Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Live with it then. Stop pissing and moaning like a little bitch.You're right he is just a straight up flunky.
Translation: We like to make up BS legal wording in order to make people believe it's in the Constitution in order to get our way. ...Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
So in other words you can find no justification for this blatant attempt to rifle through Trump's personal financial affairs other than it might turn up something you can use to politically attack the president. The Constitution does not grant congress the right to use it's authority to go on partisan witch hunts....sorry.Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Live with it then. Stop pissing and moaning like a little bitch.You're right he is just a straight up flunky.
Translation: We like to make up BS legal wording in order to make people believe it's in the Constitution in order to get our way. ...Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge in Washington ruled Monday against President Donald Trump in a financial records dispute with Congress.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said Trump cannot block a House subpoena of financial records. He said the Democratic-led House committee seeking the information has said it believes the documents would help lawmakers consider strengthening ethics and disclosure laws, among other things.
The committee's reasons were "valid legislative purposes," Mehta said, and it was not for him "to question whether the Committee's actions are truly motivated by political considerations."
Judge rules against Trump in records dispute with Congress
Does a higher court overturn this ruling?
How much longer can the Trump Administration stonewall the Congress.
Trump's accounting firm is not a part of the Gov't, so he can't use executive powers.
This judge followed the Constitution. The only way this is overturned is if a judge decides to legislate from the bench. The Congress has broad oversight powers.
Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Without a legitimate reason, they have no authority to demand private papers.
You just did, moron.A Trump Humper accusing someone of bitching and moaning, you can't make this shit up.
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge in Washington ruled Monday against President Donald Trump in a financial records dispute with Congress.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said Trump cannot block a House subpoena of financial records. He said the Democratic-led House committee seeking the information has said it believes the documents would help lawmakers consider strengthening ethics and disclosure laws, among other things.
The committee's reasons were "valid legislative purposes," Mehta said, and it was not for him "to question whether the Committee's actions are truly motivated by political considerations."
Judge rules against Trump in records dispute with Congress
Does a higher court overturn this ruling?
How much longer can the Trump Administration stonewall the Congress.
Trump's accounting firm is not a part of the Gov't, so he can't use executive powers.
This judge followed the Constitution. The only way this is overturned is if a judge decides to legislate from the bench. The Congress has broad oversight powers.
Not that broad, bubba. Trump could have the IRS auditing every single one of them, but he's not a partisan shitheel like they are.
You just did, moron.A Trump Humper accusing someone of bitching and moaning, you can't make this shit up.
Uh, no they don't or they'd get a court ordered search warrant to find specific documents.Uh they have a legitimate reason.
Nowhere at all.Exactly where in the Constitution does it say the President must turn over his financial records to Congress?? ....
Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the Constitution, public laws, and House and Senate rules. It is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
Without a legitimate reason, they have no authority to demand private papers.
Uh they have a legitimate reason or should I say reasons.
Yeah well just see how far it gets. LOL however this does bring up a good point. I think it's long past time to rein in this run amuck judiciary and make it so that if there is any tug of war between the administration and the judiciary that it must occur at the Supreme Court level and not just any judicial pissant that feels the urge.WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge in Washington ruled Monday against President Donald Trump in a financial records dispute with Congress.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said Trump cannot block a House subpoena of financial records. He said the Democratic-led House committee seeking the information has said it believes the documents would help lawmakers consider strengthening ethics and disclosure laws, among other things.
The committee's reasons were "valid legislative purposes," Mehta said, and it was not for him "to question whether the Committee's actions are truly motivated by political considerations."
Judge rules against Trump in records dispute with Congress
Does a higher court overturn this ruling?
How much longer can the Trump Administration stonewall the Congress.
Trump's accounting firm is not a part of the Gov't, so he can't use executive powers.
Once again, there is nothing in the Constitution that requires a President to turn over his tax records to Congress.No dumbass have you ever heard of CHECKS and BALANCES, this is a country governed by laws not a ruler named Trump.
More baseless insults. More bitching and moaning from you. So childishly tiresome.That's all you do ass clown is bitch and moan.
I think this judge that made such a ruling is deep state. He seems to be part of the Democrat hate that they should be in charge of American life. I wonder if political strings in the Hillary camp had his FBI file conveniently tucked away to get such a ruling. They did it in the Russian investigation using the top brass in the FBI. Hannity said there were about 1% bad cops and 99% good Cops in the FBI. I think this Obama judge is just one more of a long line of ordered attacks on President Trump.All Hussein appointees should be impeached and removed from office. They are all globalist and Marxist pigs that exist only to subvert the US Constitution.
It's the DEEP STATE RUN!
Q. If the deep state is so deep, how do the kooks on the right know it is deep, or even exists.
A. It's the same old story, a conspiracy theory.
