Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're too stupid to have a plan to answer the question asked in the OP.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
More bull shit. I've posted time over time my position on gun control; yet liars by omission - you, Rabbit and a number of others - lump me and all liberals into the same think tank and label us gun grabbers. That's a lie and if you don't know it you're brain dead.
I'll spell it out to you one more time Kaz, though being the dishonest lying member of the crazy right wing you'll continue to make false, misleading and iniquitous allegations to the contrary.
All citizens who are sober, sane and have no history violent behavior, have never been detained as a danger to themselves or others should have the absolute right to own, possess or have in their custody and control a gun, to protect their family, their home or business.
The absolute right with the following limits, ... Don't know what "absolute means, do you sparky?
All persons who want to own, possess or have in their custody and control of gun, need to be licensed by their State of Residence.
Those persons who have proven a need to carry a weapon in public need to have prior permission from the law enforcement agencies where the weapon will be carried as well as the license issued by the state.
All other persons who own, possess or have in their custody or control or provides to an unlicensed person a gun, may suffer the consequences of jail, fine, probation or confiscation of all firearms. Of course jail and the confiscation of all firearms will be the consequence for all serial offenders and first time offenders may have the charges dismissed if they are able to meet the standards set forth to obtain a license.
Anyone who sells, gives, loans or otherwise provides a gun to an unlicensed person is guilty of a felony, and may have their license suspended or revoked if they are licensed, and licensed or not face other penalties as proscribed by law.
And you believe this will keep guns out of the hands of criminals, that government licenses law abiding gun owners? Seriously?
And still you don't answer the question if since you believe the Second Amendment right can be granted only to those who the State approves and pay ongoing fees, can they do that with our first Amendment right to free speech?
Are gun dealers licensed? On going fees, I never wrote that. Better to put a tax on ammo and guns, a user fee.
Gun owners have to pay to maintain licenses, you didn't know that?
What about free speech, can we tax and put user fees on it? Or are some Amendments in the Bill of Rights more equal than others?
How about a tax on the words a writer uses, that would make it more expensive to insult people on the internet and in magazines and blogs....like the one he wants on ammo...and guns...put a user fee on words and computers and taxes...in fact....you should need to get a license for any means of communication...computers, tablets, smart phones.....that way the government will know that you aren't using those things for slander, libel, for selling illegal substances....organizing criminal activity with them.....sounds great....f**k the Bill of Rights....the government needs to control us so we don't do stupid stuff....why stop at just guns.......?
You cant explain it and that makes me stupid?Gun dealers are licensed to allow them to engage in commerce in guns.More bull shit. I've posted time over time my position on gun control; yet liars by omission - you, Rabbit and a number of others - lump me and all liberals into the same think tank and label us gun grabbers. That's a lie and if you don't know it you're brain dead.
I'll spell it out to you one more time Kaz, though being the dishonest lying member of the crazy right wing you'll continue to make false, misleading and iniquitous allegations to the contrary.
All citizens who are sober, sane and have no history violent behavior, have never been detained as a danger to themselves or others should have the absolute right to own, possess or have in their custody and control a gun, to protect their family, their home or business.
The absolute right with the following limits, ... Don't know what "absolute means, do you sparky?
All persons who want to own, possess or have in their custody and control of gun, need to be licensed by their State of Residence.
Those persons who have proven a need to carry a weapon in public need to have prior permission from the law enforcement agencies where the weapon will be carried as well as the license issued by the state.
All other persons who own, possess or have in their custody or control or provides to an unlicensed person a gun, may suffer the consequences of jail, fine, probation or confiscation of all firearms. Of course jail and the confiscation of all firearms will be the consequence for all serial offenders and first time offenders may have the charges dismissed if they are able to meet the standards set forth to obtain a license.
Anyone who sells, gives, loans or otherwise provides a gun to an unlicensed person is guilty of a felony, and may have their license suspended or revoked if they are licensed, and licensed or not face other penalties as proscribed by law.
And you believe this will keep guns out of the hands of criminals, that government licenses law abiding gun owners? Seriously?
And still you don't answer the question if since you believe the Second Amendment right can be granted only to those who the State approves and pay ongoing fees, can they do that with our first Amendment right to free speech?
Are gun dealers licensed? On going fees, I never wrote that. Better to put a tax on ammo and guns, a user fee.
Gun owners have to pay to maintain licenses, you didn't know that?
What about free speech, can we tax and put user fees on it? Or are some Amendments in the Bill of Rights more equal than others?
