Kamala Harris Slept Her Way to the Top

[Ame®icano]

apparently Indian + Jamaican = Black

Mutt whore.

right wing bigotry?

For calling her mutt, or for calling her whore?

 

[Ame®icano]

Riddle me this: why is it OK for a young black girl to suck a married politicians cock, but...well, let's stop there.

Why are democrats lining up behind Kamala?

Why is it ok for the Potus of the US to bed a porn star and a playboy bunny shortly after his wife gave birth??

Because he's a man! When a man beds a wide variety of sleazy partners, he's a STUD! When a woman has sex outside of marriage, she's a fucking whore!!

It's called a "double standard", and it's based on misogyny and hatred of women, especially women who seek power. How dare she think that men will listen to or obey her! Fucking whore!

Keep going guys. Keep pissing the women off.

It's not double standard.

You have no idea what does it take to be a STUD.

On the contrary, to be a WHORE the only effort needed is to spread the legs.

 

[Wry Catcher]

What platform do you support? Some detail will be appreciated.

She is for single payer, I’m against single payer. She is for prosecuting parents for their children’s truancy, I think it’s a bad idea, it hurts low income and minorities harder than other parents. Don’t like her immigration policy, there is a legal path for citizenship and we need to follow it. She is purposing tax credits, I am against tax credits, we need higher taxes and lower spending. Just fundamental differences, nothing earthshaking.

Single payer is much like the wall issue, the devil is in the details and no one has yet provided the details of single payer and how long it will be, and how much the wall will cost.

What is her "immigration policy"? Why are you opposed to tax credits (only when they apply to the needy, and not corporations?)?

I agree, we need higher taxes, and those who make the most don't need it for food, shelter and clothing. Thus those who do need tax credits.

We need to simplify the tax code, why play the tax credit game? If you make under a certain amount then you don’t pay taxes, no need to give out credits. As for your childish stereotyping bigotry, I am not for tax credits for corporations, I’m not for corporate welfare, you either make it or you don’t.

Try to be civil, and I won't thing badly of you. Apparently you've never worked with the working poor. I have, and thankfully I have never needed credits or financial assistance of any kind.

I went to two public universities, and my costs were minimum. Even the required readings were available for in the library use at no cost; my kids paid an average $100 a book, esp. the science and math text books.

I have worked with the working poor and I still think the tax credits are a bad idea, our time and money would be better spent educating, teaching them simple economics, budgeting, training and help them develop working skills.

BTW, I am being civil, you assumed I was for corporate tax credits for some silly reason. I corrected your slight on me.

My comment on corporate tax credits was a question.

Your first paragraph is very elitist, and if you did work with this demographic I'd be surprised.

 

[Wry Catcher]

parrot

judgement? how did he judge her? he stated a fact. why do facts offend you bunch of babies?

"she's just a common whore" isn't judging?

i don't give a flying horsefuck what you or he says and if i disagree, i'll say so. you seem to be more than willing to do the same. however i don't then drop down and call you a crybaby.

do what you gotta do and have at it.

dude, you are nothing but a judgement guy. Every thread. How you have more class than the biased thinking left, right, whatever. dude. you are a self righteous SOB to the max. you are afraid of commitment.

BTW, the fact is she slept with a married man in return for opportunities. that makes her a whore. No judgement, just fact.

Do you have evidence that she slept with a married man? If not, you're a damn liar.

BTW, extramarital affairs are common, and I suspect many of those who have attacked Sen. Harris as a "whore" have had an extramarital affair.

Hypocrisy is, BTW, one of the deadly sins committed too often by those on the right, and very often by those like you on the extreme right.

well sure, willie said so. why do you doubt him?

yo Wry Catcher where'd you go?

Back yard, involved in Honey do's.

 

[Dragonlady]

Single payer is much like the wall issue, the devil is in the details and no one has yet provided the details of single payer and how long it will be, and how much the wall will cost.

What is her "immigration policy"? Why are you opposed to tax credits (only when they apply to the needy, and not corporations?)?

I agree, we need higher taxes, and those who make the most don't need it for food, shelter and clothing. Thus those who do need tax credits.

Single payer works pretty simply:

1. Doctors, hospitals and labs would bill the state office for all necessary medical services they provide for all patients, and the state would remit the payments.

