Kamala Harris Draws Blood At Senate Hearing

[bripat9643]

Mueller reached no finding on obstruction of justice, and after reveing the evidence Mueller laid out in his report, Barr quite appropriately concluded there was no actionable evidence of obstruction of justice.

Except Mueller's decision was not based on a lack of evidence. He, under DOJ policy, could not make a determination and Barr, as the AG could not have taken prosecutorial action either. He opted instead to cover the president.

Therefore the correct course was to pass it along to the only body who could take action. The congress.

Just because the AG felt there was no evidence for prosecution, does not mean there isnt ample evidence for impeachment.

The congress should have the full, unredacted report with all of the underlying evidence.

Sorry dope. Congress is entitled to NOTHING. Turning the entire case over to Mueller put this in the AG's hands. Per Mueller whether or not Trump was President played NO PART in his decision to not indict. The LACK OF EVIDENCE did. The AG can't decide on prosecution? Do you even know how stupid you sound? Give it up derpster. You LOST. Period. End of book. Enjoy 6 more years of Trump.

Wrong. Read the constitution.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Better yet. Read what the author of the special counsel rules says about releasing the report.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/23/i-wrote-special-counsel-rules-attorney-general-can-should-release-mueller-report/?outputType=amp

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. Absolutely nothing in the law or the regulations prevents the report from becoming public. Indeed, the relevant sources of law give Attorney General P. William Barr all the latitude in the world to make it public."

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

 

[the other mike]

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. "

Senator Graham and the Senate Judiciary Committee have the full unredacted report.
Stop lying.

 

[the other mike]

All these Democrats in the Senate Judiciary Committee have access to the unredacted Mueller Report.

Feinstein, Dianne (CA), Ranking Member
Leahy, Patrick J. (VT)
Durbin, Richard J. (IL)
Whitehouse, Sheldon (RI)
Klobuchar, Amy (MN)
Coons, Christopher A. (DE)
Blumenthal, Richard (CT)
Hirono, Mazie K. (HI)
Booker, Cory A. (NJ)
Harris, Kamala D. (CA)

 

[Hutch Starskey]

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. "

Senator Graham and the Senate Judiciary Committee have the full unredacted report.
Stop lying.

That's not my quote. That's a quote from the link, dope.

Besides, that's not public.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Except Mueller's decision was not based on a lack of evidence. He, under DOJ policy, could not make a determination and Barr, as the AG could not have taken prosecutorial action either. He opted instead to cover the president.

Therefore the correct course was to pass it along to the only body who could take action. The congress.

Just because the AG felt there was no evidence for prosecution, does not mean there isnt ample evidence for impeachment.

The congress should have the full, unredacted report with all of the underlying evidence.

Sorry dope. Congress is entitled to NOTHING. Turning the entire case over to Mueller put this in the AG's hands. Per Mueller whether or not Trump was President played NO PART in his decision to not indict. The LACK OF EVIDENCE did. The AG can't decide on prosecution? Do you even know how stupid you sound? Give it up derpster. You LOST. Period. End of book. Enjoy 6 more years of Trump.

Wrong. Read the constitution.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Better yet. Read what the author of the special counsel rules says about releasing the report.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/23/i-wrote-special-counsel-rules-attorney-general-can-should-release-mueller-report/?outputType=amp

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. Absolutely nothing in the law or the regulations prevents the report from becoming public. Indeed, the relevant sources of law give Attorney General P. William Barr all the latitude in the world to make it public."

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

That's exactly the point, dope.

He's deliberately burying it.

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry dope. Congress is entitled to NOTHING. Turning the entire case over to Mueller put this in the AG's hands. Per Mueller whether or not Trump was President played NO PART in his decision to not indict. The LACK OF EVIDENCE did. The AG can't decide on prosecution? Do you even know how stupid you sound? Give it up derpster. You LOST. Period. End of book. Enjoy 6 more years of Trump.

Wrong. Read the constitution.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Better yet. Read what the author of the special counsel rules says about releasing the report.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/23/i-wrote-special-counsel-rules-attorney-general-can-should-release-mueller-report/?outputType=amp

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. Absolutely nothing in the law or the regulations prevents the report from becoming public. Indeed, the relevant sources of law give Attorney General P. William Barr all the latitude in the world to make it public."

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

That's exactly the point, dope.

He's deliberately burying it.

No one shares you delusions, snowflake.

 

[the other mike]

Some folks are sweating bullets now.

 

[hadit]

I made no such claim, liar.

This is what Barr said regarding obstruction nearly a month before the report was released:

Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report

"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."


That was not Mueller's finding and Barr testified this week that he had not reviewed any underlying evidence before making his determination.

Mueller reached no finding on obstruction of justice, and after reveing the evidence Mueller laid out in his report, Barr quite appropriately concluded there was no actionable evidence of obstruction of justice.

Except Mueller's decision was not based on a lack of evidence. He, under DOJ policy, could not make a determination and Barr, as the AG could not have taken prosecutorial action either. He opted instead to cover the president.

Therefore the correct course was to pass it along to the only body who could take action. The congress.

Just because the AG felt there was no evidence for prosecution, does not mean there isnt ample evidence for impeachment.

The congress should have the full, unredacted report with all of the underlying evidence.

