Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 16,067
- 6,139
- 208
"What's a border Czar and who appointed her to that position?"...is throwing shade for child trafficking?Throwing shade for child trafficking is not a good look.
Are you ok?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"What's a border Czar and who appointed her to that position?"...is throwing shade for child trafficking?Throwing shade for child trafficking is not a good look.
Yet, no decisions you cut and pasted address sanctuary cities which you claimed were protected by the Constitution.Did you think the links I provided were constitutional decisions made by me? ROFL.
I didn't say so.
Scalia said so. O'Connor said so. Alito said so. The supreme court said so.
This thread isn't about what I think, it's about what SCOTUS has decided over and over.
They did address sanctuary cities.Yet, no decisions you cut and pasted address sanctuary cities which you claimed were protected by the Constitution.
Not s single mention of sanctuary cities in anything you cut and pasted. So no, nothing in the Constitution protects sanctuary cities.They did address sanctuary cities.
The fed cannot compel local agencies to enforce federal laws.
Thus, sanctuary cities are protected by the constitution.
Are you familiar with the 9th amendment?Not s single mention of sanctuary cities in anything you cut and pasted. So no, nothing in the Constitution protects sanctuary cities.
Let's be honest here. Had Cackles managed to stem the tide of illegal immigration, the very same people now running away from tagging her with any responsibility for the border would be shrieking from the rooftops how wonderful a job she did. The fact is, the media at the time was gaga over her being tasked with this and I didn't see ANY of the usual suspects contradicting them, did you?I'm not sure why democrats keep attempting to deflect Harris from any responsibility connected to the Biden/Harris administration.
You all keep saying the vp doesn't do anything, then try and use her experience as vp for qualifications to be POTUS.
Since you claim to be ignorant on the subject, did you, at the time the media was going gaga over her appointment, make ANY claim to the contrary, that she in fact had no responsibility for it at all? It would seem that, if you are determined to absolve her of responsibility, you would have been saying something back then.Cool story.
Now back to my question.
What's a border Czar and who appointed Kamala to that position?
Harris, Biden. The ignorant act didn't work.What's a border Czar and who appointed her to that position?
That's so laughably silly. As your claim to the Constitution protects sanctuary cities is a total bust, you're hoping to sidestep and deflect.Are you familiar with the 9th amendment?
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
This literally renders your pathetic trollish argument moot.
How come you don't support the constitution?
Because the Biden/Harris administration has been a failure.I'm not sure why democrats keep attempting to deflect Harris from any responsibility connected to the Biden/Harris administration.
Since you claim to be ignorant on the subject, did you, at the time the media was going gaga over her appointment, make ANY claim to the contrary, that she in fact had no responsibility for it at all?
I'm not absolving her of responsibility. I'm simply saying your false narrative of her responsibility is bullshit.It would seem that, if you are determined to absolve her of responsibility, you would have been saying something back then.
Link please.Harris, Biden. The ignorant act didn't work.
You think the 9th amendment is laughably silly?That's so laughably silly. As your claim to the Constitution protects sanctuary cities is a total bust, you're hoping to sidestep and deflect.
Why do you insist on trying to rewrite the Constitution to fit your agenda?
Acknowledging the fact that the administration has allowed millions of illegals into the country is hyperpartisan?No. Hyper partison.
'Harris, appointed by Biden as border czar,"Link please.
You think hurling Constitutional amendments you don't understand supports your nonsense claim that sanctuary cities are protected by the Constitution?You think the 9th amendment is laughably silly?
Are you even American?
Rarely have I seen such a disregard for the constitution.
Did you get one of those missing kids? Paid by the cartels?"What's a border Czar and who appointed her to that position?"...is throwing shade for child trafficking?
Are you ok?
Nah, it's a lame deflection - your specialty."What's a border Czar and who appointed her to that position?"...is throwing shade for child trafficking?
Are you ok?
No. They are probably picking apples in an orchard somewhere while the farmer that employee them laughs while getting government subsidies.Did you get one of those missing kids? Paid by the cartels?
So you don't know. Lol.Nah, it's a lame deflection - your specialty.