rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,221
- 158,186
- 2,615
Not for longWait Afghanistan wasn't harboring Bin Laden?
If Bush was hunting Bin Laden, why didn’t he follow him into Pakistan?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not for longWait Afghanistan wasn't harboring Bin Laden?
Ha!NATO - Google Search
www.google.com
Not for long
If Bush was hunting Bin Laden, why didn’t he follow him into Pakistan?
Quit changing the subject the Taliban were harboring Bin Laden, going into Pakistan would have widened the warNot for long
If Bush was hunting Bin Laden, why didn’t he follow him into Pakistan?
Biden allowed Putin to invade UkraineAs a way to weaken the NATO alliance and please Putin
Biden has shown how effective the NATO alliance can be and it is EXPANDING with Finland and Sweden
Biden allowed Putin to invade Ukraine
You are confused Moon Bat.Idiot-Gram ^^^
Yes, you are too! Having not making a credible post, it's clear you don't have a substance or thought provoking for the readers.
Biden is simply covering his corruption up at tax payer expense.Evidently not
He is making Putin pay a heavy price
Meanwhile, the guy YOU voted for called Putin a Genius and mocked NATO as weak
Afghanistan was harboring Bin Laden and were given a choice, Iraq never kept the cease fire agreement, had WMD's and tried to assassinate a former President what else do you want
Hunter Biden was getting $80K a month from the Ukrainians for a position in an Energy company that he was no way in hell qualified to have.
Bin Laden was in Pakistan, Iraq had no WMDs beyond what we gave them to use against Iran.
Not at first he wasn'tBin Laden was in Pakistan, Iraq had no WMDs beyond what we gave them to use against Iran.
All she said was jello pudding and he nodded like an idiotYou Moon Bats know that these two shitheads are laughing at you idiots that let them get away with stealing the election, don't you?
U.S. troops found nearly 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq from 2004 to 2011: report
American troops found nearly 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq from 2004 to 2011, but their discoveries were kept secret by the U.S. government, the New York Times reports.www.yahoo.com
So you are saying they produced none!The discovery of pre-Gulf War chemical weapons — most of them "filthy, rusty or corroded" — did not fit the narrative.
And where did they get them? From us. We gave them chem weapons to use against Iran back when we were doing the enemy of my enemy is my friend routine with Iraq
So you are saying they produced none!
And the Democrats howled about how much we were spending. There is also the difference that the vast, vast majority of that was the DOD spending it not just giving it to Afghanistan so there was an accounting of where the money was going.We spent trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq and Republicans never demanded an accounting
But those were Republican wars
I am saying what they had was no threat at all to the US and not a valid reason to invade a sovereign nation. There is no evidence they produced their own. They were not that advanced.