Despite that there are many unlicensed dealers. I fail to see the connection here.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
OK that still wont keep guns from the hands of criminals.Gun free Zones and drug free zones are an administrative tool allowing the criminal justice system to add an enhancement to a sentence for violating any laws within a specified area. Thus if someone commits even a low grade misdemeanor in such a zone, and has a gun in their possession, they can get a one year CJ enhancement to any sentence they may receive for the initial crime.
I'm so sorry if calling Kaz a jerk hurt his feelings. But arrogant ignoramuses need to be put in their place.
Fees by the way are the new tax, as are enhancements and penalty assessments.
Gun free Zones and drug free zones are an administrative tool allowing the criminal justice system to add an enhancement to a sentence for violating any laws within a specified area. Thus if someone commits even a low grade misdemeanor in such a zone, and has a gun in their possession, they can get a one year CJ enhancement to any sentence they may receive for the initial crime.
I'm so sorry if calling Kaz a jerk hurt his feelings. But arrogant ignoramuses need to be put in their place.
Fees by the way are the new tax, as are enhancements and penalty assessments.
You cant explain it and that makes me stupid?Gun dealers are licensed to allow them to engage in commerce in guns.The absolute right with the following limits, ... Don't know what "absolute means, do you sparky?
And you believe this will keep guns out of the hands of criminals, that government licenses law abiding gun owners? Seriously?
And still you don't answer the question if since you believe the Second Amendment right can be granted only to those who the State approves and pay ongoing fees, can they do that with our first Amendment right to free speech?
Are gun dealers licensed? On going fees, I never wrote that. Better to put a tax on ammo and guns, a user fee.
Gun owners have to pay to maintain licenses, you didn't know that?
What about free speech, can we tax and put user fees on it? Or are some Amendments in the Bill of Rights more equal than others?
Despite that there are many unlicensed dealers. I fail to see the connection here.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
Here's my plan: You can never keep guns from the hands of criminals. Deal with that first.
In the 46-page study, which can be read in its entirety here, Kates and Mauser looked at and compared data from the U.S. and parts of Europe to show that stricter laws don’t mean there is less crime. As an example, when looking at “intentional deaths,” or murder, on an international scope, the U.S. falls behind Russia, Estonia, and four other countries, ranking it seventh. More specifically, data shows that in Russia, where guns are banned, the murder rate is significantly higher than in the U.S in comparison.
“There is a compound assertion that guns are uniquely available in the United States compared with other modern developed nations, which is why the United States has by far the highest murder rate. Though these assertions have been endlessly repeated, [the latter] is, in fact, false and [the former] is substantially so,” the authors point out, based on their research.
Kates and Mauser clarify that they are not suggesting that gun control causes nations to have higher murder rates, rather, they “observed correlations that nations with stringent gun controls tend to have much higher murder rates than nations that allow guns.”
The study goes on to say:
…the burden of proof rests on the proponents of the more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death mantra, especially since they argue public policy ought to be based on that mantra. To bear that burden would at the very least require showing that a large number of nations with more guns have more death and that nations that have imposed stringent gun controls have achieved substantial reductions in criminal violence (or suicide). But those correlations are not observed when a large number of nations are compared across the world.
The paper resurfaced at a time when Boston itself has been looking for ways to combat gun violence, and gun-related deaths, after a sharp uptick in shootings in the city this year.
As of July, more than 100 people had been impacted by shootings in Boston in some way, and more than 17 people had been killed in the city by someone with a firearm. The increase in incidents showed a nearly 30 percent increase in gun-related deaths compared with the same time period in 2012. That number has gone up slightly since then.
OK so you admit you have zero plan to keep guns from criminals, which is the topic of this thread. Try to keep up, really.You cant explain it and that makes me stupid?Gun dealers are licensed to allow them to engage in commerce in guns.Are gun dealers licensed? On going fees, I never wrote that. Better to put a tax on ammo and guns, a user fee.
Gun owners have to pay to maintain licenses, you didn't know that?
What about free speech, can we tax and put user fees on it? Or are some Amendments in the Bill of Rights more equal than others?
Despite that there are many unlicensed dealers. I fail to see the connection here.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
Here's my plan: You can never keep guns from the hands of criminals. Deal with that first.
No, I had nothing to do with you being stupid.
That you don't understand the word mitigate is sad beyond comment. You were fast on the draw in taking my sarcastic comment to cut off their hands, but failed to comprehend that comment was not meant to be a solution, it was meant as a criticism of the thread itself.
I believe we can mitigate gun violence in America, maybe this article will make the curious agree with me; I have no hope for the willfully ignorant and the stupid.
