Jews In Obama's World

Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.


Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.[/QUOT
what a stupid reply, and you are only legitimizing what he said. Capitulation so soon?


You won't live long enough to see that event.
 
9. "....it wasn’t done “randomly” but purposefully and in a directed fashion. It didn’t matter who they were individually, true. What mattered was this: JEW. JEW. JEW. JEW.

That isn’t random, bub.


10 Obama stepped in it on Monday. He said something stupid and ill-advised. (After all, he had previously said the attack was an act of anti-Semitism.)

And rather than walk it back, the administration’s blatherskites on Tuesday foolishly chose to step in it even more deeply by twisting themselves into pretzels on the “randomness” issue."
Op.Cit.

Three Muslim students were murdered in North Carolina last night.

I expect you won't write that off as 'random', but will acknowledge that it was homegrown anti-Muslim terrorism...

eh?



Did you mistake me for Obama, you imbecile?

He's the one throwing around the term 'random.'
 
This week the mistake in the White House once again identified himself and his administration as the most bigoted in our history. Well...it may be a tie with an earlier Progressive, one who segregated civil service.....


Further, this dolt added fuel to the fire which centers around comments such as







How to explain his latest attack on a religion abhorred by Islam?




1. "Anti-Semitic horrors don‘t exist in Obama’s world

2. ... White House mouthpiece Josh Earnest said something disgusting — I don’t know how else to describe it — about the massacre at the Hyper Casher kosher supermarket in Paris one month ago.

“The individuals who were killed in that terrible, tragic incident,” Earnest droned, “were killed not because of who they were but because of where they randomly happened to be.”


3. Nobody “randomly” happens to be in a kosher supermarket, not even in Manhattan.... the clientele of a kosher supermarket is almost entirely made up of Jews. You know this because you’re not an idiot.

4. ...if you want to find Jews, a kosher supermarket is the place to be on a Friday morning, as people are preparing for the Sabbath.

5. ...Earnest is the press secretary of the most important person in the world... he isn’t an illiterate dope. Which means he knows this too.

So what he did was speak a vile lie, and a deeply dishonorable one.

It’s dishonorable because his remarks suggest these murders were meaningless acts of nihilism, when they in fact were terrifyingly meaningful acts of anti-Semitic murder on European soil 70 years after the Holocaust...




6. .... it appears that Earnest’s vile lie can’t be excused away as an expression of his own moral cretinousness.

For only a few minutes later, about half a mile away from him in Washington, Earnest’s fellow administration mouthpiece Jen Psaki took to the podium at the State Department’s press briefing and with similar moral cretinousness dismissed the purpose and goal of the Jew-killers at Hyper Casher.


7. .... Earnest and Psaki both tried to pretend they hadn’t said what they said. “Terror attack at Paris Kosher market was motivated by anti-Semitism,” tweeted Earnest.

For her part, Psaki said, “We have always been clear that the attack on the kosher grocery store was an anti-Semitic attack that took the lives of innocent people.”
Well, no, you weren’t always clear, now, were you?" Anti-Semitic horrors don 8217 t exist in Obama 8217 s world New York Post


Dunno which is more objectionable, what Whie House Press Secretaries say from time to time, or those who try to make hay out of it like it's not political doublespeak.

If someone on tv news says it in front of a camera it's more disturbing to me than if some political mouthpiece does. One's excusable because that's what they're being told to say, another's coming from their own mind.

Earnst said it in a press conference. Obama made his statement in an interview. It is inexcusable to pretend that the attack on the Hypermarket was akin to drive by shootings in Chicago.


Earnest said it because someone told him to. IMagine it went along the lines of, "If you have a problem saying it we'll find another Press Secretary." He also said it was an anti-semitic attack, so trying to hang the President through a Press Secretary is obviously what you're doing. As with numerous other conservative bashes on the administration it's almost always just thinly veiled attacks on the President because you guys don't like taking orders from a ******. (I read your minds.)

Someone told him to, is right. He is supporting the administration line, which is the issue here. How can Obama and his administration maintain it was a random attack? It was anything but random.


An anti-semitic attack is not random. Nor have I heard the administration claim it was random. What Earnest was trying to do was depict the kosher deli victims themselves, as individuals, as random victims. Not the location in which they were victimized. I and everyone else without a bug up their ass about a black President understood this just fine.

Get your head out of Obama's ass.
Earnst said:
“The individuals who were killed in that terrible, tragic incident,” Earnest droned, “were killed not because of who they were but because of where they randomly happened to be.”
]

They were Jews. They were killed because they were Jews. That is who they were. They ddint randomly happen to be in a kosher supermarket Friday morning. They were there on purpose and so were the terrorists.
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
Not deliberately misconstrued. The meaning was clear: It was a random act of violence that could have happened to anyone else.
But that is false.