As you said, the devil is in the details. What about the taxes to pay for all of this? Basically, instead of paying health insurance premiums, you pay health insurance taxes. But instead of a complex and expensive system of administration, paperwork, pre-approvals for care, and third party billing companies, doctors and hospitals can streamline their practices, enabling them to treat more patients, more efficiently, because most of the accounting paperwork is eliminated.

In the US, 30% of every health care dollar is spent on administration - billing and payments, to hundreds of health insurance companies, collecting co-pays, chasing the uninsured. In single payer countries, that figure is less than 10%. That one line item alone reduces your costs by 20% or more, across the board. In Canada, our administration rate is 7%. 15% of your population is uninsured. That's nearly a 25% difference. Imagine if hospitals and clinics had spent 25% less on billing and collection. They could reduce their fees.

In most doctor's offices in Canada, the receptionist submits the monthly bill to the provincial heath insurance office. No third party billing company, no chasing co-pays, or the uninsured. One doctor who had practiced in both Canada and the US said he made more money in the US, but kept much more of what he earned in Canada because his expenses were so much lower. He could also spend more time with his patients since he didn't have to get pre-approvals or deal with insurance companies, which meant he could see more patients, thereby increasing his practice.

I've also talked to people who have been treated under both health care systems. When Americans living in Canada first encounter our health care system, they are shocked that nobody asks about how their bill will be paid. They just ask for your OHIP card at reception. You hand them your card, they swipe it, and everything that happens thereafter is all about your care.

When I get sick, I go to the doctor. If I am hospitalized, I don't have to worry about paying the bill, because I will have no bills from either. All I worry about is getting better and going home.

Thank you. I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, that preventative medicine from cradle to grave would be a cost benefit, even when free for every citizen.

You still haven't learned that nothing is free. Sad.

You haven't learned to think outside the box. Consider, if you will, how preventative medicine has conquered Polio and other serious diseases, and when a serious illness / disease is treatable and less costly when discovered early, in regular, age appropriate physicals and dental care.

Counseling is part of preventative care, teaching not lecturing tweens and teens about health**, and how good health is the most important factor in every persons life; something they and adults can only do for themselves.

**Pointing out how smoking, alcohol and other drugs will impact their health negatively, and how exercise and meditation / prayer can positively effect their health.

Two different things. No one sees a doctor for free.

Our basic medical expenses are covered in our taxes. All doctors' visits and hospital stays required no out of pocket expenditure. If I'm sick, I call, make an appointment, go to the office, give them my OHIP card which they swipe and give back to me, and I go and wait until I'm called in to see the doctor. Same when I go to the hospital. I never see the bills. What this means to me is that if I'm sick, I get care.

If you go to the doctor and he finds a cancerous mole and excises it before it develops "roots" and gets into your bloodstream, you may pay $300 for that doctor's visit, but by removing the mole before the cancer gets into your system, thereby saving you/your insurance company $300,000 for the cost of surgery, hospitalization, chemo, and disability insurance for the lost wages, I'd call that a "free" doctor's visit.

Americans postpone going to the doctor because of co-pays. Insurance companies believe copays reduce abuse of the system, by giving the patient a "stake" in the process. I would say that the $12,000 premium for individual health care insurance is more than a sufficient stake in the process and there should be NO copays.

One major way of reducing health insurance costs is preventative medicine. Catching problems early before they require hospitalization. The most expensive way of dealing with problems is going to the emergency room, and with the American health care system, a lot of people end up in the emergency room because they haven't sought treatment for a small problem until it become a much more expensive major illness.

 

[BS Filter]

Single payer works pretty simply:

1. Doctors, hospitals and labs would bill the state office for all necessary medical services they provide for all patients, and the state would remit the payments.

As you said, the devil is in the details. What about the taxes to pay for all of this? Basically, instead of paying health insurance premiums, you pay health insurance taxes. But instead of a complex and expensive system of administration, paperwork, pre-approvals for care, and third party billing companies, doctors and hospitals can streamline their practices, enabling them to treat more patients, more efficiently, because most of the accounting paperwork is eliminated.

In the US, 30% of every health care dollar is spent on administration - billing and payments, to hundreds of health insurance companies, collecting co-pays, chasing the uninsured. In single payer countries, that figure is less than 10%. That one line item alone reduces your costs by 20% or more, across the board. In Canada, our administration rate is 7%. 15% of your population is uninsured. That's nearly a 25% difference. Imagine if hospitals and clinics had spent 25% less on billing and collection. They could reduce their fees.

