John Lewis dead

Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?


Not anymore.

Just sayin'.
Thank god
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
 
Where the Marxist liberal Poli media onslaught began. He got pushed to the ground once and you would think he was brutally beaten by police. Another historical lie.

Pushed down? He had his skull fractured. When he was a Freedom Rider, he was beaten by a group of ignorant rednecks in a Greyhound buss station restroom. He was arrested several times on that trip. All because he had the audacity to sit next to a white person traveling in his group.

Those who marched in the 1960s were not violent rioters. Some, like John Lewis did not even fight back. They were beaten and murdered for marching for the right to register to vote. Not out of some misguided loyalty to criminals who were killed by police. They wanted to vote.

What about thye Democrats killing some participants?
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
Your missing the whole argument.. it has nothing to do with the 60’s.. your stuck on things you been spoon fed .. you aren’t a free thinker.. we are talking about things that are affecting African-Americans today. And for the past 60 years.
you can’t participate in the conversation because you can’t think outside of the box.. I think a few of us have tried to get you to do so you’re either extremely ignorant uneducated or just plain dumb
 
Lewis was essentially a racist troll. Blacks with talent, intelligence and skill were hired just like Whites throughout the history of the USA. The ugly beast had nothing to offer so he joined the Commie Blacks (Micheal King, the troll on the bus, etc.) financed by well-funded White-hating "Justice Warrior" entities not taking into account the South was fucked over after the tragically unnecessary Civil War and the subsequent racial tension was intentional. Just like now.

Absolute bullshit. In 1961 Lewis endured several beatings by mobs as a member of the Freedom Riders. His crime? Sitting beside a white person who was traveling in his group.

He marched for the right for blacks to register to vote. Something so important and so common it is now hard to fathom.
At least he wasn't killed by the Democrats like Liuzzo, Schwener, Goodman and Chaney...
 
Black people were being hosed by the fire department, getting eaten by dogs and beaten down by rabid pigs for protesting peacefully for the basic rights of citizenship.
Are you this dense? Uneducated? All protest even the anti war ppl had dogs and fire hoses, you race baiting ahole.. and they worked. They should be used again. That’s how protest that got violent were broken up. As they should

During protests that were peaceful, the same tactics with water hoses, police dogs and rabid cops were used, you brain dead, race baiting troll.

There are an abundance of videos on YouTube and many articles online verifying that fact,

Look them up, as opposed to making up lie after lie.
I do believe that the protest were mostly peaceful back then, just as they are now when they start out, but back then just as we have now, their are the instigators who start the violence in hopes to get it done in that way. The peaceful protestor's then get caught in the cross fire between the cops and the trouble makers.
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
Your missing the whole argument.. it has nothing to do with the 60’s.. your stuck on things you been spoon fed .. you aren’t a free thinker.. we are talking about things that are affecting African-Americans today. And for the past 60 years.
you can’t participate in the conversation because you can’t think outside of the box.. I think a few of us have tried to get you to do so you’re either extremely ignorant uneducated or just plain dumb

LMAO!! You really are dancing today, aren't you.

First, you claim I said segregation ended in 1964. When I call you on that lie, and describe why it is a lie, you go into this "you are stuck in the 60s" nonsense.

I can participate in the conversation quite well. And I do so without lying about what someone actually said. Pity you can't do the same.
 
Lewis was essentially a racist troll. Blacks with talent, intelligence and skill were hired just like Whites throughout the history of the USA. The ugly beast had nothing to offer so he joined the Commie Blacks (Micheal King, the troll on the bus, etc.) financed by well-funded White-hating "Justice Warrior" entities not taking into account the South was fucked over after the tragically unnecessary Civil War and the subsequent racial tension was intentional. Just like now.

Absolute bullshit. In 1961 Lewis endured several beatings by mobs as a member of the Freedom Riders. His crime? Sitting beside a white person who was traveling in his group.

He marched for the right for blacks to register to vote. Something so important and so common it is now hard to fathom.
At least he wasn't killed by the Democrats like Liuzzo, Schwener, Goodman and Chaney...

Not for lack of trying. He was beaten down on numerous occasions by them.
 
