

It's like Nazis that had to follow their ruler, because they would be ostracized and condemned, if they didn't follow orders. Nazism is a religion btw. The trilogy religions follow the same rules.

But somehow we're ok with that?

Nazis were socialists. No different than you.

and considering that of the two of us you are the only one attacking others because of religion, you are the religious fanatic.

 

[RWS]

And that's why I can't understand why people follow religions that established themselves by genocide.

Yet again I will say, you have an unbalanced view of history and religion.

Why would my view be unbalanced when I'm following faith and logic? I'm interested in hearing your point of view.

 

[RWS]

Tell me a little about Locke,

No. Figure it out for yourself.

but I will tell you about Yuri Bezmenov. But I think you already know what he has to say.

You said just to look up Locke, yet you won't provide a snippet? Why? I always provide stuff before I make you look it up.

That tells me it's a false search, which you have done before.

 

[RWS]

Tell me a little about Locke,

No. Figure it out for yourself.

but I will tell you about Yuri Bezmenov. But I think you already know what he has to say.

Never heard about him. Tell me about Locke.

 

[RWS]

That's faith.

Faith is having complete trust in something or someone. You only have faith in yourself and that is misguided. You aren’t perfect. God is.

I don't have faith in myself to a point of perfection. I'm far from that. I do have faith in knowing what is good and what is not. I know my mistakes but I would never hurt anyone, based on religion..

You worship yourself.

don’t kid yourself, you are a religious fanatic. I don’t for a second believe you wouldn’t hurt others for your religion.

I would never do that. Only in self defense. My way is talking logic and faith. I don't want people in the world killing others based on their Santa Claus belief.

My view is for the good of humanity.

 

[RWS]

The only Locke I know is from the tv show Lost. And he was a kick-ass mofo! And probably my favorite character.

 

[RWS]

Christians, Islamics, and Jews all believe in the same God.

Yet all they want to do is kill each other...

Maybe that God doesn't exist. Because you would think God would have taken care of the problem.

Joe pesci would have done it with a couple of swings with his baseball bat. Like George Carlin said...

 

[RWS]

Going out, catch you later...

 

[ding]

And that's why I can't understand why people follow religions that established themselves by genocide.

Yet again I will say, you have an unbalanced view of history and religion.

Why would my view be unbalanced when I'm following faith and logic? I'm interested in hearing your point of view.

Not sure what that has to do with your bias, Roy.

your view of history and religion is unbalanced because you only focus on what you perceive to be bad and totally ignore the good.

now do you understand?

 

[ding]

Tell me a little about Locke,

No. Figure it out for yourself.

but I will tell you about Yuri Bezmenov. But I think you already know what he has to say.

You said just to look up Locke, yet you won't provide a snippet? Why? I always provide stuff before I make you look it up.

That tells me it's a false search, which you have done before.

You need to be spoon fed? Really?

Ok, I’ll spoon feed you.

Constitutional Rights Foundation

Locke wrote that all individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away. Among these fundamental natural rights, Locke said, are "life, liberty, and property."

Locke believed that the most basic human law of nature is the preservation of mankind. To serve that purpose, he reasoned, individuals have both a right and a duty to preserve their own lives. Murderers, however, forfeit their right to life since they act outside the law of reason.

Locke also argued that individuals should be free to make choices about how to conduct their own lives as long as they do not interfere with the liberty of others. Locke therefore believed liberty should be far-reaching.

By "property," Locke meant more than land and goods that could be sold, given away, or even confiscated by the government under certain circumstances. Property also referred to ownership of one's self, which included a right to personal well being. Jefferson, however, substituted the phrase, "pursuit of happiness," which Locke and others had used to describe freedom of opportunity as well as the duty to help those in want.

The purpose of government, Locke wrote, is to secure and protect the God-given inalienable natural rights of the people. For their part, the people must obey the laws of their rulers. Thus, a sort of contract exists between the rulers and the ruled. But, Locke concluded, if a government persecutes its people with "a long train of abuses" over an extended period, the people have the right to resist that government, alter or abolish it, and create a new political system.

 

[ding]

The only Locke I know is from the tv show Lost. And he was a kick-ass mofo! And probably my favorite character.

That doesn’t surprise me.