In most doctor's offices in Canada, the receptionist submits the monthly bill to the provincial heath insurance office. No third party billing company, no chasing co-pays, or the uninsured. One doctor who had practiced in both Canada and the US said he made more money in the US, but kept much more of what he earned in Canada because his expenses were so much lower. He could also spend more time with his patients since he didn't have to get pre-approvals or deal with insurance companies, which meant he could see more patients, thereby increasing his practice.

I've also talked to people who have been treated under both health care systems. When Americans living in Canada first encounter our health care system, they are shocked that nobody asks about how their bill will be paid. They just ask for your OHIP card at reception. You hand them your card, they swipe it, and everything that happens thereafter is all about your care.

When I get sick, I go to the doctor. If I am hospitalized, I don't have to worry about paying the bill, because I will have no bills from either. All I worry about is getting better and going home.

Thank you. I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, that preventative medicine from cradle to grave would be a cost benefit, even when free for every citizen.

You still haven't learned that nothing is free. Sad.

You haven't learned to think outside the box. Consider, if you will, how preventative medicine has conquered Polio and other serious diseases, and when a serious illness / disease is treatable and less costly when discovered early, in regular, age appropriate physicals and dental care.

Counseling is part of preventative care, teaching not lecturing tweens and teens about health**, and how good health is the most important factor in every persons life; something they and adults can only do for themselves.

**Pointing out how smoking, alcohol and other drugs will impact their health negatively, and how exercise and meditation / prayer can positively effect their health.

Two different things. No one sees a doctor for free.

Our basic medical expenses are covered in our taxes. All doctors' visits and hospital stays required no out of pocket expenditure. If I'm sick, I call, make an appointment, go to the office, give them my OHIP card which they swipe and give back to me, and I go and wait until I'm called in to see the doctor. Same when I go to the hospital. I never see the bills. What this means to me is that if I'm sick, I get care.

If you go to the doctor and he finds a cancerous mole and excises it before it develops "roots" and gets into your bloodstream, you may pay $300 for that doctor's visit, but by removing the mole before the cancer gets into your system, thereby saving you/your insurance company $300,000 for the cost of surgery, hospitalization, chemo, and disability insurance for the lost wages, I'd call that a "free" doctor's visit.

Americans postpone going to the doctor because of co-pays. Insurance companies believe copays reduce abuse of the system, by giving the patient a "stake" in the process. I would say that the $12,000 premium for individual health care insurance is more than a sufficient stake in the process and there should be NO copays.

One major way of reducing health insurance costs is preventative medicine. Catching problems early before they require hospitalization. The most expensive way of dealing with problems is going to the emergency room, and with the American health care system, a lot of people end up in the emergency room because they haven't sought treatment for a small problem until it become a much more expensive major illness.

You're talking about Medicare for seniors. You want to extend that to everyone, regardless of age, huh.

 

[jc456]

Single payer is much like the wall issue, the devil is in the details and no one has yet provided the details of single payer and how long it will be, and how much the wall will cost.

What is her "immigration policy"? Why are you opposed to tax credits (only when they apply to the needy, and not corporations?)?

I agree, we need higher taxes, and those who make the most don't need it for food, shelter and clothing. Thus those who do need tax credits.

Single payer works pretty simply:

1. Doctors, hospitals and labs would bill the state office for all necessary medical services they provide for all patients, and the state would remit the payments.

As you said, the devil is in the details. What about the taxes to pay for all of this? Basically, instead of paying health insurance premiums, you pay health insurance taxes. But instead of a complex and expensive system of administration, paperwork, pre-approvals for care, and third party billing companies, doctors and hospitals can streamline their practices, enabling them to treat more patients, more efficiently, because most of the accounting paperwork is eliminated.

In the US, 30% of every health care dollar is spent on administration - billing and payments, to hundreds of health insurance companies, collecting co-pays, chasing the uninsured. In single payer countries, that figure is less than 10%. That one line item alone reduces your costs by 20% or more, across the board. In Canada, our administration rate is 7%. 15% of your population is uninsured. That's nearly a 25% difference. Imagine if hospitals and clinics had spent 25% less on billing and collection. They could reduce their fees.

