excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 19,604
- 37,649
- 2,290
This is the same man who has won numerous cases in court against the FDA. Quite the CV all around.
www.theepochtimes.com
Jonathan W. Emord is a constitutional and administrative lawyer who has appeared before the federal courts and agencies for 35 years. He is the only attorney in American history to have defeated the FDA eight times in federal court. He served as an attorney in the FCC during the Reagan Administration and as a Vice President at the Cato Institute. Jonathan is the author of numerous published works and books, including Freedom, Technology, and the First Amendment, The Rise of Tyranny, Global Censorship of Health Information, and Restore the Republic which are all critically acclaimed. Former Congressman Ron Paul calls Jonathan “an expert in constitutional theory and history” and “an expert litigator with a long string of legal victories over the federal bureaucracy” (from Ron Paul’s Foreword to Restore the Republic). Jonathan is a columnist for U.S.A. Today Magazine and has appeared on several national programs, including the Stossel Show (Fox Business Channel), McCuistion (PBS), and Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, and in several documentaries.
...
Jonathan Emord, a constitutional law and litigation expert, told The Epoch Times that he believes that the trial violated President Trump’s due process rights and was “riddled with bias” but that he, too, sees little hope for Supreme Court intervention until the New York Court of Appeals has weighed in.
“The fact of the matter is that a trial violated President Trump’s due process rights and was riddled with bias, evidentiary rulings that deprive him of a full and fair opportunity to present his case,” he said.
“On the merits, there really is no foundation for a legal basis for decision because it’s a novel theory of law that’s been applied,” Mr. Emord said of the way the case was brought by Mr. Bragg.
Asked why Mr. Johnson suggested that the Supreme Court should step in at an earlier-than-normal stage of the appeals process, Mr. Emord suggested it’s because of “exceptional circumstances.”
“He’s arguing that there are exceptional circumstances that would warrant the Supreme Court to intervene and while there certainly are exceptional circumstances, I suspect that the Supreme Court would not intervene in the first instance, but would allow an appellate court in New York to issue a determination,” he said.
...
Jonathan Emord, a constitutional law and litigation expert, told The Epoch Times that he believes that the trial violated President Trump’s due process rights and was “riddled with bias” but that he, too, sees little hope for Supreme Court intervention until the New York Court of Appeals has weighed in.
“The fact of the matter is that a trial violated President Trump’s due process rights and was riddled with bias, evidentiary rulings that deprive him of a full and fair opportunity to present his case,” he said.
“On the merits, there really is no foundation for a legal basis for decision because it’s a novel theory of law that’s been applied,” Mr. Emord said of the way the case was brought by Mr. Bragg.
Asked why Mr. Johnson suggested that the Supreme Court should step in at an earlier-than-normal stage of the appeals process, Mr. Emord suggested it’s because of “exceptional circumstances.”
“He’s arguing that there are exceptional circumstances that would warrant the Supreme Court to intervene and while there certainly are exceptional circumstances, I suspect that the Supreme Court would not intervene in the first instance, but would allow an appellate court in New York to issue a determination,” he said.
...
Dershowitz Says Trump Could Fast-Track His Appeal to Supreme Court
President Trump has vowed to appeal his guilty verdict.
www.theepochtimes.com
Jonathan W. Emord is a constitutional and administrative lawyer who has appeared before the federal courts and agencies for 35 years. He is the only attorney in American history to have defeated the FDA eight times in federal court. He served as an attorney in the FCC during the Reagan Administration and as a Vice President at the Cato Institute. Jonathan is the author of numerous published works and books, including Freedom, Technology, and the First Amendment, The Rise of Tyranny, Global Censorship of Health Information, and Restore the Republic which are all critically acclaimed. Former Congressman Ron Paul calls Jonathan “an expert in constitutional theory and history” and “an expert litigator with a long string of legal victories over the federal bureaucracy” (from Ron Paul’s Foreword to Restore the Republic). Jonathan is a columnist for U.S.A. Today Magazine and has appeared on several national programs, including the Stossel Show (Fox Business Channel), McCuistion (PBS), and Coast to Coast AM with George Noory, and in several documentaries.
The Authoritarians
The untold story of how Authoritarians from the Progressive Era to the present removed all constitutional barriers to the deprivation of individual rights, upending the promise of the Declaration of Independence and inviting a new socialist state in America.
books.google.com
The Authoritarians
The untold story of how Authoritarians from the Progressive Era to the present removed all constitutional barriers to the deprivation of individual rights, upending the promise of the Declaration of Independence and inviting a new socialist state in America.
books.google.com