Where the Marxist liberal Poli media onslaught began. He got pushed to the ground once and you would think he was brutally beaten by police. Another historical lie.

Pushed down? He had his skull fractured. When he was a Freedom Rider, he was beaten by a group of ignorant rednecks in a Greyhound buss station restroom. He was arrested several times on that trip. All because he had the audacity to sit next to a white person traveling in his group.

Those who marched in the 1960s were not violent rioters. Some, like John Lewis did not even fight back. They were beaten and murdered for marching for the right to register to vote. Not out of some misguided loyalty to criminals who were killed by police. They wanted to vote.

What about thye Democrats killing some participants?
XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Those were horrific, heinous crimes against people. I hope they are never forgotten. I am just glad the kkk has been largely destroyed, other than a few ignorant ones who try to make noise. Try ineffectively, I might add.
 
Lewis was essentially a racist troll. Blacks with talent, intelligence and skill were hired just like Whites throughout the history of the USA. The ugly beast had nothing to offer so he joined the Commie Blacks (Micheal King, the troll on the bus, etc.) financed by well-funded White-hating "Justice Warrior" entities not taking into account the South was fucked over after the tragically unnecessary Civil War and the subsequent racial tension was intentional. Just like now.

Absolute bullshit. In 1961 Lewis endured several beatings by mobs as a member of the Freedom Riders. His crime? Sitting beside a white person who was traveling in his group.

He marched for the right for blacks to register to vote. Something so important and so common it is now hard to fathom.
At least he wasn't killed by the Democrats like Liuzzo, Schwener, Goodman and Chaney...

Not for lack of trying. He was beaten down on numerous occasions by them.

Guess the Democrat KKK had other uses for him, like furthering Jim Crow laws.... He sold out MLK's movement...
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
Your missing the whole argument.. it has nothing to do with the 60’s.. your stuck on things you been spoon fed .. you aren’t a free thinker.. we are talking about things that are affecting African-Americans today. And for the past 60 years.
you can’t participate in the conversation because you can’t think outside of the box.. I think a few of us have tried to get you to do so you’re either extremely ignorant uneducated or just plain dumb

LMAO!! You really are dancing today, aren't you.

First, you claim I said segregation ended in 1964. When I call you on that lie, and describe why it is a lie, you go into this "you are stuck in the 60s" nonsense.

I can participate in the conversation quite well. And I do so without lying about what someone actually said. Pity you can't do the same.
So you don’t think Luis ended segregation?? Im
Confused.. yes or no
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
Your missing the whole argument.. it has nothing to do with the 60’s.. your stuck on things you been spoon fed .. you aren’t a free thinker.. we are talking about things that are affecting African-Americans today. And for the past 60 years.
you can’t participate in the conversation because you can’t think outside of the box.. I think a few of us have tried to get you to do so you’re either extremely ignorant uneducated or just plain dumb

LMAO!! You really are dancing today, aren't you.

First, you claim I said segregation ended in 1964. When I call you on that lie, and describe why it is a lie, you go into this "you are stuck in the 60s" nonsense.

I can participate in the conversation quite well. And I do so without lying about what someone actually said. Pity you can't do the same.
So you don’t think Luis ended segregation?? Im
Confused.. yes or no

I agree that you are confused. That is obvious.
 
Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.
As always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?

Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.

And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.
Lol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining ha

Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.

But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.

If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.
No one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lol

The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.

I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.

At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.


Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.

Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.
I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgusting

I have not ignored anything. And you are not bringing awareness about anything. You are scrambling and dancing to avoid admitting that you were wrong.

Are there ghettos in Atlanta? Yes. Were the policies of the democrats good for black people? No.

Did John Lewis support Jim Crow laws? No, he did not. And your insistence that he did is simply you lying to try and save face. Jim Crow laws were a very specific type of law. Apparently you were unaware of that fact. But now you know. So quit bullshitting and trying to make claims about what you said.

