Justice Ginsberg attacks the legitimacy of Trump's candidacy

compare Trumps outstanding service to the country creating wealth for many and jobs for even more with Ginsberg's contributions that actually helped the working class.
That's silly. Trump cost hundreds of thousands their jobs in bankruptcies and closings. He has done no public service for the country. He is temperamentally unqualified for the presidency. Any comment about "at least he is better than Hillary" is similar to "there both really bad losers, but Donald is better," is ludicrous.

Neither are qualified.

Vote Johnson/Weld.

I see fake is quoting the "outyourass" poll. The source of most of his statistics.
I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.
Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.
That is not the problem.

images
actually that would be a problem. Nobody knows who he is so why would they vote for him
 
That's silly. Trump cost hundreds of thousands their jobs in bankruptcies and closings. He has done no public service for the country. He is temperamentally unqualified for the presidency. Any comment about "at least he is better than Hillary" is similar to "there both really bad losers, but Donald is better," is ludicrous.

Neither are qualified.

Vote Johnson/Weld.

I see fake is quoting the "outyourass" poll. The source of most of his statistics.
I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.
Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.
That is not the problem.

images
actually that would be a problem. Nobody knows who he is so why would they vote for him
He's got 12%, and his strength is growing.
 
I didn't say she was wrong about her opinion, I said she was wrong to express it. You realize judges are supposed to at least pretend to be impartial, right Jake? Or do you? As long as they support socialism you're good with however far they want to go to get it?
You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.
Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to
Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.



Comrade Starkiev

We concur. Johnson is NOT a Libertarian.

Trump is indeed a fascist -

BUT

our most important and basic right

the right to bear arms is secured with him


.
You have no 2nd Amendment right to have a bazooka, a recoiless rifle, a mortar, a tank, etc., unless you meet federal (regulation and registration and qualification) guidelines.

You are misuing the OP to quarrel something that has no bearing to it. Stop.


You have no idea what you are talking about.

The 2A confers NO REGULATORY AUTHORITY.


Americans will carry whatever it takes to defend their lives. WHATEVER IT TAKES.


.
 
You realize that Trump crossed the line when he wrongly attacked Curiel. That is not acceptable in politics, and I have no problem with Ginsberg metaphorically giving him a bloody lip. The second the left on Bush and the right on Obama stopped being decent were the days that the gloves came off. There is a decent America from right of center to left of center. The far left and the far right have become enemies of American values.

And, Kaz . . . you have no idea what is socialism anymore than Conty or gipper.

Vote for Johnson.
Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to
Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.
Comrade Starkiev We concur. Johnson is NOT a Libertarian. Trump is indeed a fascist - BUT our most important and basic right the right to bear arms is secured with him


.
You have no 2nd Amendment right to have a bazooka, a recoiless rifle, a mortar, a tank, etc., unless you meet federal (regulation and registration and qualification) guidelines.

You are misusing the OP to quarrel something that has no bearing to it. Stop.
You have no idea what you are talking about. The 2A confers NO REGULATORY AUTHORITY. Americans will carry whatever it takes to defend their lives. WHATEVER IT TAKES. .
You demonstrate breathless lack of comprehension about matters constitutional. You are not a scholar or a patriot.

This OP is about Ginsberg, not a rant about the 2d.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.

She obviously believes his candidacy is an attack on the constitution? So, you just assume what she believes, or you heard her say it? I wonder how the constitution can be attacked anyway. I know she resents Trump getting free publicity. A novel idea. A candidate not depending on special interests to fund his campaign means he can at least try to accomplish what he says he will do, unlike clinton or obama or the rest of the pack who are bought and paid for by special interests.
 
I see fake is quoting the "outyourass" poll. The source of most of his statistics.
I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.
Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.
That is not the problem.

images
actually that would be a problem. Nobody knows who he is so why would they vote for him
He's got 12%, and his strength is growing.
wow, a whole 12 %? bet he wont even get half of that on election day
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.

She obviously believes his candidacy is an attack on the constitution? So, you just assume what she believes, or you heard her say it? I wonder how the constitution can be attacked anyway. I know she resents Trump getting free publicity. A novel idea. A candidate not depending on special interests to fund his campaign means he can at least try to accomplish what he says he will do, unlike clinton or obama or the rest of the pack who are bought and paid for by special interests.
"I know she resents Trump getting free publicity" is the stupidest statement on the Board today, maybe all week, jasonfree. You know nothing of the sort. So you like, OK, but stay honest about it all.
 
