Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
Pick a better hero, fuckhead!You are a fucking idiot.
Are you still at this?
You stupid hate filled Moon Bats are obsessed with Kyle, aren't you?
Get a life loser!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pick a better hero, fuckhead!You are a fucking idiot.
Are you still at this?
You stupid hate filled Moon Bats are obsessed with Kyle, aren't you?
Get a life loser!
I disagree. Introducing deadly force is aggression!
defending oneself is not.Introducing deadly force is aggression!
He wasn't defending, he was shooting!defending oneself is not.
He was running around with a rifle looking for people to shoot. Not that much different than George Zimmerman. If these guys are your heroes, then you are bat-shit crazy!
He was running around with a rifle looking for people to shoot.
This is true. Rittenhouse was the one attacked. He was responding to that perceived deadly aggression.I disagree. Introducing deadly force is aggression!
AFTER HE WAS ATTACKEDHe wasn't defending, he was shooting!
his father lived there,It wasn't even his fucking community!
My point is...fuck the 2nd Amendment! Fuck it in your ass! You gun guys are sick in the head and you are less than 10% of society!
you are less than 10% of society!
This is kind of also likely the difference between the criminal case and the civil case. The criminal case focuses on that event (and the subsequent events). The civil case will likely allow in more events prior to that. Of course it could likely allow more in about the others involved in the incident - the three shootees, and the person who fired the Glock.This is true. Rittenhouse was the one attacked. He was responding to that perceived deadly aggression.
Answer the question.Before, or after, he did some attacking himself?
Deadly force is deadly force and is only deadly when actual force is applied to the point of death.I disagree. Introducing deadly force is aggression!
No, chasing him down a street and eventually cornering him in a parking lot where Rittenhouse had no exit, THEN attacking an armed man. To me those are the acts of an unhinged person.Unhinged lunatic with a plastic bag?
Rittenhouse was attacked AND HIT with a four-foot-long skateboard shaped club. The kind of weight and leverage an object that large gives could easily crack open a skull or crush bones. That skateboard had more weight and leverage than a baseball bat and any number of people have been convicted of ADW when using baseball bats.Rittenhouse was attacked with a skateboard and a plastic bag. Neither are deadly weapons. Rittenhouse, on the otherhand, brought a deadly weapon to a protest that was none of his business! He brought that weapon to shoot somebody! Those murders were premeditated.
No he did notBefore, or after, he did some attacking himself?
The absolute fact is that Rittenhouse introoduced no force deadly or otherwiseI disagree. Introducing deadly force is aggression!
No you are a fucking liar and foolMy point is...fuck the 2nd Amendment! Fuck it in your ass! You gun guys are sick in the head and you are less than 10% of society!
Why is he so important to defend?He was there for 24 hours before he shot anyone.
and only after he was attacked,
A plastic bag and a skateboard?This is true. Rittenhouse was the one attacked. He was responding to that perceived deadly aggression.
And before that?AFTER HE WAS ATTACKED
Why are you incapable of accepting the facts?Why is he so important to defend?