Juan de Fuca
Gold Member
- May 24, 2016
- 3,254
- 452
- 130
- Thread starter
- #61
Juan. Why is this in Politics? Now I've asked the mods how far we can go over the kids of the candidates because I can go nutso kookoo bye bye over Chelsea say for starters.
But I will keep addressing these asshole threads that keep popping up in Politics, our premiere page at USMB with the ever overwhelming and underwhelming "Republicans have poopy pants" bullshit threads.
This shit has to stop.
She isn't a kid first of all, she is a thirty five year old adult. Secondly, she is the daughter of a man who will appear at his own fraud trial in 4 1/2 months. I think that makes it a political consideration. You may not agree, but two frauds don't make a right.
No problem with it. Just waiting for a decision from the mods. Most importantly I can't wait to open up a can of whoop ass on Chelsea and her husband. Oh. Purring here. Especially her husbands family. Purr. Purr. Purr.
![]()
Chelsea Clinton is an adult. Have at it.
Actually I won't unless the rules change. Everywhere I have ever posted the class act thing to do was to leave family members and their family members off or out of the discussion.
Ever hear a song "Crossfire"? I don't want people who have not asked to be caught in it to be me taking them out. It's a decency thing I have. If your thread stands and we are allowed to now go after family members I won't have a problem with it at all Juan. But and as I have had to point it out before from the movie Good Morning Vietnam, "I'll make you wish you died as a child".
Are you really sure we are able to go after Chelsea and her husband? Are you certain you want us to have that ability?
If this is evidence of a family associated con job then I believe it is relevant to the conversation. There are no kids involved here. Both children are almost 15 years past majority and should be viewed as an individual adult.