In most doctor's offices in Canada, the receptionist submits the monthly bill to the provincial heath insurance office. No third party billing company, no chasing co-pays, or the uninsured. One doctor who had practiced in both Canada and the US said he made more money in the US, but kept much more of what he earned in Canada because his expenses were so much lower. He could also spend more time with his patients since he didn't have to get pre-approvals or deal with insurance companies, which meant he could see more patients, thereby increasing his practice.

I've also talked to people who have been treated under both health care systems. When Americans living in Canada first encounter our health care system, they are shocked that nobody asks about how their bill will be paid. They just ask for your OHIP card at reception. You hand them your card, they swipe it, and everything that happens thereafter is all about your care.

When I get sick, I go to the doctor. If I am hospitalized, I don't have to worry about paying the bill, because I will have no bills from either. All I worry about is getting better and going home.

Thank you. I believe, and correct me if I'm wrong, that preventative medicine from cradle to grave would be a cost benefit, even when free for every citizen.

You still haven't learned that nothing is free. Sad.

You haven't learned to think outside the box. Consider, if you will, how preventative medicine has conquered Polio and other serious diseases, and when a serious illness / disease is treatable and less costly when discovered early, in regular, age appropriate physicals and dental care.

Counseling is part of preventative care, teaching not lecturing tweens and teens about health**, and how good health is the most important factor in every persons life; something they and adults can only do for themselves.

**Pointing out how smoking, alcohol and other drugs will impact their health negatively, and how exercise and meditation / prayer can positively effect their health.

Two different things. No one sees a doctor for free.

those on welfare receive money from us, so technically, the poor see doctors for free. then they come at us like we hold them down. funny shit. we pay for them and they are ungrateful fks.

 

[BluesLegend]

Vote for Kamala because she puts out?

How old are you, 14?

Old enough to trigger you lib snowflakes.

 

[jc456]

parrot

"she's just a common whore" isn't judging?

i don't give a flying horsefuck what you or he says and if i disagree, i'll say so. you seem to be more than willing to do the same. however i don't then drop down and call you a crybaby.

do what you gotta do and have at it.

dude, you are nothing but a judgement guy. Every thread. How you have more class than the biased thinking left, right, whatever. dude. you are a self righteous SOB to the max. you are afraid of commitment.

BTW, the fact is she slept with a married man in return for opportunities. that makes her a whore. No judgement, just fact.

Do you have evidence that she slept with a married man? If not, you're a damn liar.

BTW, extramarital affairs are common, and I suspect many of those who have attacked Sen. Harris as a "whore" have had an extramarital affair.

Hypocrisy is, BTW, one of the deadly sins committed too often by those on the right, and very often by those like you on the extreme right.

well sure, willie said so. why do you doubt him?

yo Wry Catcher where'd you go?

Back yard, involved in Honey do's.

my back yard is currently the Arctic Circle. so I'm going nowhere for the next 24 hours.

 

[Dragonlady]

Riddle me this: why is it OK for a young black girl to suck a married politicians cock, but...well, let's stop there.

Why are democrats lining up behind Kamala?

Why is it ok for the Potus of the US to bed a porn star and a playboy bunny shortly after his wife gave birth??

Because he's a man! When a man beds a wide variety of sleazy partners, he's a STUD! When a woman has sex outside of marriage, she's a fucking whore!!

It's called a "double standard", and it's based on misogyny and hatred of women, especially women who seek power. How dare she think that men will listen to or obey her! Fucking whore!

Keep going guys. Keep pissing the women off.

It's not double standard.

You have no idea what does it take to be a STUD.

On the contrary, to be a WHORE the only effort needed is to spread the legs.

The guys you call "studs" women call "fuckboys". Men who really don't like women, as people, but are avowed heterosexuals. Trump is a fuckboy. That's why he has to pay for it these days.

 

[Meathead]

The guys you call "studs" women call "fuckboys". Men who really don't like women, as people, but are avowed heterosexuals. Trump is a fuckboy. That's why he has to pay for it these days.

Men call women who are too fat and ugly to get laid dragonladiies or dykes. I'm sure it pure coincidence.

 

[Papageorgio]

Yeah, it is. You're separated, still married, and not divorced yet.

You are a HYPOCRITE.

How is he a hypocrite. Harris slept with a married man, that is a fact. Harris and Brown had an affair, that is a fact. Not sure how you can call facts hypocritical.

