Judge sets absurd trial date for Trump case

No, I'm just not impressed by white propaganda. Civil Rights heroes like MLK Jr. had to teach whites how to not be bigoted deplorable mutants. It's too bad so many of you resist that education. 😄
all demofks in fact.
 
no crimes, none!!!

The evidence says otherwise. Trump's own attorney admitted, on TV, that Trump tried to stop an official proceeding from happening. And NARA still has the fraudulent election documents that the Trump campaign had made with their fake electors, available for anyone to see.

You pretending otherwise won't change a thing about the outcome of this trial.
 
Sure, it's not whining.
It’s not. It only seems like whining to a pussy like you.
Tell us more about how unfair it is that your orange douchebag gets indicted for committing crimes.
False. President Trump was NOT indicted for committing any crimes. He didn’t commit any crimes. He got indicted because incredibly biased persecutors are abusing our criminal Justice system for rabidly partisan purely political purposes. It is entirely about election interference.

Never gets old.
Your schtick is very old.
 
Last edited:
No such thing. They were ALTERNATE electors, as allowed by law and as used twice before in America's history. CG is 0 for 1.
They didn't follow the official process to become alternate electors. You don't get to commit fraud to have your way.
No one was intimidated except that official in Ukraine that Biden told he had 6 hours to fire the prosecutor of his son or he would stop funds to Ukraine. On video tape clear as day. The very thing Trump was impeached for allegedly doing, but good to know when Biden's trial comes. CG is 0 for 2.
That's not what Raffensberger is going to testify to. 😄
Exactly what Al Gore and about 30 democrats are on record trying to do every election. CG is now 0 for 3.
:itsok:
0 for 4. Like a good commie, you want to be judge, jury and executioner. Too bad you are in for a rude disappointment.
No, I'm an observer. The judge and jury we all get to watch on TV. 😁
 
Sure, it's not whining. Tell us more about how unfair it is that your orange douchebag gets indicted for committing crimes. Never gets old. :auiqs.jpg:

One of the guiding tenets of MAGA is infallibility and immunity from any law. Anything they do is legal. No matter how egregiously criminal.

These trials are an affront to that belief.
 
Then why are the prisons so full of innocent people? Why are so many cases so often overturned upon appeal and retrial? Guilty of the charges is a semantical version of being guilty of the CRIMES. You just want Trump CONVICTED. You said it. You couldn't give a flying fuck whether he is actually guilty of the crimes or you would want him to have a fair trial as well, and cases like this typically take 1.5 years or more to go to trial, much less the epic situation of trying a former president who is actually in the midst of running for reelection being charged by the man he is running against.

NOW look at who the moron is. :1peleas:

All the trials should take place before the election. Defendants don't set the trial dates.
 
It’s not. It only seems like whining to a pussy like you.

False. President Trump was NOT indicted for committing any crimes. He didn’t commit any crimes. He got indicted because incredibly biased persecutors are abusing our criminal Justice system for rabidly partisan purely political purposes. It is entirely about election interference.


Your schtick is very old.
they don't have any crimes yet!!!!
 
No. It doesn’t. You have no actual evidence. As you know.

Laughing......so by your new standards of evidence, this statement is complete and meaningless pseudo-legal horseshit?

""But when President Trump loses a re-election bid after Crystal clear Evidence suggesting Massive Voting Fraud of various types, any claim of a Stolen Election is just kook “Conspiracy theory” and an insidious plot to undermine the people’s faith in our elections.""
 

Forum List

Back
Top