Justice Sam Alito Evacuated with His Family to an Undisclosed Location as Death Threats Intensify and Wisconsin Pro-Life Office is Firebombed

[Ropey]

Moonglow took time off of his support of Disney's grooming to post here. I hope you all appreciate it.

Read the Draft to Overturn Roe V. Wade: Justice Samuel Alito’s Leaked Opinion

A first draft of an opinion written by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito that would overturn Roe V. Wade was leaked to Politico and published in full.

heavy.com

 

[TeeDub]

Executed? What death sentence appropriate crime have they committed?

Trespassing, like Ashly Babbitt.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It's illegal to "protest" a judge's home.

depends on the nature and purpose of the protest.

 

[TeeDub]

CNN is literally building cover for the brown shirts carrying out these acts.

They are consistent.

 

[BlindBoo]

illegal, under 18 U.S.C. § 1507 (subsection numbers added),

1. Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or
2. with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
3. pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or
4. in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
5. with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
6. shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Federal Statute Bans Picketing Judges' Residences "With The Intent of Influencing [the] Judge"

There's been talk of protests outside Supreme Court Justices' homes; but it appears likely that such protests are illegal, under 18…

reason.com

 

[BS Filter]

depends on the nature and purpose of the protest.

Show me your source.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What a retard! Shitforbrains says the Leftards outside the homes of Justices have no intent of intimidation!

I asked a question, one you cannot seem to answer.

 

[MarathonMike]

Politicians should stand by their decisions. As long as it doesnt attemptan insurrection its fine.
Alito has let down America and should resign and go and live in Russia.

You post a lot of lame stuff, but you went full retard this time.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Show me your source.

see post number 65

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Remember, Joe Biden refused multiple times to warn people against protesting outside of justices' homes -- which is actually illegal -- or to urge calm.

He wants this. Just like he wanted the riots of 2020.

He must be impeached. And Kamala too.

Reports: Justice Samuel Alito Moved to Undisclosed Location

Alito has reportedly been moved to an undisclosed location for safety, after leftwing radicals attempting to intimidate conservative justices.

www.breitbart.com

Sounds like insurrection to me.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Violent leftist. ^^^

Ummmmm........Maybe I'm using reverse gay psychology on Tammy Tainted. It worked he gave me a thumbs up. He has never done that before....lololol

 

[Harpy Eagle]

illegal, under 18 U.S.C. § 1507 (subsection numbers added),

1. Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or
2. with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
3. pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or
4. in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
5. with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
6. shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Federal Statute Bans Picketing Judges' Residences "With The Intent of Influencing [the] Judge"

There's been talk of protests outside Supreme Court Justices' homes; but it appears likely that such protests are illegal, under 18…

reason.com

Based upon the intent it could be illegal

 

[BS Filter]

illegal, under 18 U.S.C. § 1507 (subsection numbers added),

1. Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or
2. with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
3. pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or
4. in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or
5. with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence,
6. shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Federal Statute Bans Picketing Judges' Residences "With The Intent of Influencing [the] Judge"

There's been talk of protests outside Supreme Court Justices' homes; but it appears likely that such protests are illegal, under 18…

reason.com

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

depends on the nature and purpose of the protest.

What?

Why would the "nature and purpose" make a difference?

 

[candycorn]

Yeah, that’s it! The illegal protesters outside of Justices homes are Limbaugh fans!

Clearly.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

So you are OK with Arson and Attempted Murder (if the houses are occupied) of anyone who doesn't think like you.
You are one pathetic asshole.

LOLOL.............See previous post....lololol

 

[marvin martian]

Hope they catch the arsonist.

No you don't. You're on the record supporting state-sponsored violence against the left's political opponents.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Based upon the intent it could be illegal

2. with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
That one seems to be fairly easy to prove, don't you agree?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What?

Why would the "nature and purpose" make a difference?

The law says so.

18 U.S.C. § 1507

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing

 

[Harpy Eagle]

2. with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty,
That one seems to be fairly easy to prove, don't you agree?

It does indeed.