Definition of affair: : a romantic or passionate attachment typically of limited duration

No Willie was NOT a married man he had been separated from his wife for 10 YEARS. FOX NEWS is lying again, and they're very well noted for their manufactured conspiracies. Wake the fuck up!

Redirect to another post on this thread and you can read all about it. Click this link.
Kamala Harris Slept Her Way to the Top

You're confused TRUMP was married to Melania when he had an affair with Stormy Daniels, and you're not having a shit fit about that, are you? And he paid off another woman he had an affair with while he was married to Melania. This double standard is not working real well for you anymore.

Now if you want to see some of the doozies that FOX NEWS has shoved down your throats just click these links to redirect to these other threads on this board. (credible, verifiable links & video's included)
I feel sorry for anyone that is still watching FOX NEWS. They are the FAKE news.
Do you still believe FOX NEWS?--in light of the Nunes memo release
FOX NEWS--involved in FEDERAL Law suit over Seth Rich conspiracy story.

He was separated however he was still married to his wife, separated is not divorce. The rest of your post is irrelevant as I don’t watch FOX News nor do I care.

This is just totally laughable. You people who completely dismiss Drumph fucking whores all over the place (while he is married and NOT SEPARATED) and having an affair with Marla Maples when he was married (and NOT separated), find that Harris is some kind of whore for having a relationship with a separated man, a man who was separated from his wife for TEN YEARS. The hypocrisy is incredible!

I haven't dismissed a thing! I didn't vote for Trump because I didn't like him and his personal life. She did have an affair with a married man. Where am I wrong? Come quit your blasted deflecting and defending and be honest.

 

[Papageorgio]

She is for single payer, I’m against single payer. She is for prosecuting parents for their children’s truancy, I think it’s a bad idea, it hurts low income and minorities harder than other parents. Don’t like her immigration policy, there is a legal path for citizenship and we need to follow it. She is purposing tax credits, I am against tax credits, we need higher taxes and lower spending. Just fundamental differences, nothing earthshaking.

Single payer is much like the wall issue, the devil is in the details and no one has yet provided the details of single payer and how long it will be, and how much the wall will cost.

What is her "immigration policy"? Why are you opposed to tax credits (only when they apply to the needy, and not corporations?)?

I agree, we need higher taxes, and those who make the most don't need it for food, shelter and clothing. Thus those who do need tax credits.

We need to simplify the tax code, why play the tax credit game? If you make under a certain amount then you don’t pay taxes, no need to give out credits. As for your childish stereotyping bigotry, I am not for tax credits for corporations, I’m not for corporate welfare, you either make it or you don’t.

Try to be civil, and I won't thing badly of you. Apparently you've never worked with the working poor. I have, and thankfully I have never needed credits or financial assistance of any kind.

I went to two public universities, and my costs were minimum. Even the required readings were available for in the library use at no cost; my kids paid an average $100 a book, esp. the science and math text books.

I have worked with the working poor and I still think the tax credits are a bad idea, our time and money would be better spent educating, teaching them simple economics, budgeting, training and help them develop working skills.

BTW, I am being civil, you assumed I was for corporate tax credits for some silly reason. I corrected your slight on me.

My comment on corporate tax credits was a question.

Your first paragraph is very elitist, and if you did work with this demographic I'd be surprised.

Take it whatever way you want to take it, it makes no difference to me if you believe or don't believe me. The working poor get stuck in the day to day rut, throwing a lousy tax credit at them once a year seems elitist to me.

 

[22lcidw]

Riddle me this: why is it OK for a young black girl to suck a married politicians cock, but...well, let's stop there.

Why are democrats lining up behind Kamala?

Why is it ok for the Potus of the US to bed a porn star and a playboy bunny shortly after his wife gave birth??

Because he's a man! When a man beds a wide variety of sleazy partners, he's a STUD! When a woman has sex outside of marriage, she's a fucking whore!!

It's called a "double standard", and it's based on misogyny and hatred of women, especially women who seek power. How dare she think that men will listen to or obey her! Fucking whore!

Keep going guys. Keep pissing the women off.

It's not double standard.

You have no idea what does it take to be a STUD.

On the contrary, to be a WHORE the only effort needed is to spread the legs.

The guys you call "studs" women call "fuckboys". Men who really don't like women, as people, but are avowed heterosexuals. Trump is a fuckboy. That's why he has to pay for it these days.