You want to discuss John Lewis record as a democrat, or the harm done to blacks by the democratic party? Fine. First you admit that Mr. Lewis did NOT, in fact, support Jim Crow laws.
I’ve already explain the new Jim Crowe laws.. stop pretending I haven’t been over this 100 times just because you’re wrong just because your butt hurt.. TAKE A HIKE

Bullshit. Saying they are "new Jim Crow laws" is a dodge and you know it. If they were "new Jim Crow laws" they would be new laws forcing racial segregation. They aren't.

Just stop. You have been arguing bullshit for too many pages. Just stop. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws (falsely called "new" or otherwise). You are trying to avoid admitting you are wrong. But every person reading this bullshit can see that you were ignorant about it.

Just stop with the bullshit. You will never admit you are wrong, and I am fine with that. That is who you are, sadly. But stop pretending. Stop flailing around trying to defend your ignorance.
Of course there is, new area in Boston sea port has no black owned business in a city that graduates more blacks than whites in the past 30 years. Destroying education is implementing Jim Crow Laws.. let’s keep the neighborhood segregated

You are like a little kid who has been corrected. "Well that is what I call it!" while stamping your feet.

If it was a new Jim Crow law (and I notice you didn't add the "new" until well into defending your error), it would be a law that forces segregation on penalty of prosecution. The fact that blacks do not own businesses in a new, trendy section of Boston is not due to Jim Crow laws. The people living in ghettos are not there because the law won't LET them move elsewhere. They are there because of poverty. Jim Crow laws concerning education were laws that did not allow integration in schools. What you have in Boston is school districts that are mostly black and poor. And the funding for most public schools come from local property taxes. Poor areas have low taxes, so there is less funding for the schools. That is NOT Jim Crow laws, no matter how many times you stomp your feet and yell "That is what I call it!!".
It is Jim Crow laws, new ones. They saw welfare, and destroying education had the same effect as have a sign in the window NO BLACKS ALLOWED.. im more advanced than you in race relations.. I’m making history. Now sit back down and enjoy the ride

You are delusional. The new laws may have similar effects. But they are NOT Jim Crow laws.

As far as being more advanced in race relations, you defending and advocating lynching pretty much shoots that down. And, when you are told of a lynching in the 1980s, your first response being "Well he shouldn't have raped that white girl" shows you to be far behind the curve on race relations.
Cool story, I deal with reality

No, you absolutely do not. Or your reality changes with each new lie.
Bullshit I bet Atlanta is more segregated today than it was in 1964

Is it because of a law? That is the actual point, and you pretend it isn't.

And no, it is not more segregated than it was in 1964. In 1964 there were NO interracial neighborhoods. Now you would be hard pressed to find an area in the greater Atlanta area that is NOT interracial. You want to make claims about Boston, that is fine. But don't pretend you can tell me about my city when you have likely never been here.
How about integrated with diversity of thought? I could almost guarantee you that if I took 500 Trump supporters and put them in a black Atlanta neighborhood they would not be welcomed

That would depend on how they acted. Just like if you took 500 democrats and put them in a neighborhood of Trump supporters.
I know democrats have segregated us,, I’ve got pics of blacks wearing KKK, they were welcomed because they agreed with them.. segregation is about similarities. Z When you divide us by race gender religion color of skin like Democrats have With new policies than you Will have a segregation issue

The issue is whether or not it is a law. That is why they call them Jim Crow LAWS.
Im explained my definition.. and it’s facts

Right. Since you made a bogus claim, now you want to claim you have your own definition.

Funny thing about language and communication, if it is not accepted by the masses (and this is not) it is worthless.
How is it bogus? We are more divided today than we are in 1964.

In 1964, few white people had black friends, at least in the south. Now we have black neighbors, interracial couples, more black millionaires than ever, more black celebrities, and more freedom of movement for all people. There is no need for a green book for black to travel. There are blacks in positions or leadership, including the previous US Presidency. Black sit beside whites in classrooms and share medical facilities instead of being required to have separate facilities. Blacks own tv networks, music studios, and radio stations.

The way the poor are treated have improved, but still has a long, long way to go. Every major university admits black student at a favorable rate. There is not a career field or academic degree program that does not admit blacks.

