Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't even know you're being played.L James and Judge Engeron found out how much campaign cash Trump had hand on and geared his judgement on draining Trump's cash horde..
This is clear election interference, but and dried.
What was egregious was YEARS and YEARS if not decades, or FRAUDULENT business records. Alan Weisselberg was able to verify the years and extent of fraudulent records, and was fined $1,000,000 for his role.And punitive damages are only awarded when the defendant's actions were particularly egregious. What was egregious in the deal between Trump and the banks? It's the same type of deal done by literally millions of people across the entire country on a daily basis.
There is no statute of limitations on back taxes, Gene. Why wasn't Trump charged criminally?What was egregious was YEARS and YEARS if not decades, or FRAUDULENT business records. Alan Weisselberg was able to verify the years and extent of fraudulent records, and was fined $1,000,000 for his role.
The other side of that coin is juveniles based on age, not being held for serious crimes like murder. Yet that side of the coin they allow a determination of mental competence to override being under age.You're an awful lawyer, Gene! Of course it's about someone being underage. How naive they are doesn't come into play. They can be worldly. They can be aware. IT DOESN'T MATTER! IF THEY'RE UNDERAGE IT'S RAPE!
Gene? Do yourself a favor! Walk away from that analogy. It was stupid and it's not getting any smarter!The other side of that coin is juveniles based on age, not being held for serious crimes like murder. Yet that side of the coin they allow a determination of mental competence to override being under age.
Yep.Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) A punitive damages award should have a single-digit ratio to the compensatory damages award. In other words, a ratio of 9:1 is the maximum acceptable. In addition, the court may not consider the defendant's assets to justify an excessive award.
So given that Trump’s damages to his so-called victim were 0 (they actually made money), 9:1 means Trump should pay 0.Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) A punitive damages award should have a single-digit ratio to the compensatory damages award. In other words, a ratio of 9:1 is the maximum acceptable. In addition, the court may not consider the defendant's assets to justify an excessive award.
They know they're handicapped by the law from subpoenaing the underlying business records, and personal depositions to verify the information given in business records.And are you claiming that the bank had a "naive nature"? Really? I'm sure that will be news to them!
How was E. Jean Carroll damaged to the tune of $5 million?Yep.
So the punitive damages in the AG's case should be $0.00 since the actual damages were $0.00
In the E. Jean Carroll Case, punitive damages should be no more that $45 Million since the actual damages were $5 Million.
In the Mark Stein case the punitive damages should be $9.00 since the actual damages were $1.00
They did what Mitch McConnell (leader of the US senate) said they could do after January 6th.Once he left office they decided to inflict lawfare on him.
The sad thing is for you morons is that if you just left him alone he wouldn't have the support he does now.
The bank has no interest in subpoenaing records from Trump. They’re happy with the contract, and made $100 million off of it.They know they're handicapped by the law from subpoenaing the underlying business records, and personal depositions to verify the information given in business records.
It's no different than if you go into a restaurant, and demanding the right to inspect the kitchen, the food storage, and interview the employees about the safety of the food, including the receipts for the ingredients.
They did what Mitch McConnell (leader of the US senate) said they could do after January 6th.
There are statute of limitations on everything except for crimes punishable by death, like murder, rape and treason.There is no statute of limitations on back taxes, Gene. Why wasn't Trump charged criminally?
That was the jury award. I didn't say it was just. I am only saying the punitive award of $83 Million is much more that the statutory limit.How was E. Jean Carroll damaged to the tune of $5 million?
Read the judgement. It's in there. But pack a lunch, it's probably a hundred pages of excruciating details.How was E. Jean Carroll damaged to the tune of $5 million?
Post #71. You said actual damages were $5 million.That was the jury award. I didn't say it was just. I am only saying the punitive award of $83 Million is much more that the statutory limit.
Many States limit punitive damages to 3:1 or 4:1.
Actual damages in the Stein case was $1, but the punitive award was $1 Million...
If the bank could have, they would have taken Trump to court, instead of trusting his business records. Get him under oath for the details in the financial statements.The bank has no interest in subpoenaing records from Trump. They’re happy with the contract, and made $100 million off of it.
No harm, no foul.
No harm no foul means you can drive drunk, as long as you don't injure somebody.The bank has no interest in subpoenaing records from Trump. They’re happy with the contract, and made $100 million off of it.
No harm, no foul.