More parts of the rest of the world are becoming more nasty in gender relationships. Except the western world. I call you extermination skeletons.

 

[Bush92]

thank goodness women don't insist sexual charity should cover multitudes of sins as well.

taking it for the team to get legislation passed should be a positive thing.

modern times!

 

[Bush92]

She's the female Bill Clinton. Or Ted Kennedy, John Edwards, Gary Hart...…..

I worked for Edwards 2004 campaign. Why I got out of politics and I am no longer a Democrat.

Wait .....What?

You were a Breck Girl devotee? Ho Li Fuk.

Wanted to stop US jobs from going overseas. He was the best candidate on trade. I don’t care about your party affiliations.

 

[Bush92]

He paid for services rendered. Billy Boy exposed himself and forced himself on women. He also spent time down on his billionaire buddies fantisex island. Willie Brown sat back and watched his power attract “Kamala Toe” Harris like a fly to fly paper. She was willing to whore her way to SF City Hall.

Dude. Trump did an intro to a porn film, has banged porn stars while one of his multiple wives was pregnant, and his wife did softcore lesbian porn. Nothing comes close to that level of trash.

Kamala Harris does.

She had multiple husbands and banged porn stars, was in porn films like trump? Show the proof

Nope. She’s just a common whore who didn’t have the skill set to make in SF politics. So she fucked the old mayor Willie.

so she fucked an old willie.

doesn't mean she's a whore or she's without skills.

She digest where she was based on the merit of her legal work. Just the merit of what a great knob job she gives.

 

[Bush92]

These are not lies

so they're fake news?

~S~

So you deny Willie Brown statements?

Did you see what Brown wrote. Read below and then apologize for being a jerk.

Sure, I dated Kamala Harris. So what?

I’ve been peppered with calls from the national media about my “relationship” with Kamala Harris, particularly since it became obvious that she was going to run for president. Most of them, I have not returned.

Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago. Yes, I may have influenced her career by appointing her to two state commissions when I was Assembly speaker.

And I certainly helped with her first race for district attorney in San Francisco. I have also helped the careers of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and a host of other politicians.

The difference is that Harris is the only one who, after I helped her, sent word that I would be indicted if I “so much as jaywalked” while she was D.A.

So fucking what? Willie Brown is a liar. Kamala fucked him because he gave her a car. Pelosi probably did the same...Look up Burton and Pelosi and Brown. They had a fuck circle. Kamala was new young meat for Willie that's all. She's a whore.

You're disgusting, judgmental and a liar. You have no evidence to prove what you've posted, and no clue about Sen. Harris' life.

Yet you pronounce judgement as if you are the self appointed grand inquisitor.

Take it up with Willie Brown. He’s the one that said he treated her like a Motel 6 chickenhead.

 

[Bush92]

Yep, she had an affair with Brown and who cares if she blew him or not? Her platform doesn't match mine so I would probably not vote for her.

What platform do you support? Some detail will be appreciated.

She is for single payer, I’m against single payer. She is for prosecuting parents for their children’s truancy, I think it’s a bad idea, it hurts low income and minorities harder than other parents. Don’t like her immigration policy, there is a legal path for citizenship and we need to follow it. She is purposing tax credits, I am against tax credits, we need higher taxes and lower spending. Just fundamental differences, nothing earthshaking.

Single payer is much like the wall issue, the devil is in the details and no one has yet provided the details of single payer and how long it will be, and how much the wall will cost.

What is her "immigration policy"? Why are you opposed to tax credits (only when they apply to the needy, and not corporations?)?

I agree, we need higher taxes, and those who make the most don't need it for food, shelter and clothing. Thus those who do need tax credits.

We need to simplify the tax code, why play the tax credit game? If you make under a certain amount then you don’t pay taxes, no need to give out credits. As for your childish stereotyping bigotry, I am not for tax credits for corporations, I’m not for corporate welfare, you either make it or you don’t.

Try to be civil, and I won't thing badly of you. Apparently you've never worked with the working poor. I have, and thankfully I have never needed credits or financial assistance of any kind.

I went to two public universities, and my costs were minimum. Even the required readings were available for in the library use at no cost; my kids paid an average $100 a book, esp. the science and math text books.

Did you bang the University President? Kamala would.

 

[Bush92]

Wonder if 68 year old Willie played this in the Mayors office when 24 year old Kamala Toe was going down to pound town with Mr. Brown!