Muslim Communist Organizer dunce. Nuff said.
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.


Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.[/QUOT
what a stupid reply, and you are only legitimizing what he said. Capitulation so soon?


You won't live long enough to see that event.
Not because it is not appropriate.
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.


Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
They ddint randomly happen to be there. They were there deliberately, and so were the terrorists.

Yes they did. They were unlucky enough to be there when the terrorist arrived. Had they gone a little earlier or a little latter........
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.


Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
They ddint randomly happen to be there. They were there deliberately, and so were the terrorists.

Yes they did. They were unlucky enough to be there when the terrorist arrived. Had they gone a little earlier or a little latter........
They were not there randomly. They were there deliberately. ANd the terrorists targeted them deliberately.
What about that is unclear to you?
The terrorists didnt think "Oh, we'll shoot up some place. Here's a place that seems like it has lots of people for us to shoot."
No, they sought out the hypermarket on purpose. Nothing random about it.
 
Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.[/QUOT
what a stupid reply, and you are only legitimizing what he said. Capitulation so soon?


You won't live long enough to see that event.
Not because it is not appropriate.


Because it is an impossibility.
The result of your karma.
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
Not deliberately misconstrued. The meaning was clear: It was a random act of violence that could have happened to anyone else.
But that is false.

I understand. You confused the word who and what.
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.


Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
They ddint randomly happen to be there. They were there deliberately, and so were the terrorists.

Yes they did. They were unlucky enough to be there when the terrorist arrived. Had they gone a little earlier or a little latter........
They were not there randomly. They were there deliberately. ANd the terrorists targeted them deliberately.
What about that is unclear to you?
The terrorists didnt think "Oh, we'll shoot up some place. Here's a place that seems like it has lots of people for us to shoot."
No, they sought out the hypermarket on purpose. Nothing random about it.

It was not a deliberate swipe at Jews by the administrations spokesman.
 
9. "....it wasn’t done “randomly” but purposefully and in a directed fashion. It didn’t matter who they were individually, true. What mattered was this: JEW. JEW. JEW. JEW.

That isn’t random, bub.


10 Obama stepped in it on Monday. He said something stupid and ill-advised. (After all, he had previously said the attack was an act of anti-Semitism.)

And rather than walk it back, the administration’s blatherskites on Tuesday foolishly chose to step in it even more deeply by twisting themselves into pretzels on the “randomness” issue."
Op.Cit.

Three Muslim students were murdered in North Carolina last night.

I expect you won't write that off as 'random', but will acknowledge that it was homegrown anti-Muslim terrorism...

eh?



Did you mistake me for Obama, you imbecile?

He's the one throwing around the term 'random.'

Did I mistake you for someone who can read English?
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
Not deliberately misconstrued. The meaning was clear: It was a random act of violence that could have happened to anyone else.
But that is false.

I understand. You confused the word who and what.
Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
They ddint randomly happen to be there. They were there deliberately, and so were the terrorists.

Yes they did. They were unlucky enough to be there when the terrorist arrived. Had they gone a little earlier or a little latter........
They were not there randomly. They were there deliberately. ANd the terrorists targeted them deliberately.
What about that is unclear to you?
The terrorists didnt think "Oh, we'll shoot up some place. Here's a place that seems like it has lots of people for us to shoot."
No, they sought out the hypermarket on purpose. Nothing random about it.

It was not a deliberate swipe at Jews by the administrations spokesman.





So.....they're just stupid?
And the folks who voted for stupid people......the same?

11.Obama: “violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris.”



This is what Earnest and the White House want us to believe. In a late-afternoon tweet, Earnest said, “Our view has not changed ... POTUS didn’t intend to suggest otherwise.”


But what if this is disingenuous and false?


What if the administration is now so committed to its bizarre assertion that the acts of terror in Paris and the horrifying butcheries of ISIS have not been perpetrated in the name of Islam that it chose to dance around the anti-Semitic agency of Islamist Jew-killers — until it was caught out, that is?



If this is so, the moral cretin is the man now resident in the Oval Office."
Anti-Semitic horrors don 8217 t exist in Obama 8217 s world New York Post





Obama: ".... the moral cretin..."


Remember when the Liberals regaled America with talk of 'Obama, the Messiah'????



Once again, Liberals have hitched their wagons to a fraud.
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
Not deliberately misconstrued. The meaning was clear: It was a random act of violence that could have happened to anyone else.
But that is false.

I understand. You confused the word who and what.
I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.
All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
They ddint randomly happen to be there. They were there deliberately, and so were the terrorists.

