Judge nixes effort to block Confederate statue's removal, Sessions should be outraged

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

They want to tear down the entire nation, culture and society. What they want to replace it with? Who knows....

 

[RodISHI]

They want to tear down the entire nation, culture and society. What they want to replace it with? Who knows....

More compliant peeps.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

They want to tear down the entire nation, culture and society. What they want to replace it with? Who knows....

More compliant peeps.

Morally depraved, consumerist and hedonistic while state compliant....sure.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A last-ditch effort to block the removal of a monument to a Confederate general in New Orleans was rejected Wednesday by a Louisiana judge who turned away arguments that the city doesn't own the statue or the land on which it sits.

"This has gone on an inordinate amount of time," Judge Kern Reese said as he outlined reasons for his refusal to grant an injunction protecting the statue of Gen. P.G.T Beauregard. It was a reference to state and federal court battles that delayed removal of the Beauregard monument and three others for more than a year.

Judge rejects effort to block Confederate statue's removal


looks like this pilgrim is riding off into his last sunset...

ah, the good ole days of enslaving people, then drinking a few mint juleps and watch them make you rich

Sorry General B, off to oblivion with ya! lol

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A last-ditch effort to block the removal of a monument to a Confederate general in New Orleans was rejected Wednesday by a Louisiana judge who turned away arguments that the city doesn't own the statue or the land on which it sits.

"This has gone on an inordinate amount of time," Judge Kern Reese said as he outlined reasons for his refusal to grant an injunction protecting the statue of Gen. P.G.T Beauregard. It was a reference to state and federal court battles that delayed removal of the Beauregard monument and three others for more than a year.

Judge rejects effort to block Confederate statue's removal


looks like this pilgrim is riding off into his last sunset...

ah, the good ole days of enslaving people, then drinking a few mint juleps and watch them make you rich

Sorry General B, off to oblivion with ya! lol

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Honestly, who gives a shit? Nobody alive had anything to do with slavery. One way or the other. It's time to stand up and tell these grievance hustlers it's OVER.

 

[Pogo]

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A last-ditch effort to block the removal of a monument to a Confederate general in New Orleans was rejected Wednesday by a Louisiana judge who turned away arguments that the city doesn't own the statue or the land on which it sits.

"This has gone on an inordinate amount of time," Judge Kern Reese said as he outlined reasons for his refusal to grant an injunction protecting the statue of Gen. P.G.T Beauregard. It was a reference to state and federal court battles that delayed removal of the Beauregard monument and three others for more than a year.

Judge rejects effort to block Confederate statue's removal


looks like this pilgrim is riding off into his last sunset...

ah, the good ole days of enslaving people, then drinking a few mint juleps and watch them make you rich

Sorry General B, off to oblivion with ya! lol

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

 

[JohnnyApplesack]

lest we forget

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A last-ditch effort to block the removal of a monument to a Confederate general in New Orleans was rejected Wednesday by a Louisiana judge who turned away arguments that the city doesn't own the statue or the land on which it sits.

"This has gone on an inordinate amount of time," Judge Kern Reese said as he outlined reasons for his refusal to grant an injunction protecting the statue of Gen. P.G.T Beauregard. It was a reference to state and federal court battles that delayed removal of the Beauregard monument and three others for more than a year.

Judge rejects effort to block Confederate statue's removal


looks like this pilgrim is riding off into his last sunset...

ah, the good ole days of enslaving people, then drinking a few mint juleps and watch them make you rich

Sorry General B, off to oblivion with ya! lol

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

 

[Pogo]

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.
I didn't even mention that the Thirteenth Amendment -- passed 1865 -- made slavery illegal nationally. So both points prove Katz wrong.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

 

[Pogo]

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

Whatever dialect that might be, no one else understands it.

Are you or are you not contesting that the northern states had all passed laws abolishing slavery by 1804? Are you or are you not contesting that the Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery nationwide?

If you can't articulate your point ---- you ain't got one.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

Whatever dialect that might be, no one else understands it.

If you can't articulate your point ---- you ain't got one.

You need a bouncing ball or something, fuckwit? How much clearer can someone say you believe what the side that won in the civil war tells you to believe, and as a northerner...you are smug about it?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A last-ditch effort to block the removal of a monument to a Confederate general in New Orleans was rejected Wednesday by a Louisiana judge who turned away arguments that the city doesn't own the statue or the land on which it sits.

