Judge sets absurd trial date for Trump case

[jc456]

Fake electors, intimidation of election officials and his desire to coincidentally find the exact number of votes he needed to beat Joe Biden. That was easy. It's almost like I actually read the indictment.

Then you're saying to arrest Clinton now?

Faithless electors in the 2016 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.

 

[konradv]

Then you're saying to arrest Clinton now?

Faithless electors in the 2016 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.

Trump had his chance!

 

[jc456]

You would have called that “rush to judgement”.

it's truly a third world kangaroo court of law against opposing candidates. And you're proud of looking like fools. Immunity clause.

 

[jc456]

Trump had his chance!

so did Hitlery.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Enemy democrats clouded their case with 12 million pages of meaningless nonsense. They hope that Trump's lawyers will not have time to slog through the garbage. The entire prosecution's game is to prevent Trump from mounting a defense of any kind. Meanwhile, hide the real evidence behind the smokescreen. Yes they have to turn evidence over, if asked. They are gambling that it's so well hidden it would never be asked for.

I would put a team on 24 hours a day to scan in all 12 million pages, then use AI to search.

 

[Magnus]

So you agree that it's political too.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Trump’s Federal Trial on Election Interference Set to Start March 4, 2024 — The Wall Street Journal

Trial date one day before Super Tuesday primaries heightens clash between GOP front-runner’s legal and campaign schedules

apple.news

It is unlikely in the extreme that a massive trial of this magnitude (Constitutionally, politically, historically and legally) will be “ready” for trial that soon. But the judge’s very biased agenda is crystal clear. And it’s unacceptable.

(Since this trial is far more about politics than justice, I chose the politics forum).

/——-/ Pay wall

 

[Faun]

No such thing. They were ALTERNATE electors, as allowed by law and as used twice before in America's history. CG is 0 for 1.

Fake electors...

LOL

Yeah, that's the ticket! They weren't fake electors, they were "alternate" electors.

Yeah, "alternate." You know, just like George Floyd bought a pack of cigarettes with an "alternate" $20.00.

 

[jc456]

No such thing. They were ALTERNATE electors, as allowed by law and as used twice before in America's history. CG is 0 for 1.

post #185

 

[Magnus]

Did you really come up with all by yourself?

Why, do you need help with your posts? My sympathies.

 

[Skylar]

Then you're saying to arrest Clinton now?

Faithless electors in the 2016 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.

That would be you, citing you.

The same poor, hapless soul that has no idea what the Immunities Clause is.

Where did Clinton try and obstruct on official proceeding? Where did Clinton conspire to make fraudulent election documents?

 

[Magnus]

No, you can't. You obviously just say stupid shit here you can't back up just as these DAs are filing charges against Trump that they won't be able to back up and make stick in court neither. You are all the same. Throw mud and hope something just sticks.

Awww.... that's my boy. Let it all out. Do you feel better now?

 

[Curried Goats]

Clinton requested electors change their votes. and she wasn't a president at the time of the ask.

Faithless electors in the 2016 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Three of these votes were invalidated under the faithless elector laws of their respective states, and the elector either subsequently voted for the pledged candidate or was replaced by someone who did.[2][3][4] Although there had been a combined total of 155 instances of individual electors voting faithlessly prior to 2016 in over two centuries of previous US presidential elections, 2016 was the first election in over a hundred years in which multiple electors worked to alter the result of the election.

Yeah, she didn't forge her own fake electors, did she?

 

[jc456]

LOL

Yeah, that's the ticket! They weren't fake electors, they were "alternate" electors.

Yeah, "alternate." You know, just like George Floyd bought a pack of cigarettes with an "alternate" $20.00.

post #185 read up. fk, yet again,

 

[BackAgain]

/——-/ Pay wall

I get some shit via apple. The Wall Steer Journal pieces come through for me.

Here is an alternative source for the same story:

https://www.npr.org/2023/08/28/1196309946/trump-trial-jan-6

Not the same reporter and differing wordage.

 

[Magnus]

You, of course, are the retard.

And it’s not “whining.” Not that you care about honesty.

Now, be a good little tyke, and play in traffic.

Sure, it's not whining. Tell us more about how unfair it is that your orange douchebag gets indicted for committing crimes. Never gets old.

 

[jc456]

Yeah, she didn't forge her own fake electors, did she?

sure she did. did you read it?

 

[Curried Goats]

OK. Now you're weirder

No, I'm just not impressed by white propaganda. Civil Rights heroes like MLK Jr. had to teach whites how to not be bigoted deplorable mutants. It's too bad so many of you resist that education.

 

[jc456]

Sure, it's not whining. Tell us more about how unfair it is that your orange douchebag gets indicted for committing crimes. Never gets old.

no crimes, none!!!

 

[Skylar]

Enemy democrats clouded their case with 12 million pages of meaningless nonsense. They hope that Trump's lawyers will not have time to slog through the garbage. The entire prosecution's game is to prevent Trump from mounting a defense of any kind. Meanwhile, hide the real evidence behind the smokescreen. Yes they have to turn evidence over, if asked. They are gambling that it's so well hidden it would never be asked for.

I would put a team on 24 hours a day to scan in all 12 million pages, then use AI to search.

What is he going to have to be prepped for, the 'truth'?