No, blacks are far better off now than they were in 1964. Go out and blow up a black church now, and I am certain you will be prosecuted quickly and harshly.
I agree with this, but radical Black's are attempting to put the uncle Tom's and Tomasena's back in chains. Biden just miss-quoted who it is that wants to do it. A secret - It's not the Republican's.
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
Your missing the whole argument.. it has nothing to do with the 60’s.. your stuck on things you been spoon fed .. you aren’t a free thinker.. we are talking about things that are affecting African-Americans today. And for the past 60 years.
you can’t participate in the conversation because you can’t think outside of the box.. I think a few of us have tried to get you to do so you’re either extremely ignorant uneducated or just plain dumb

LMAO!! You really are dancing today, aren't you.

First, you claim I said segregation ended in 1964. When I call you on that lie, and describe why it is a lie, you go into this "you are stuck in the 60s" nonsense.

I can participate in the conversation quite well. And I do so without lying about what someone actually said. Pity you can't do the same.
So you don’t think Luis ended segregation?? Im
Confused.. yes or no

I agree that you are confused. That is obvious.
Got cha again haha
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
His own or was he used like Biden is fixing to be used, otherwise if by some stroke of genius he wins the presidency ??

The real problem makers are experts at using people in power, especially if they find them gullable enough to be used.
 
Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
XXXXXXXXXXXX​
John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

His past involvement with the civil rights movement doesn't give him a lifetime pass. He soiled himself with with lying about others, notably his claiming that peaceful tea-party members called him the N-work, accusing McCain and Palin of racism, promoting that false Russian Collusion made Trump's presidency illegitimate... He ended up being a divisive hack, and it was all his own doing.
Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964 lol

Please point out where I said segregation was over in 1964. I would say I would wait, but we both know you can't do it.
Ok so you admit Lewis was part of the problem

Once again you lie about what I said. You get caught every time, and yet you continue.

Did you find a post where I said segregation was over in 1964?
Is Luis part of the problem yes or no?

:auiqs.jpg:

How many questions have I asked you in this thread alone? You have consistently refused to answer them. Oh but now, you want me to answer yours? LMAO!! Too funny!

So did you find the post where I said segregation was over in 1964? Or do you admit you lied when you said "Clear example of SEGREGATION! That winter born claims was over in 1964"?
Did you not praise him for fighting to end segregation!??? Lol helloooo mcfly haha

Quit dancing. Either point out where I said segregation was over in 1964 or admit you lied.
Your denying it.. so I win.. who’s next

You win? LMAO!! So when you refuse to answer my question of when I posted the claim that segregation ended in 1964, I win?

You remember that I praised him for fighting to end segregation and for voter registration for blacks. But you forget that the Selma marches happened in 1965. Which, in case you were wondering, was after 1964.

Also, praising someone for fighting to end something is not the same as saying it ended. But, since you don't have the balls to admit you cannot find a single instance where I claimed that segregation ended in 1964, I will have to be satisfied that you cannot, will not, and refuse because you know your statement was a lie.

In other words, I never said segregation was over in 1964. I was raised, and live, in the South. I know what year the schools were integrated in my home town. It was well after 1964. So why would I say segregation ended in 1964? Answer? I wouldn't. I didn't. You lied.
Your missing the whole argument.. it has nothing to do with the 60’s.. your stuck on things you been spoon fed .. you aren’t a free thinker.. we are talking about things that are affecting African-Americans today. And for the past 60 years.
you can’t participate in the conversation because you can’t think outside of the box.. I think a few of us have tried to get you to do so you’re either extremely ignorant uneducated or just plain dumb

LMAO!! You really are dancing today, aren't you.

First, you claim I said segregation ended in 1964. When I call you on that lie, and describe why it is a lie, you go into this "you are stuck in the 60s" nonsense.

I can participate in the conversation quite well. And I do so without lying about what someone actually said. Pity you can't do the same.
So you don’t think Luis ended segregation?? Im
Confused.. yes or no

I agree that you are confused. That is obvious.
Got cha again haha

You got nothing. Did I say he ended segregation?

Once again, please point out where I said John Lewis ended segregation. You keep lying about what I say, and it is obvious.

Although, between the two of us, only one has said he would like to see the kkk return. And it wasn't me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top