"This has gone on an inordinate amount of time," Judge Kern Reese said as he outlined reasons for his refusal to grant an injunction protecting the statue of Gen. P.G.T Beauregard. It was a reference to state and federal court battles that delayed removal of the Beauregard monument and three others for more than a year.

Judge rejects effort to block Confederate statue's removal


looks like this pilgrim is riding off into his last sunset...

ah, the good ole days of enslaving people, then drinking a few mint juleps and watch them make you rich

Sorry General B, off to oblivion with ya! lol

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

That's not true. Slavery was abolished only in New England. There were still slaves. Slavery wasn't totally abolished until the 13th Amendment.

 

[Pogo]

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

Whatever dialect that might be, no one else understands it.

If you can't articulate your point ---- you ain't got one.

You need a bouncing ball or something, fuckwit? How much clearer can someone say you believe what the side that won in the civil war tells you to believe, and as a northerner...you are smug about it?

I'm in the South, DUMBASS.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

Whatever dialect that might be, no one else understands it.

If you can't articulate your point ---- you ain't got one.

You need a bouncing ball or something, fuckwit? How much clearer can someone say you believe what the side that won in the civil war tells you to believe, and as a northerner...you are smug about it?

I'm in the South, DUMBASS.

Are you from the South or just in it, cocksmoker?

 

[Pogo]

Yes...fortunately, the democrats were defeated in the Civil War by the Republicans...and then the Republicans freed their black slaves....the democrats are still mad about that.....

Nope, the Civil War wasn't between political parties, Shitferbrains.
Maybe take some of these ellipses you seem to be overstocked with to a pawn shop and see if you can trade 'em for a history book.

The democrats fought to keep their slaves...the Republicans, the anti-slavery party, fought the war, defeated the democrats and then freed the black slaves owned by the democrats......

Nice try at deflecting the truth though...

Shit for brains.

Nope. The democrats in the south had their slaves freed. The democrats in the north kept their slaves for years.

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

That's not true. Slavery was abolished only in New England. There were still slaves. Slavery wasn't totally abolished until the 13th Amendment.

>> The Declaration of Independence not only declared the colonies free of Britain, but it also helped to inspire Vermont to abolish slavery in its 1777 state constitution. By 1804, all Northern states had voted to abolish the institution of slavery within their borders. << -- Slavery and the Making of America

--- And the 13th was passed ... again... in 1865. Which makes it impossible for anyone, in the South, North or anywhere else, whether they be "'democrats" [sic], "Republicans", some other party or no party at all, to keep slaves "for years". Or even "for minutes".

You do understand how linear time works, do you not?

This just in --- amazingly enough, no political party affiliation was ever required to own slaves anyway.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It was a great tragedy that the South lost the Civil War. We would have ended up a much stronger people.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

It was a great tragedy that the South lost the Civil War. We would have ended up a much stronger people.

Indeed.

 

[Pogo]

Pretty neat trick, since all the northern states had abolished slavery by 1804.

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

Whatever dialect that might be, no one else understands it.

If you can't articulate your point ---- you ain't got one.

You need a bouncing ball or something, fuckwit? How much clearer can someone say you believe what the side that won in the civil war tells you to believe, and as a northerner...you are smug about it?

I'm a half-breed. Parents on both sides of the line, way over. I've been moving back and forth between North and South since I was seven months old. Fluent in both languages.

So believe me when I say --- "Fuck you".

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

You're exhibiting 'northerner white privilege'. You have the luxury of being smug about the lies of the victors, who write the history books . In every other case...you'd agree.

Bet you won't in this case....because you are an intellectual coward.

Perhaps that sentence can be hammered into English someday.

While we're waiting for that to happen -- the point stands, uncontested.

It is in English, you must be functionally illiterate.

Whatever dialect that might be, no one else understands it.

If you can't articulate your point ---- you ain't got one.

You need a bouncing ball or something, fuckwit? How much clearer can someone say you believe what the side that won in the civil war tells you to believe, and as a northerner...you are smug about it?

I'm a half-breed. Parents on both sides of the line, way over. I've been moving back and forth between North and South since I was seven months old.

So believe me when I say --- "Fuck you".

Fuck you too, carpetbagging dandy ass faggot.