I see that you are as confused as usual. Ginsberg correctly pointed out the problem with Trump's candidacy. No real Republican is voting for Trump but will be instead for Johnson.
Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.
That is not the problem.

images
actually that would be a problem. Nobody knows who he is so why would they vote for him
He's got 12%, and his strength is growing.
wow, a whole 12 %? bet he wont even get half of that on election day
He will get above 10%, and that is more than enough with anti-Trump women, blacks, browns, and millennials to deny him 43 of Obama's 57 states.
 
Nobody even knows who the hell Johnson is. He has a much chance of winning as I do. And Im not even running.
You want to waste a vote? go for it.
That is not the problem.

images
actually that would be a problem. Nobody knows who he is so why would they vote for him
He's got 12%, and his strength is growing.
wow, a whole 12 %? bet he wont even get half of that on election day
He will get above 10%, and that is more than enough with anti-Trump women, blacks, browns, and millennials to deny him 43 of Obama's 57 states.
so you basically want hillary?
What is it that causes people like you to become so anti American?
 
Swish, I'm talking about your blind adulation of the communist Ginsburg and that she has no place in delving in the political side as a lifetime judge. How did you not learn to read in all those years of government school, Jake? And I'm not voting for Johnson because I'm a libertarian. You are voting for him because he's not one. I don't give a shit about the party they belong to
Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.
Comrade Starkiev We concur. Johnson is NOT a Libertarian. Trump is indeed a fascist - BUT our most important and basic right the right to bear arms is secured with him


.
You have no 2nd Amendment right to have a bazooka, a recoiless rifle, a mortar, a tank, etc., unless you meet federal (regulation and registration and qualification) guidelines.

You are misusing the OP to quarrel something that has no bearing to it. Stop.
You have no idea what you are talking about. The 2A confers NO REGULATORY AUTHORITY. Americans will carry whatever it takes to defend their lives. WHATEVER IT TAKES. .
You demonstrate breathless lack of comprehension about matters constitutional. You are not a scholar or a patriot.

This OP is about Ginsberg, not a rant about the 2d.


The bitch claims that she can use the 2A to disarm us.

.
 
Ginsberg is not a communist, and you are a hidden lesbian, if we are going to exchange insults.

I am voting for Johnson because he is not a libertarian. And for your information, neither is Johnson.

Trump is a fascist at heart, and as such he candidacy is bankrupt.
Comrade Starkiev We concur. Johnson is NOT a Libertarian. Trump is indeed a fascist - BUT our most important and basic right the right to bear arms is secured with him


.
You have no 2nd Amendment right to have a bazooka, a recoiless rifle, a mortar, a tank, etc., unless you meet federal (regulation and registration and qualification) guidelines.

You are misusing the OP to quarrel something that has no bearing to it. Stop.
You have no idea what you are talking about. The 2A confers NO REGULATORY AUTHORITY. Americans will carry whatever it takes to defend their lives. WHATEVER IT TAKES. .
You demonstrate breathless lack of comprehension about matters constitutional. You are not a scholar or a patriot.

This OP is about Ginsberg, not a rant about the 2d.


The bitch claims that she can use the 2A to disarm us.

.
I say we make walkers, depends and soft foods illegal. Lets see how fast she tries to protect those things most important to her now.
 
Just? I've had you people pegged since high school.

As to education, the system needs to wrested away from the Democrats, by whatever means.
Maybe y'all could shoot them or put them in prison, like the Chinese did during the revolution.

If they continue to turn against America, why not? :laugh:

It has never occurred to you to question why educated people tend to be Democrats?

That has not been the case in my experience. Democrats tend to live their lives in Fantasia.


Maybe they've learned something you didn't?

Unlikely. Star Trek and Disney films do not an education make.

Why are people with many years of education more likely to be liberals?

As I said, that has not been the case in my experience.

I am liberal in the classic sense. Democrats tend not to be.
Well, Billy, it's you folks who keep insisting that our universities are full of Democrat/liberal professors brainwashing our precious youth--I wouldn't know; I graduated 20+ years ago and haven't been back on a college campus since. I was taking your word for it.

I graduated 40+ years ago, and I myself do occasionally visit college campuses.