Sorry dope. Congress is entitled to NOTHING. Turning the entire case over to Mueller put this in the AG's hands. Per Mueller whether or not Trump was President played NO PART in his decision to not indict. The LACK OF EVIDENCE did. The AG can't decide on prosecution? Do you even know how stupid you sound? Give it up derpster. You LOST. Period. End of book. Enjoy 6 more years of Trump.

LOL....
The AG can't indict a sitting president either, dope.

What would Barr have done if Mueller had recommended charges? Nothing.
Probably would have critcized and excoriated Mueller for suggesting so.

Barr is doing what he was recruited to do.
Bury it.

Poor little dope. Showing your stupidity yet again. So Barr buried the report by giving the summary and then releasing the report with proper redactions in a timely manner? The only thing obstructed was your pathetic attempts to keep this hoax alive. The screams when Barr starts indicting the Dims involved in this may set decibel records.

The narrative is set trying to discredit the new investigations. Obstruction at its finest.

 

[hadit]

Sorry dope. Congress is entitled to NOTHING. Turning the entire case over to Mueller put this in the AG's hands. Per Mueller whether or not Trump was President played NO PART in his decision to not indict. The LACK OF EVIDENCE did. The AG can't decide on prosecution? Do you even know how stupid you sound? Give it up derpster. You LOST. Period. End of book. Enjoy 6 more years of Trump.

Wrong. Read the constitution.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Better yet. Read what the author of the special counsel rules says about releasing the report.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/23/i-wrote-special-counsel-rules-attorney-general-can-should-release-mueller-report/?outputType=amp

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. Absolutely nothing in the law or the regulations prevents the report from becoming public. Indeed, the relevant sources of law give Attorney General P. William Barr all the latitude in the world to make it public."

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

Nothing requires him to make it public either, dumbass.

That's exactly the point, dope.

He's deliberately burying it.

By making it available to people with authority to act on it. Is cold hot in your world too?

 

[lantern2814]

Mueller reached no finding on obstruction of justice, and after reveing the evidence Mueller laid out in his report, Barr quite appropriately concluded there was no actionable evidence of obstruction of justice.

Except Mueller's decision was not based on a lack of evidence. He, under DOJ policy, could not make a determination and Barr, as the AG could not have taken prosecutorial action either. He opted instead to cover the president.

Therefore the correct course was to pass it along to the only body who could take action. The congress.

Just because the AG felt there was no evidence for prosecution, does not mean there isnt ample evidence for impeachment.

The congress should have the full, unredacted report with all of the underlying evidence.

Sorry dope. Congress is entitled to NOTHING. Turning the entire case over to Mueller put this in the AG's hands. Per Mueller whether or not Trump was President played NO PART in his decision to not indict. The LACK OF EVIDENCE did. The AG can't decide on prosecution? Do you even know how stupid you sound? Give it up derpster. You LOST. Period. End of book. Enjoy 6 more years of Trump.

Wrong. Read the constitution.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Wrong again. Read the law governing special counsel investigations. Continuing your streak of a lifetime of being wrong.

Better yet. Read what the author of the special counsel rules says about releasing the report.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/23/i-wrote-special-counsel-rules-attorney-general-can-should-release-mueller-report/?outputType=amp

"The public has every right to see Robert S. Mueller III's conclusions. Absolutely nothing in the law or the regulations prevents the report from becoming public. Indeed, the relevant sources of law give Attorney General P. William Barr all the latitude in the world to make it public."

Sure, let's just ignore those pesky laws that say grand jury information, and names of people not indicted can NOT legally be released. Per the LAW. Another WaPo OPINION that can relegated to lies and used as fish wrap.

 

[Clipper]

Barr's career accomplishments make Kamala look like the rank amateur that she is.

Yea, imagine a man of Barr's caliber kissing the ass of a sleazy, two bit hack like Trump for a job. Some people will do anything for a title. That's what Sessions did & look where he ended up. A nobody in the scrap heap of history. Which is where Barr will end up.

Nothing of which has anything to do with Barr's career making Kamala's career look like a joke.

If he had such a great career, what's he doing kissing the ass of a corrupt bottom feeder like Trump?

 

[BluesLegend]

Barr's career accomplishments make Kamala look like the rank amateur that she is.

Yea, imagine a man of Barr's caliber kissing the ass of a sleazy, two bit hack like Trump for a job. Some people will do anything for a title. That's what Sessions did & look where he ended up. A nobody in the scrap heap of history. Which is where Barr will end up.

Nothing of which has anything to do with Barr's career making Kamala's career look like a joke.

If he had such a great career, what's he doing kissing the ass of a corrupt bottom feeder like Trump?

Barr is AG of The United States moron.

 

[Clipper]

Barr's career accomplishments make Kamala look like the rank amateur that she is.

Yea, imagine a man of Barr's caliber kissing the ass of a sleazy, two bit hack like Trump for a job. Some people will do anything for a title. That's what Sessions did & look where he ended up. A nobody in the scrap heap of history. Which is where Barr will end up.

Nothing of which has anything to do with Barr's career making Kamala's career look like a joke.

If he had such a great career, what's he doing kissing the ass of a corrupt bottom feeder like Trump?

Barr is AG of The United States moron.

Yes he is. You forgot to mention his duty of being Trump's head ball washer. It's pretty sad if you think about Barr lowering himself to Trump's level.