Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,666
- 2,180
You should read the Constitution some time.
Meanwhile- you are a dollar short and 50 years too late.
Feel free to start a thread about how upset you are that the Supreme Court overturned the rights of Virginia voters to ban mixed race marriages.
I have. Marriage laws are not specifically under the prevue of the federal government. Marriage laws have long been under the prevue of the states themselves. It was purely a power grab and only then by one vote.
again... STATUS is the purview of the state. if that status is given out in discriminatory fashion it is up to the court to rule those regulations unconstitutional.
Which, as anyone with a brain would know, is a right that the state would have to show a compelling interest in denying. Right?
If you believe that incest marriage should be legal, make your case for it. Yet every time I ask you to present your argument........you abandon it.
Do you think all siblings wanna have sex, or just those that want to enter into a contract that doesn't require sex?
You are a kinky bastard aren't you Sally?
Why is it whenever I ask you to present your argument for incest marriage.....you always deflect, and respond with a question?
If you have no valid argument for incest marriage, just say so. But advocating it...and then abandoning it are hardly useful.