Regardless, I've had ample opportunity to speak to the whippersnappers over the years, and the profs, and ignorance has been on an astonishing upsliding scale for decades.

The Millennials are by far the overall dumbest group I've yet encountered. Idiocracy indeed. They can't tie their shoes without texting for instructions.
And they overwhelmingly despise Trump.

Being the overall dumbest group, that says something for stupidity, doesn't it.
 
Maybe y'all could shoot them or put them in prison, like the Chinese did during the revolution.

If they continue to turn against America, why not? :laugh:

It has never occurred to you to question why educated people tend to be Democrats?

That has not been the case in my experience. Democrats tend to live their lives in Fantasia.


Maybe they've learned something you didn't?

Unlikely. Star Trek and Disney films do not an education make.

Why are people with many years of education more likely to be liberals?

As I said, that has not been the case in my experience.

I am liberal in the classic sense. Democrats tend not to be.
Well, Billy, it's you folks who keep insisting that our universities are full of Democrat/liberal professors brainwashing our precious youth--I wouldn't know; I graduated 20+ years ago and haven't been back on a college campus since. I was taking your word for it.

I graduated 40+ years ago, and I myself do occasionally visit college campuses.

Regardless, I've had ample opportunity to speak to the whippersnappers over the years, and the profs, and ignorance has been on an astonishing upsliding scale for decades.

The Millennials are by far the overall dumbest group I've yet encountered. Idiocracy indeed. They can't tie their shoes without texting for instructions.
And they overwhelmingly despise Trump.

Being the overall dumbest group, that says something for stupidity, doesn't it.
Only the stupids like you would think so. They may not be liberal like Ginsberg, but they detest Trump.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.
While Ginsberg regrets her comments about Trump, declaring it was an obvious bias against the next possible president of the US, the US regrets the day Ginsberg was made a SC justice. She should be recalled, if that is possible.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.
While Ginsberg regrets her comments about Trump, declaring it was an obvious bias against the next possible president of the US, the US regrets the day Ginsberg was made a SC justice. She should be recalled, if that is possible.
---
Recalled? You mean impeached?
On what grounds?
What allegations of legal or ethical misconduct?
.
 
Scalia was the most activist SCOTUS judge ever to sit on the bench. The cons loved his con biased opinions. But when Ginsburg gives her's the cons call it inappropriate, because the truth hurts their little feelings.

Trump can't call Clinton crooked without proving that he's not, by releasing his tax returns. Thanks Ruth.

Yeah, a SCOTUS that follows the Constitution is an "activist" in the eyes of the leftard clown posse.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com

Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.
While Ginsberg regrets her comments about Trump, declaring it was an obvious bias against the next possible president of the US, the US regrets the day Ginsberg was made a SC justice. She should be recalled, if that is possible.
---
Recalled? You mean impeached?
On what grounds?
What allegations of legal or ethical misconduct?
.


The fact that the old klunt belongs to the Council On Foreign Relations should automatically get the disgusting pile of shit kicked to the curb.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com
Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.
While Ginsberg regrets her comments about Trump, declaring it was an obvious bias against the next possible president of the US, the US regrets the day Ginsberg was made a SC justice. She should be recalled, if that is possible.
Recalled? You mean impeached?
On what grounds?
What allegations of legal or ethical misconduct?
.
The fact that the old klunt belongs to the Council On Foreign Relations should automatically get the disgusting pile of shit kicked to the curb.
---
Not an impeachable offense.
.
 
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg calls Trump a 'faker,' he says she should resign - CNNPolitics.com
Trump thinks he can attack a judge's heritage and ethnicity but reacts badly to being called out by Ginsberg.

She was great friends with Scalia. She believes in civility. She obviously believes Trump's candidacy is an attack on the Constitution.
While Ginsberg regrets her comments about Trump, declaring it was an obvious bias against the next possible president of the US, the US regrets the day Ginsberg was made a SC justice. She should be recalled, if that is possible.
Recalled? You mean impeached?
On what grounds?
What allegations of legal or ethical misconduct?
.
The fact that the old klunt belongs to the Council On Foreign Relations should automatically get the disgusting pile of shit kicked to the curb.
---
Not an impeachable offense.
.

Let me guess....you know NOTHING bout the CFR or it's goals.....typical.
 

Forum List

Back
Top