Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2013
- 94,567
- 66,507
Father trying to keep his 7 year old from being castrated:
“But the judge is simultaneously slapping a gag order on the father, forbidding him from speaking publicly about the case. That means that she might have granted the father ‘equal’ voice in whether or not the boy is castrated and further encouraged to “socially transition” into a girl boy who wears lipstick, false eyelashes, and other drag-queen accoutrements, but that she’ll also side with the mother on every point of dispute, and the father now will be forbidden, upon pain of contempt and jail, to say so in public.”
1st Amendment is meaningless. I hope someone takes care of this judge.
“But the judge is simultaneously slapping a gag order on the father, forbidding him from speaking publicly about the case. That means that she might have granted the father ‘equal’ voice in whether or not the boy is castrated and further encouraged to “socially transition” into a girl boy who wears lipstick, false eyelashes, and other drag-queen accoutrements, but that she’ll also side with the mother on every point of dispute, and the father now will be forbidden, upon pain of contempt and jail, to say so in public.”
1st Amendment is meaningless. I hope someone takes care of this judge.