U.S. Has More Guns 8211 And Gun Deaths 8211 Than Any Other Country Study Finds - ABC News
Apparently it is to keep law abiding citizens from having guns...
And again.....more and more Americans are owning and carrying guns and the gun murder and accident rate is going down...not up.....
And again.....more and more Americans are owning and carrying guns and the gun murder and accident rate is going down...not up.....
The post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this therefore because of this) fallacy is based upon the mistaken notion that simply because one thing happens after another, the first event was a cause of the second event. Post hoc reasoning is the basis for many superstitions and erroneous beliefs.
See: post hoc fallacy - The Skeptic s Dictionary - Skepdic.com
You cant explain it and that makes me stupid?Gun dealers are licensed to allow them to engage in commerce in guns.Are gun dealers licensed? On going fees, I never wrote that. Better to put a tax on ammo and guns, a user fee.
Gun owners have to pay to maintain licenses, you didn't know that?
What about free speech, can we tax and put user fees on it? Or are some Amendments in the Bill of Rights more equal than others?
Despite that there are many unlicensed dealers. I fail to see the connection here.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
Here's my plan: You can never keep guns from the hands of criminals. Deal with that first.
No, I had nothing to do with you being stupid.
That you don't understand the word mitigate is sad beyond comment. You were fast on the draw in taking my sarcastic comment to cut off their hands, but failed to comprehend that comment was not meant to be a solution, it was meant as a criticism of the thread itself.
I believe we can mitigate gun violence in America, maybe this article will make the curious agree with me; I have no hope for the willfully ignorant and the stupid.
U.S. Has More Guns 8211 And Gun Deaths 8211 Than Any Other Country Study Finds - ABC News
You cant explain it and that makes me stupid?Gun dealers are licensed to allow them to engage in commerce in guns.Gun owners have to pay to maintain licenses, you didn't know that?
What about free speech, can we tax and put user fees on it? Or are some Amendments in the Bill of Rights more equal than others?
Despite that there are many unlicensed dealers. I fail to see the connection here.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
Here's my plan: You can never keep guns from the hands of criminals. Deal with that first.
No, I had nothing to do with you being stupid.
That you don't understand the word mitigate is sad beyond comment. You were fast on the draw in taking my sarcastic comment to cut off their hands, but failed to comprehend that comment was not meant to be a solution, it was meant as a criticism of the thread itself.
I believe we can mitigate gun violence in America, maybe this article will make the curious agree with me; I have no hope for the willfully ignorant and the stupid.
U.S. Has More Guns 8211 And Gun Deaths 8211 Than Any Other Country Study Finds - ABC News
Begging the question
You cant explain it and that makes me stupid?Gun dealers are licensed to allow them to engage in commerce in guns.
Despite that there are many unlicensed dealers. I fail to see the connection here.
That's cause you're stupid.
Do you know what the thread title is? Likely not, since your biases cloud any judgment you might have if you were not mentally challenged.
I'll help since you and Kaz are too stupid, too biased and frankly jerks:
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
What is your plan Rabbit, Kaz?
Here's my plan: You can never keep guns from the hands of criminals. Deal with that first.
No, I had nothing to do with you being stupid.
That you don't understand the word mitigate is sad beyond comment. You were fast on the draw in taking my sarcastic comment to cut off their hands, but failed to comprehend that comment was not meant to be a solution, it was meant as a criticism of the thread itself.
I believe we can mitigate gun violence in America, maybe this article will make the curious agree with me; I have no hope for the willfully ignorant and the stupid.
U.S. Has More Guns 8211 And Gun Deaths 8211 Than Any Other Country Study Finds - ABC News
Begging the question
You really need to stop pretending you understand logical fallacies or continue to prove you're an arrogant ignoramus.
The Fallacy-a-Day Podcast An easy way to learn the logical fallacies. Published each day Monday-Friday.The Fallacy-a-Day Podcast An easy way to learn the logical fallacies. Published each day Monday-Friday.
I suggest you sign up ^^^. It might make a debate with you substantive and challenging, for than now your efforts are a read for laughter.
You've asked an important question here, one which in spite of how obvious it is rarely asked and never answered.Every time there's a shooting, liberals run around saying this proves we need more gun laws. I ask liberals over and over how exactly you are going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals every time you say you want more gun laws.
In particular, address given that drugs are illegal, and yet any parent knows any kid can get as much pot as they want. There are millions of guns in the US, millions more in the world. So don't just say more laws, explain how more laws are going to actually work.
So, there have been 7 shootings killing at least 10 people in the last decade. The only thing you've achieved so far is that no one was shooting back.