Yes they did. They were unlucky enough to be there when the terrorist arrived. Had they gone a little earlier or a little latter........
They were not there randomly. They were there deliberately. ANd the terrorists targeted them deliberately.
What about that is unclear to you?
The terrorists didnt think "Oh, we'll shoot up some place. Here's a place that seems like it has lots of people for us to shoot."
No, they sought out the hypermarket on purpose. Nothing random about it.

It was not a deliberate swipe at Jews by the administrations spokesman.





So.....they're just stupid?
And the folks who voted for stupid people......the same?

11.Obama: “violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris.”



This is what Earnest and the White House want us to believe. In a late-afternoon tweet, Earnest said, “Our view has not changed ... POTUS didn’t intend to suggest otherwise.”


But what if this is disingenuous and false?


What if the administration is now so committed to its bizarre assertion that the acts of terror in Paris and the horrifying butcheries of ISIS have not been perpetrated in the name of Islam that it chose to dance around the anti-Semitic agency of Islamist Jew-killers — until it was caught out, that is?



If this is so, the moral cretin is the man now resident in the Oval Office."
Anti-Semitic horrors don 8217 t exist in Obama 8217 s world New York Post





Obama: ".... the moral cretin..."


Remember when the Liberals regaled America with talk of 'Obama, the Messiah'????



Once again, Liberals have hitched their wagons to a fraud.

When the Israelis killed over a 1000 Palestinians, what's the racist catchphrase for that?

Shouldn't we all of all races and ethnicities have our own cool word like 'anti-Semitism?
 
The Muslim Communist Organizer doesn't care for Jews. I think many American Jews are finally coming to that sobering realization. Him and his Party are in 'Throw Israel under the Bus' mode. The Left is behind this recent rapid rise in Antisemitism in Western Europe and the U.S. The Democratic Party is no friend to Jews. It's time for American Jews to accept that.
Do you have any links to back-up that "word salad" you posted Pollie paulitician :eusa_eh:
 
I suppose the 1000+ innocent Palestinians that were killed by Israel over the summer just happened to be 'randomly' where they were.
Actually they were "randomly" where Hamas had set up military installations.
But quit deflecting, you asshole.

You can prove that?

Would you then, btw, concede that if a Palestinian blew up a bus that had 50 Israeli civilians on it that that is not an act of terrorism, but rather a legitimate military target, since, effectively, large percentages of Israelis are members of the Israeli military?
 
Impressive pseudo outrage.

Dishonest as usual.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
Not deliberately misconstrued. The meaning was clear: It was a random act of violence that could have happened to anyone else.
But that is false.

I understand. You confused the word who and what.
Nothing pseudo here.

I'm outraged that folks like you not only put this despicable creature in office, but that you remain an apologist for him.


Let me remind you about this exchange between Henry David Thoreau and his friend Ralph Waldo Emerson, when Thoreau was put in jail for civil disobedience...

Ralph, upon noting Henry in jail: "Henry, what are you doing in there??"

Henry, in response: "Ralph, what are you doing out there??"



In case you miss the point.....why aren't just as enraged?


I laugh at your phony outrage too.



I cry at your stupidity.
Which part is dishonest? Did Obama and Earnst not say those things? Were they somehow true?

All of it.

" ..because of where they randomly happened to be." Deliberately misconstrued.
They ddint randomly happen to be there. They were there deliberately, and so were the terrorists.

Yes they did. They were unlucky enough to be there when the terrorist arrived. Had they gone a little earlier or a little latter........
They were not there randomly. They were there deliberately. ANd the terrorists targeted them deliberately.
What about that is unclear to you?
The terrorists didnt think "Oh, we'll shoot up some place. Here's a place that seems like it has lots of people for us to shoot."
No, they sought out the hypermarket on purpose. Nothing random about it.

It was not a deliberate swipe at Jews by the administrations spokesman.
I confused no such thing.
It was a deliberate whitewash by the administration of an act of terror by radical Muslims against Jews. How do you keep missing that?
 
I suppose the 1000+ innocent Palestinians that were killed by Israel over the summer just happened to be 'randomly' where they were.
Actually they were "randomly" where Hamas had set up military installations.
But quit deflecting, you asshole.

You can prove that?

Would you then, btw, concede that if a Palestinian blew up a bus that had 50 Israeli civilians on it that that is not an act of terrorism, but rather a legitimate military target, since, effectively, large percentages of Israelis are members of the Israeli military?
It's well known that is exactly what happened.
If they were Israeli civilians then they were not Israeli soldiers. But even if they were Israeli soldiers that is still an act of terrorism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top